甜高粱生物燃料相关特性研究进展

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb17020025

中国农学通报 ›› 2017, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (15): 91-98.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb17020025

• 资源环境生态土壤气象 • 上一篇下一篇

甜高粱生物燃料相关特性研究进展

王荣华¹,李红侠^2,3,张文彬²,刘乃新^2,3,4

(¹石河子农业科学研究院甜菜研究所,新疆石河子 832011；²黑龙江大学农作物研究院/中国农业科学院甜菜研究所,哈尔滨 150080；³中国农业科学院北方糖料作物资源与利用重点开放实验室,哈尔滨 150080；⁴农业部糖料产品质量安全风险评估实验室/农业部甜菜品质监督检验测试中心,哈尔滨 150080）

收稿日期:2017-02-08 修回日期:2017-05-05 接受日期:2017-03-22 出版日期:2017-05-26 发布日期:2017-05-26
通讯作者: 刘乃新
基金资助:
兵团科技攻关项目“甜菜新品种选育与种质资源创新”(2016AC027)。

Research Progress of Relative Characteristics of Sweet Sorghum Biofuels

Wang Ronghua¹, Li Hongxia^2,3, Zhang Wenbin², Liu Naixin^2,3,4

(¹Research Institute of Sugarbeet Institute, Xinjiang Shihezi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shihezi Xinjiang 832011; ²Crop Academy of Heilongjiang University/Sugarbeet Research Institute of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Harbin 150080; ³Key Laboratory of North Sugar Crop Resource and Utilization, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Harbin 150080; ⁴Laboratory of Quality & Safety Risk Assessment for Sugar Crops Products (Harbin), Ministry of Agriculture/Center for the Control of Sugarbeet Quality, Ministry of Agriculture, P, R. China, Harbin 150080)

Received:2017-02-08 Revised:2017-05-05 Accepted:2017-03-22 Online:2017-05-26 Published:2017-05-26

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 旨在为中国甜高粱生物燃料的快速生产、深入研究与发展提供借鉴与参考。笔者总结了近几年甜高粱生物燃料相关特性的研究状况；综述了根、叶、茎、株高、分蘖、花，QTL等的分子研究水平，收获后贮藏及生物转化效率的研究进展等；最后提出几点研究建议：针对不同生境确定适宜的、特异的选育目标，培养极具优势的品系或材料；注重主要性状间QTL尤其是胁迫下的关联性、相关性、协同性的研究；加强产业循环链中关键和薄弱环节的研发，使其可用价值和效益达最大化。

关键词: 韭, 韭, 原植物, 比较形态学, 植物分类学

Abstract: This paper reviewed the research progress on comprehensive characters relative to biofuels of sweet sorghum, such as roots, leaves, stems, flowering, plant height, tillering, QTL molecular level, storage after harvest and bioconversion efficiency, etc, to provide a reference for the development of sweet sorghum for biofuel production.

中图分类号:

S566.5

王荣华,李红侠,张文彬,刘乃新. 甜高粱生物燃料相关特性研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2017, 33(15): 91-98.

Wang Ronghua,Li Hongxia,Zhang Wenbin and Liu Naixin. Research Progress of Relative Characteristics of Sweet Sorghum Biofuels[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2017, 33(15): 91-98.

参考文献

[1] Davila-Gomez F, Chuck-Hernandez C, Perez-Carrillo E, et al. Evaluation of bioethanol production from five different varieties of sweet and forage sorghums (Sorghum bicolor (L) Moench)[J].Ind. Crops Prod.,2011,33(3):611-616.
[2] Sipos B, Reczey J, Somorai Z, et al. Sweet sorghum as feedstock for ethanol production: enzymatic hydrolysis of steam--pretreated bagasse[J].Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol.,2009,153(1):151-162.
[3] McCollum T, McCuistion K, Bean B. Brown midrib and photoperiod sensitive forage sorghums//. Proceedings of the 2005 plains nutrition council spring conference[C]. San Antonio, Texas A&M University Agricultural Research and Extension Center Amarillo, 2005.
[4] Calvino M, Messing J. Sweet sorghum as a model system for bioenergy crops[J]. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol., 2012, 23(3):323-329.
[5] Renny-Byfield S, Wendel J F. Doubling down on genomes: polyploidy and crop plants[J]. Am. J. Bot., 2014, 101(10):1711-1725.
[6] 王炜,崔明九,秦春林,等.基于文献计量的甜高粱研究态势分析[J].草业科学,2016,33(9):1846-1858.
[7] 刘乃新,高谊,张文彬,等.2015年英文文献甜高粱研究动向[J].中国糖料,2016,38(6):52-54.
[8] Herder G D , G Van Isterdael, T Beeckman, et al. The roots of a new green revolution[J]. Trends Plant Sci., 2010,15(11):600-607.
[9] Comas L H, Mueller K E, Taylor L L, et al. Beerling. Evolutionary patterns and biogeochemical significance of angiosperm root traits[J]. Int.J. Plant Sci., 2012,173(6):584-595.
[10] Hirel B, Gouis J L, Ney B, et al. Gallais. The challenge of improving nitrogen use efficiency in crop plants: towards a more central role for genetic variability and quantitative genetics within integrated approaches[J]. J. Exp. Bot., 2007, 58(9):2369-2387.
[11] Anami S E, Zhang L M, Xia Y, et al. Sweet sorghum ideotypes: genetic improvement of the biofuel syndrome[J]. Food & Energy Security, 2015, 4(3):159-177.
[12] Fakrudin B, Kavil S, Girma Y, et al. Molecular mapping of genomic regions harbouring QTLs for root and yield traits in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) [J]. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants, 2013, 19(3):409-419.
[13] Mace E, Singh V, Van Oosterom E, et al. QTL for nodal root angle in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) co-locate with QTL for traits associated with drought adaptation[J]. Theor. Appl. Genet., 2012, 124(1):97-109.
[14] Li R, Han Y, Lv P, et al. Molecular mapping of the brace root traits in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) [J]. Breed. Sci., 2014, 64(2):193-198.
[15] McHale M, Eamens A L, Finnegan E J, et al. A 22--nt artificial microRNA mediates widespread RNA silencing in Arabidopsis[J]. Plant J., 2013, 76(3):519-529.
[16] Burks P S, Kaiser C M, Hawkins E M, et al. Genomewide Association for Sugar Yield in Sweet Sorghum[J]. Crop Science, 2015, 55(5):2138-2148.
[17] Ackerly D, Knight C, Weiss S, et al. Leaf size, specific leaf area and microhabitat distribution of chaparral woody plants: contrasting patterns in species level and community level analyses[J]. Oecologia, 2002, 130(3):449-457.
[18] Reddy R N, R Madhusudhana, S Mohan M, et al. Mapping QTL for grain yield and other agronomic traits in post--rainy sorghum Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench[J]. Theor. Appl. Genet., 2013, 126(8):1921-1939.
[19] Lu X P, Yun J F, Gao C P, et al. Quantitative trait loci analysis of economically important traits in Sorghum bicolor x S. sudanense hybrid[J]. Can. J. Plant Sci., 2011, 91(1):81-90.
[20] Zou G, Yan S, Zhai G, et al. Genetic variability and correlation of stalk yield- related traits and sugar concentration of stalk juice in a Sweet sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) population[J]. Aust. J. Crop Sci., 2011, 5(10):1232-1238.
[21] Guan Y, Wang H, Qin L, et al. QTL mapping of bio--energy related traits in Sorghum[J]. Euphytica, 2011, 182(3):431-440.
[22] Narayanan S, Aiken R M, Prasad P, et al. A simple quantitative model to predict leaf area index in sorghum[J]. Agron. J., 2014, 106(1):219-226.
[23] Murray S C, Sharma A, Rooney W L, et al. Genetic improvement of sorghum as a biofuel feedstock: I. QTL for stem sugar and grain nonstructural carbohydrates[J]. Crop Sci., 2008, 48(6):2165-2179.
[24] Tian F, Bradbury P J, Brown P J, et al. Genome--wide association study of leaf architecture in the maize nested association mapping population[J]. Nat. Genet., 2011, 43(2):159-162.
[25] Morinaka Y, Sakamoto T, Inukai Y, et al. Morphological alteration caused by brassinosteroid insensitivity increases the biomass and grain production of rice[J]. Plant Physiol., 2006, 141(3):924-931.
[26] Xin Z, Wang M L. Sorghum as a versatile feedstock for bioenergy production[J]. Biofuels, 2011, 2(5):577-588.
[27] Hart G, Schertz K, Peng Y, et al. Genetic mapping of Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench QTLs that control variation in tillering and other morphological characters[J]. Theor. Appl. Genet., 2001, 103(8):1232-1242.
[28] Murray S C, Rooney W L, Mitchell S E, et al. Genetic improvement of sorghum as a biofuel feedstock: II. QTL for stem and leaf structural carbohydrates[J]. Crop Sci., 2008, 48(6):2180-2193.
[29] Wang F, Liu C Z. Development of an economic refining strategy of Sweet sorghum in the inner Mongolia region of China[J]. Energy Fuels, 2009, 23(8):4137-4142.
[30] Qazi H A, Paranjpe S, Bhargava S. Stem sugar accumulation in Sweet sorghum-activity and expression of sucrose metabolizing enzymes and sucrose transporters[J]. J. Plant Physiol., 2012, 169(6):605-613.
[31] Biswal A K, Hao Z, Pattathil S, et al. Downregulation of GAUT12 in Populus deltoides by RNA silencing results in reduced recalcitrance, increased growth and reduced xylan and pectin in a woody biofuel feedstock[J]. Biotechnol. Biofuels, 2015,8(1):1-26.
[32] Shiringani A L, Friedt W. QTL for fibre--related traits in grain x Sweet sorghum as a tool for the enhancement of sorghum as a biomass crop[J]. Theor. Appl. Genet., 2011, 123(6):999-1011.
[33] H Yu, Cong L, Zhu Z, et al. Identification of differentially expressed microRNA in the stems and leaves during sugar accumulation in sweet sorghum[J]. Gene, 2015, 571(2):221-230.
[34] Yamaguchi S. Gibberellin metabolism and its regulation. Annu[J]. Rev. Plant Biol., 2008, 59:225-251.
[35] Ordonio R L, Ito Y, Hatakeyama A, et al. Gibberellin deficiency pleiotropically induces culm bending in sorghum: an insight into sorghum semi--dwarfbreeding[J]. Sci. Rep., 2014, 4(4):61
[36] Okuno A, Hirano K, Asano K, et al. New approach to increasing rice lodging resistance and biomass yield through the use of high gibberellin producing varieties[J]. PLoS One, 2014, 9(2):e86870.
[37] Poovaiah C R, Mazarei M, Decker S R, et al. Transgenic switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) biomass is increased by overexpression of switchgrass sucrose synthase (PvSUS1) [J]. Biotechnol. J., 2014, 10(4):552-563.
[38] Multani D S, Briggs S P, Chamberlin M A, et al. Loss of an MDR transporter in compact stalks of maize br2 and sorghum dw3 mutants[J]. Science, 2003, 302(5642):81-84.
[39] Klein R R, Rodriguez-Herrera R, Schlueter J A, et al. Rooney. Identification of genomic regions that affect grain--mould incidence and other traits of agronomic importance in sorghum[J]. Theor. Appl. Genet., 2001, 102(2):307-319.
[40] Hammer G, Cooper M, Tardieu F, et al. Models for navigating biological complexity in breeding improved crop plants[J]. Trends Plant Sci., 2006, 11(12):587-593.
[41] Kariali E, Mohapatra P K. Hormonal regulation of tiller dynamics in differentially--tillering rice cultivars[J]. Plant Growth Regul., 2007, 53(3):215-223.
[42] Kong W, Guo H, Goff V H, et al. Genetic analysis of vegetative branching in sorghum[J]. Theor. Appl. Genet., 2014, 127(11):2387-2403.
[43] Lin Q, Wang D, Dong H, et al. Rice APC/CTE controls tillering by mediating the degradation of MONOCULM 1[J]. Nat. Commun., 2012, 3(2):752.
[44] Zhao H, Huai Z, Xiao Y, et al. Natural variation and genetic analysis of the tiller angle gene MsTAC1 in Miscanthus sinensis[J]. Planta, 2014,240(1):161-75.
[45] Zhang B, Wang Q. MicroRNA--based biotechnology for plant improvement[J]. J. Cell. Physiol., 2015,230(1):1-15.
[46] Mullet J, Morishige D, McCormick R, et al. Energy Sorghum--a genetic model for the design of C₄ grass bioenergy crops[J]. J. Exp. Bot., 2014,65(13):3479-3489.
[47] Bendix C, Marshall C M, Harmon F G. Circadian clock genes universally control key agricultural traits[J]. Mol. Plant, 2015, 8(8):1135-1152
[48] Kebrom T H, Burson B L, Finlayson S A. Phytochrome B represses Teosinte Branched1 expression and induces sorghum axillary bud outgrowth in response to light signals[J]. Plant Physiol., 2006, 140(3):1109-1117.
[49] Murphy R L, Morishige D T, Brady J A, et al. Ghd7 (Ma6) represses sorghum flowering in long days: Ghd7 alleles enhance biomass accumulation and grain production. Plant Gen., 2014, 7(2):10.
[50] Wang C Q, Guthrie C, Sarmast M K, et al. BBX19 interacts with CONSTANS to repress FLOWERING LOCUS T transcription, defining a flowering time checkpoint in Arabidopsis[J]. Plant Cell, 2014, 26(9):3589-602.
[51] Anami S E, Zhang L M, Xia Y, et al. Sweet sorghum ideotypes: genetic improvement of stress tolerance[J]. Food and Energy Security, 2015, 4(1):3-24.
[52] Teingtham K. QTL Mapping of Biomass Related Traits in Sweet Sorghum//. Plant & Animal Genome[C]. San Diego, CA, 2015.
[53] Teingtham K. Genotyping by sequencing for identification and mapping of QTLs for bioenergy-related traits in sweet sorghum[D]. Ann Arbor: The University of Nebraska - Lincoln, ProQuest Dissertations Publishing, 2016.
[54] Burgos L. Genetic agronomic and compositional characterization of brown midrib sweet sorghum lignocellulosic biomass for ethanol production[D]. Gradworks, 2015.
[55] Wang L H, Yang Z W, Zhu L, et al. Cloning and Prokaryotic Expression of Sweet Sorghum Succinic Semialdehyde Dehydrogenase SbSSADH[J]. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2015,31(7):83-90.
[56] Bellmer D, Huhnke R, Whiteley R, et al. The untapped potential of Sweet sorghum as a bioenergy feedstock[J]. Biofuels, 2010,1(4):563-573.
[57] Vandenbrink, J P, Hilten R N, Das K, et al. Quantitative models of hydrolysis conversion efficiency and biomass crystallinity index for plant breeding[J]. Plant Breeding, 2013, 132:252-258.
[58] Wang Y H, Acharya A, Burrell A M, et al. Mapping and candidate genes associated with saccharification yield in sorghum[J]. Genome, 2013, 56(11):659-665.
[59] Van Acker R, LepléJ C, Aerts D, et al. Improved saccharification and ethanol yield from field--grown transgenic poplar deficient in cinnamoyl--CoA reductase[J]. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci., 2014, 111(2):845-850.
[60] Fu C, Mielenz J R, Xiao X, et al. Genetic manipulation of lignin reduces recalcitrance and improves ethanol production from switchgrass[J]. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci., 2011,108(9):3803-3808.
[61] Petti C, Harman-Ware A E, Tateno M, et al. Sorghum mutant RG displays antithetic leaf shoot lignin accumulation resulting in improved stem saccharification properties[J]. Biotechnol. Biofuels, 2013,6:1-16.
[62] Vermerris W, Saballos A, Ejeta G, et al. Molecular breeding to enhance ethanol production from corn and sorghum stover[J]. Crop Sci., 2007,47(3):S142-153.
[63] Mace E, Jordan D. Location of major effect genes in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) [J]. Theor. Appl. Genet., 2010, 121(7):1339-1356.
[64] Li Z, Zhao C, Zha Y, et al. The minor wall--networks between monolignols and interlinked--phenolics predominantly affect biomass enzymatic digestibility in Miscanthus[J]. PLoS One, 2014b, 9(8):e105115.
[65] Sahoo D K, Maiti I B. Biomass derived from transgenic tobacco expressing the Arabidopsis CESA3 ixr1-2 gene exhibits improved saccharification[J]. Acta Biol. Hung., 2014, 65(2):189-204.

甜高粱生物燃料相关特性研究进展

Research Progress of Relative Characteristics of Sweet Sorghum Biofuels

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

关于本刊

作者中心

审者中心

在线期刊

联系我们

[1]	王丽霞, 殷晓敏, 刘永霞, 连子豪, 王必尊, 何应对. 间作韭菜模式下番木瓜根区微生物群落变化特征[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(31): 66-76.
[2]	陈德西,何忠全,郭云建,黄腾飞,裔雪清,刘欢,卢代娟,刘富平. 蓟马在韭菜上的发生规律和防治[J]. 中国农学通报, 2018, 34(15): 145-151.
[3]	李朝霞,祝国栋,薛明,刘芳,纪桂霞. 不同肥料对韭菜迟眼蕈蚊发生的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2017, 33(9): 64-68.
[4]	刘海明,夏晓飞,李亚蒙,王凌凌. 历史典籍中“藻”及其相关植物的原植物研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2017, 33(14): 143-146.
[5]	祝国栋,李朝霞,薛明,赵海朋,刘芳,纪桂霞. 不同设施栽培韭菜韭蛆的发生规律及其影响的环境因素[J]. 中国农学通报, 2017, 33(10): 134-139.
[6]	刘海明,赵妍,李亚蒙. “苋”及其相关植物的原植物研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2016, 32(7): 53-58.
[7]	惠霖,黄修梅,袁春爱,王金霞,李虹. 复合盐碱胁迫对韭菜种子萌发的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2016, 32(4): 53-57.
[8]	刘海明,赵妍,夏晓飞,李亚蒙. “芹”及其相关植物的原植物研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2016, 32(16): 199-204.
[9]	刘海明,常莉,韩冬,王凌凌,夏晓飞,李亚蒙. “韭”及其相关植物的原植物研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2016, 32(1): 47-51.
[10]	刘海明,夏晓飞,韩冬,王凌凌,李亚蒙. “姜”及其相关植物的原植物考[J]. 中国农学通报, 2015, 31(4): 68-72.
[11]	刘海明,常莉,夏晓飞,王凌凌,韩冬,钟蓓,李亚蒙. “葱”及其相关植物的原植物研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2015, 31(34): 47-53.
[12]	刘海明,夏晓飞,王凌凌,韩冬,李亚蒙. “荠”及其相关植物的原植物考证[J]. 中国农学通报, 2015, 31(25): 48-52.
[13]	刘海明,夏晓飞,王凌凌,韩冬,李亚蒙. 中国传统文化中“玉簪”原植物的研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2015, 31(20): 267-270.
[14]	胡彬黄中乔刘西莉赵连宏姚丹丹师迎春. 9种杀菌剂对韭菜灰霉病的防治效果[J]. 中国农学通报, 2014, 30(4): 293-298.
[15]	吴传万杜小凤王连臻杨文飞周青顾大路王伟中. 天然保鲜剂对韭薹保鲜效果的研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2010, 26(1): 51-55.