Quality Dynamic Changes of Nine Sweetpotato Varieties in Different Developmental Stages

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2024-0106

Abstract

Abstract:

The purpose of this study was to investigate the phenotypic and main quality changes of nine yellow-fleshed sweetpotato (YFSP) varieties at different development stages, and to provide a theoretical basis for the breeding of fresh sweetpotato. Nine winter YFSP varieties were used as materials. The diameter, length, weight, flesh color, dry rate, starch, and soluble sugar content of sweetpotato at five development stages were measured and analyzed. The results showed that the diameter, length, weight and dry rate of single potato increased continuously during the development process. The growth rate of sweetpotato length of ‘Guangshu 79’ was the fastest at 45-105 d, and that of ‘Anna’ was the fastest at 135-165 d. The highest rate of increase in diameter and single sweetpotato weight was ‘Mashali’. The dry matter rate of ‘Guangshu 79’ increased the fastest. The soluble sugar content showed a downward trend during development, and ‘Guangshu 79’ showed the fastest decline. With the increase of starch content, ‘Guangshu 79’ increased rapidly in the early growth period of 45-105d, and ‘Anna’ increased fastest in 135-165d. The study found that the length, diameter, single root weight, dry rate and total starch content of YFSP tubers increased gradually with the growth and development period, and the content of soluble sugar decreased gradually. The rapid development and growth periods of different varieties of sweet potato were different.

Key words: fresh sweetpotato, yellow-fleshed sweetpotato, quality traits, development stage, phenotypic characteristics

LUO Qinxiang, YAO Yanqiang, YANG Jiali, ZHANG Rong, JIANG Feng, WANG Zhangying. Quality Dynamic Changes of Nine Sweetpotato Varieties in Different Developmental Stages[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(3): 9-17.

Figures/Tables 6

References 36

[1]	李航兵, 杨薇, 吴小红, 等. 西乡县12个不同类型甘薯品种比较试验[J]. 基层农技推广, 2023, 11(6):20-22.
[2]	施志鹏, 许文峰, 徐传婕, 等. 甘薯栽培特性和储藏根发育的研究进展[J]. 植物生理学报, 2020(6):10.
[3]	ALAM M K, SAMS S, RANA Z H, et al. Minerals and effect of thermal processing on carotenoids composition in nine varieties orange-feshed sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas L.)[J]. Journal of food composition and analysis, 2020, 92(1):3.
[4]	马代夫, 刘庆昌, 张立明. 中国甘薯[M]. 南京: 江苏凤凰科学技术出版社, 2021.
[5]	李林静. 南方主要甘薯品种的品质特性研究[D]. 长沙: 中南大学隆平分院, 2014.
[6]	ATEEA B A, OMAYMA O, SHALTOUT E. Effect of home-cooking methods on phenolic composition and antioxidant activity of sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.) cultivars grown in Egypt[J]. Food and nutrition sciences, 2012, 3(4):490-499.
[7]	KOUROUMA V, MU T H, ZHANG M. Effects of cooking process on carotenoids and antioxidant activity of orange-fleshed sweet potato[J]. Lwt, 2019, 104:134-141.
[8]	徐伟东. 水稻籽粒无淀粉突变体的细胞学观察和生理代谢分析[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2023.
[9]	李明, 傅玉凡, 王大一, 等. 不同肉色甘薯交互嫁接后块根干物质积累研究[J]. 西南农业学报, 2010, 23(5):6.
[10]	余华, 宋永康, 姚清华, 等. 不同肉色甘薯营养成分分析[J]. 福建农业学报, 2010, 25(4):482-485.
[11]	王汝娟. 食用型甘薯产量和品质形成与钾营养调控[D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2006.
[12]	杨雪, 张丹丹, 李奇岩, 等. 淀粉型和鲜食型甘薯品种淀粉与可溶性糖含量的比较分析[J]. 青岛农业大学学报, 2021(4):240-244.
[13]	TANG C, JIANG B, EJAZ I, et al. High-throughput phenotyping of nutritional quality components in sweet potato roots by near-infrared spectroscopy and chemometrics methods[J]. Food chemistry, 2023, 20(10):8.
[14]	张文杰, 辛曙丽, 黄哲瑞, 等. 甘薯块根发育过程中关键蔗糖分解酶及其基因家族成员的鉴定[J]. 热带作物学报, 2022(8):43.
[15]	王晓庆, 徐娟, 黄洁, 等. 红黄肉甘薯性状的灰色关联度分析及营养食味评价[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报, 2013, 41(2):53-60.
[16]	WANG M, LI X, SHEN Y, et al. A systematic high-throughput phenotyping assay for sugarcane stalk quality characterization by near-infrared spectroscopy[J]. Plant methods, 2021, 17(1):15.
[17]	ZHANG R, CHEN H, CHEN Y. Impact of different cooking methods on the flavor and chemical profile of yellow-fleshed table-stock swectpotatoes (Pomoea batatas L.)[J]. Food chem x, 2022, 17(16):5.
[18]	施志鹏, 许文峰, 徐传婕, 等. 甘薯栽培特性和储藏根发育的研究进展[J]. 植物生理学报, 2020(6):10-17.
[19]	陈景阳. 盐胁迫下稻米微量元素与营养因子间的相关性分析[D]. 湛江: 广东海洋大学, 2023.
[20]	王庆美. 紫甘薯产量和品质形成生理机制及对弱光,地膜覆盖响应研究[D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2023.
[21]	兰孟焦, 吴问胜, 肖满秋. 江西甘薯品种资源主要农艺性状分析与综合评价[J]. 东北农业大学学报, 2021, 52(10):1-10,31.
[22]	陆娣, 岳铭, 鉴万博. 辽宁甘薯品系主要农艺性状的相关性及主成分分析[J]. 园艺与种苗, 2018, 38(2):43-46.
[23]	陈路路, 孙哲, 田昌庚, 等. 鲜食型紫薯新品种'泰紫薯1号'的选育及生长发育规律研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021(30):37.
[24]	GARCIA-GONZALEZ J. Planting date and cultivar selection to manage southern blight in potatoesin the mid-Atlantic United States[J]. Crop protection, 2022, 162:111-117.
[25]	WAILARE A M, MADU A I. Yield variability of Irish potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) as affected by cultivars and sowing date in the Sudan Savanna Zone of Nigeria[J]. Journal of dryland agriculture, 2019, 5(4):33-41.
[26]	王超. 播种时期与种薯处理方式对马铃薯生长及产量品质的影响[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北农业大学, 2023.
[27]	FARRAR J. Sucrose and the integration of metabolism in vascular plants[J]. Plant science: an international journal of experimental plant biology, 2000, 154(1):79-98.
[28]	唐忠厚, 朱晓倩, 李强, 等. 不同基因型甘薯直链淀粉含量差异研究[J]. 食品工业科技, 2011, 33(11):108-110.
[29]	傅玉凡, 梁媛媛, 孙富年, 等. 甘薯块根生长过程中淀粉含量的变化[J]. 西南大学学报(自然科学版), 2008, 30(4):56-61.
[30]	BONTE D R, PICHA D H, JOHNSON H A. Carbohydrate-related changes in sweetpotato storage roots during development[J]. Journal of the american society for horticultural science, 2000, 125(2):24-28.
[31]	程鹏. 甘薯干物质积累与分配品种间差异的研究[D]. 重庆: 西南大学, 2019.
[32]	班超. 甘薯的生长发育特点及逆境因子分析[J]. 河南农业, 2019(13):42-42.
[33]	陈晓光, 李洪民, 张爱君, 等. 不同氮水平下多效唑对食用型甘薯光合和淀粉积累的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2012, 38(9):1728-1733.
[34]	张雨濛. 芋球茎淀粉积累与食味品质形成的关系及其对5-ALA响应研究[D]. 扬州: 扬州大学, 2022.
[35]	占雷雷. 甘薯块根膨大和品质形成中蔗糖分解酶的初步探究[D]. 海口: 海南大学, 2019.
[36]	周志林, 唐君, 曹清河, 等. 淀粉专用型甘薯品质形成规律及其与主要农艺性状的相关性[J]. 江苏农业学报, 2020, 36(2):277-283.