熏蒸剂威百亩对土壤微生物数量和酶活性的影响

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.2013-2813

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 威百亩是一种甲胺衍生物，在黄瓜、番茄、烟草等作物田采用熏蒸处理防治土传病害。为了探明其对土壤生态环境造成的影响，采用室内模拟试验方法研究了威百亩不同剂量、不同处理时间对土壤微生物数量及酶活性的影响。结果表明，威百亩对土壤细菌和放线菌均表现出抑制—激活—恢复的趋势，但对放线菌的影响程度小于细菌，恢复培养40天对放线菌的激活率达最大，为180.77%，恢复培养30天对细菌的激活率达293.61%；而对土壤真菌则表现出强烈的抑制作用，抑制程度与处理剂量呈正相关，高剂量处理(90.28 mg/kg、180.56 mg/kg)对真菌的抑制率均为100%，到恢复培养60天各处理组真菌数量与对照组之间仍存在显著性差异(P<0.05)。威百亩处理后，中低剂量处理对土壤蔗糖酶活性表现激活—抑制—激活—恢复的趋势，高剂量处理表现抑制—激活—恢复的趋势，最高激活率达213.62%；对土壤脲酶活性表现出抑制作用，处理剂量越高，抑制率越大，且这种抑制作用是不可恢复的；对磷酸酶和过氧化氢酶均表现出先抑制后激活的趋势。由此可知，威百亩对土壤真菌种群和脲酶活性的影响较大，而对土壤细菌、放线菌及蔗糖酶、磷酸酶和过氧化氢酶活性的影响是暂时性的，随着培养时间的延长，微生物种群及酶活性可恢复，不会对农作物生长及土壤环境造成潜在危害。

关键词: 烤烟, 烤烟, ‘红花大金元’, 化学成分, 因子分析, 综合评价

Abstract: Metham-sodium is a methylamine derivative which is used on cucumber, tomato, and tobacco (seed bed). It can protect crops from soil-borne diseases, but it will affect soil microbial, then affect soil enzymes. This study was an attempt to evaluate the environmental ecology influence after using metham-sodium. By simulation in laboratory, the investigation studied the relationship between different concentrations of metham-sodium, different treatment time and soil microbial population, soil enzyme activities in a selected soil. The results showed as follows: metham-sodium had similar effects on soil bacteria and actinomycetes which were inhibition-stimulation-recovery, but the effect on bacteria was bigger than actinomycetes. The highest stimulation of bacteria was 293.61%, however, the actinomyces was 180.77%. While metham-sodium at each concentration inhibit soil fungi at the test; the inhibition of high concentration (90.28 mg/kg, 180.56 mg/kg) was 100%, and the level of inhibition was proper to the concentration of metham-sodium. The effects of four representative soil enzymes to metham-sodium showed different dynamic changes. The effects of metham-sodium on soil invertase were dosage-dependent. When soil was fumigated with low or medium concentrations of metham-sodium, the effects showed stimulation-inhibition-stimulation-recovery, while those treated with high concentrations of metham-sodium showed inhibition-stimulation-recovery, and the stimulation was up to 213.62%. To all of the concentrations of metham-sodium, soil urease activity presented irreversible inhibition impact, and the inhibition of metham-sodium on soil fungal were dosage-depenndent. The effects of metham-sodium on soil phosphatase and catalase were inhibited at first, and then stimulated. It showed that metham-sodium have great effect on soil fungi and urease, but to soil bacteria, actinomycetes, soil invertase, phosphatase and catalase, the effects are temporary without potential harm to soil fertility and crop growing.

卜东欣张超张鑫丛聪王金信. 熏蒸剂威百亩对土壤微生物数量和酶活性的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2014, 30(15): 227-233.

参考文献

[1] UNDP MBTOC. Report of the methyl bromide technical options committee[A]. Nairobi: UNDP,1998:35-43.
[2] 曹坳程,郭美霞,王秋霞,等.世界土壤消毒技术进展[J].中国蔬菜, 2010,1(21):17-22.
[3] 关松荫,张德生,张志明.土壤酶及其研究法[M].北京:农业出版社, 1986.
[4] 严昶升,周礼恺,张德生.土壤肥力研究法[M].北京:农业出版社, 1988.
[5] 廖敏,谢晓梅,吴良欢.水稻覆膜旱作对稻田土壤微生物生态质量的影响[J].中国水稻科学,2002,16(3):243-246.
[6] 林玉锁,龚瑞忠,朱忠林.农药与生态环境保护[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2000:78-180.
[7] 单敏,虞云龙,方华,等.丁草胺对土壤微生物数量和酶活性的影响[J].农药学学报,2005,7(4):383-386.
[8] Kalam A, Tah J, Mukherjee A K. Pesticide effects on microbial population and soil enzyme activities during vermicomposting of agricultural waste[J]. Environmental Biology,2004,25(02):201-208.
[9] 滕春红,陶波.除草剂氯嘧磺隆对土壤酶活性的影响[J].农业环境科学学报,2006,25(5):1294-1298.
[10] 张腾,燕平梅,李园,等.4种熏蒸剂对土壤微生物特性的影响[J].中国农学通报,2013,29(3):116-120.
[11] 鲁如坤.土壤农化分析方法[M].北京:中国农业科技出版社,2000: 146-204.
[12] 喻子牛,何绍江,李阜棣.农业微生物学实验技术[M].北京:农业出版社,1996.
[13] Tabatabai MA. Soil enzymes[A]. In: Weewer R.M, Angle S, Bottomley P, et al. Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2.Microbiological and Biochemical Properties[C]. Soil Science Society of America, Wisconsin WI,1994:775-833.
[14] 周德庆.生物学实验教程[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2005:99-128.
[15] 陈华癸.土壤微生物学[M].上海:上海科学技术出版社,1979.
[16] Yakabe L E, Parker S R, Kluepfel D A. Effect of pre- plant soil fumigants on Agrobacterium tumefaciens, pythiaceous species, and subsequent soil recolonization by A. tumefaciens[J]. Crop Protection,2010(29):583-590.
[17] Stackebrandt E, Rainey F A, Ward-Rainey N L. ProPosalfor a new hierarchic classification system, Actinobacteria classis nov[J]. International journal of systematic bacteriology,1997,47(2):479-491.
[18] 范昆,王开运,王东,等.1,3-二氯丙烯药剂对土壤微生物数量和酶活性的影响[J].生态学报,2008,28(2):0695-0701.
[19] Martin J P. Influence of pesticide residues on soil microbiological and properties[J]. Residue Reviews,1963(4):96-129.
[20] 杨春.四硫代碳酸钠作为土壤熏蒸剂的应用潜力评估及对土壤生物环境的影响[D].北京:中国农业科学院,2011.
[21] 陈宗泽,殷勤燕,王旭明,等.土壤病原菌对连作大豆的致病性初探[J].吉林农业大学学报,1999,21(1):29-32.
[22] Tu C M. Effect of four experimental insecticides on enzyme activities and levels of adenosine triphosphate in mineral and organic soil[J]. Environmental Science & Health Part B,1990,25 (06):787-800.
[23] 闫颖,袁星,樊宏娜.五种农药对土壤转化酶活性的影响[J].中国环境科学,2004,24(5):588-591.
[24] 周世萍,段昌群,韩青辉,等.毒死蜱对土壤蔗糖酶活性的影响[J].生态环境,2005,14(5):672-674.
[25] Wainwright M. A review of the effects pesticides on microbial activity in soils[J]. Soil Science,1978,29(03):287-298.
[26] 冯波,单敏,方华,等.百菌清对土壤微生物数量和酶活性的影响[J].农业环境科学学报,2006,25(3):674-677.
[27] 和文祥,朱铭莪,童江云,等.有机肥对土壤脲酶活性特征的影响[J].西北农业学报,1997,6(2):73-75.
[28] Varel V H. Use of urease inhibitors to control Nitrogen lossfrom livestock waste[J]. Bioresource Technology,1997,62(01):11-17.
[29] 郭明,张小萍,曹玉.3种杀虫剂对土壤磷酸酶活性的影响[J].西北农林科技大学学报:自然科学版,2001,29(2):69-72.
[30] Boero G, Thien S. Phosphatase activity and phosphorus availability in the rhizosphere of corn roots[M]. Harley JL and Scott Russell R (Eds.), The Soil Root Interface, Academic Press, London,1979:231- 242.
[31] 陈国峰,杨红.除草剂使它隆对土壤酶活性及呼吸强度的影响[J].生态环境,2008,17(3):1016-1020.
[32] 乔思佳.嘧菌酯对土壤酶活性的影响[D].长春:吉林农业大学, 2012.
[33] 李时银,张晓昆,冯建昉,等.氰戊菊酯及代谢物对土壤过氧化氢酶活性的影响[J].中国环境科学,2002,22(2):154-157.