中国农学通报 ›› 2022, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (21): 36-43.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2021-0869
朱诗君1(), 王丽丽1, 金树权1(
), 周金波1, 卢晓红2
收稿日期:
2021-09-06
修回日期:
2021-12-04
出版日期:
2022-07-25
发布日期:
2022-08-23
通讯作者:
金树权
作者简介:
朱诗君,男,1991年出生,浙江温州人,助理研究员,博士,主要从事农用微生物资源的开发及应用。通信地址:315101 浙江省宁波市鄞州区德厚街19号,Tel:0574-87184037,E-mail: 基金资助:
ZHU Shijun1(), WANG Lili1, JIN Shuquan1(
), ZHOU Jinbo1, LU Xiaohong2
Received:
2021-09-06
Revised:
2021-12-04
Online:
2022-07-25
Published:
2022-08-23
Contact:
JIN Shuquan
摘要:
为了探究生物有机肥和复合微生物菌剂联用对土壤理化性质、草莓营养生长和果实品质的影响,以草莓‘红颊’为试验材料,设置普通有机肥底肥(T0);普通有机肥底肥+菌剂追肥(T1);生物有机肥底肥(T2);生物有机肥底肥+菌剂追肥(T3);灭活生物有机肥底肥+灭活菌剂追肥(T4)跟踪调查不同处理下的土壤理化性质、草莓营养生长、果实产量及品质。结果显示:生物有机肥底肥和菌剂追施可以明显改善土壤酸化,提高土壤有机质及速效养分,并降低土壤电导率。该措施对草莓的营养生长和果实品质同样也有显著积极作用。通过对比现蕾期到成熟期的变化率,T3处理的草莓株高、株幅以及叶绿素较T0处理分别依次增加了2.53%、3.62%和18.99%。此外比对T3与T0的植株质量表明,T3的地上部分生物质和干物质量分别提高了20.05%、5.09%,而地下部分生物质和干物质量提高了2.69%、5.05%。此外,T3处理增加各代果实单果重和挂果数,草莓产量达(30.10±3.87)t/hm2。其对果实品质改善也有显著的积极作用,各代果实的可溶性固形物提高2.08%~5.32%,可滴定酸降低了5.15%~18.76%,维生素C提高了5.67%~10.22%。综上所述,添加生物有机肥作为底肥,并辅以菌剂追施,可提高土壤肥力,并对草莓生长、产量和果实品质有显著的积极影响,本研究为设施草莓栽培提供技术依据和理论支撑。
中图分类号:
朱诗君, 王丽丽, 金树权, 周金波, 卢晓红. 生物有机肥和菌剂对土壤肥力及草莓生长品质的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(21): 36-43.
ZHU Shijun, WANG Lili, JIN Shuquan, ZHOU Jinbo, LU Xiaohong. Effects of Bio-organic Fertilizer and Microbial Agents on Soil Fertility and Growth and Quality of Strawberry[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(21): 36-43.
处理 | pH | 电导率/(μS/cm) | 有机质/(g/kg) | 全氮/(g/kg) | 速效磷/(mg/kg) | 速效钾/(mg/kg) | 碱解氮/(mg/kg) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
试验前 | 6.54±0.13a | 284.35±11.27a | 24.94±2.35b | 2.20±0.56a | 57.13±9.27b | 304.48±54.38b | 99.15±22.39b |
T0 | 6.58±0.08a | 280.62±8.96a | 29.08±1.85a | 2.35±0.29a | 60.38±10.11a | 333.29±66.27b | 103.27±20.58b |
T1 | 6.62±0.14a | 277.63±5.96a | 30.43±2.10a | 2.46±0.33a | 60.74±8.35a | 387.59±86.35a | 116.51±16.68a |
T2 | 6.61±0.10a | 279.58±12.36a | 31.31±1.23a | 2.57±0.72a | 62.03±6.67a | 437.52±43.28a | 120.77±17.35a |
T3 | 6.65±0.89a | 271.58±7.29b | 33.25±2.73a | 2.62±0.63a | 62.59±6.98a | 503.38±62.38a | 144.22±26.57a |
T4 | 6.59±0.19a | 276.35±8.88a | 32.19±1.56a | 2.58±0.51a | 62.38±7.89a | 484.82±74.29a | 135.50±19.83a |
处理 | pH | 电导率/(μS/cm) | 有机质/(g/kg) | 全氮/(g/kg) | 速效磷/(mg/kg) | 速效钾/(mg/kg) | 碱解氮/(mg/kg) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
试验前 | 6.54±0.13a | 284.35±11.27a | 24.94±2.35b | 2.20±0.56a | 57.13±9.27b | 304.48±54.38b | 99.15±22.39b |
T0 | 6.58±0.08a | 280.62±8.96a | 29.08±1.85a | 2.35±0.29a | 60.38±10.11a | 333.29±66.27b | 103.27±20.58b |
T1 | 6.62±0.14a | 277.63±5.96a | 30.43±2.10a | 2.46±0.33a | 60.74±8.35a | 387.59±86.35a | 116.51±16.68a |
T2 | 6.61±0.10a | 279.58±12.36a | 31.31±1.23a | 2.57±0.72a | 62.03±6.67a | 437.52±43.28a | 120.77±17.35a |
T3 | 6.65±0.89a | 271.58±7.29b | 33.25±2.73a | 2.62±0.63a | 62.59±6.98a | 503.38±62.38a | 144.22±26.57a |
T4 | 6.59±0.19a | 276.35±8.88a | 32.19±1.56a | 2.58±0.51a | 62.38±7.89a | 484.82±74.29a | 135.50±19.83a |
处理 | 现蕾期 | 始花期 | 初果期 | 转红期 | 成熟期 | 周期变化率/% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
株高/cm | T0 | 6.28±0.72 a | 12.35±0.88 a | 17.89±1.36 a | 21.67±1.79 a | 23.63±1.83 a | 277.93±15.35 a |
T1 | 6.43±0.75 a | 12.83±2.21 a | 18.49±1.28 a | 22.32±3.56 a | 24.60±2.34 a | 283.61±19.37 a | |
T2 | 6.30±1.00 a | 12.48±2.03 a | 18.13±1.35 a | 21.74±2.51 a | 23.87±1.78 a | 282.83±28.84 a | |
T3 | 6.32±1.01 a | 12.59±1.53 a | 18.37±0.99 a | 21.73±1.89 a | 24.13±2.64 a | 284.96±20.49 a | |
T4 | 6.35±1.23 a | 12.60±1.27 a | 18.42±0.73 a | 21.80±2.15 a | 24.25±1.93 a | 281.89±18.33 a | |
株幅/cm | T0 | 23.12±2.47 a | 24.65±1.35 a | 27.75±1.99 a | 28.43±1.98 a | 29.05±3.02 a | 25.54±1.26 a |
T1 | 23.20±2.40 a | 24.67±1.32 a | 27.87±2.84 a | 28.82±1.93 a | 29.17±1.74 a | 26.43±4.34 a | |
T2 | 23.06±2.13 a | 24.57±1.11 a | 27.42±2.66 a | 28.33±1.37 a | 29.01±2.23 a | 25.92±1.35 a | |
T3 | 23.00±1.98 a | 24.30±1.98 a | 27.37±1.40 a | 28.36±1.03 a | 28.95±1.07 a | 26.47±2.66 a | |
T4 | 23.15±1.72 a | 24.73±2.26 | 27.65±1.08 a | 28.71±2.13 a | 29.15±0.95 a | 25.92±2.58 a | |
叶绿素 | T0 | 36.63±1.76 a | 37.79±0.47 a | 38.49±1.57 a | 38.58±0.95 a | 38.55±1.33 a | 52.34±0.76 b |
T1 | 36.68±1.18 a | 37.91±0.90 a | 38.63±0.54 a | 38.77±1.33 a | 38.88±0.62 a | 60.59±1.67 a | |
T2 | 36.57±0.99 a | 37.72±0.29 a | 38.51±0.85 a | 38.56±0.36 a | 38.58±0.72 a | 55.21±1.02 b | |
T3 | 36.69±1.10 a | 37.94±0.67 a | 38.56±1.33 a | 38.82±0.53 a | 38.96±0.85 a | 62.28±0.45 a | |
T4 | 36.72±2.15 a | 38.01±1.23 a | 38.64±2.08 a | 38.85±0.99 a | 38.93±0.59 a | 60.18±0.89 a |
处理 | 现蕾期 | 始花期 | 初果期 | 转红期 | 成熟期 | 周期变化率/% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
株高/cm | T0 | 6.28±0.72 a | 12.35±0.88 a | 17.89±1.36 a | 21.67±1.79 a | 23.63±1.83 a | 277.93±15.35 a |
T1 | 6.43±0.75 a | 12.83±2.21 a | 18.49±1.28 a | 22.32±3.56 a | 24.60±2.34 a | 283.61±19.37 a | |
T2 | 6.30±1.00 a | 12.48±2.03 a | 18.13±1.35 a | 21.74±2.51 a | 23.87±1.78 a | 282.83±28.84 a | |
T3 | 6.32±1.01 a | 12.59±1.53 a | 18.37±0.99 a | 21.73±1.89 a | 24.13±2.64 a | 284.96±20.49 a | |
T4 | 6.35±1.23 a | 12.60±1.27 a | 18.42±0.73 a | 21.80±2.15 a | 24.25±1.93 a | 281.89±18.33 a | |
株幅/cm | T0 | 23.12±2.47 a | 24.65±1.35 a | 27.75±1.99 a | 28.43±1.98 a | 29.05±3.02 a | 25.54±1.26 a |
T1 | 23.20±2.40 a | 24.67±1.32 a | 27.87±2.84 a | 28.82±1.93 a | 29.17±1.74 a | 26.43±4.34 a | |
T2 | 23.06±2.13 a | 24.57±1.11 a | 27.42±2.66 a | 28.33±1.37 a | 29.01±2.23 a | 25.92±1.35 a | |
T3 | 23.00±1.98 a | 24.30±1.98 a | 27.37±1.40 a | 28.36±1.03 a | 28.95±1.07 a | 26.47±2.66 a | |
T4 | 23.15±1.72 a | 24.73±2.26 | 27.65±1.08 a | 28.71±2.13 a | 29.15±0.95 a | 25.92±2.58 a | |
叶绿素 | T0 | 36.63±1.76 a | 37.79±0.47 a | 38.49±1.57 a | 38.58±0.95 a | 38.55±1.33 a | 52.34±0.76 b |
T1 | 36.68±1.18 a | 37.91±0.90 a | 38.63±0.54 a | 38.77±1.33 a | 38.88±0.62 a | 60.59±1.67 a | |
T2 | 36.57±0.99 a | 37.72±0.29 a | 38.51±0.85 a | 38.56±0.36 a | 38.58±0.72 a | 55.21±1.02 b | |
T3 | 36.69±1.10 a | 37.94±0.67 a | 38.56±1.33 a | 38.82±0.53 a | 38.96±0.85 a | 62.28±0.45 a | |
T4 | 36.72±2.15 a | 38.01±1.23 a | 38.64±2.08 a | 38.85±0.99 a | 38.93±0.59 a | 60.18±0.89 a |
处理 | 地上部生物质量 | 地下生物质量 | 地上部干物质量 | 地下干物质量 |
---|---|---|---|---|
T0 | 221.00±6.14 b | 40.47±3.25 a | 38.00±2.80a | 11.89±1.98a |
T1 | 238.84±5.52 b | 40.86±2.42 a | 38.73±1.23a | 12.18±1.46a |
T2 | 225.05±9.00 b | 40.49±3.48 a | 38.35±2.45a | 12.06±0.80a |
T3 | 265.32±10.26 a | 42.53±7.50 a | 39.02±3.62a | 12.49±1.93a |
T4 | 241.58±12.39 b | 41.23 ±5.68 a | 38.81±4.23 | 12.23±1.88 |
处理 | 地上部生物质量 | 地下生物质量 | 地上部干物质量 | 地下干物质量 |
---|---|---|---|---|
T0 | 221.00±6.14 b | 40.47±3.25 a | 38.00±2.80a | 11.89±1.98a |
T1 | 238.84±5.52 b | 40.86±2.42 a | 38.73±1.23a | 12.18±1.46a |
T2 | 225.05±9.00 b | 40.49±3.48 a | 38.35±2.45a | 12.06±0.80a |
T3 | 265.32±10.26 a | 42.53±7.50 a | 39.02±3.62a | 12.49±1.93a |
T4 | 241.58±12.39 b | 41.23 ±5.68 a | 38.81±4.23 | 12.23±1.88 |
处理 | 第一代果 | 第二代果 | 第三代果 | 末代果 | 产量/ (t/hm2) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
单果重/g | 坐果数/个 | 单果重/g | 坐果数/个 | 单果重/g | 坐果数/个 | 单果重/g | 坐果数/个 | ||||||
T0 | 14.84±1.73a | 4.01±0.96a | 13.01±2.55b | 5.30±0.37a | 13.77±4.01a | 4.45±0.58a | 11.13±3.2a | 8.23±1.39a | 25.32±2.81b | ||||
T1 | 15.89±2.77a | 4.18±1.01a | 14.13±1.93a | 5.94±0.49a | 12.67±2.33a | 5.68±0.39a | 12.34±3.57a | 8.79±0.87a | 29.77±3.06a | ||||
T2 | 15.67±2.53a | 4.22±1.44a | 15.34±3.08a | 5.33±0.57a | 13.09±3.97a | 5.58±0.67a | 12.20±3.8a | 8.12±1.57a | 28.80±3.56a | ||||
T3 | 16.02±3.43a | 4.19±0.71a | 15.97±2.77a | 5.23±0.46a | 13.11±3.82a | 5.76±0.88a | 13.00±4.37a | 8.33±2.02a | 30.10±3.87a | ||||
T4 | 15.87±3.16a | 4.16±2.03a | 15.12±2.11a | 5.41±0.98a | 12.97±2.57a | 5.61±0.58a | 12.87±2.67a | 8.42±0.98a | 29.60±2.88a |
处理 | 第一代果 | 第二代果 | 第三代果 | 末代果 | 产量/ (t/hm2) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
单果重/g | 坐果数/个 | 单果重/g | 坐果数/个 | 单果重/g | 坐果数/个 | 单果重/g | 坐果数/个 | ||||||
T0 | 14.84±1.73a | 4.01±0.96a | 13.01±2.55b | 5.30±0.37a | 13.77±4.01a | 4.45±0.58a | 11.13±3.2a | 8.23±1.39a | 25.32±2.81b | ||||
T1 | 15.89±2.77a | 4.18±1.01a | 14.13±1.93a | 5.94±0.49a | 12.67±2.33a | 5.68±0.39a | 12.34±3.57a | 8.79±0.87a | 29.77±3.06a | ||||
T2 | 15.67±2.53a | 4.22±1.44a | 15.34±3.08a | 5.33±0.57a | 13.09±3.97a | 5.58±0.67a | 12.20±3.8a | 8.12±1.57a | 28.80±3.56a | ||||
T3 | 16.02±3.43a | 4.19±0.71a | 15.97±2.77a | 5.23±0.46a | 13.11±3.82a | 5.76±0.88a | 13.00±4.37a | 8.33±2.02a | 30.10±3.87a | ||||
T4 | 15.87±3.16a | 4.16±2.03a | 15.12±2.11a | 5.41±0.98a | 12.97±2.57a | 5.61±0.58a | 12.87±2.67a | 8.42±0.98a | 29.60±2.88a |
[1] | 刘亚柏. 几种水溶肥喷施对草莓产量及品质的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2019, 35(16):77-81. |
[2] |
GIAMPIERI F, TULIPANI S, ALVAREZ-SUAREZ J M, et al. The strawberry: Composition, nutritional quality, and impact on human health[J]. Nutrition, 2012, 28(1):9-19.
doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2011.08.009 URL |
[3] | 陈青英, 耿芳, 何风杰, 等. 不同有机肥对土壤特性及'红地球'葡萄生长和品质的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(16):82-88. |
[4] |
ANSARI R A, MAHMOOD I. Optimization of organic and bio-organic fertilizers on soil properties and growth of pigeon pea[J]. Scientia horticulturae, 2017, 226:1-9.
doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2017.07.033 URL |
[5] |
TAO C, LI R, XIONG W, et al. Bio-organic fertilizers stimulate indigenous soil pseudomonas populations to enhance plant disease suppression[J]. Microbiome, 2020, 8(1):1-14.
doi: 10.1186/s40168-019-0777-4 URL |
[6] | 仇美华, 郭德杰, 马艳, 等. 沙性土壤设施桃树减肥增效技术研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(17):58-64. |
[7] | 刘人萱, 张小蕊, 王睿, 等. 生防菌剂对人参灰霉病菌抑制作用及田间防控效果[J]. 菌物研究, 2021:1-6. |
[8] | 张佼, 屈锋, 朱玉尧, 等. 增施有机肥和微生物菌剂对春季杨凌设施番茄产量和品质的影响[J]. 西北农业学报, 2019, 28(5):767-773. |
[9] |
CHEN Y, XU Y, ZHOU T, et al. Biocontrol of fusarium wilt disease in strawberries using bioorganic fertilizer fortified with Bacillus licheniformis x-1 and Bacillus methylotrophic us z-1[J]. 3 Biotech, 2020, 10(2):1-14.
doi: 10.1007/s13205-019-1978-z URL |
[10] | KHALIL N H, AGAH R J. Effect of chemical, organic and bio fertilization on growth and yield of strawberry plant[J]. Int’l Journal of advances in chemical engg., & biological sciences, 2017, 4(1):5. |
[11] | 赵军, 李勇, 冉炜, 等. 有机肥替代部分化肥对稻麦轮作系统产量及土壤微生物区系的影响[J]. 南京农业大学学报, 2016, 39(4):594-602. |
[12] | 赵政, 陈巍, 王欢, 等. 木霉微生物肥与减量化肥配施对番茄产量、品质及土壤肥力的影响[J]. 土壤学报, 2018, 55(5):1243-1253. |
[13] | 王涛, 乔卫花, 李玉奇, 等. 轮作和微生物菌肥对黄瓜连作土壤理化性状及生物活性的影响[J]. 土壤通报, 2011, 42(3):578-583. |
[14] |
TARKALSON D D, PAYERO J O, HERGERT G W, et al. Acidification of soil in a dry land winter wheat-sorghum/corn-fallow rotation in the semiarid US Great Plains[J]. Plant and soil, 2006, 283(1):367-379.
doi: 10.1007/s11104-006-0027-y URL |
[15] | 汪吉东, 张辉, 张永春, 等. 连续施用不同比例鸡粪氮对水稻土有机质积累及土壤酸化的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2014, 20(5):1178-1185. |
[16] |
YE G, LIN Y, LIU D, et al. Long-term application of manure over plant residues mitigates acidification, builds soil organic carbon and shifts prokaryotic diversity in acidic Ultisols[J]. Applied soil ecology, 2019, 133:24-33.
doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2018.09.008 URL |
[17] |
LI S, LIU Y, WANG J, et al. Soil acidification aggravates the occurrence of bacterial wilt in South China[J]. Frontiers in microbiology, 2017, 8:703.
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00703 URL |
[18] |
LIU M, WANG C, LIU X, et al. Saline-alkali soil applied with vermicompost and humic acid fertilizer improved macroaggregate microstructure to enhance salt leaching and inhibit nitrogen losses[J]. Applied soil ecology, 2020, 156:103705.
doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2020.103705 URL |
[19] | 辛雅芬. 球毛壳菌生物菌肥对草莓生长和品质的影响[J]. 南方农业学报, 2013, 44(7):1145-1149. |
[20] | 唐光木, 黄微, 卢丽, 等. 三种滴灌肥对草莓生长、产量及品质的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2021(1):156-160. |
[21] | HAFEZ M, POPOV A I, RASHAD M. Integrated use of bio-organic fertilizers for enhancing soil fertility-plant nutrition, germination status and initial growth of corn (Zea mays L.)[J]. Environmental technology & innovation, 2021, 21:101329. |
[22] | 任海英, 王剑, 郑锡良, 等. 生物有机肥对衰弱病杨梅营养改良及强壮树势的作用[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(16):127-137. |
[23] |
TAGLIAVINI M, BALDI E, LUCCHI P, et al. Dynamics of nutrients uptake by strawberry plants (Fragaria x ananassa Dutch.) grown in soil and soilless culture[J]. Eur. J. Agron., 2005, 23:15-25.
doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2004.09.002 URL |
[24] |
ARAUJO R, DUNLAP C, FRANCO C M. Analogous wheat root rhizosphere microbial successions in field and greenhouse trials in the presence of biocontrol agents paenibacillus peoriae sp9 and streptomyces fulvissimus fu14[J]. Molecular plant pathology, 2020, 21(5):622-635.
doi: 10.1111/mpp.12918 URL |
[25] |
DING C, SHEN Q, ZHANG R, et al. Evaluation of rhizosphere bacteria and derived bio-organic fertilizers as potential biocontrol agents against bacterial wilt (Ralstonia solanacearum) of potato[J]. Plant and soil, 2013, 366(1):453-466.
doi: 10.1007/s11104-012-1425-y URL |
[26] | 李炳韵, 程云飞, 唐浩真, 等. 配施生物有机肥与无机肥对连作菠萝土壤的影响[J]. 热带生物学报, 2020:1-10. |
[27] |
TODESCHINI V, AITLAHMIDI N, MAZZUCCO E, et al. Impact of beneficial microorganisms on strawberry growth, fruit production, nutritional quality and volatilome[J]. Frontiers in plant science, 2018, 9:1611.
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01611 URL |
[28] | 齐国辉, 陈贵林, 吕桂云, 等. 丛枝菌根真菌对重茬草莓产量和品质的影响[J]. 果树学报, 2001(6):341-344. |
[29] | 张庆华, 曾祥国, 韩永超, 等. 土壤熏蒸剂棉隆和生物菌肥对草莓连作土壤真菌多样性的影响[J]. 微生物学通报, 2018, 45(5):1048-1060. |
[30] |
MENDES R, GARBEVA P, RAAIJMAKERS J M. The rhizosphere microbiome: significance of plant beneficial, plant pathogenic, and human pathogenic microorganisms[J]. FEMS microbiology reviews, 2013, 37(5):634-663.
doi: 10.1111/1574-6976.12028 URL |
[31] |
PHILIPPOT L, RAAIJMAKERS J M, LEMANCEAU P, et al. Going back to the roots: the microbial ecology of the rhizosphere[J]. Nature reviews microbiology, 2013, 11(11):789-799.
doi: 10.1038/nrmicro3109 URL |
[32] | 林子敬. 化肥减施条件下微生物菌剂对红枣根际微生物的影响[D]. 乌鲁木齐: 新疆大学, 2019:14-17. |
[33] |
DE WEGER L A, VAN DER VLUGT C, WIJFJES A, et al. Flagella of a plant-growth-stimulating pseudomonas fluorescens strain are required for colonization of potato roots[J]. Journal of bacteriology, 1987, 169(6):2769-2773.
doi: 10.1128/jb.169.6.2769-2773.1987 URL |
[34] | DE WEGER L A, BAKKER P A, SCHIPPERS B, et al. “Pseudomonas spp. With mutational changes in the o-antigenic side chain of their lipopolysaccharide are affected in their ability to colonize potato roots” in signal molecules in plants and plant-microbe interactions[M].Springer, 1989:197-202. |
[35] |
RINAUDI L V, GIORDANO W. An integrated view of biofilm formation in rhizobia[J]. FEMS microbiology letters, 2010, 304(1):1-11.
doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2009.01840.x URL |
[36] |
TAN S, YANG C, MEI X, et al. The effect of organic acids from tomato root exudates on rhizosphere colonization of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens t-5[J]. Applied soil ecology, 2013, 64:15-22.
doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2012.10.011 URL |
[37] | LOPES L D, PEREIRA E SILVA M D C, ANDREOTE F D. Bacterial abilities and adaptation toward the rhizosphere colonization[J]. Frontiers in microbiology, 2016, 7:1341. |
[1] | 崔莹莹, 周波, 陈义勇, 刘嘉裕, 黎健龙, 唐颢, 唐劲驰. 广东茶区土壤肥力时空变化分析与综合评价[J]. 中国农学通报, 2023, 39(1): 85-95. |
[2] | 卢丽兰, 王玉萍, 尹欣幸, 黄英凯, 范海阔. 海南省水果型椰子园土壤养分调查与评价[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(8): 72-80. |
[3] | 李祥, 王永平, 王耀凤, 褚春年, 孙喜军, 柯希恒, 曾桥. 枝条有机肥最佳堆肥参数及施用效果研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(6): 63-68. |
[4] | 韩晓芳, 田晓明, 杨永利, 张敬智, 张清, 张凯, 张涛, 贾林. 2种土壤复合改良剂对滨海盐渍土的改良及肥力作用[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(5): 54-59. |
[5] | 沙月霞, 黄泽阳, 魏照清. 生物菌剂撒施对宁夏石嘴山盐碱地微生物群落结构的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(34): 82-90. |
[6] | 姜玉琴, 谢先进, 黄达. 耕地质量对耕地生产力的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(3): 75-80. |
[7] | 晁赢, 付钢锋, 阎祥慧, 杭中桥, 杨全刚, 王会, 潘红, 娄燕宏, 诸玉平. 有机肥对作物品质、土壤肥力及环境影响的研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(29): 103-107. |
[8] | 丁学双, 朱红青, 丁映风, 姚巧敏, 张青青, 姚春馨, 周晓罡, 杨加珍, 丁玉梅, 陈佳. 一种复合微生物菌剂在甜脆豌豆中的田间应用效果[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(26): 15-19. |
[9] | 刘子凡, 苏必孟, 黄洁, 魏云霞, 肖子丽. 木薯花生不同间作模式对木薯地土壤肥力的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(25): 102-107. |
[10] | 魏加弟, 王永芬, 何翔, 杨佩文, 俞艳春, 郑泗军, 徐胜涛. 植物覆盖对蕉园土壤微生物群落功能多样性的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(17): 90-97. |
[11] | 赵秀东, 陈晓芳, 袁自然, 叶寅. 有机肥替代对土壤养分的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(16): 74-80. |
[12] | 王文军, 王道中. 砂姜黑土区小麦玉米轮作制下有机肥适宜替代比例研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(15): 78-84. |
[13] | 于会丽, 徐变变, 徐国益, 邵微, 高登涛, 司鹏. 生物有机肥对苹果幼苗生长、生理特性以及土壤微生物功能多样性的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(1): 32-38. |
[14] | 谭凯炎, 闵庆文, 邬定荣. 从土壤气候视角解析农业文化遗产地的自然禀赋——以宽城传统板栗栽培系统为例[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(7): 88-94. |
[15] | 汪茜, 宋娟, 李冬萍, 刘增亮, 车江旅, 陈廷速. 丛枝菌根真菌及深色有隔内生真菌对大田生姜生长效应分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(6): 62-67. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||