Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2024, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (14): 104-111.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2024-0034
Previous Articles Next Articles
WU Randi1,2(), GE Liqing3, ZHANG Fudou2, SHEN Shicai2, YANG Yunhai2, YANG Shaosong2, ZHENG Fengping2, FAN Zewen2,4, GAO Jiale1,2, XU Gaofeng2(
)
Received:
2024-01-12
Revised:
2024-03-11
Online:
2024-05-15
Published:
2024-05-09
WU Randi, GE Liqing, ZHANG Fudou, SHEN Shicai, YANG Yunhai, YANG Shaosong, ZHENG Fengping, FAN Zewen, GAO Jiale, XU Gaofeng. Effects of Two Crops on Clonal Growth and Node Reproduction of Invasive Alternanthera philoxeroides[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(14): 104-111.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2024-0034
处理方式 | 浓度/(g/kg) | 存活率/% | |
---|---|---|---|
红薯 | 香茅草 | ||
表层覆盖 | 100 | 87.50±2.06Abc | 89.13±3.78Abc |
80 | 84.38±1.39Abcd | 88.13±2.34Abc | |
60 | 86.50±1.92Abc | 90.50±1.65Abc | |
40 | 85.00±3.36Abcd | 89.38±3.48Abc | |
20 | 87.50±2.47Abc | 90.63±1.53Abc | |
混土栽培 | 100 | 55.56±5.61Af | 50.00±6.17Ahi |
80 | 61.11±6.25Bef | 78.89±4.44Acde | |
60 | 66.67±6.70Bef | 88.89±3.27Abc | |
40 | 83.33±3.3B3bc | 94.44±5.56Aab | |
20 | 85.33±1.59Bbc | 95.44±5.56Aab | |
水提液浇灌 | 100 | 56.25±3.13Af | 43.75±3.31Bi |
80 | 65.63±7.87Aef | 59.38±1.95Bgh | |
60 | 71.88±5.57Ade | 65.63±2.00Bfg | |
40 | 78.13±1.59Abcd | 71.88±3.95Bef | |
20 | 100.00±0.00Aa | 75.00±2.19Bdef | |
CK | -- | 100.00±0.00Aa | 100.00±0.00Aa |
处理方式 | 浓度/(g/kg) | 存活率/% | |
---|---|---|---|
红薯 | 香茅草 | ||
表层覆盖 | 100 | 87.50±2.06Abc | 89.13±3.78Abc |
80 | 84.38±1.39Abcd | 88.13±2.34Abc | |
60 | 86.50±1.92Abc | 90.50±1.65Abc | |
40 | 85.00±3.36Abcd | 89.38±3.48Abc | |
20 | 87.50±2.47Abc | 90.63±1.53Abc | |
混土栽培 | 100 | 55.56±5.61Af | 50.00±6.17Ahi |
80 | 61.11±6.25Bef | 78.89±4.44Acde | |
60 | 66.67±6.70Bef | 88.89±3.27Abc | |
40 | 83.33±3.3B3bc | 94.44±5.56Aab | |
20 | 85.33±1.59Bbc | 95.44±5.56Aab | |
水提液浇灌 | 100 | 56.25±3.13Af | 43.75±3.31Bi |
80 | 65.63±7.87Aef | 59.38±1.95Bgh | |
60 | 71.88±5.57Ade | 65.63±2.00Bfg | |
40 | 78.13±1.59Abcd | 71.88±3.95Bef | |
20 | 100.00±0.00Aa | 75.00±2.19Bdef | |
CK | -- | 100.00±0.00Aa | 100.00±0.00Aa |
处理方式 | 浓度/ | 叶面积/cm2 | 生物量/g | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(g/kg) | 红薯 | 香茅草 | 红薯 | 香茅草 | |||||||
表层覆盖 | 100 | 5.42±0.41Bde | 7.06±0.52Aab | 3.21±0.08Bgh | 3.98±0.06Afg | ||||||
80 | 6.39±0.18Bbc | 7.42±0.29Aa | 3.35±0.05Bg | 4.01±0.08Afg | |||||||
60 | 6.96±0.24Aab | 7.51±0.34Aa | 3.37±0.06Bg | 4.16±0.11Adef | |||||||
40 | 7.31±0.21Aa | 7.54±0.46Aa | 4.25±0.13Acd | 4.25±0.10Ade | |||||||
20 | 7.63±0.20Aa | 7.69±0.33Aa | 5.94±0.14Aa | 5.91±0.13Aa | |||||||
混土栽培 | 100 | 4.51±0.18Bfg | 5.97±0.24Av | 3.50±0.10Bg | 3.90±0.16Ag | ||||||
80 | 5.13±0.24Bef | 6.11±0.36Ac | 3.98±0.12Bf | 4.11±0.13Adef | |||||||
60 | 5.50±0.15Bde | 6.47±0.41Abc | 4.15±0.13Ade | 4.26±0.12Ade | |||||||
40 | 5.81±0.24Bcd | 6.96±0.29Aab | 4.32±0.19Ac | 4.68±0.13Ac | |||||||
20 | 6.97±0.28Aab | 7.15±0.27Aa | 5.44±0.37Bb | 5.29±0.11Ab | |||||||
水提液浇灌 | 100 | 3.37±0.08Ai | 2.52±0.14Bf | 3.34±0.04Ag | 2.63±0.05Bj | ||||||
80 | 3.61±0.14Ahi | 3.15±0.27Bef | 3.46±0.03Ag | 3.21±0.04Ai | |||||||
60 | 3.84±0.11Aghi | 3.42±0.15Be | 3.76±0.05Afg | 3.73±0.12Ah | |||||||
40 | 4.21±0.24Agh | 3.86±0.29Bde | 4.27±0.08Acd | 3.97±0.09Afg | |||||||
20 | 4.96±0.19Af | 4.32±0.21Bd | 5.41±0.08Ac | 4.54±0.07Ac | |||||||
CK | -- | 7.58±0.18Aa | 7.58±0.18Aa | 6.04±0.12Aa | 6.04±0.12Aa | ||||||
处理方式 | 浓度/ | 叶面积/cm2 | 生物量/g | ||||||||
(g/kg) | 红薯 | 香茅草 | 红薯 | 香茅草 | |||||||
表层覆盖 | 100 | 1.08±0.03Ac | 1.24±0.05Abc | 0.35±0.02Abc | 0.43±0.03Aa | ||||||
80 | 1.13±0.05Bbc | 1.31±0.04Aabc | 0.41±0.03Ab | 0.43±0.02Aa | |||||||
60 | 1.15±0.06Bbc | 1.38±0.08Aab | 0.41±0.01Ab | 0.45±0.04Aa | |||||||
40 | 1.17±0.06Bbc | 1.43±0.10Aa | 0.43±0.04Aab | 0.46±0.02Aa | |||||||
20 | 1.26±0.06Ab | 1.45±0.11Aa | 0.47±0.03Aa | 0.48±0.04Aa | |||||||
混土栽培 | 100 | 0.84±0.03Aef | 0.87±0.06Af | 0.21±0.02Aef | 0.29±0.03Ac | ||||||
80 | 0.87±0.05Aef | 0.91±0.09Aef | 0.25±0.03Be | 0.38±0.04Ab | |||||||
60 | 0.89±0.06Ade | 0.96±0.10Aef | 0.27±0.02Bde | 0.39±0.02Ab | |||||||
40 | 0.91±0.08Ade | 1.04±0.11Ade | 0.29±0.04Bde | 0.41±0.02Aab | |||||||
20 | 1.03±0.1A1cd | 1.15±0.09Acd | 0.43±0.02Aab | 0.44±0.03Aa | |||||||
水提液浇灌 | 100 | 0.46±0.03Ai | 0.37±0.02Ah | 0.19±0.01Af | 0.13±0.02Ae | ||||||
80 | 0.55±0.02Ahi | 0.41±0.02Bh | 0.21±0.02Aef | 0.16±0.01Ad | |||||||
60 | 0.67±0.07Agh | 0.52±0.03Bgh | 0.24±0.01Ae | 0.18±0.03Ad | |||||||
40 | 0.75±0.05Afg | 0.59±0.03Bg | 0.25±0.03Ae | 0.21±0.02Acd | |||||||
20 | 0.81±0.07Aef | 0.63±0.05Bg | 0.31±0.02Acd | 0.28±0.02Ac | |||||||
CK | -- | 1.42±0.13Aa | 1.42±0.13Aa | 0.49±0.04Aa | 0.49±0.04Aa |
处理方式 | 浓度/ | 叶面积/cm2 | 生物量/g | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(g/kg) | 红薯 | 香茅草 | 红薯 | 香茅草 | |||||||
表层覆盖 | 100 | 5.42±0.41Bde | 7.06±0.52Aab | 3.21±0.08Bgh | 3.98±0.06Afg | ||||||
80 | 6.39±0.18Bbc | 7.42±0.29Aa | 3.35±0.05Bg | 4.01±0.08Afg | |||||||
60 | 6.96±0.24Aab | 7.51±0.34Aa | 3.37±0.06Bg | 4.16±0.11Adef | |||||||
40 | 7.31±0.21Aa | 7.54±0.46Aa | 4.25±0.13Acd | 4.25±0.10Ade | |||||||
20 | 7.63±0.20Aa | 7.69±0.33Aa | 5.94±0.14Aa | 5.91±0.13Aa | |||||||
混土栽培 | 100 | 4.51±0.18Bfg | 5.97±0.24Av | 3.50±0.10Bg | 3.90±0.16Ag | ||||||
80 | 5.13±0.24Bef | 6.11±0.36Ac | 3.98±0.12Bf | 4.11±0.13Adef | |||||||
60 | 5.50±0.15Bde | 6.47±0.41Abc | 4.15±0.13Ade | 4.26±0.12Ade | |||||||
40 | 5.81±0.24Bcd | 6.96±0.29Aab | 4.32±0.19Ac | 4.68±0.13Ac | |||||||
20 | 6.97±0.28Aab | 7.15±0.27Aa | 5.44±0.37Bb | 5.29±0.11Ab | |||||||
水提液浇灌 | 100 | 3.37±0.08Ai | 2.52±0.14Bf | 3.34±0.04Ag | 2.63±0.05Bj | ||||||
80 | 3.61±0.14Ahi | 3.15±0.27Bef | 3.46±0.03Ag | 3.21±0.04Ai | |||||||
60 | 3.84±0.11Aghi | 3.42±0.15Be | 3.76±0.05Afg | 3.73±0.12Ah | |||||||
40 | 4.21±0.24Agh | 3.86±0.29Bde | 4.27±0.08Acd | 3.97±0.09Afg | |||||||
20 | 4.96±0.19Af | 4.32±0.21Bd | 5.41±0.08Ac | 4.54±0.07Ac | |||||||
CK | -- | 7.58±0.18Aa | 7.58±0.18Aa | 6.04±0.12Aa | 6.04±0.12Aa | ||||||
处理方式 | 浓度/ | 叶面积/cm2 | 生物量/g | ||||||||
(g/kg) | 红薯 | 香茅草 | 红薯 | 香茅草 | |||||||
表层覆盖 | 100 | 1.08±0.03Ac | 1.24±0.05Abc | 0.35±0.02Abc | 0.43±0.03Aa | ||||||
80 | 1.13±0.05Bbc | 1.31±0.04Aabc | 0.41±0.03Ab | 0.43±0.02Aa | |||||||
60 | 1.15±0.06Bbc | 1.38±0.08Aab | 0.41±0.01Ab | 0.45±0.04Aa | |||||||
40 | 1.17±0.06Bbc | 1.43±0.10Aa | 0.43±0.04Aab | 0.46±0.02Aa | |||||||
20 | 1.26±0.06Ab | 1.45±0.11Aa | 0.47±0.03Aa | 0.48±0.04Aa | |||||||
混土栽培 | 100 | 0.84±0.03Aef | 0.87±0.06Af | 0.21±0.02Aef | 0.29±0.03Ac | ||||||
80 | 0.87±0.05Aef | 0.91±0.09Aef | 0.25±0.03Be | 0.38±0.04Ab | |||||||
60 | 0.89±0.06Ade | 0.96±0.10Aef | 0.27±0.02Bde | 0.39±0.02Ab | |||||||
40 | 0.91±0.08Ade | 1.04±0.11Ade | 0.29±0.04Bde | 0.41±0.02Aab | |||||||
20 | 1.03±0.1A1cd | 1.15±0.09Acd | 0.43±0.02Aab | 0.44±0.03Aa | |||||||
水提液浇灌 | 100 | 0.46±0.03Ai | 0.37±0.02Ah | 0.19±0.01Af | 0.13±0.02Ae | ||||||
80 | 0.55±0.02Ahi | 0.41±0.02Bh | 0.21±0.02Aef | 0.16±0.01Ad | |||||||
60 | 0.67±0.07Agh | 0.52±0.03Bgh | 0.24±0.01Ae | 0.18±0.03Ad | |||||||
40 | 0.75±0.05Afg | 0.59±0.03Bg | 0.25±0.03Ae | 0.21±0.02Acd | |||||||
20 | 0.81±0.07Aef | 0.63±0.05Bg | 0.31±0.02Acd | 0.28±0.02Ac | |||||||
CK | -- | 1.42±0.13Aa | 1.42±0.13Aa | 0.49±0.04Aa | 0.49±0.04Aa |
[1] |
doi: 10.1016/j.sajb.2023.09.038 URL |
[2] |
doi: 10.1353/bae.2018.0000 URL |
[3] |
|
[4] |
|
[5] |
doi: 10.1016/j.aquabot.2006.09.004 URL |
[6] |
|
[7] |
|
[8] |
王斐. 茎节片段化、脱水和构树叶片水浸提液对空心莲子草营养繁殖的影响[D]. 扬州: 扬州大学, 2016.
|
[9] |
付文竹, 陈振亚, 淮虎银. 空心莲子草地下茎克隆繁殖特征[J]. 生态科学, 2006(4):316-319,324.
|
[10] |
陈中义, 江红英. 空心莲子草无性繁殖体的大小及数量对其建群效应的影响[J]. 长江大学学报(自然科学版)农学卷, 2009, 6(1):72-75,114.
|
[11] |
宋振, 张瑞海, 张国良, 等. 空心莲子草叶甲释放量对空心莲子草防控效果的研究[J]. 生态环境学报, 2018, 27(11):2033-2038.
doi: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2018.11.008 |
[12] |
覃海蓉, 郭文锋, 阳莎, 等. 莲草直胸跳甲和根结线虫共同危害对空心莲子草及莲子草生长的影响[J]. 河南农业大学学报, 2021, 55(5):890-895.
|
[13] |
申时才, 徐高峰, 张付斗, 等. 红薯叶片浸提液对5种主要农田杂草种子萌发及幼苗生长的化感作用[J]. 生态学报, 2017, 37(6):1931-1938.
|
[14] |
赵俊, 李亚红, 付思明, 等. 云南调味蔬菜发展现状[J]. 中国蔬菜, 2013(17):12-13.
|
[15] |
黎华寿, 黄京华, 张修玉, 等. 香茅天然挥发物的化感作用及其化学成分分析[J]. 应用生态学报, 2005(4):763-767.
|
[16] |
许智萍, 范源洪, 何璐, 等. 云南香茅草精油含量及主要化学成分分析[J]. 热带农业科学, 2020, 40(11):115-120
|
[17] |
牛远, 石沁荣, 吴冉迪, 等. 外源海藻糖和氯化胆碱对油菜苗期干旱胁迫的缓解效应分析[J]. 云南农业大学学报(自然科学), 2021, 36(5):753-761,798.
|
[18] |
从春蕾, 刘天雷, 邹焓. 安顺市空心莲子草入侵对伴生杂草的组成及多样性的影响[J]. 南方农业, 2016, 10(22):47-52.
|
[19] |
喻大昭, 魏守辉, 朱文达, 等. 空心莲子草对水稻生长的影响及其经济阈值[J]. 植物保护学报, 2008(1):69-73.
|
[20] |
苏田, 吴姝瑾, 胡姝珍, 等. 外来种空心莲子草的入侵及其克隆特性综述[J]. 南方林业科学, 2021, 49(1):44-47,54.
|
[21] |
王颖, 李为花, 李丹, 等. 空心莲子草入侵机制及防治策略研究进展[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2015, 32(4):625-634.
|
[22] |
彭雪梅, 李程程, 李海燕, 等. 土壤水分对外来入侵植物空心莲子草(Alternanthera philoxeroides)存活和生长特征的影响[J]. 东北师大学报(自然科学版), 2022, 54(4):114-120.
|
[23] |
高俊, 汪慧泉, 顾东祥, 等. 秸秆还田对土壤生态及农作物生长发育影响的研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2023, 39(30):87-93.
doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2022-0897 |
[24] |
doi: 10.1038/srep38036 |
[25] |
赵明涛, 王超群, 何玉实, 等. 银川平原常见沉水植物种间关系和生态位研究[J]. 湿地科学, 2023, 21(3):414-420.
|
[26] |
宋誉, 郭文锋, 李晓琼. 克隆整合对入侵杂草空心莲子草和本土莲子草生长及光合性能的影响[J]. 华南农业大学学报, 2023, 44(4):531-538.
|
[27] |
邓丽丽, 吕培, 黄学奇, 等. 红薯水提物对外来入侵植物空心莲子草生长的化感影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(7):2202-2210.
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202007.020 |
[28] |
邓丽丽. 红薯对空心莲子草生态控制机理的研究[D]. 合肥: 安徽农业大学, 2020.
|
[29] |
刘容秀, 崔金腾, 张克中. NaCl胁迫对‘Robina’百合叶片和根部抗氧化酶系统及根尖离子流速的影响[J]. 北京农学院学报, 2020, 35(2):77-83.
|
[30] |
孙建伟. 淹水对玉米细胞抗氧化酶系统的影响[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2020, 48(1):44-45,48.
|
[31] |
徐珂珂, 李新月, 鲁焕, 等. 干旱胁迫下杂草稻和栽培稻种子萌发及幼苗根的部分生长和生理生化指标的比较[J]. 植物资源与环境学报, 2022, 31(1):86-88.
|
[32] |
潘宇, 张昊, 李湘, 等. 耐盐促生菌与其复合菌剂对盐胁迫狼尾草生长及生理生化的影响[J]. 贵州农业科学, 2023, 51(7):39-49.
|
[1] | ZOU Yuyan, WANG Lianjun, LEI Jian, CHAI Shasha, JIN Xiaojie, CHENG Xianliang, YANG Xinsun, LI Yanzhi. Protection Status and Development Countermeasures of National Geographical Indication of Sweetpotato [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(2): 152-157. |
[2] | ZHANG Riqian, HE Mengying, QIAN Meijiao, ZHANG Xue, LIU Yilin, WAN Chuanjie, ZHANG Zhen. Alternanthera philoxeroides in Different Habitats: Occurrence of Stamen Feminization and Its Distribution Pattern Within the Inflorescence [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(4): 29-35. |
[3] | Yuan Jianmin, He Lu, Yang Xiaoqiong, Xu Zhiping, Kong Weixi. Simultaneous Determination of 11 Trace Elements in Cymbopogon citratus by ICP-OES with Microwave Digestion [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(14): 69-73. |
[4] | . Research and Application of Soilless Culture System of Ipomoea batatas [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2015, 31(27): 94-98. |
[5] | . Effects on Physiological Characteristics of Ipomoea batatas Lam Under Salt Stress and Exogenous Ca2+ [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2014, 30(24): 111-117. |
[6] | Song Fuping, Huang Jie, Liu Guodao, Xu Ruili, Ye Jianqiu. Evaluation of 8 Leaf-Vegetable Sweet Potato Germplasm in Hainan Province [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2008, 24(9): 421-424. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||