微生态制剂改良土壤对凋萎病杨梅营养生长和果实品质的作用

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2022-0292

中国农学通报 ›› 2023, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (9): 153-157.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2022-0292

• 食品·营养·检测·安全 • 上一篇下一篇

微生态制剂改良土壤对凋萎病杨梅营养生长和果实品质的作用

任海英¹(), 郑静梦², 史伟³, 吴昊娣², 王康强⁴, 俞明全², 王震铄³, 王琦³()

¹ 浙江省农业科学院园艺研究所，杭州 310021
² 三门县果树特产推广总站，浙江三门 317100
³ 中国农业大学植保学院，北京 100094
⁴ 仙居县特产技术推广中心，浙江仙居 317300

收稿日期:2022-04-14 修回日期:2022-06-08 出版日期:2023-03-25 发布日期:2023-03-23
通讯作者: 王琦，男，1967年出生，教授，主要从事植物微生态学和植物病害生物防治研究。通信地址：100094 北京市海淀区圆明园西路2号中国农业大学植保学院，Tel：010-62731460，E-mail：wangqi@cau.edu.cn.
作者简介:
任海英，女，1974年出生，山东沂水人，博士，研究员，从事杨梅病害逆境防控和优质高效栽培技术研究。通信地址：310021 杭州市上城区石桥路139号浙江省农业科学院园艺研究所，Tel：0571-86410266，E-mail：renhy@zaas.ac.cn。
基金资助:
浙江省重点研发计划项目“微生物与杨梅互作和健康栽培研究”(2021C02009); 浙江省重点研发计划项目“基于作物健康的农产品提质增效关键技术研发与集成应用”(2020C02001); 浙江省重点研发计划项目“杨梅衰弱病病因与绿色防控技术研究”(2019C02038)

Effects of Micro-ecology Preparation Improving Soil on the Vegetative Growth and Fruit Quality of Twig Blight Diseased Bayberry

REN Haiying¹(), ZHENG Jingmeng², SHI Wei³, WU Haodi², WANG Kangqiang⁴, YU Mingquan², WANG Zhenshuo³, WANG Qi³()

¹ Institute of Horticultural Sciences, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou 310021
² Sanmen Fruit Specialty Promotion Station, Sanmen, Zhejiang 317100
³ College of Plant Protection, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100094
⁴ Xianju Specialty Technology Promotion Center, Xianju, Zhejiang 317300

Received:2022-04-14 Revised:2022-06-08 Online:2023-03-25 Published:2023-03-23

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

凋萎病是近年来危害杨梅产业的主要病害，为研究微生态制剂对凋萎病杨梅营养生长和果实品质的影响，设置抗重茬微生态制剂、土壤调理剂、生物有机肥以及不同组合处理进行试验，常规管理为对照。结果表明，各处理均显著促进梢长、梢粗、叶长、叶宽，显著降低果实可滴定酸含量。其中抗重茬微生态制剂处理的梢长、梢粗和叶长分别比对照增加122.92%、19.80%和18.94%，果实可溶性固形物和总糖分别增加9.98%和19.04%，表现最优；生物有机肥处理的叶宽比对照增加15.99%，表现最优。土壤调理剂处理的果实可滴定酸含量比对照降低51.16%，为最低。综上所述，所有处理中单施用抗重茬微生态制剂的杨梅营养生长和果实品质最好，抗重茬微生态制剂值得在杨梅产业上大力推广用于改良凋萎病杨梅的营养生长和果实品质。

关键词: 凋萎病杨梅, 抗重茬微生态制剂, 土壤调理剂, 生物有机肥, 营养生长, 果实品质

Abstract:

Bayberry twig blight has been a major disease endangering the bayberry industry in recent years. In order to study the effect of micro-ecology preparation on the vegetative growth and fruit quality of twig blight diseased bayberry, anti-continuous cropping microbial agent, soil conditioner, bio-organic fertilizer and different combinations were selected for experiments, and conventional management was the control. The results showed that all the treatments significantly promoted shoot length, shoot diameter, leaf length and leaf width, and significantly reduced the titratable acid content of fruits. Compared with those of the control, the twig length, shoot thickness, leaf length, soluble solids and total sugar of anti-continuous cropping microbial agent treatment were the highest, which increased by 122.92%, 19.80%, 18.94%, 9.98% and 19.04%, respectively; the leaf width of bio-organic fertilizer treatment was the highest, increased by 15.99%; the content of titratable acid of soil conditioner treatment was the lowest, decreased by 51.16%. In summary, the vegetative growth and fruit quality of the single application of anti-continuous cropping microbial agent were the best among all the treatments. The anti-continuous cropping microbial agent could be promoted to improve the quality of the vegetative growth and fruit quality of bayberry influenced by twig blight.

Key words: twig blight diseased bayberry, anti-continuous cropping microbial agent, soil conditioner, bio-organic fertilizer, vegetative growth, fruit quality

任海英, 郑静梦, 史伟, 吴昊娣, 王康强, 俞明全, 王震铄, 王琦. 微生态制剂改良土壤对凋萎病杨梅营养生长和果实品质的作用[J]. 中国农学通报, 2023, 39(9): 153-157.

REN Haiying, ZHENG Jingmeng, SHI Wei, WU Haodi, WANG Kangqiang, YU Mingquan, WANG Zhenshuo, WANG Qi. Effects of Micro-ecology Preparation Improving Soil on the Vegetative Growth and Fruit Quality of Twig Blight Diseased Bayberry[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(9): 153-157.

图/表 3

参考文献 28

[1]	求盈盈, 任海英, 王汉荣, 等. 杨梅突发性枝叶凋萎病发病调查与病原接种研究[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2011(1):98-100.
[2]	REN H Y, GANG L I, LIANG S, et al. Effects of culture media, carbon and nitrogen sources and environmental factors on mycelial growth and sporulation of Pestalotiopsis microspora strains, the agent of bayberry twig blight in southern China[J]. Asia of life sciences, 2013, 22(2):713-727.
[3]	何桂娥, 徐春燕, 何凤杰. 杨梅枝叶凋萎病病因分析及综防建议[J]. 浙江柑橘, 2013(3):29-33.
[4]	陈利新, 黄武强, 郑道序, 等. 杨梅凋萎病的发生与品种的关系研究[J]. 农村经济与科技, 2020(2):34-35.
[5]	张振兰, 朱潇婷, 任海英, 等. 杨梅种质资源对凋萎病抗性评价[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2014(10):4.
[6]	颜丽菊, 蒋芯, 任海英, 等. 杨梅属种质资源田间凋萎病发生及抗性研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(28):103-107. doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2021-0192
[7]	任海英, 戚行江, 梁森苗, 等. 杨梅凋萎病综合防治技术要点总结[J]. 中国南方果树, 2015, 44(2):119-120.
[8]	林瑞, 任海英, 安笑笑, 等. 生物有机肥对杨梅凋萎病防控及其树势恢复的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2019, 31(7):1096-1104. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2019.07.09
[9]	高林梅, 陈磊, 王精华, 等. 抗重茬微生态菌剂在马铃薯栽培中的应用效果分析[J]. 中国农技推广, 2018, 34(9):63-65.
[10]	刘洋, 陈文钊, 焦玉英, 等. 抗重茬菌剂对西瓜生长的影响[J]. 中国瓜菜, 2015, 28(2):44-46.
[11]	彭小彤, 郭文杰, 朱炳耀. 草莓抗重茬生物菌剂的研究与应用[J]. 农业与技术, 2021, 41(13):81-83.
[12]	尤艳蓉, 赵贵宾, 李城德, 等. 抗重茬剂在玉米上的应用初报[J]. 甘肃农业科技, 2020(7):37-40.
[13]	白博文, 刘善江, 申俊峰, 等. 土壤调理剂研发及应用研究进展[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2021, 49(3):14-18.
[14]	NICOLOPOULOU-STAMATI P, MAIPAS S, KOTAMPASI C, et al. Chemical pesticides and human health: The urgent need for a new concept in agriculture[J]. Front public health, 2016, 4:148.
[15]	YADAV A N. Plant microbiomes for sustainable agriculture: current research and future challenges[J]. Plant microbiomes for sustainable agriculture, 2020:475-482.
[16]	ABRIOUEL H, FRANZ C, OMAR N B, et al. Diversity and applications of Bacillus bacteriocins[J]. FEMS microbiology reviews, 2011, 35:201-232. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2010.00244.x pmid: 20695901
[17]	FIRA D, DIMKIĆ I, BERIĆ T, et al. Biological control of plant pathogens by Bacillus species[J]. Journal of biotechnology, 2018, 285:44-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2018.07.044 URL
[18]	MAGDA E, HODA A H, MAYSA E M. Potential of Bacillus isolates as bio-control agents against some fungal phytopathogens[J]. Biocatalysis and agricultural biotechnology, 2016, 5:173-178. doi: 10.1016/j.bcab.2016.02.001 URL
[19]	ANDRI ́C S, MEYER T, ONGENA M. Bacillus responses to plant-associated fungal and bacterial communities[J]. Frontier in microbiology, 2020, 11:1350.
[20]	CHEN X H, KOUMOUTSI A, SCHOLZ R, et al. More than anticipated-production of antibiotics and other secondary metabolites by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42[J]. Journal of molecular microbiology biotechnology, 2008, 16:14-24.
[21]	DEVI S, KIESEWALTER H T, KOV ́ACS R, et al. Depiction of secondary metabolites and antifungal activity of Bacillus velezensis DTU001[J]. Synthetic and systems biotechnology, 2019, 4:142-149. doi: 10.1016/j.synbio.2019.08.002 URL
[22]	ALI M A, REN H, AHMED T, et al. Antifungal effects of rhizospheric Bacillus species against bayberry twig blight pathogen Pestalotiopsis versicolor[J]. Agronomy, 2020, 10(11):1811. doi: 10.3390/agronomy10111811 URL
[23]	ADAMS P B. The potential of mycoparasites for biological control of plant diseases[J]. Annual review of phytopathology, 1990, 28(1):59-72. doi: 10.1146/phyto.1990.28.issue-1 URL
[24]	徐培培, 沈小燕, 沈寅寅, 等. 哈茨木霉微生物菌剂在水稻上的应用研究[J]. 上海农业科技, 2017,(2):3.
[25]	谷祖敏, 毕卉, 张兵, 等. 不同木霉菌株对黄瓜枯萎病菌的拮抗作用[J]. 西北农业学报, 2018, 27(3):6.
[26]	KTHIRI Z, JABEUR M B, MACHRAOUI M, et al. Coating seeds with Trichoderma strains promotes plant growth and enhance the systemic resistance against Fusarium crown rot in durum wheat[J]. Egyptian journal of biological pest control, 2020, 30(1).
[27]	STUMMER B E, ZHANG Q, ZHANG X, et al. Quantification of Trichoderma afroharzianum, Trichoderma harzianum and Trichoderma gamsii inoculants in soil, the wheat rhizosphere and in planta suppression of the crown rot pathogen Fusarium pseudograminearum[J]. Journal of applied microbiology, 2020, 129(4):971-990. doi: 10.1111/jam.v129.4 URL
[28]	任海英, 徐巧, 戚行江, 等. 健康与凋萎病杨梅树体及根围菌群的差异[J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(9):3107-3118. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202109.005

处理序号	施肥方法
1	生物有机肥+土壤调理剂+抗重茬微生态制剂
2	生物有机肥+抗重茬微生态制剂
3	生物有机肥+土壤调理剂
4	土壤调理剂+抗重茬微生态制剂
5	生物有机肥
6	抗重茬微生态制剂
7	土壤调理剂
CK	常规管理

处理序号	施肥方法
1	生物有机肥+土壤调理剂+抗重茬微生态制剂
2	生物有机肥+抗重茬微生态制剂
3	生物有机肥+土壤调理剂
4	土壤调理剂+抗重茬微生态制剂
5	生物有机肥
6	抗重茬微生态制剂
7	土壤调理剂
CK	常规管理

处理	梢长/cm	梢粗/mm	叶绿素SPAD	叶长/mm	叶宽/mm	叶厚/mm
1	9.09±0.94c	3.27±0.13bc	40.14±4.57a	106.55±2.95b	33.38±1.2b	0.47±0.19b
2	9.37±1.04c	3.36±0.21c	40.59±3.24a	112.6±3.24bc	36.23±1.22c	0.48±0.19b
3	9.02±0.87c	3.24±0.13b	40.3±2.67a	110.61±2.77b	34.61±1.2b	0.47±0.12b
4	10.54±1.12d	3.14±0.17b	38.08±3.75a	112.89±3.26bc	34.86±1.05b	0.47±0.06b
5	7.16±0.58b	3.38±0.25c	40.55±3.45a	110.52±5.93b	36.85±0.78c	0.51±0.13c
6	12.35±1.21e	3.51±0.15d	40.89±2.39a	116.24±4.35c	33.65±1.84b	0.51±0.08c
7	9.11±0.88c	3.22±0.13b	38.96±7.7a	115.76±3.61c	35.97±1.05bc	0.43±0.52a
CK	5.54±0.4a	2.93±0.1a	39.27±3.24a	97.73±2.41a	31.77±0.81a	0.48±0.12b

处理	梢长/cm	梢粗/mm	叶绿素SPAD	叶长/mm	叶宽/mm	叶厚/mm
1	9.09±0.94c	3.27±0.13bc	40.14±4.57a	106.55±2.95b	33.38±1.2b	0.47±0.19b
2	9.37±1.04c	3.36±0.21c	40.59±3.24a	112.6±3.24bc	36.23±1.22c	0.48±0.19b
3	9.02±0.87c	3.24±0.13b	40.3±2.67a	110.61±2.77b	34.61±1.2b	0.47±0.12b
4	10.54±1.12d	3.14±0.17b	38.08±3.75a	112.89±3.26bc	34.86±1.05b	0.47±0.06b
5	7.16±0.58b	3.38±0.25c	40.55±3.45a	110.52±5.93b	36.85±0.78c	0.51±0.13c
6	12.35±1.21e	3.51±0.15d	40.89±2.39a	116.24±4.35c	33.65±1.84b	0.51±0.08c
7	9.11±0.88c	3.22±0.13b	38.96±7.7a	115.76±3.61c	35.97±1.05bc	0.43±0.52a
CK	5.54±0.4a	2.93±0.1a	39.27±3.24a	97.73±2.41a	31.77±0.81a	0.48±0.12b

处理	单果重/g	硬度N	可溶性固形物/%	总糖/%	可滴定酸/%	维生素C/(mg/100g)
1	25.74±0.76c	1.91±0.4d	11.58±0.17bc	10.69±0.17bc	1.12±0.04d	8.15±0.24c
2	24.00±0.62b	1.29±0.06a	10.83±0.16a	10.25±0.19b	1.05±0.03c	7.49±0.17a
3	19.10±0.78a	1.41±0.06b	10.75±0.17a	9.65±0.16a	1.01±0.05c	7.70±0.18b
4	22.95±0.73b	1.29±0.06a	10.52±0.23a	9.40±0.13a	1.18±0.05d	7.59±0.29ab
5	26.60±0.99c	1.43±0.08b	10.35±0.17a	9.58±0.16a	0.85±0.04b	7.81±0.33b
6	19.59±1.14a	1.56±0.07c	12.01±0.28c	11.38±0.25c	1.04±0.07c	7.48±0.38a
7	23.17±0.96b	1.54±0.08c	11.25±0.25b	10.88±0.17c	0.63±0.05a	8.04±0.31b
CK	24.26±0.86b	1.45±0.07b	10.92±0.25ab	9.56±0.14a	1.29±0.02e	7.15±0.17a

微生态制剂改良土壤对凋萎病杨梅营养生长和果实品质的作用

Effects of Micro-ecology Preparation Improving Soil on the Vegetative Growth and Fruit Quality of Twig Blight Diseased Bayberry

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 3

参考文献 28

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

关于本刊

作者中心

审者中心

在线期刊

联系我们

[1]	刘瑜, 李萍, 赵凯丽, 闫实, 刘继培, 刘磊, 郭宁. 化肥减量配施生物有机肥对芹菜产量、品质和土壤养分的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2023, 39(8): 63-68.
[2]	邵雪花, 匡石滋, 黄建辉, 欧阳嘉敏, 万妍, 赖多. 留树保鲜技术对油甘果实品质的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2023, 39(7): 140-145.
[3]	牛先前, 江莉, 林秋金, 林秀香, 李永裕, 施清. 福建百香果果实品质优势区域划分[J]. 中国农学通报, 2023, 39(7): 40-45.
[4]	殷丽萍, 刘思远, 蔡成梅, 石小丽, 朱小娟, 袁国明, 汪吉东, 张辉, 徐聪, 马洪波. 嘉博文土壤调理剂对萝卜产量品质、土壤理化性质的研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2023, 39(6): 64-71.
[5]	郑健, 芮丹萍, 高贤玉, 张惠云, 宋云连, 潘继红, 余卫霖, 王跃全, 刘思源, 郑平清, 罗心平. 云南永德‘桂味’与区试品种荔枝果实品质表现[J]. 中国农学通报, 2023, 39(4): 44-51.
[6]	高文瑞, 孙艳军, 韩冰, 费聪, 王显生, 徐刚. 弱光对西瓜果实品质及蔗糖代谢的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2023, 39(1): 56-61.
[7]	曾婕, 余浪, 达布希拉图, 李云驹. 磷基土壤调理剂在低磷红壤上对小白菜生长的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(9): 81-87.
[8]	董文彩, 刘宪斌, 李红梅, 赵双梅, 包金美, 沈健萍, 梁芳, 鲁美. 不同水平供钙量对木本观赏植物生长发育的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(8): 42-50.
[9]	彭程, 邓林萍, 蒙万聪, 常晓晓, 张增文, 罗贱良, 邱继水, 陆育生. 套袋对柰李果实外观及香气物质的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(7): 45-51.
[10]	邵雪花, 赖多, 肖维强, 贺涵, 刘传和, 匡石滋. 不同干燥方法对番石榴果实品质及抗氧化活性的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(6): 134-140.
[11]	赵明新, 曹刚, 王玮, 曹素芳, 李红旭. 5个梨授粉品种与‘玉露香梨’授粉效应比较研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(28): 52-57.
[12]	张紫卿, 韩守安, 王敏, 谢辉, 张雯, 周龙. 叶幕整形方式对新疆主要红色酿酒葡萄生长和果实品质的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(28): 58-67.
[13]	周琳, 李梦莎, 王化, 沈光, 吕品, 周丽萍. 不同品种蓝靛果果实品质比较研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(26): 44-49.
[14]	朱诗君, 王丽丽, 金树权, 周金波, 卢晓红. 生物有机肥和菌剂对土壤肥力及草莓生长品质的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(21): 36-43.
[15]	于会丽, 徐变变, 徐国益, 邵微, 高登涛, 司鹏. 生物有机肥对苹果幼苗生长、生理特性以及土壤微生物功能多样性的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(1): 32-38.