火干扰对土壤动物的影响—基于文献计量分析

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2025-0424

中国农学通报 ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (6): 111-119.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2025-0424

• 资源·环境·生态·土壤·气象 • 上一篇下一篇

火干扰对土壤动物的影响—基于文献计量分析

魏丹(), 崔福星, 潘虹, 李虹, 郭媛, 杨立宾, 付晓宇(), 李海军()

黑龙江省科学院自然与生态研究所，哈尔滨 150040

收稿日期:2025-05-30 修回日期:2025-10-11 出版日期:2026-03-25 发布日期:2026-03-30
通讯作者:
李海军，男，1980年出生，黑龙江海伦人，副研究员，硕士，主要从事动物生态学研究。通信地址：150040 黑龙江省哈尔滨市香坊区哈平路103号黑龙江省科学院自然与生态研究所，Tel：0451-86050036，E-mail：17581072@qq.com；
付晓宇，女，1987年出生，黑龙江哈尔滨人，助理研究员，博士，主要从事土壤动物学研究。通信地址：150040 黑龙江省哈尔滨市香坊区哈平路103号黑龙江省科学院自然与生态研究所，Tel：0451-86052003，E-mail：18646583130@163.com。
作者简介:
魏丹，女，1981年出生，黑龙江伊春人，副研究员，硕士，主要从事土壤动物学研究。通信地址：150040 黑龙江省哈尔滨市香坊区哈平路103号黑龙江省科学院自然与生态研究所，Tel：0451-86050036，E-mail：weidan_0929@163.com。
基金资助:
黑龙江省科学院重点研发计划项目“落叶松林火烧迹地土壤线虫群落特征及影响因子研究”(ZYDF2024ZR02); 黑龙江省省属科研院所科研业务费项目“土壤动物对林火响应的时间动态及其驱动机制研究”(CZKYF2026-C007); 黑龙江省科学院对外合作项目“中国-俄罗斯生态联合创新研究中心平台建设项目”(DWHZ2023ZR01)

Effects of Fire Disturbance on Soil Fauna Based on Bibliometric Analysis

WEI Dan(), CUI Fuxing, PAN Hong, LI Hong, GUO Yuan, YANG Libin, FU Xiaoyu(), LI Haijun()

Institute of Nature and Ecology, Heilongjiang Academy of Sciences, Harbin 150040

Received:2025-05-30 Revised:2025-10-11 Published:2026-03-25 Online:2026-03-30

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

火干扰作为重要的生态扰动因子，通过直接热效应与间接环境改变调控土壤动物群落结构与功能，进而影响地下生态过程。为系统梳理该领域研究进展、明确学科发展脉络与前沿方向，本研究以Web of Science数据库中2000—2024年关于火干扰对土壤动物影响的研究文献为数据源，运用CiteSpace软件对检索到的296篇文献进行了文献计量学分析。研究结果表明：该领域研究的年发文量呈“缓慢发展-快速增长-爆发式增长”的阶段性特征，2024年达30篇峰值；研究力量主要集中于美国、中国、德国等55个国家（地区），其中美国发文量77篇（中介中心性0.82），处于核心主导地位，与中国、德国、加拿大等国形成了广泛的合作网络；中国发文量27篇位列全球第二，但中介中心性仅0.1，国际合作需进一步加强。关键词共现与聚类分析显示，研究热点从火干扰直接效应逐步转向土壤动物群落演替、碳循环耦合机制及生态系统稳定性维持；关键词突现分析表明，2016年后“有机碳”“火烧强度”等成为前沿方向。在气候变化背景下，量化火干扰对土壤动物多样性的非线性影响、评估生物多样性损失对生态系统服务的长期效应、构建多尺度群落动态预测模型将是未来研究重点。本研究为该领域学术研究与生态管理提供了系统性数据支撑与方向指引。

关键词: 火干扰, 土壤动物, 文献计量, 研究热点

Abstract:

As a key ecological disturbance factor, fire disturbance significantly affects the reorganization and functional decline of soil fauna communities through direct thermal effects and indirect environmental changes, thereby perturbing belowground ecological processes. In order to systematically summarize the research progress on the impacts of fire disturbance on soil fauna and clarify the disciplinary development context and cutting-edge directions, this study took the literature on the impacts of fire disturbance on soil fauna published from 2000 to 2024 in the Web of Science database as the data source, and conducted a bibliometric analysis on the 296 retrieved literatures using CiteSpace software. The results showed that the annual number of publications in this field presented a trend of "slow development-rapid growth-explosive growth", reaching a peak of 30 in 2024. The research strength was mainly concentrated in 55 countries (regions) such as the United States, China, and Germany. Among them, the United States had published 77 articles (betweenness centrality 0.82 ), which is at the core dominance, and had formed an extensive cooperative network with China, Germany and other countries. China ranked the second in the world with 27 papers published, but the betweenness centrality was only 0.1, and international cooperation needed to be further strengthened. Keywords co-occurrence and cluster analysis showed that the research focus gradually shifted from the direct effect of fire disturbance to the succession of soil animal communities, the coupling mechanism of carbon cycle and the maintenance of ecosystem stability. Keyword burst analysis showed that "organic carbon" and "fire intensity" became the frontier directions after 2016. Against the background of climate change, it has great significance to conduct the research on ecological effects and recovery mechanisms of fire disturbance on soil fauna. Quantifying the nonlinear impacts of fire disturbance on soil fauna diversity, assessing the long-term effects of biodiversity loss on ecosystem services and constructing multi-scale community dynamic prediction models are likely to be the research priorities in the next few years.

Key words: fire disturbance, soil fauna, bibliometrics, research hotspots

魏丹, 崔福星, 潘虹, 李虹, 郭媛, 杨立宾, 付晓宇, 李海军. 火干扰对土壤动物的影响—基于文献计量分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2026, 42(6): 111-119.

WEI Dan, CUI Fuxing, PAN Hong, LI Hong, GUO Yuan, YANG Libin, FU Xiaoyu, LI Haijun. Effects of Fire Disturbance on Soil Fauna Based on Bibliometric Analysis[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(6): 111-119.

图/表 8

图1. 火干扰对土壤动物影响的研究论文发文量（2000—2024年）

图2. 火干扰对土壤动物影响研究国家合作网络图谱

图3. 火干扰对土壤动物影响研究机构合作网络图谱

图4. 火干扰对土壤动物影响研究作者合作网络图谱

图5. 火干扰对土壤动物影响研究领域的关键词共现图

排名	关键词	出现频次	中心性	排名	关键词	出现频次	中心性
1	responses	36	0.44	6	management	25	0.12
2	community	34	0.03	7	decomposition	24	0.1
3	diversity	34	0.22	8	soil	23	0.07
4	fire	34	0.04	9	wildfire	20	0.06
5	biodiversity	33	0.33	10	soil fauna	20	0.02

表1. 火干扰对土壤动物影响研究领域的高频关键词

图6. 火干扰对土壤动物影响研究领域的关键词聚类图

图7. 火干扰对土壤动物影响研究领域最强引用前十突现关键词

参考文献 44

[1]	PAUSAS J G, KEELEY J E. Wildfires as an ecosystem service[J]. Frontiers in ecology and the environment, 2019, 17(5):289-295. doi: 10.1002/fee.2044
[2]	KELLY L T, GILJOHANN K M, DUANE A, et al. Fire and biodiversity in the Anthropocene[J]. Science, 2020, 370(6519):eabb0355.
[3]	VAN DER WERF G R, MORTON D C, DEFRIES R S, et al. Global fire emissions and the contribution of deforestation, savanna, forest, agricultural, and peat fires (1997-2009)[J]. Atmospheric chemistry and physics, 2010, 10(6):16153-16230.
[4]	MCKENZIE D, LITTELL J S, MANTUA N J. Climate change and the eco-hydrology of fire: will area burned increase in a warming western USA?[J]. Ecological applications, 2018, 28(5):1313-1330. doi: 10.1002/eap.2018.28.issue-5 URL
[5]	ZHANG X, GUAN D, LI W, et al. The effects of forest thinning on soil carbon stocks and dynamics: a meta-analysis[J]. Forest ecology & management, 2018, 429:36-43.
[6]	CHENG Z, WU S, WEI D, et al. Current status of research on wildland fire impacts on soil environment and soil organisms and hotspots visualization analysis[J]. Fire, 2024, 7(5):16. doi: 10.3390/fire7010016 URL
[7]	MORETTI M, DUELLI P, OBRIST M K. Biodiversity and resilience of arthropod communities after fire disturbance in temperate forests[J]. Oecologia, 2006, 149(2):312-327. pmid: 16804704
[8]	杨光, 李颖, 张秋良, 等. 兴安落叶松林火烧迹地土壤有效磷与土壤微生物生物量磷时空演变特征[J]. 生态学报, 2023, 43(12):5027-5037.
[9]	BASTIAS B A, XU Z H, CAIRNEY J W G. Influence of repeated prescribed burning on the soil fungal community in an eastern Australian wet sclerophyll forest[J]. Soil biology and biochemistry, 2006, 38(12):3492-3501. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2006.06.007 URL
[10]	GONGALSKY K B, ZAITSEV A S, KOROBUSHKIN D I, et al. Forest fire induces short-term shifts in soil food webs with consequences for carbon cycling[J]. Ecology letters, 2020, 23(12):1824-1833.
[11]	赵蔓, 张晓曼, 杨明洁. 林火干扰对油松针叶林物种多样性与土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2023, 43(18):7413-7421.
[12]	BOWMAN D M J S, BALCH J K, ARTAXO P, et al. Vegetation fires in the Anthropocene[J]. Nature reviews earth & environment, 2020, 1(10):516-529.
[13]	BARDGETT R D, WARDLE D A. Aboveground-belowground linkages: biotic interactions, ecosystem processes, and global change[J]. Eos, transactions american geophysical union, 2013, 92(26):222. doi: 10.1029/2011EO260011 URL
[14]	NIZHELSKIY M S, KAZEEV K S, VILKOVA V V, et al. Smoke toxicity to the biota and the biological activity of soils when modeling fires[J]. Biology bulletin, 2023, 50(10):196-213.
[15]	RUBTSOV S S, NEGROBOV O P. Soil mesofauna in fire-induced oak forest[J]. Acta biologica sibirica, 2017, 3(3):6.
[16]	BASTOW J, SABO J L, FINLAY J C, et al. The impacts of a wildfire in a semiarid grassland on soil nematode abundances over 4 years[J]. Biology and fertility of soils, 2020, 56(5):693-705.
[17]	HESSBURG P F, SPIES T A, PERRY D A, et al. Tamm review: management of mixed-severity fire regime forests in Oregon, Washington, and Northern California[J]. Forest ecology and management, 2016, 366:221-250. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2016.01.034 URL
[18]	WESTERLING A L. Increasing western US forest wildfire activity: sensitivity to changes in the timing of spring[J]. Philosophical transactions of the royal society b: biological sciences, 2016, 371(1696):20150178. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0178 URL
[19]	王松年, 侯瑞萍, 冯印成. 重庆缙云山2种林分土壤呼吸对火干扰的响应[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2023, 21(3):69-77.
[20]	张雪萍, 李景科, 张毅, 等. 大兴安岭火烧迹地土壤动物生态地理分析[J]. 地理研究, 2006, 25(2):327-334.
[21]	KOROBUSHKIN D I, GORBUNOVA A Y, ZAITSEV A S, et al. Trait-specific response of soil macrofauna to forest burning along a macrogeographic gradient[J]. Applied soil ecology, 2017, 112:97-100. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2016.12.004 URL
[22]	SPRINGETT J A. The effect of prescribed burning on the soil fauna and on litter decomposition in Western Australian forests[J]. Australian journal of ecology, 1976, 1(2):77-82. doi: 10.1111/aec.1976.1.issue-2 URL
[23]	CASTRO-HUERTA R, MORALES C, GAJARDO J, et al. Soil mesofauna responses to fire severity in a sclerophyllous forest in central Chile[J]. Forests, 2021, 12(11):1444. doi: 10.3390/f12111444 URL
[24]	BECK K, MÜLLER C, BAUER A, et al. Effects of bark beetle disturbance and fuel types on fire radiative power and burn severity in the Bohemian-Saxon Switzerland[J]. Forestry: an international journal of forest research, 2024, 1(1):59-70.
[25]	SPRINGETT J A. The effects of a single hot summer fire on soil fauna and on litter decomposition in jarrah (Eucalyptus marginata) forest in Western Australia[J]. Austral ecology, 1979, 4(3):279-291. doi: 10.1111/aec.1979.4.issue-3 URL
[26]	ZAITSEV A S, GONGALSKY K B, MALMSTRÖM A, et al. Why are forest fires generally neglected in soil fauna research? a mini-review[J]. Applied soil ecology, 2016, 98:261-271. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2015.10.012 URL
[27]	阚志毅, 陈光程, 陈彬, 等. 热带气旋对红树林的影响研究进展--基于文献计量分析[J]. 生态学报, 2023, 43(18):7797-7806.
[28]	陈悦, 陈超美, 刘则渊, 等. CiteSpace知识图谱的方法论功能[J]. 科学学研究, 2015, 33(2):242-253.
[29]	唐浩竣, 李海萍, 陈文悦, 等. 基于科学知识图谱谈土壤有机碳研究进展[J]. 土壤学报, 2019, 56(3):541-552.
[30]	蓝婷, 唐立娜, 徐智邦, 等. 基于文献计量的城市空间紧凑度研究知识图谱分析[J]. 生态学报, 2022, 42(4):1645-1654.
[31]	COBO M J, LÓPEZ-HERRERA A G, HERRERA-VIEDMA E, et al. Science mapping software tools: review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools[J]. Journal of the American society for information science and technology, 2014, 62(7):1382-1402. doi: 10.1002/asi.v62.7 URL
[32]	付晓宇, 魏丹, 伍一宁, 等. 土壤动物研究热点的可视化分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2023, 39(18):158-164. doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2022-0592
[33]	张振煜, 汤镇霖, 张朝晖, 等. 基于文献计量学的国家湿地公园研究[J]. 生态学报, 2023, 43(22):9555-9563.
[34]	QI J, CHENG P, GAO F, et al. Research advances and prospects on rapid acquisition technology of farmland soil physical and chemical parameters[J]. Smart agriculture, 2024, 6(3):17-33. doi: 10.12133/j.smartag.SA202404003
[35]	安占昊, 李元恒, 马晖玲, 等. 基于CiteSpace的草原土壤近三十年研究态势分析[J]. 中国草地学报, 2024, 46(7):123-134.
[36]	GONGALSKY K B, ZAITSEV A S. The role of spatial heterogeneity of the environment in soil fauna recovery after fires[J]. Doklady biological sciences, 2016, 471(2):413-416.
[37]	DELGADO-BAQUERIZO M, ELDRIDGE D J, REICH P B, et al. Soil microbial communities drive the resistance of ecosystem multifunctionality to global change in drylands across the globe[J]. Ecology letters, 2017, 20(10):1295-1305. doi: 10.1111/ele.2017.20.issue-10 URL
[38]	杨大星, 杨文佳, 叶婷, 等. 火烧干扰对喀斯特地区大型土壤节肢动物群落的影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 2019, 38(3):1449-1456.
[39]	GONGALSKY K B, ZAITSEV A S, PERSSON T. Recovery of soil macrofauna after wildfires in boreal forests[J]. Soil biology & biochemistry, 2013, 57:182-191. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.07.005 URL
[40]	GORBUNOVA A Y, KOROBUSHKIN D I, GONGALSKY K B, et al. Forest fires increase variability of soil macrofauna communities along a macrogeographic gradient[J]. European journal of soil biology, 2017, 83:43-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ejsobi.2017.09.003 URL
[41]	张淑花, 张雪萍. 大兴安岭火烧迹地土壤动物的群落多样性[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2009, 15(5):672-676.
[42]	GIBSON K, JOHNSON N, LATURNO C, et al. Abundance of mites, but not of collembolans or nematodes, is reduced by restoration of a Pinus ponderosa forest with thinning, mastication, and prescribed fire[J]. Trees, forests and people, 2022, 7:100190. doi: 10.1016/j.tfp.2022.100190 URL
[43]	KONDRATOVA A V, BRYANIN S V, SINYAKOVA N I. Effect of fire-derived charcoal on the early decomposition of oak leaf litter under faunal community complexity[J]. Contemporary problems of ecology, 2025, 18(1):13-23. doi: 10.1134/S1995425524700860
[44]	FARSKÁ J, ADÁMEK M, SCHLAGHAMERSKÝ J, et al. Long-term post-fire recovery of an oribatid mite assemblage: a case study from a temperate coniferous forest[J]. Applied soil ecology, 2024, 202:105603. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2024.105603 URL

火干扰对土壤动物的影响—基于文献计量分析

Effects of Fire Disturbance on Soil Fauna Based on Bibliometric Analysis

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 8

参考文献 44

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

关于本刊

作者中心

审者中心

在线期刊

联系我们

[1]	任嘉隆, 李红娟, 刘继亮, 辛未冬. 长期免耕覆盖对大型土壤动物群落结构与多样性的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2026, 42(5): 92-100.
[2]	周佳慧, 唐浦林, 张诗野, 张爱华, 汪树理, 魏航, 任新龙, 郜玉钢, 王艳芳. 基于CNKI数据库的土壤酸化调节措施文献计量分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2026, 42(2): 203-210.
[3]	秦小欢, 焦多朵, 金铁棚, 孙师, 郜坤媛, 胡建霖. 人参属植物根系微生态研究态势分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2026, 42(2): 84-92.
[4]	卢云峰, 李锐群, 曾润华, 李树忠, 王忠美, 李智海, 贾冬冬. 基于Web of Science文献计量的香蕉枯萎病研究态势分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2025, 41(8): 149-158.
[5]	徐静, 王超, 万小刚, 赵岳, 伍勇. 基于文献计量的中国植物内生真菌学位论文研究热点与趋势分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2025, 41(8): 140-148.
[6]	王彦, 刘晓丽, 张怡, 陈宏灏. 基于CiteSpace的葡萄阿小叶蝉研究进展可视化分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2025, 41(7): 121-127.
[7]	曾婷, 胡晋豪, 龚颖婷, 姚建武, 申健, 王荣辉, 李盟军. 基于文献计量法的轮作影响氨排放研究进展及热点分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2025, 41(35): 110-121.
[8]	钱海林, 王诗岩, 任鹏, 杨芳, 常佳琪, 常阳阳, 王东印. 基于文献计量分析的油莎豆研究热点及趋势[J]. 中国农学通报, 2025, 41(32): 145-157.
[9]	钱帅, 王明达, 祝慧, 刘淑媛, 王浩宇, 范利超. 文献计量学视角下蚯蚓对土壤有机碳转化累积的影响研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2025, 41(32): 61-73.
[10]	刘雅君, 何涵, 李爽, 孙晓春, 汪晓蕊, 史鑫波, 蔡兴航, 黄文静. 珠子参研究的全球知识网络：文献计量与可视化分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2025, 41(31): 47-59.
[11]	魏丹, 崔福星, 李虹, 潘虹, 郭媛, 杨立宾, 付晓宇, 李海军. 基于CiteSpace的土壤动物研究现状与热点分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2025, 41(29): 137-145.
[12]	杨笑楠, 赵国瑞, 赵玲玲, 胡静波, 王嘉乐, 杜娇, 刘国顺, 刘战卿, 陈冲, 张松涛. 基于文献计量学的可溶性有机碳研究知识图谱分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2025, 41(28): 111-121.
[13]	张瑞, 张蛟, 崔士友, 余清源, 朱宇恒, 杨硕, 田晋钰, 车飞伟, 陈英龙, 韦还和, 戴其根, 陈澎军. 基于文献计量学对外源物缓解作物非生物胁迫效应的分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2025, 41(27): 44-53.
[14]	王彦, 陈宏灏, 刘晓丽, 马建华. 基于VOSviewer和CiteSpace的介壳虫研究进展及趋势[J]. 中国农学通报, 2025, 41(24): 151-164.
[15]	安艳, 欧巧明, 王丽, 梁婷玉, 崔文娟, 朱旭. 紫苏叶活性化学成分研究进展及其抗氧化与抑菌活性的物质基础[J]. 中国农学通报, 2025, 41(20): 128-142.