Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2023, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (34): 1-8.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2022-0937
LI Wenqian(), ZHANG Haijun, HAN Mingming, MU Qun, LV Lianjie
Received:
2022-11-07
Revised:
2023-04-24
Online:
2023-12-05
Published:
2023-11-30
LI Wenqian, ZHANG Haijun, HAN Mingming, MU Qun, LV Lianjie. Effects of Tillage Practices and Nitrogen Rates on Dry Matter Accumulation and Remobilization and Grain Yield of Winter Wheat Under Straw Returning Treatment[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(34): 1-8.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2022-0937
秸秆处理 | 耕作措施 | 施氮量 | 籽粒产量/(×103 kg/hm2) | 穗数/(×106穗/hm2) | 穗粒数/粒 | 千粒重/g | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1st | 2nd | 1st | 2nd | 1st | 2nd | 1st | 2nd | ||||||
S0 | R | N135 | 8.58gh | 8.82fg | 5.54h | 5.62f | 38.33bc | 37.87cd | 37.15gh | 37.63fg | |||
N180 | 8.92f | 9.04ef | 5.83f | 5.80e | 38.03bc | 38.20c | 36.84h | 37.34gh | |||||
N225 | 9.35d | 9.51c | 6.1d | 6.00cd | 37.33bc | 37.87cd | 36.44i | 36.95i | |||||
N270 | 9.47cd | 9.56c | 6.31c | 6.21bc | 37.33bc | 38.21c | 35.67j | 35.93j | |||||
P | N135 | 8.27j | 7.95k | 5.06j | 5.28g | 36.32c | 37.03cd | 37.54f | 37.68fg | ||||
N180 | 8.53h | 8.49i | 5.3i | 5.54f | 36.67c | 36.71d | 37.36fg | 37.47g | |||||
N225 | 8.92f | 8.79g | 5.67g | 5.78e | 36.67c | 37.03cd | 36.96gh | 37.22h | |||||
N270 | 9.05ef | 9.09e | 6.06de | 6.04cd | 37.04c | 37.37cd | 36.41i | 36.90i | |||||
B | N135 | 8.40i | 8.44i | 5.22i | 5.54f | 38.23bc | 37.97cd | 37.74ef | 37.71f | ||||
N180 | 8.65gh | 8.65h | 5.63gh | 5.74e | 38.19bc | 37.63cd | 37.62ef | 37.5g | |||||
N225 | 8.96f | 8.93f | 5.94e | 5.92d | 37.67bc | 37.97cd | 37.42fg | 37.16h | |||||
N270 | 9.15e | 9.11e | 6.12d | 6.10c | 38.24bc | 38.63bc | 37.09gh | 36.85i | |||||
S1 | R | N135 | 8.28j | 8.18j | 5.65gh | 5.77e | 38.22bc | 39.83b | 36.94h | 38.24e | |||
N180 | 8.67g | 8.59hi | 5.90ef | 5.92de | 38.33bc | 39.5bc | 37.37fg | 38.52de | |||||
N225 | 9.04ef | 8.73gh | 6.28c | 6.07cd | 38.67b | 39.5bc | 37.84e | 38.94c | |||||
N270 | 9.15e | 8.84fg | 6.34c | 6.22b | 39.15ab | 38.83bc | 37.43fg | 38.34e | |||||
P | N135 | 8.54h | 8.52i | 5.80f | 5.95d | 39.33ab | 40.67a | 37.22g | 38.61d | ||||
N180 | 9.04ef | 9.03ef | 5.96e | 6.11c | 40.33a | 40.02b | 37.82e | 38.94c | |||||
N225 | 9.46cd | 9.44c | 6.4bc | 6.36b | 40.33a | 40.33a | 38.85c | 39.37b | |||||
N270 | 9.52c | 9.48c | 6.46b | 6.54a | 39.67ab | 41.67a | 38.29d | 38.87cd | |||||
B | N135 | 9.13e | 9.25d | 6.18cd | 6.08cd | 40.14ab | 41.23a | 37.66ef | 38.69d | ||||
N180 | 9.72b | 9.84b | 6.43b | 6.41ab | 40.21ab | 41.42a | 38.34d | 39.28b | |||||
N225 | 9.82ab | 9.92ab | 6.51ab | 6.53a | 39.24ab | 41.31a | 39.50a | 39.99a | |||||
N270 | 9.86a | 9.97a | 6.59a | 6.55a | 40.22ab | 40.67a | 39.21b | 39.43b | |||||
方差分析 | S | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ||||
T | ** | ** | ** | ** | * | ** | ** | ** | |||||
N | ** | ** | ** | ** | NS | NS | ** | ** | |||||
S×T | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | |||||
S×N | ** | ** | ** | NS | NS | NS | ** | ** | |||||
T×N | ** | ** | ** | NS | NS | NS | ** | ** | |||||
S×T×N | * | ** | ** | NS | NS | NS | * | ** |
秸秆处理 | 耕作措施 | 施氮量 | 籽粒产量/(×103 kg/hm2) | 穗数/(×106穗/hm2) | 穗粒数/粒 | 千粒重/g | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1st | 2nd | 1st | 2nd | 1st | 2nd | 1st | 2nd | ||||||
S0 | R | N135 | 8.58gh | 8.82fg | 5.54h | 5.62f | 38.33bc | 37.87cd | 37.15gh | 37.63fg | |||
N180 | 8.92f | 9.04ef | 5.83f | 5.80e | 38.03bc | 38.20c | 36.84h | 37.34gh | |||||
N225 | 9.35d | 9.51c | 6.1d | 6.00cd | 37.33bc | 37.87cd | 36.44i | 36.95i | |||||
N270 | 9.47cd | 9.56c | 6.31c | 6.21bc | 37.33bc | 38.21c | 35.67j | 35.93j | |||||
P | N135 | 8.27j | 7.95k | 5.06j | 5.28g | 36.32c | 37.03cd | 37.54f | 37.68fg | ||||
N180 | 8.53h | 8.49i | 5.3i | 5.54f | 36.67c | 36.71d | 37.36fg | 37.47g | |||||
N225 | 8.92f | 8.79g | 5.67g | 5.78e | 36.67c | 37.03cd | 36.96gh | 37.22h | |||||
N270 | 9.05ef | 9.09e | 6.06de | 6.04cd | 37.04c | 37.37cd | 36.41i | 36.90i | |||||
B | N135 | 8.40i | 8.44i | 5.22i | 5.54f | 38.23bc | 37.97cd | 37.74ef | 37.71f | ||||
N180 | 8.65gh | 8.65h | 5.63gh | 5.74e | 38.19bc | 37.63cd | 37.62ef | 37.5g | |||||
N225 | 8.96f | 8.93f | 5.94e | 5.92d | 37.67bc | 37.97cd | 37.42fg | 37.16h | |||||
N270 | 9.15e | 9.11e | 6.12d | 6.10c | 38.24bc | 38.63bc | 37.09gh | 36.85i | |||||
S1 | R | N135 | 8.28j | 8.18j | 5.65gh | 5.77e | 38.22bc | 39.83b | 36.94h | 38.24e | |||
N180 | 8.67g | 8.59hi | 5.90ef | 5.92de | 38.33bc | 39.5bc | 37.37fg | 38.52de | |||||
N225 | 9.04ef | 8.73gh | 6.28c | 6.07cd | 38.67b | 39.5bc | 37.84e | 38.94c | |||||
N270 | 9.15e | 8.84fg | 6.34c | 6.22b | 39.15ab | 38.83bc | 37.43fg | 38.34e | |||||
P | N135 | 8.54h | 8.52i | 5.80f | 5.95d | 39.33ab | 40.67a | 37.22g | 38.61d | ||||
N180 | 9.04ef | 9.03ef | 5.96e | 6.11c | 40.33a | 40.02b | 37.82e | 38.94c | |||||
N225 | 9.46cd | 9.44c | 6.4bc | 6.36b | 40.33a | 40.33a | 38.85c | 39.37b | |||||
N270 | 9.52c | 9.48c | 6.46b | 6.54a | 39.67ab | 41.67a | 38.29d | 38.87cd | |||||
B | N135 | 9.13e | 9.25d | 6.18cd | 6.08cd | 40.14ab | 41.23a | 37.66ef | 38.69d | ||||
N180 | 9.72b | 9.84b | 6.43b | 6.41ab | 40.21ab | 41.42a | 38.34d | 39.28b | |||||
N225 | 9.82ab | 9.92ab | 6.51ab | 6.53a | 39.24ab | 41.31a | 39.50a | 39.99a | |||||
N270 | 9.86a | 9.97a | 6.59a | 6.55a | 40.22ab | 40.67a | 39.21b | 39.43b | |||||
方差分析 | S | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ||||
T | ** | ** | ** | ** | * | ** | ** | ** | |||||
N | ** | ** | ** | ** | NS | NS | ** | ** | |||||
S×T | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | |||||
S×N | ** | ** | ** | NS | NS | NS | ** | ** | |||||
T×N | ** | ** | ** | NS | NS | NS | ** | ** | |||||
S×T×N | * | ** | ** | NS | NS | NS | * | ** |
生长季 | 指标 | 与籽粒产量的相关系数 | 直接通径系数 | 间接通径系数 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
穗数 | 穗粒数 | 千粒重 | ||||
2018—2019 | 穗数 | 0.892** | 0.930** | — | 0.523 | 0.341 |
穗粒数 | 0.432** | -0.188** | -0.106 | — | -0.099 | |
千粒重 | 0.426** | 0.184** | 0.068 | 0.097 | — | |
2019—2020 | 穗数 | 0.831** | 0.921** | — | — | 0.472 |
穗粒数 | 0.457** | — | — | — | — | |
千粒重 | 0.297** | -0.176** | 0.090 | — | — |
生长季 | 指标 | 与籽粒产量的相关系数 | 直接通径系数 | 间接通径系数 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
穗数 | 穗粒数 | 千粒重 | ||||
2018—2019 | 穗数 | 0.892** | 0.930** | — | 0.523 | 0.341 |
穗粒数 | 0.432** | -0.188** | -0.106 | — | -0.099 | |
千粒重 | 0.426** | 0.184** | 0.068 | 0.097 | — | |
2019—2020 | 穗数 | 0.831** | 0.921** | — | — | 0.472 |
穗粒数 | 0.457** | — | — | — | — | |
千粒重 | 0.297** | -0.176** | 0.090 | — | — |
[1] |
石祖梁, 贾涛, 王亚静, 等. 我国农作物秸秆综合利用现状及焚烧碳排放估算[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2017, 38(9):32-37.
|
[2] |
方放, 李想, 石祖梁, 等. 黄淮海地区农作物秸秆资源分布及利用结构分析[J]. 农业工程学报, 2015, 31(2):228-234.
|
[3] |
王新媛, 赵思达, 郑险峰, 等. 秸秆还田和氮肥用量对冬小麦产量和氮素利用的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(23):5043-5053.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2021.23.010 |
[4] |
司开玲. 秸秆焚烧与农村环境危机:基于“代谢断裂”理论的思考[J]. 中国农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2018, 35(4):61-68.
|
[5] |
周成河, 覃大吉. 不同耕作方式对土壤理化性状及小麦产量的影响[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2019, 58(2):53-57.
|
[6] |
|
[7] |
赵红香. 耕作措施与秸秆还田对农田土壤质量和冬小麦根系生长与代谢的调控[D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2021.
|
[8] |
孟庆阳, 王永华, 靳海洋, 等. 耕作方式与秸秆还田对砂姜黑土土壤酶活性及冬小麦产量的影响[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2016, 36(3):341-346.
|
[9] |
黄明, 吴金芝, 李友军, 等. 耕作方式和氮肥用量对旱地小麦产量、蛋白质含量和土壤硝态氮残留的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(24):5206-5219.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2021.24.004 |
[10] |
陈金, 唐玉海, 尹燕枰, 等. 秸秆还田条件下适量施氮对冬小麦氮素利用及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2015, 41(1):160-167.
|
[11] |
李昊昱, 孟兆良, 庞党伟, 等. 周年秸秆还田对农田土壤固碳及冬小麦-夏玉米产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(6):893-903.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2019.81078 |
[12] |
陈金. 耕作模式与施氮量对土壤质量及冬小麦产量的调控效应[D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2017.
|
[13] |
庞党伟, 陈金, 唐玉海, 等. 玉米秸秆还田方式和氮肥处理对土壤理化性质及冬小麦产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2016, 42(11):1689-1699.
|
[14] |
陈金, 庞党伟, 韩明明, 等. 耕作模式对土壤生物活性与养分有效性及冬小麦产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2017, 43(8):1245-1253.
|
[15] |
|
[16] |
穆心愿, 赵霞, 谷利敏, 等. 秸秆还田量对不同基因型夏玉米产量及干物质转运的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(1):29-41.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.01.003 |
[17] |
韩明明, 李文倩, 陈金, 等. 秸秆还田及施氮量对冬小麦产量及氮素利用效率的影响[J]. 山东农业科学, 2017, 49(9):95-100.
|
[18] |
庞党伟. 耕作和氮肥互作对耕层土壤理化性质及冬小麦产量的影响[D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2016.
|
[19] |
蒋向, 贺德先, 任洪志, 等. 轮耕对麦田土壤容重和小麦根系发育的影响[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2012, 32(4):711-715.
|
[20] |
梅晶晶, 周苏玫, 徐凤丹, 等. 小麦根蘖发育和产量对耕作和追氮方式以及施氮量的响应[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2020, 26(6):1069-1080.
|
[21] |
赵亚丽, 郭海斌, 薛志伟, 等. 耕作方式与秸秆还田对冬小麦-夏玉米轮作系统中干物质生产和水分利用效率的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2014, 40(10):1797-1807.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2014.01797 |
[22] |
李向东, 季书勤, 张德奇, 等. 豫南雨养区周年不同耕作模式对小麦花后干物质动态和产量的影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 2011, 30(9):1942-1948.
|
[23] |
黄明, 吴金芝, 李友军, 等. 不同耕作方式对旱作区冬小麦生产和产量的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2009, 25(1):50-54.
|
[24] |
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0813417106 URL |
[25] |
周冬冬, 张军, 李福建, 等. 稻秸还田与耕作方式对小麦产量形成及籽粒品质的影响[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2022, 42(10):1273-1282.
|
[26] |
郑宾, 赵伟, 徐铮, 等. 不同耕作方式与氮肥类型对夏玉米光合性能的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2017, 43(6):925-934.
|
[27] |
doi: 10.1038/270431a0 |
[28] |
仝锦, 孙敏, 任爱霞, 等. 高产小麦品种植株干物质积累运转、土壤耗水与产量的关系[J]. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(17):3467-3478.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.17.005 |
[29] |
游来勇, 李冰, 王昌全, 等. 秸秆还田量对麦-稻轮作体系作物产量、氮素吸收利用效率的影响[J]. 核农学报, 2015, 29(12):2394-2401.
doi: 10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2015.12.2394 |
[30] |
王维钰, 乔博,
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2016.11.010 |
[31] |
王福玉, 陈贵菊, 孙雷明, 等. 耕作方式与施氮量互作对小麦生长、产量与品质的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(9):20-26.
doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2021-0450 |
[32] |
刘卫玲, 程思贤, 吴健, 等. 深松(耕)时期与方式对砂姜黑土耕层改良及其冬小麦物质积累和养分吸收的影响[J]. 河南农业大学学报, 2020, 54(3):392-399.
|
[33] |
许菁, 贺贞昆, 冯倩倩, 等. 耕作方式对冬小麦-夏玉米光合特性及周年产量形成的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2017, 23(1):101-109.
|
[34] |
宋明丹, 李正鹏, 冯浩. 不同水氮水平冬小麦干物质积累特征及产量效应[J]. 农业工程学报, 2016, 32(2):119-126.
|
[35] |
马东辉, 王月福, 周华, 等. 氮肥和花后土壤含水量对小麦干物质积累、运转及产量的影响[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2007(5):847-851.
|
[36] |
赵财, 王巧梅, 郭瑶, 等. 水氮耦合对地膜玉米免耕轮作小麦干物质积累及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2018, 44(11):1694-1703.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2018.01694 |
[37] |
王玉杰, 王永华, 韩磊, 等. 不同栽培管理模式对冬小麦花后干物质积累与分配特征及产量的影响[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2011, 31(5):894-900.
|
[38] |
张瑞富, 杨恒山, 高聚林, 等. 深松促进春玉米干物质和磷素的积累与转运[J]. 农业工程学报, 2016, 32(19):106-112.
|
[39] |
赵亚南, 宿敏敏, 吕阳, 等. 减量施肥下小麦产量、肥料利用率和土壤养分平衡[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2017, 23(4):864-873.
|
[40] |
姜丽娜, 马静丽, 方保停, 等. 限水减氮对豫北冬小麦产量和植株不同层次器官干物质运转的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(6):957-966.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2019.81068 |
[41] |
张莹. 不同春玉米品种氮效率差异及其对深松减氮的响应机制[D]. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古农业大学, 2018.
|
[42] |
吴金芝, 黄明, 李友军, 等. 耕作方式和氮肥用量对旱地小麦产量、水分利用效率和种植效益的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2021, 35(5):264-271.
|
[43] |
何天池. 秸秆还田模式和氮肥施用对玉米水肥利用及产量的影响[D]. 沈阳: 沈阳农业大学, 2020.
|
[1] | MIAO Huan, QIAO Yunfa, LI Qing, MIAO Shujie. The Responses of Nitrogen Loss from Paddy Field to Simulated Rainfall and Restored Materials [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(9): 85-91. |
[2] | SUN Liyang, XU Minggang, WANG Jinfeng, LI Jianhua, LIU Ping, SUN Nan. Response of Soil Available Nutrients and Bulk Density to Straw Returning in North China [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(5): 100-108. |
[3] | GAO Jun, WANG Huiquan, GU Dongxiang, ZHANG Simei, ZHANG Chuanhui, GU Kejun. Effects of Straw Returning on Soil Ecology and Crop Growth and Development [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(30): 87-93. |
[4] | OUYANG Hongwei, OU Jinxiu, LIN Zhaoli, ZHANG Hua, LUO Jun, LI Shiyan. Advances in the Decomposition of Straw from Returned Crops [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(30): 74-81. |
[5] | DUAN Xiaotong, WANG Yimei, DU Junjun, ZHANG Yujian, XI Bingtao. The Analysis of Temperature Variation and Its Effect on Agriculture in Qingxu County During 1960—2019 [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(26): 116-122. |
[6] | MA Biao, YANG Yingbo, NIAN Lili, ZHANG Xiaoning, LIU Xuelu. Research Status of Straw Returning Based on Bibliometrics [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(16): 145-155. |
[7] | XIAO Jian, ZHANG Jianglin, GAO Yajie, LU Yanhong, LIAO Yulin, NIE Jun. Field Management and Nutrient Management of Ratoon Rice: A Review [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(15): 8-13. |
[8] | HU Xuechun, XIE Wenyan, MA Xiaonan, ZHOU Huaiping, YANG Zhenxing, LIU Zhiping. Effects of Long-term Straw Returning on Organic Carbon and Carbon Pool Management Index in Dryland Maize Soil [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(34): 8-13. |
[9] | ZHANG Nan, PAN Shiqiu, QIAO Yunfa, ZHU Baoguo, MIAO Shujie. The Response of N2O Emissions to Straw Returning and Biochar Addition During Maize Growing Season in Mollisol [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(27): 79-85. |
[10] | WEI Zexiu, PENG Jun, ZHUO Ma, YANG Sutao, BIANBA Zhuoma, MIMA Gengcai. Ecological Adaptability Study on Several Early-maturing Highland Barley Varieties in Langkazi County [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(27): 6-12. |
[11] | ZHONG Xuefen, CHONG Haotian, GUO Zhan, HUANG Liying, ZHANG Yunbo. Large-Panicle Rice Varieties: Synergistic Enhancement of Yield and Nitrogen Use Efficiency [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(21): 1-6. |
[12] | QIE Tianzhen, LI Fu, LI Yahua, WANG Lifang, ZHANG Tingting, ZHANG Jiaqian, WANG Hongwei, ZHANG Dejian. Effects of Tillage Methods on Soil Chemical Properties Under Straw Returning Condition [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(21): 58-69. |
[13] | JIN Yangang, DING Jinfeng, YUAN Quan, XIA Zhonghua, YIN Jing, YANG Yongle, LIU Hailang, REN Yangtao, CHEN Wei, LI Zhenfu, ZHAO Qibing, WEI Wanjuan, ZHENG Yayue. Sowing Date and Planting Density of Strong-gluten Wheat in Huaibei Area of Jiangsu: Effects on Grain Yield and Quality [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(18): 1-7. |
[14] | MA Chao. Basic Situation and Problems of Conservation Tillage in Black Soil in Heilongjiang Province [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(17): 143-147. |
[15] | LI Shouhua. Effect of Long-term Straw Returning on Topsoil Nutrients and Crop Yield Under Wheat-Maize Rotation [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(14): 60-64. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||