Effects of Intercropping Patterns on Physicochemical Properties of Red Soil and Soybean Qualities

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2023-0797

Abstract

Abstract:

The aims are to explore the effects of different soybean planting patterns on the physicochemical properties of red soil and soybean quality and identify suitable planting patterns for soybeans, providing theoretical basis for improving the physicochemical properties of red soil and the nutritional quality of soybeans, and guide production practice. The one-way ANOVA method was used to compare and analyze the effects of different planting modes of soybean monoculture, maize-soybean intercropping and cassava-soybean intercropping on the physicochemical properties (pH, electrical conductivity and organic matter, hydrolytic nitrogen, total phosphorus, and available potassium contents) of red soil and the nutritional qualities (sugar, crude protein and fat contents) of soybean. The PLSR analysis method was used to explore the relationship between the physicochemical properties of red soil and soybean qualities. The pH, electrical conductivity, hydrolytic nitrogen, crude protein and fat content of cassava-soybean intercropping were significantly higher than those of soybean monoculture (P<0.05), and their organic matter and available potassium contents were also relatively higher. The PLS2 analysis results showed that there was a significant correlation between the pH and electrical conductivity of red soil and quality indicators of soybeans. The PLS1 analysis further found that there was a significant negative correlation between electrical conductivity and sugar content, and a significant positive correlation with crude fat content; the pH and electrical conductivity of red soil are positively correlated with the crude protein content of soybeans(P<0.05). The pH and electrical conductivity of soil have a significant impact on the quality of soybeans. Cassava-soybean intercropping has a positive effect on improving the pH and electrical conductivity of red soil as well as improving the nutritional quality of soybean. The planting mode is superior to maize-soybean intercropping.

Key words: soybean, intercropping, soil physicochemical properties of red soil, nutritional quality, partial least squares regression, planting pattern

LI Huajian, DENG Guojun, LUO Zhenyuan, NONG Quandong, LI Chunqing, NONG Bin, CHEN Biqin, HU Xiaozhang, LIU Na, WEN Heming. Effects of Intercropping Patterns on Physicochemical Properties of Red Soil and Soybean Qualities[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(26): 8-14.

Figures/Tables 7

References 28

[1]	俞霞. 红壤旱地甜玉米‖大豆间作系统作物产量、碳氮吸收累积和土壤养分的变化特征研究[D]. 南昌: 江西农业大学, 2021.
[2]	ZHANG S, MENG L, HOU J, et al. Maize/soybean intercropping improves stability of soil aggregates driven by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in a black soil of northeast China[J]. Plant and soil, 2022, 481(1-2):63.
[3]	MBAHA E U, OGIDIB E. Effect of soybean plant populations on yield and productivity of cassava and soybean grown in a cassava-based intercropping system[J]. Tropical and subtropical agroecosystems, 2012, 15(2):241-248.
[4]	ADENIYAN O N. Growth and yield performance of some improved soybean varieties as influenced by intercropping with maize and cassava in two contrasting locations in Southwest Nigeria[J]. African journal of biotechnology, 2006, 520(20):1886-1889.
[5]	ZHANG R, MU Y, LI X, et al. Response of the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi diversity and community in maize and soybean rhizosphere soil and roots to intercropping systems with different nitrogen application rates[J]. Science of the total environment, 2020, 740(2020):139810.
[6]	张雷昌, 汤利, 董艳, 等. 根系互作影响玉米大豆间作作物氮吸收[J]. 云南农业大学学报(自然科学), 2016, 31(6):1111-1119.
[7]	高蕊, 龚颖婷, 李沛然, 等. 木薯//大豆间距对间作作物农艺性状及品质的影响[J]. 大豆科学, 2018, 37(1):81-86.
[8]	WANG G, SHENG L, ZHAO D, et al. Allocation of nitrogen and carbon is regulated by nodulation and mycorrhizal networks in soybean/maize intercropping system[J]. Frontiers in plant science, 2016, 7:1901. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01901 pmid: 28018420
[9]	张智晖. 玉米/大豆间作模式对土壤酶活性及土壤养分的影响[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2011, 39(16):9706-9707.
[10]	李东利. 玉米/大豆间作体系氮素吸收及根际土壤养分和微生物特征的研究[D]. 银川: 宁夏大学, 2022.
[11]	肖特, 崔阔澍, 黄文娟, 等. 玉米/大豆带状套作种间根系互作效应与水分利用效率[J]. 西南农业学报, 2022, 35(12):2758-2771.
[12]	李荣云, 刘翠娟, 廖琦, 等. 木薯间套种大豆试验产量与效益分析[J]. 农业科技通讯, 2018, 557(5):136-137.
[13]	孔佳丽. 不同产地樱桃酒的呈味特征研究[D]. 上海: 上海应用技术大学, 2017.
[14]	陈申宽, 齐广, 武迎红, 等. 大豆连作对土壤养分及其产量的影响[J]. 哲里木畜牧学院学报, 1999(3):31-33,40.
[15]	王金龙, 徐冉, 王彩洁, 等. 大豆连作条件下土壤环境的变化及其危害[J]. 山东农业科学, 2005(2):54-57.
[16]	王聪, 李明, 邱广伟, 等. 不同种植模式对黑龙江黑土理化性状的影响[J]. 河南农业科学, 2023, 52(2):74-83.
[17]	田艺心, 曹鹏鹏, 张海英, 等. 磷肥减施对间作大豆/玉米农艺性状及产量、经济效益的影响[J]. 山东农业科学, 2020, 52(8):85-89.
[18]	XU Z, LI C, ZHANG C, et al. Intercropping maize and soybean increases efficiency of land and fertilizer nitrogen use; A meta-analysis[J]. Field crops research, 2020, 246(C):107661.
[19]	何亚玲. 大豆幅宽变化对玉米大豆间作系统种间关系的影响[D]. 银川: 宁夏大学, 2022.
[20]	侯健. 供氮水平对玉米/大豆间作根际土壤细菌和养分吸收及产量的影响[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北农业大学, 2022.
[21]	朱喜霞, 郑玉珍, 王海红, 等. 机械化条件下“豆玉”不同行距配置和减肥对作物产量及大豆光合特性的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(29):16-21. doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2022-0411
[22]	方萍, 刘卫国, 刘孝德, 等. 玉-豆间作对菜用大豆品质的影响[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2016, 42(5):556-564.
[23]	皮义均. 玉米-大豆间作对黄壤有机碳稳定性的影响及其机制[D]. 贵阳: 贵州大学, 2022.
[24]	高蕊. 木薯宽窄行间作大豆体系的研究[D]. 广州: 华南农业大学, 2018.
[25]	徐钰, 杨岩, 江丽华, 等. 土壤改良措施对盐碱地大豆产量和品质的影响[J]. 山东农业科学, 2020, 52(11):86-89.
[26]	覃锋燕, 杨慰贤, 彭晓辉, 等. 粉垄耕作木薯根际与非根际土壤的细菌群落结构多样性差异[J]. 西南农业学报, 2022, 35(4):729-739.
[27]	段玉, 邢弘擎, 刘国栋, 等. 茶树-绿豆/大豆间作对茶园土壤和茶叶品质的影响[J]. 南京农业大学学报, 2022, 45(3):511-520.
[28]	王利娜, 赵文, 孙佳, 等. 南疆4个地区枣园土壤养分状况分析及肥力评价[J]. 经济林研究, 2022, 40(2):144-152.