欢迎访问《中国农学通报》,

中国农学通报 ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (2): 25-31.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2025-0490

• 农学·农业基础科学 • 上一篇    下一篇

晚播条件下不同小麦品种农艺性状和产量的差异性分析

王君(), 左希, 仇景涛, 杨武广, 钱晨诚()   

  1. 江苏省扬州市邗江区农作物技术推广中心, 江苏扬州 225009
  • 收稿日期:2025-06-18 修回日期:2025-11-05 出版日期:2026-01-25 发布日期:2026-01-22
  • 通讯作者:
    钱晨诚,男,1998年出生,江苏扬州人,助理农艺师,硕士研究生,主要从事小麦抗逆栽培方面的研究。通信地址:225100 江苏扬州市邗江区新城河路506号 邗江区农作物技术推广中心,E-mail:
  • 作者简介:

    王君,女,1981年出生,江苏建湖人,高级农艺师,硕士研究生,主要从事稻麦作物栽培方面的研究。通信地址:225100 江苏扬州市邗江区新城河路506号 邗江区农作物技术推广中心,Tel:0514-87782319,E-mail:

  • 基金资助:
    2024年江苏省现代农业发展专项“2024—2025年邗江区小麦绿色高质高效创建”(2024-1sj02)

Differences Analysis of Agronomic Traits and Yield of Different Wheat Varieties Under Late-Sowing Conditions

WANG Jun(), ZUO Xi, QIU Jingtao, YANG Wuguang, QIAN Chencheng()   

  1. Hanjiang Centre for Crop Technology Promotion, Yangzhou, Jiangsu 225009
  • Received:2025-06-18 Revised:2025-11-05 Published:2026-01-25 Online:2026-01-22

摘要:

旨在筛选出高产稳产耐晚播的小麦品种,通过比较17个小麦品种农艺性状及产量的差异性,以期为晚播地区小麦稳产高产提供品种选择依据和理论支撑。以CJ580等17种不同小麦品种为试材,采用单因素随机区组设计,成熟期测定产量三要素并以人工实测按13%含水量折算籽粒产量;在各生育期测定群体茎蘖数并计算成穗率;在成熟期随机选取20株代表性植株,测量株高及穗长;选择晚播条件下易发生的主要病害,在病害流行盛期目测受害程度。通过SPSS和LSD法进行数据处理分析。结果显示,不同品种在各生育阶段的茎蘖动态存在显著差异:越冬期YF19茎蘖数最高,返青期YF19、ZM18、YM23并列第一,拔节期YM1达到峰值(1008×104/hm²),孕穗乳熟期CJ580、YM43、YM36表现最优,茎蘖成穗率介于44.64%~49.79%。株高和穗长方面,YM1、YM34、YM46表现突出(株高>66cm,穗长>8cm),而ZM23、YM30等品种显著较低。病害监测显示所有品种未发生赤霉病、锈病和倒伏,仅个别出现轻微白粉病。研究发现晚播导致普遍减产,生育期缩短至200 d,株高普遍降低。表现优异的品种通过差异化补偿机制调节产量三要素,分别通过高穗数(YM43)、农艺性状均衡(YM1)、穗粒数优势(YM34)和千粒重突出(YM46)实现产量稳定,均高于6500kg/hm2。研究为极端气候下的品种筛选提供了实践依据,但结论需结合多年多区域试验进一步验证。综上所述,‘扬麦43’、‘盐麦1号’、‘扬麦34’和‘扬麦46’为极端气候和晚播条件下适宜在扬州市邗江区初步推广的耐晚播稳产品种。

关键词: 冬小麦, 晚播, 品种, 表观性状, 极端气候

Abstract:

The aim is to screen out high-yield, stable and tolerant to late sowing wheat varieties. By comparing the differences in agronomic traits and yield of 17 wheat varieties, the study aims to provide a basis and theoretical support for the selection of varieties for high yield and stable yield of wheat in late sowing areas. Using CJ580 and other 16 wheat varieties as test materials, a single-factor random block design was employed to measure the three key yield components at maturity, and convert the grain yield according to 13% moisture content. The number of tillers per plant and the earing rate were measured at various growth stages. At maturity, 20 representative plants were randomly selected to measure plant height and ear length. The main diseases that are likely to occur under late-sowing conditions were monitored, and their severity was assessed visually during the peak disease period. Data were analyzed using SPSS and the LSD method. The results showed that there were significant differences in the tiller dynamics of different varieties at various growth stages: YF19 had the highest number of tillers during the winter survival stage, YF19, ZM18, and YM23 tied for first place during the green-up stage, and YM1 reached its peak (1008×104/hm2) during the jointing stage. CJ580, YM43, and YM36 performed optimally during the earing and milk stages, with the tiller-to-earing rate ranging from 44.64% to 49.79%. In terms of plant height and ear length, YM1, YM34, and YM46 stood out (plant height> 66 cm, ear length> 8 cm), while ZM23 and YM30 were significantly lower. Disease monitoring showed that all varieties had not experienced Fusarium head blight, rust, or lodging, with only a few showing mild powdery mildew. The study found that late sowing generally led to reduced yields, shortened growth periods to 200 days, and a general decrease in plant height. Outstanding varieties regulate the three key factors of yield through a differentiated compensation mechanism. These factors include high ear numbers (YM43), balanced agronomic traits (YM1), ear-to-grain number advantage (YM34), and outstanding thousand-grain weight (YM46), all achieving stable yields above 6500 kg/hm2. This study provides practical guidance for variety screening under extreme climates, but the conclusions need to be further validated through multi-year and multi-regional trials. In summary, ‘YANGMAI 43’, ‘YANMAI 1’, ‘YANGMAI 34’, and ‘YANGMAI 46’ are suitable for initial promotion in Hanjiang District, Yangzhou under extreme climates and late sowing conditions as late-sowing-resistant and stable varieties.

Key words: winter wheat, late sowing, variety, phenotypic traits, extreme climate