Analysis of the Natural Endowment of Agricultural Cultural Heritage Sites from the Perspective of Soil and Climate: A Case Study on Kuancheng Traditional Chestnut Cultivation System

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2020-0130

Abstract

Abstract:

Kuancheng traditional chestnut cultivation system is recognized as an important agricultural cultural heritage in China. The chestnut cultivation in Kuancheng County has a long history and chestnut produced there is well known with excellent quality. To investigate the natural advantages and disadvantages of chestnut cultivation system in Kuancheng from the perspective of soil and climate, this paper analyzed the soil and climatic conditions in Kuancheng chestnut cultivation system based on the observation dataset of basic meteorological station and automatic meteorological stations in addition to the soil data gathered by specialized field sampling in the research area, the comprehensive climatic suitability for chestnut cultivation was evaluated. The results show that the soil in Kuancheng chestnut cultivation system is featured with proper pH, abundant organic matter, high N, K fertilizer and rich Fe, Mg, Mn and other trace elements content. Meanwhile, the solar radiation and heat resource in Kuancheng County are adequate to meet the needs of chestnut growth and fruit ripening, there is suitable precipitation during fruit growth and pretty large average diurnal temperature range during fruit maturity, which is beneficial to accumulation of sugar in fruits. A comprehensive assessment of climate conditions for suitability to chestnut cultivation suggests that most areas of Kuancheng County are well suitable for chestnut cultivation. However, precipitation scarcity in spring could limit chestnut yield in certain extent, appropriate spring irrigation measurement could greatly promote the potential of high-yield and high-quality chestnut production.

Key words: Kuancheng chestnut cultivation system, climate resource, soil fertility, suitability evaluation, agricultural cultural heritage

CLC Number:

Tan Kaiyan, Min Qingwen, Wu Dingrong. Analysis of the Natural Endowment of Agricultural Cultural Heritage Sites from the Perspective of Soil and Climate: A Case Study on Kuancheng Traditional Chestnut Cultivation System[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(7): 88-94.

Figures/Tables 8

References 23

[1]	黄寿波, 沈朝栋, 郁怡文, 等. 我国板栗气候生态区划探讨[J]. 湖北气象, 1998(3):23-25.
[2]	Yang F, Liu Q, Pan S Y, et al. Chemical composition and quality traits of Chinese chestnuts (Castanea mollissima) produced in different ecological regions[J]. Food Bioscience, 2015(11):33-42.
[3]	孙鲁平, 王数, 张凤荣. 燕山板栗品质与土壤特性的相关研究[J]. 土壤通报, 1998,29(6):267-269.
[4]	Zeng S C, Chen B G, Jiang C G, et al. Impact of fertilization on chestnut growth, N and P concentrations in runoff water on degraded slope land in South China[J]. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2007(19):827-833.
[5]	杨晴, 吴桂军, 张京政, 等. 不同肥料对板栗营养品质的影响[J]. 经济林研究, 2007,25(4):34-37.
[6]	郑宏兵, 束庆龙, 肖斌, 等. 土壤肥力对栗实品质的影响[J]. 安徽农业大学学报, 2005,32(4):514-517.
[7]	宋影, 郭素娟, 谢明明, 等. 有机-无机配施比例对板栗叶片氮磷营养、产量及品质的影响[J]. 东北农业大学学报, 2017,48(9):28-35.
[8]	郭素娟, 刘正民, 孙小兵, 等. 燕山早丰板栗密植园施肥–产量模型研究[J]. 核农学报, 2015,29(2):351-358.
[9]	刘霞, 刘树庆, 王胜爱, 等. 板栗品质与土壤地球化学关系研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2007,23(3):275-278.
[10]	肖啸, 张立彬, 陈述庭, 等. 山地与平地土壤对板栗品质的影响[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2007,35(23):7155-7156.
[11]	林莉, 苏淑钗. 板栗矿质营养与施肥研究进展[J]. 北京农学院学报, 2004,19(1):73-76.
[12]	温丹, 刘树庆. 气候和立地条件对板栗生长结果的影响[J]. 河北林果研究, 2006,21(4):434-437.
[13]	杨庆红, 白雪萍, 彭九慧. 影响板栗产量的气象条件分析及产量评估方法[J]. 农业网络信息, 2011(6):39-40.
[14]	郭文利, 王志华, 赵新平, 等. 北京地区优质板栗细网格农业气候区划[J]. 应用气象学报, 2004,15(3):382-384.
[15]	于长文, 许启慧, 马贵东, 等. 河北青龙板栗生长气象条件分析与气候品质认证[J]. 农学学报, 2020,10(3):93-100.
[16]	卢为国, 李卫东, 梁慧珍, 等. DTOPSIS法综合评价大豆新品种的初步探索[J]. 中国油料作物学报, 1998,20(3):22-26.
[17]	孟艳静, 袁素琴, 杨凤瑞, 等. 基于DTOPSIS法评价唐山北部山区板栗栽培气象条件[J]. 农业工程, 2012,2(12):22-25.
[18]	刘伟东, 尤焕苓, 孙丹. 1961—2010年京津冀及其周边区域温度日较差变化特征[J]. 气候与环境研究, 2016,21(2):167-174.
[19]	吴黎明, 陈伟祥, 胡伯智, 等. 板栗生长与土壤养分相关的研究[J]. 浙江林业科技, 2000,20(5):25-29.
[20]	张继亮, 孙海伟, 马玉敏, 等. 生长前期干旱对板栗生长结果的影响[J]. 落叶果树, 2000(5):8-9.
[21]	Mota M, Pinto T, Vilela A, et al. Irrigation positively affects the chestnut’s quality: The chemical composition, fruit size and sensory attributes[J]. Scientia Horticulturae, 2018,238:177-186.
[22]	Ding X H, Liu G Q, Liu X Y, et al. Partition-coordinated control of soil and water loss for chestnut forests in the Yanshan Mountain Region, China[J]. International Journal of Sediment Research, 2019,34:58-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsrc.2018.10.006 URL
[23]	黄寿波. 我国地形小气候研究概况与展望[J]. 地理研究, 1986,5(2):90-99.

项目	宽城	迁西	遵化	青龙	兴隆	承德
有效磷	13.71	34.23	67.70	18.71	23.88	25.30
速效钾	112.7	63.43	73.10	76.58	99.23	117.02
有效镁	327.8	271.5	218.0	251.3	270.8	376.0
有效铁	40.76	38.58	62.05	38.15	33.10	29.20
有效锰	11.37	14.27	7.00	9.99	8.13	8.66
有效铜	1.53	1.62	2.35	1.62	3.06	1.16
有效锌	1.55	1.22	2.19	0.83	1.86	0.70
有效硼	0.395	0.256	0.259	0.217	0.391	0.294

项目	宽城	迁西	遵化	青龙	兴隆	承德
有效磷	13.71	34.23	67.70	18.71	23.88	25.30
速效钾	112.7	63.43	73.10	76.58	99.23	117.02
有效镁	327.8	271.5	218.0	251.3	270.8	376.0
有效铁	40.76	38.58	62.05	38.15	33.10	29.20
有效锰	11.37	14.27	7.00	9.99	8.13	8.66
有效铜	1.53	1.62	2.35	1.62	3.06	1.16
有效锌	1.55	1.22	2.19	0.83	1.86	0.70
有效硼	0.395	0.256	0.259	0.217	0.391	0.294

乡镇	全氮/(g/kg)	有效磷/(mg/kg)	速效钾/(mg/kg)	有效镁/(mg/kg)	有效铁/(mg/kg)	有效锰/(mg/kg)	有效铜/(mg/kg)	有效锌/(mg/kg)	有效硼/(mg/kg)
塌山	1.32	20.05	152.35	384.5	36.6	11.575	1.47	1.55	0.446
化皮	1.32	20.6	145	406	46.7	17.7	2.22	1.64	0.478
桲罗台	1.73	5.55	135	260.5	37.9	11.6	1.35	1.65	0.359
碾子峪	1.36	15.4	97.1	286	46.7	6.84	1.59	1.035	0.382
东大地	0.64	4.3	37.5	363	20	3.05	1.09	0.6	0.15
峪耳崖	1.42	13.3	94.2	378	44	10.2	1.81	2.67	0.439
板城	1.62	16.9	81.4	269	54.5	22.7	1.33	2.16	0.512

乡镇	全氮/(g/kg)	有效磷/(mg/kg)	速效钾/(mg/kg)	有效镁/(mg/kg)	有效铁/(mg/kg)	有效锰/(mg/kg)	有效铜/(mg/kg)	有效锌/(mg/kg)	有效硼/(mg/kg)
塌山	1.32	20.05	152.35	384.5	36.6	11.575	1.47	1.55	0.446
化皮	1.32	20.6	145	406	46.7	17.7	2.22	1.64	0.478
桲罗台	1.73	5.55	135	260.5	37.9	11.6	1.35	1.65	0.359
碾子峪	1.36	15.4	97.1	286	46.7	6.84	1.59	1.035	0.382
东大地	0.64	4.3	37.5	363	20	3.05	1.09	0.6	0.15
峪耳崖	1.42	13.3	94.2	378	44	10.2	1.81	2.67	0.439
板城	1.62	16.9	81.4	269	54.5	22.7	1.33	2.16	0.512

项目	生长季日照时数/h	≥10℃积温/℃	极端最低气温/℃	9月气温日较差/℃	生长季降水量/mm
平均值或极值	1696	3623	-25.5	12.7	601.1
80%保证率	1608	3437	-21.6	11.9	495.7
年际变率/%	5.5	5.2		8.7	20.1