Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2024, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (6): 29-35.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2023-0238
Previous Articles Next Articles
TIAN Hong(), LU Jiaoyun, ZHANG Heshan, XIONG Junbo, LIU Yang(
)
Received:
2023-03-22
Revised:
2023-07-29
Online:
2024-02-22
Published:
2024-02-22
TIAN Hong, LU Jiaoyun, ZHANG Heshan, XIONG Junbo, LIU Yang. Effect of Uniconazole on Growth, Seed Yield and Quality of Prairie Grass[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(6): 29-35.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2023-0238
烯效唑浓度/(mg/kg) | 株高/cm | 节长/cm | 茎粗/mm | 倒伏率/% | 分蘖数/(个/m2) | 生殖枝数/(个/m2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 110.00±0.82a | 3.93±0.53ab | 3.14±0.50a | 90.67±1.64a | 297.33±19.10a | 205.14±15.21b |
50 | 105.93±6.98a | 4.31±0.20a | 3.24±0.57a | 42.33±1.88b | 313.78±9.85a | 225.71±16.12a |
90 | 93.57±5.77b | 4.18±0.33a | 3.08±0.32a | 30.67±0.43c | 321.33±15.90a | 210.29±11.53ab |
130 | 90.90±2.29b | 3.26±0.06b | 3.00±0.33a | 0.00±0.72d | 303.56±7.18a | 198.86±10.08b |
烯效唑浓度/(mg/kg) | 株高/cm | 节长/cm | 茎粗/mm | 倒伏率/% | 分蘖数/(个/m2) | 生殖枝数/(个/m2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 110.00±0.82a | 3.93±0.53ab | 3.14±0.50a | 90.67±1.64a | 297.33±19.10a | 205.14±15.21b |
50 | 105.93±6.98a | 4.31±0.20a | 3.24±0.57a | 42.33±1.88b | 313.78±9.85a | 225.71±16.12a |
90 | 93.57±5.77b | 4.18±0.33a | 3.08±0.32a | 30.67±0.43c | 321.33±15.90a | 210.29±11.53ab |
130 | 90.90±2.29b | 3.26±0.06b | 3.00±0.33a | 0.00±0.72d | 303.56±7.18a | 198.86±10.08b |
烯效唑浓度/ (mg/kg) | 小穗/生殖枝/个 | 种子/小穗/个 | 种子数/ (个/m2) | 千粒重/ g | 种子长/ mm | 种子宽/ mm | 种子厚/ mm | 种子产量/ (kg/hm2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 18.32±0.61c | 3.03±0.24b | 10941.71±2396.19b | 10.51±0.32ab | 17.45±1.27a | 1.96±0.26b | 1.35±0.26a | 1327.33±22.11b |
50 | 22.71±1.00a | 3.03±0.23b | 15021.14±2761.97a | 10.35±0.32b | 17.38±1.31a | 2.24±0.21a | 1.27±0.14a | 1508.31±70.24a |
90 | 21.08±1.08ab | 3.38±0.40a | 14502.29±1658.09a | 10.58±0.37ab | 17.15±0.98a | 2.20±0.23a | 1.25±0.12a | 1386.92±39.36ab |
130 | 19.74±1.47bc | 3.47±0.59a | 12791.43±2428.53ab | 10.67±0.24a | 17.30±1.31a | 2.16±0.24a | 1.33±0.16a | 1453.26±101.10ab |
烯效唑浓度/ (mg/kg) | 小穗/生殖枝/个 | 种子/小穗/个 | 种子数/ (个/m2) | 千粒重/ g | 种子长/ mm | 种子宽/ mm | 种子厚/ mm | 种子产量/ (kg/hm2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 18.32±0.61c | 3.03±0.24b | 10941.71±2396.19b | 10.51±0.32ab | 17.45±1.27a | 1.96±0.26b | 1.35±0.26a | 1327.33±22.11b |
50 | 22.71±1.00a | 3.03±0.23b | 15021.14±2761.97a | 10.35±0.32b | 17.38±1.31a | 2.24±0.21a | 1.27±0.14a | 1508.31±70.24a |
90 | 21.08±1.08ab | 3.38±0.40a | 14502.29±1658.09a | 10.58±0.37ab | 17.15±0.98a | 2.20±0.23a | 1.25±0.12a | 1386.92±39.36ab |
130 | 19.74±1.47bc | 3.47±0.59a | 12791.43±2428.53ab | 10.67±0.24a | 17.30±1.31a | 2.16±0.24a | 1.33±0.16a | 1453.26±101.10ab |
烯效唑浓度/(mg/kg) | 发芽率/% | 发芽指数 | 胚芽长/cm | 胚根长/cm | 活力指数 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 88.12±5.09a | 149.54±5.08a | 5.32±0.70b | 6.60±0.95a | 1785.22±63.96b |
50 | 90.00±3.46a | 151.62±3.00a | 5.29±0.83b | 5.90±0.72b | 1694.06±120.28b |
90 | 87.17±3.01a | 150.75±0.50a | 6.11±0.90a | 6.86±0.87a | 1958.35±55.79a |
130 | 90.72±4.50a | 150.31±1.33a | 4.86±0.61b | 5.97±0.55b | 1632.66±19.73b |
烯效唑浓度/(mg/kg) | 发芽率/% | 发芽指数 | 胚芽长/cm | 胚根长/cm | 活力指数 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 88.12±5.09a | 149.54±5.08a | 5.32±0.70b | 6.60±0.95a | 1785.22±63.96b |
50 | 90.00±3.46a | 151.62±3.00a | 5.29±0.83b | 5.90±0.72b | 1694.06±120.28b |
90 | 87.17±3.01a | 150.75±0.50a | 6.11±0.90a | 6.86±0.87a | 1958.35±55.79a |
130 | 90.72±4.50a | 150.31±1.33a | 4.86±0.61b | 5.97±0.55b | 1632.66±19.73b |
指标 | 株高 | 节长 | 茎粗 | 倒伏率 | 分蘖数 | 生殖枝数 | 小穗/生殖枝 | 种子/小穗 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
节长 | 0.20 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||
茎粗 | -0.05 | 0.56 | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||
倒伏率 | 0.79** | 0.30 | 0.12 | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||
分蘖数 | 0.00 | -0.15 | -0.28 | -0.07 | - | - | - | - | ||||||
生殖枝数 | 0.12 | 0.13 | -0.31 | 0.04 | 0.78** | - | - | - | ||||||
小穗数/生殖枝 | 0.01 | 0.21 | 0.02 | -0.29 | -0.10 | -0.23 | - | - | ||||||
种子/小穗 | -0.46 | 0.09 | 0.52 | -0.40 | -0.31 | -0.46 | -0.10 | - | ||||||
种子数 | -0.16 | 0.60* | 0.59* | -0.32 | 0.10 | 0.13 | 0.30 | 0.42 | ||||||
种子产量 | -0.07 | -0.12 | -0.29 | -0.47 | 0.55 | 0.59* | 0.29 | -0.25 | ||||||
千粒重 | -0.56 | -0.40 | -0.05 | -0.44 | 0.09 | -0.15 | -0.47 | 0.50 | ||||||
种子长 | 0.27 | -0.05 | -0.42 | 0.16 | -0.25 | 0.04 | -0.04 | -0.28 | ||||||
种子宽 | -0.46 | 0.20 | 0.08 | -0.70 | -0.05 | -0.08 | 0.75** | 0.21 | ||||||
种子厚 | 0.20 | -0.47 | -0.46 | 0.31 | -0.15 | -0.07 | -0.38 | -0.44 | ||||||
发芽率 | -0.20 | -0.08 | 0.39 | -0.22 | 0.05 | -0.12 | 0.11 | 0.52 | ||||||
发芽指数 | -0.26 | 0.29 | 0.67* | -0.08 | -0.03 | -0.18 | 0.13 | 0.53 | ||||||
活力指数 | -0.16 | 0.35 | 0.21 | 0.20 | 0.13 | -0.14 | 0.15 | 0.12 | ||||||
节长 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||
茎粗 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||
倒伏率 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||
分蘖数 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||
生殖枝数 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||
小穗数/生殖枝 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||
种子/小穗 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||
种子数 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||
种子产量 | 0.17 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||
千粒重 | -0.13 | -0.12 | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||
种子长 | -0.55 | 0.08 | 0.06 | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||
种子宽 | 0.49 | 0.52 | -0.20 | -0.24 | - | - | - | - | ||||||
种子厚 | -0.79** | -0.19 | 0.09 | 0.35 | -0.45 | - | - | - | ||||||
发芽率 | 0.20 | 0.07 | 0.11 | -0.06 | 0.10 | -0.57 | - | - | ||||||
发芽指数 | 0.32 | -0.14 | 0.15 | -0.07 | 0.09 | -0.61* | 0.84** | - | ||||||
活力指数 | 0.11 | -0.39 | 0.06 | -0.21 | -0.04 | -0.45 | -0.19 | 0.50 |
指标 | 株高 | 节长 | 茎粗 | 倒伏率 | 分蘖数 | 生殖枝数 | 小穗/生殖枝 | 种子/小穗 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
节长 | 0.20 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||
茎粗 | -0.05 | 0.56 | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||
倒伏率 | 0.79** | 0.30 | 0.12 | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||
分蘖数 | 0.00 | -0.15 | -0.28 | -0.07 | - | - | - | - | ||||||
生殖枝数 | 0.12 | 0.13 | -0.31 | 0.04 | 0.78** | - | - | - | ||||||
小穗数/生殖枝 | 0.01 | 0.21 | 0.02 | -0.29 | -0.10 | -0.23 | - | - | ||||||
种子/小穗 | -0.46 | 0.09 | 0.52 | -0.40 | -0.31 | -0.46 | -0.10 | - | ||||||
种子数 | -0.16 | 0.60* | 0.59* | -0.32 | 0.10 | 0.13 | 0.30 | 0.42 | ||||||
种子产量 | -0.07 | -0.12 | -0.29 | -0.47 | 0.55 | 0.59* | 0.29 | -0.25 | ||||||
千粒重 | -0.56 | -0.40 | -0.05 | -0.44 | 0.09 | -0.15 | -0.47 | 0.50 | ||||||
种子长 | 0.27 | -0.05 | -0.42 | 0.16 | -0.25 | 0.04 | -0.04 | -0.28 | ||||||
种子宽 | -0.46 | 0.20 | 0.08 | -0.70 | -0.05 | -0.08 | 0.75** | 0.21 | ||||||
种子厚 | 0.20 | -0.47 | -0.46 | 0.31 | -0.15 | -0.07 | -0.38 | -0.44 | ||||||
发芽率 | -0.20 | -0.08 | 0.39 | -0.22 | 0.05 | -0.12 | 0.11 | 0.52 | ||||||
发芽指数 | -0.26 | 0.29 | 0.67* | -0.08 | -0.03 | -0.18 | 0.13 | 0.53 | ||||||
活力指数 | -0.16 | 0.35 | 0.21 | 0.20 | 0.13 | -0.14 | 0.15 | 0.12 | ||||||
节长 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||
茎粗 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||
倒伏率 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||
分蘖数 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||
生殖枝数 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||
小穗数/生殖枝 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||
种子/小穗 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||
种子数 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||
种子产量 | 0.17 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||
千粒重 | -0.13 | -0.12 | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||
种子长 | -0.55 | 0.08 | 0.06 | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||
种子宽 | 0.49 | 0.52 | -0.20 | -0.24 | - | - | - | - | ||||||
种子厚 | -0.79** | -0.19 | 0.09 | 0.35 | -0.45 | - | - | - | ||||||
发芽率 | 0.20 | 0.07 | 0.11 | -0.06 | 0.10 | -0.57 | - | - | ||||||
发芽指数 | 0.32 | -0.14 | 0.15 | -0.07 | 0.09 | -0.61* | 0.84** | - | ||||||
活力指数 | 0.11 | -0.39 | 0.06 | -0.21 | -0.04 | -0.45 | -0.19 | 0.50 |
[1] |
中国饲用植物志编辑委员会. 《中国饲用植物志》(第二卷)[M]. 北京: 农业出版社, 1989:12-14.
|
[2] |
田宏, 张鹤山, 熊军波, 等. 扁穗雀麦种子落粒性和适宜采收期的研究[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2015, 54(23):5969-5972.
|
[3] |
田宏, 刘洋, 张鹤山, 等. 行距和播种量对江夏扁穗雀麦鲜草和种子产量的影响[J]. 中国草地学报, 2015, 37(4):108-113.
|
[4] |
毛培胜, 欧成明, 贾志程, 等. 我国牧草与草坪草种子生产技术的研究进展[J]. 中国草地学报, 2023, 45(1):1-11.
|
[5] |
|
[6] |
|
[7] |
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2018.03.015 URL |
[8] |
阙仁伟, 吴嘉乐, 武晶晶, 等. 烯效唑对不同株高优质稻产量和抗倒伏特性的影响[J]. 杂交水稻, 2023, 3:1-8.
|
[9] |
石丽敏, 吕学高, 刘新华, 等. 烯效唑浸种处理对川糯粱1号种子萌发及主要农艺性状的影响[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2022, 63(11):2696-2698.
|
[10] |
牛银亭, 陈培育, 鞠乐, 等. 喷施烯效唑对谷子株高和产量的影响[J]. 大麦与谷类科学, 2022, 39(5):55-58.
|
[11] |
项洪涛, 李琬, 何宁, 等. 初花期低温及预喷施烯效唑对绿豆叶片AsA-GSH循环和产量的影响[J]. 西南农业学报, 2023, 36(5):932-942.
|
[12] |
徐翔, 孙劲. 烯效唑和二甲戊灵复配对马铃薯种薯发芽的影响[J]. 西南农业学报, 2021, 34(8):1643-1648.
|
[13] |
doi: 10.1007/s12892-019-0050-0 |
[14] |
王学芳, 张忠鑫, 郑磊, 等. 多效唑、烯效唑对油菜‘秦优1618’苗期特性和抗寒性的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(36):36-40.
doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2021-0184 |
[15] |
郭溶誉, 张余, 李振东, 等. 外源烯效唑对苦荞衰老及产量的影响[J/OL]. 分子植物育种:1-11[2023-07-24]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/46.1068.S.20220412.1252.013.html.
|
[16] |
许诺, 程智鹏, 朱江丽, 等. 两种生长调节剂复合应用对草坪生长的影响研究[C]. 中国草学会, 2018:467-469.
|
[17] |
|
[18] |
苏一诺, 苗阳阳, 彭芳华, 等. S3307叶喷对连作紫花苜蓿的生理指标及生产性能影响[J]. 黑龙江八一农垦大学学报, 2020, 32(4):25-31.
|
[19] |
郭彩虹. 烯效唑对盐胁迫下柠条生长和生理特性的影响[J]. 现代园艺, 2022, 10:14-16.
|
[20] |
田宏, 刘洋, 张鹤山, 等. 扁穗雀麦(Bromus cartharticus Vahl.) 种子萌发条件的研究[J]. 草业科学, 2009, 26(7):88-93.
|
[21] |
doi: 10.1105/tpc.011650 URL |
[22] |
辛添玉. 烯效唑对大豆抗倒伏力学性状及产量的调控效应[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北农业大学, 2022.
|
[23] |
段枫, 吴沈忠, 栾鑫, 等. 烯效唑(S3307)对百合的矮化效应研究[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2022, 61(21):105-110.
|
[24] |
雷雄, 闫利军, 吴婍, 等. 多效唑(PP333)对阿坝垂穗披碱草种子产量与质量的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2017, 25(3):633-638.
doi: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2017.03.026 |
[25] |
刘星贝, 吴东倩, 汪灿, 等. 喷施烯效唑对甜荞茎秆抗倒性能及产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2015, 48(24):4903-4915.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2015.24.005 |
[26] |
张忠鑫, 王学芳, 董育红, 等. 烯效唑·多效唑对黄淮区油菜新品种秦优1699苗期和成熟期性状的影响[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2021, 49(15):142-144.
|
[27] |
张旭, 聂刚, 黄琳凯, 等. 植物生长调节剂对鸭茅种子产量的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2019, 28(6):93-100.
doi: 10.11686/cyxb2018729 |
[28] |
闫敏, 张英俊, 铁云华, 等. 生长调节剂对白三叶种子产量及产量构成要素的影响[J]. 草业科学, 2007, 24(4):58-62.
|
[29] |
罗凯, 谢琛, 汪锦, 等. 外源喷施植物生长调节剂对套作大豆碳氮代谢和花荚脱落的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(4):752-760.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2021.04129 |
[30] |
孙福东, 冯乃杰, 郑殿峰, 等. 植物生长调节剂S3307和DTA-6对大豆荚的生理代谢及GmAC的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2016, 49(7):1267-1276.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2016.07.005 |
[31] |
doi: 10.2135/cropsci2006.03.0175 URL |
[32] |
doi: 10.1007/BF03208872 URL |
[33] |
宫香伟, 刘春娟, 冯乃杰, 等. S3307和DTA-6对大豆不同冠层叶片光合特性及产量的影响[J]. 植物生理学报, 2017, 53(10):1867-1876.
|
[34] |
姚海坡, 董志强, 吕丽华, 等. 不同植物生长调节剂对冬小麦茎秆特性和产量的影响[J]. 华北农学报, 2015, 30(增刊):152-156.
|
[35] |
鞠乐, 陈培育, 牛银亭, 等. 烯效唑浸种对谷子种子萌发及幼苗生长的影响[J]. 大麦与谷类科学, 2023, 40(2):15-20.
|
[36] |
刘芬, 屈成, 王鑫, 等. 不同调控技术对晚稻机插秧秧苗生长及产量的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2017, 33(23):113-118.
doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb17010025 |
[37] |
刘金平, 游明鸿. 生长抑制剂对老芒麦种群生殖投入与收益及种子质量的影响[J]. 中国草地学报, 2013, 35(1):42-48.
|
[38] |
田宏, 邵麟慧, 熊军波, 等. 扁穗雀麦种子休眠期和发芽特性的初步研究[J]. 种子, 2016, 35(10):83-86.
|
[1] | CHEN Guiyun, WANG Huifang, WANG Duo, SHI Dingguo, ZHANG Zhijun, XU Dongya, LI Yunchuan, KONG Decui, WANG Na, WANG Ge, DING Yi, BAI Yuxiang. Effects of Tobacco Stem Biochar Based Fertilizer Application on Production and Quality of Flue-cured Tobacco [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(1): 12-19. |
[2] | YU Chong, ZHANG Fengyun, HUANG Hao, LU Yuncai. Quantitative Genetic Analysis of Cob Correlated Traits in Maize F2 Population [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(5): 13-20. |
[3] | AN Jiangang, ZHANG Xiao, LIANG Jianqiu, YANG Wenying, ZENG Zhaoqiong, YU Xiaobo, WANG Jia, FENG Jun, ZHANG Mingrong, WU Haiying. Corn-soybean Intercropping Silage: Exploration of Suitable Harvesting Period and Correlation Analysis of Soybean Agronomic Traits [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(36): 40-47. |
[4] | SONG Li, QIN Jie, LI Xuan, WU Xiaoyan. Effects of Liquid Mulching Film on Agronomic Traits, Yield of Peanut and Soil Fertility [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(33): 33-37. |
[5] | SHANG Na, LI Qiuzhi, LI Haitao, YU Fagang. Application of Peanut Regulation Technology [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(24): 38-42. |
[6] | XU Yingchao, LU Sen, ZHANG Sicheng, MENG Qitao, LIN Huijing, XUE Shudan, LIU Hongbiao, GUO Hanquan, FU Manqin, SONG Dongguang, ZHONG Yujuan. Progress of Genome-wide Association Studies in Genetic Improvement of Cucurbitaceae [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(22): 23-33. |
[7] | GUO Shanhu, WU Zhongming, WANG Yongping, ZHANG Jintao, XU Sai, WU Jia, DING Borui, DA Yingfei, ZHANG Mingtian, LUO Qipeng. Preliminary Research on Reducing Effect of Different Fertilization Measures on Continuous Cropping Obstacles of Tobacco [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(19): 9-15. |
[8] | ZHAO Jianan, CAO Xiaodong, SHANG Liping, TONG Xiaoli, LI Baojun, ZHAO Yajun, LUO Bin, WANG Hao. Effects of Picking Flowering Stalk on Agronomic Traits and Economic Benefits of Brassica napus L. [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(12): 28-34. |
[9] | TIAN Yixin, GAO Fengju, ZHU Guanxiong, CAO Pengpeng, WANG Chunyu, GAO Qi, HUA Fangjing. Effects of Different Fertilization Modes on Agronomic Traits, Yield and Fertilizer Agronomic Efficiency of Summer Soybean [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(11): 50-56. |
[10] | BUKA Ouerna, SONG Mei, HUANG Min, MAO Pengzhi, DU Jing, ZHANG Yanan. Effect of Planting Density on Agronomic Traits and Yield of Chili Pepper [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(10): 31-37. |
[11] | CHEN Yinghua, BAI Ruxiao, WANG Juan, ZHANG Xinjiang, LIU Linghui, LIU Xiaolong, FENG Guorui, WEI Changzhou. Foliar Spraying Uniconazole and Boron: Effects on Yield and Sugar Content of Sugar Beet in Taer Basin [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(9): 41-48. |
[12] | ZHENG Benchuan, ZHANG Jinfang, JIANG Jun, CUI Cheng, CHAI Liang, HUANG Youtao, ZHOU Zhengjian, LI Haojie, JIANG Liangcai. Correlation Analysis of Main Traits and Yield of Brassica napus ‘Chuanyou’ Varieties with Different Maturity Stages [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(7): 7-17. |
[13] | SHEN Jicheng, ZHAO Caixia, YE Fahui, LI Yaxin, LIU Demei, LIU Ruijuan, SHEN Yuhu, ZHANG Huaigang, CHEN Wenjie. Analysis of Germplasm Differentiation of Ledu Long Pepper Based on Agronomic Traits [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(7): 29-34. |
[14] | DONG Hongye, XU Ting, LIU Wenhao, LI Qiang, LIU Yantao. Peanut in the Southeastern Margin of Tarim Basin of Xinjiang: Analysis and Comprehensive Evaluation of Main Agronomic Traits [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(6): 26-30. |
[15] | HU Ping, FENG Minyu, WU Fengyu, CAO Heyu. Suitable Sowing Temperature for Direct Seeding Early Rice [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(35): 70-75. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||