Biological Effects of 4 Organic Manures on Potted Grapevines

Abstract

Abstract: In order to discuss the biological effect on grape of different kinds of organic manures, we searched four organic manures for the affections of the growth and the microcosm around rhizine of ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’ grapevine (Vitis Vinifera L.) potted. The results indicated that the amount of bacterium and actinomycets in soil around rhizine was distinctly increased by applying manures, but the increase of the amount of fungi is not marketable. Furthermore, all the manures promoted the development and growth of grape new roots clearly. It was found that various manures significantly increased the plant total weight and various organ weight contact to the control. Applying green manure increases the amount of bacterium and actinomycets in soil around rhizine hundreds of times, increases the number of new roots clearly, develops stem diameter, significantly raises the starch and soluble sugar content of transport root and 1,2- year-old branch. The effect of applying sheep manure was the second. While applying chook manure develops the growth of the grape, not good at the enhancement of the soluble sugar and starch content, and also enhances the amount of the fungi in soil. Applying dairy manure on the microsom is very little, but can enhance the growth of the grape. Overall, it could be concluded that green manure is the best.

CLC Number:

S662.1

Wang Xiaodi,, Wang Haibo, Qin Dong, Zhai Heng. Biological Effects of 4 Organic Manures on Potted Grapevines[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2007, 23(4): 260-260.

References

[1] 吴建峰,林先贵.土壤微生物在促进植物生长方面的作用.土壤,2003,(1):18-21.
[2] 陈秀蓉,南志标.细菌多样性及其在农业生态系统中的作用.草业科学,2002,19(9):34-38.
[3] Topaliantz S, Ponge J F, Arrouays D, et al. Effect of organic manure and the endogeic earthworm pontoscolex corethrurus (oligochaeta: Glossoslolecidae) on soil fertility and bean production. Biology and Fertilizer Soils, 2002,(36):313-319.
[4] 樊军,郝明德.长期轮作与施肥对土壤主要微生物类群的影响.水土保持研究,2003,10(1):88-89.
[5] Peacock A D, Mullen M D, Ringelberg D B, et al. Soil microbial community responses to dairy manure or ammonium nitrate applications. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2001,33(7~8):1011-1019.
[6] 毕军,夏光利,毕研文,等.腐殖酸生物活性肥料对冬小麦生长及土壤微生物活性的影响.植物营养与肥料学报,2005,11(1):99-103.
[7] Biederbeck V O, Zentner R P, Campbell C A. Soil microbial populations and activities as influenced by legume green fallow in a semiarid climate. Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2005,37(10):1775-1784.
[8] 李秀英,赵秉强,李絮花,等.不同施肥制度对土壤微生物的影响及其与土壤肥力的关系.中国农业科学,2005,38(8):1591-1599.
[9] 孙瑞莲,朱鲁生,赵秉强,等.长期施肥对土壤微生物的影响及其在养分调控中的作用.应用生态学报,2004,15(10):1907-1910.
[10] Toyota K, Kuninaga S. Comparison of soil microbial community between soils amended with or without farmyard manure [J]. Applied Soil Ecology, 2006,33(1):39-48.
[11] 王绍辉,张福锁.局部施肥对植株生长及根系形态的影响.土壤通报,2002,33(2):153-155.
[12] 李絮花,杨守祥,于振文,等.有机肥对小麦根系生长及根系衰老进程的影响.植物营养与肥料学报,2005,11(4):467-472.
[13] Tu C, Ristaino J B, Hu S J. Soil microbial biomass and activity in organic tomato farming systems: Effects of organic inputs and straw mulching. Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2006,38(2):247-255.

[1]	Qiu Meihua, Guo Dejie, Ma Yan, Wang Guangfei, Liang Yonghong. The Technology of Reducing Chemical Fertilizer and Increasing Economic Benefit of Protected Peach in Sandy Soil [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(17): 58-64.
[2]	. Development of TP-M13-SSR Primer for Prunus tenella Batsch. [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2017, 33(27): 55-60.
[3]	. Correlation Between Tree Body Gummosis and Storability of‘Huyou 018’Nectarine [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2016, 32(19): 182-188.
[4]	. Physiological Characteristics of Nectarine Seedlings Under High Temperature Stress [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2016, 32(10): 79-84.
[5]	. Production Cost and Benefit Analysis of Peach in Shandong Province [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2016, 32(1): 88-91.
[6]	. Exploring of the Suitable Initial Culture in the Fast Reproduction System of ‘Dwarf Yunong Rootstock No.1’ of Prunus persica [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2013, 29(16): 163-166.
[7]	. Allelopathic Effect of Extracts from Peach Tree Roots on Growth of Maotao [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2012, 28(28): 260-264.
[8]	. Effects of Liming on Foliar of the Peach Tree in Brown-red Soil of South Hubei Province [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2011, 27(25): 270-276.
[9]	. Influence of Fruit Bagging and DHEA on Glucose-6-phosphate Dehydrogenase and Anthocyanin of Peach Fruit [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2011, 27(13): 232-237.
[10]	. Studies on the Relationships between Sucrose Accumulation and Related Enzymes Activities in Developing ‘Shuguang’ Peach Fruit [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2009, 25(7): 206-209.
[11]	Lai Chengchun,, Yu Yabai, Lai Zhongxiong, Xie Honggen, Wang Qi, Chen Yuan. Induction of the calli for the embryos of “Premier” honey peach and their subculture and maintenance [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2008, 24(11): 54-59.
[12]	Li Jing, Fang Qing, Wang Zheng, Li Chengbin. The Discuss on the Disinfections Methods of the Research Dwarfish Rootstock [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2007, 23(12): 324-324.
[13]	Li Yanping, Niu Jianxin, Chen Qing. Review on the Factors to Influence on the Metabolism of Sugars and Acids in Peach Fruit [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2007, 23(8): 212-212.
[14]	Wang Chengxia, Dong Xiaoying, Li Peihuan, Wang Yong-zhang, Liu Cheng-lian, Yuan Yongbing. Studies on the Correlation between POD、SOD、CAT Activity in Leaves and Dwarf、Growth of Peach Trees [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2007, 23(6): 353-353.
[15]	Song Shangwei, Li Jing, Yan Feng, Wang Fang. Preliminary Study on Cold Resistance of Several Peach Varieties [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2007, 23(1): 225-225.