欢迎访问《中国农学通报》,

中国农学通报 ›› 2025, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (8): 11-18.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2024-0531

• 农学·农业基础科学 • 上一篇    下一篇

播期和密度对‘洛豆1304’生育进程、光合特性、农艺性状、产量及品质的影响

李林(), 晏云, 亢江飞, 孟琦翰, 方社法, 陈颖民, 郭建秋()   

  1. 洛阳市农林科学院,河南洛阳 471023
  • 收稿日期:2024-08-15 修回日期:2024-11-26 出版日期:2025-03-15 发布日期:2025-03-14
  • 通讯作者:
    郭建秋,男,1972年出生,河南新安人,副研究员,硕士,研究方向:大豆遗传育种与栽培。通信地址:471023 河南省洛阳市洛龙区农科路1号 洛阳市农林科学院,E-mail:
  • 作者简介:

    李林,男,1979年出生,河南渑池人,助理研究员,本科,研究方向:大豆遗传育种与栽培。通信地址:471023 河南省洛阳市洛龙区农科路1号 洛阳市农林科学院,E-mail:

  • 基金资助:
    河南省农业农村厅“河南省农业良种联合攻关项目”(2022010304); 农业农村部“黄淮海高油高产大豆新品种设计与培育项目”(2023ZD04033)

The Effects of Sowing Date and Density on Growth Process, Photosynthetic Characteristics, Agronomic Traits, Yield, and Quality of ‘Luodou 1304’

LI Lin(), YAN Yun, KANG Jiangfei, MENG Qihan, FANG Shefa, CHEN Yingmin, GUO Jianqiu()   

  1. Luoyang Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, Luoyang, Henan 471023
  • Received:2024-08-15 Revised:2024-11-26 Published:2025-03-15 Online:2025-03-14

摘要: 为探究洛阳市农林科学院选育的大豆新品种‘洛豆1304’的最适播期和密度,采用裂区试验设计,主区为播期B(B1:6月21日、B2:7月1日、B3:7月11日),副区为密度M(M1:13.5万株/hm2、M2:18万株/hm2、M3:22.5万株/hm2、M4:27万株/hm2),分析了播期和密度对‘洛豆1304’生育进程、光合特性、农艺性状、产量及品质的影响。结果表明:推迟播期会缩短‘洛豆1304’的生育进程,播期每推迟10 d,生育期分别缩短4 d和5 d。适期早播会显著提高盛花期、盛荚期净光合速率和蒸腾速率,降低盛花期胞间CO2浓度,减少底荚高,增加百粒重,提升粗蛋白质含量和蛋脂总含量。降低密度会显著增加盛荚期净光合速率,减少盛荚期胞间CO2浓度,增加单株有效分枝、单株有效荚数、单株粒数和单株粒重。播期对产量有较大影响,早播比晚播产量高,B1播期平均产量最高,达到5269.49 kg/hm2,显著高于B2、B3播期。密度对产量的影响较小,在B1播期下,不同密度间产量差异不显著,M2、M3和M4密度下产量均较高,分别达到5249.45 kg/hm2、5219.68 kg/hm2和5683.21 kg/hm2。研究发现,密度对产量的影响小于播期对产量的影响,‘洛豆1304’最适宜播期为6月21日,适宜密度为18万~27万株/hm2。研究旨在为新品种‘洛豆1304’的示范推广提供理论技术支撑。

关键词: 播期, 密度, ‘洛豆1304’, 产量, 品质

Abstract:

In order to explore the optimal sowing date and density of the new soybean variety ‘Luodou 1304’ bred by Luoyang Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, a split plot experimental design was adopted. The main plot was sowing period B (B1: June 21, B2: July 1, B3: July 11), and the sub plot was density M (M1: 135000 plants/hm2, M2: 180000 plants/hm2, M3: 225000 plants/hm2, M4: 270000 plants/hm2). The effects of sowing period and density on the growth process, photosynthetic characteristics, agronomic traits, yield, and quality of ‘Luodou 1304’were analyzed. The results showed that delaying the sowing date would shorten the growth process of ‘Luodou 1304’. For every 10 days of sowing delay, the growth period would be shortened by 4 days and 5 days, respectively. Early sowing at the appropriate time could significantly increase the net photosynthetic rate and transpiration rate during the peak flowering and pod period, and reduced the intercellular CO2 concentration during the peak flowering period; significantly reduced the height of the bottom pod and increased the weight of one hundred seeds; significantly increased crude protein content and total egg fat content. Reducing density would significantly increase the net photosynthetic rate during the peak pod period and significantly reduced the intercellular CO2 concentration during the peak pod period; significantly increased effective branching per plant, effective pod number per plant, grain number per plant, and grain weight per plant. The sowing date had a significant impact on yield, with early sowing yielding more than late sowing. The average yield of B1 sowing date was the highest, reaching 5269.49 kg/hm2, significantly higher than that of B2 and B3 sowing dates. The effect of density on yield was relatively small. Under the B1 sowing period, there was no significant difference in yield between different densities, and the yields under M2, M3, and M4 densities were relatively high, reaching 5249.45 kg/hm2, 5219.68 kg/hm2, and 5683.21 kg/hm2, respectively. This study found that planting density had a smaller effect on yield than sowing date. The most suitable sowing date for ‘Luodou 1304’ is June 21st, with a suitable density of 180000 to 270000 plants/hm2. The study aims to provide theoretical and technical support for the demonstration and promotion of the new variety ‘Luodou 1304’.

Key words: sowing time, density, ‘Luodou 1304’, yield, quality