不同生态型芸芥响应盐胁迫的有机物质初步研究

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb16030179

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了探明有机渗透调节剂在耐盐性中的作用,本研究以芸芥耐盐生态型和不耐盐生态型为试材,测定了盐胁迫下芸芥叶片可溶性蛋白、脯氨酸、可溶性糖含量等。结果表明,渗透势和可溶性蛋白含量在两种生态型间均无明显差异；叶片渗透势和有机渗透调节剂之间没有呈现一致性的变化趋势；不同盐胁迫下,耐盐生态型较不耐盐生态型含有较多的脯氨酸,而在高盐胁迫下,在耐盐生态型中还检测到了高浓度的可溶性糖和游离氨基酸。随着盐浓度的升高,耐盐生态型中可溶性蛋白的总量缓慢增加,但当盐浓度大于200 mmol L_-1时,可溶性蛋白的含量下降。这些结果初步证明,脯氨酸、可溶性糖和游离氨基酸在盐胁迫应答中起关键作用,可作为选择耐盐芸芥的标准。

关键词: 黄土旱塬, 黄土旱塬, 小麦, 水分利用效率, 水势, 产量

Abstract: In order to study the effect of organic osmolyte in salt stress, salt-tolerant and non-tolerant ecotypes of Eruca sativa Mill. were used as materials, the content of soluble protein, proline, soluble sugar in leaves were measured. The results showed that osmotic potential and soluble protein content had no significant difference between the two ecotypes, and conforming variation trend was not found between leaf osmotic potential and organic osmolyte. Under different salt stresses, the salt-tolerant plants had higher proline content than that of non-tolerant plants, and soluble sugar and free amino acid of high concentration were found in salttolerant plants under high salt stress. The content of soluble protein increased slowly in salt-tolerant plants with the increase of salt concentration, and the content of soluble protein decreased when the salt concentration ＞200 mmol/L. The results indicated that proline, soluble sugar and free amino acid played important roles in the responses to salt stress, and could be the standard to select salt-tolerant Eruca sativa.

范惠玲,刘秦,白生文,李华青. 不同生态型芸芥响应盐胁迫的有机物质初步研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2017, 33(3): 52-56.

参考文献

[1] 孙万仓,范惠玲,孟亚雄, 等. 利用RAPD分子标记技术研究芸芥的遗传多样性[J].中国农业科学, 2006,39(5):1049-1057.
[2] Chen K, Zhang XB, Jiang JL, et al. Plantlet regeneration from cotyledon, cotyledon petiole, and hypocotyl explants via somatic embryogenesis pathway in roquette (Eruca sativa Mill.)[J]. Plant Biosyst, 2011,145, 68-76.
[3] Michalis O, Chara P, Dimitra K. Relationships between nitrogen, dry matter accumulation and glucosinolates in Eruca sativa Mill[J]. Plant and Soil, 2012,1: 347-358.
[4] Matsuzawa Y, Mekiyanon S, Kaneko Y, et al. Male sterility in alloplasmic Brassica rapa L. carrying Eruca sativa cytoplasm[J]. Plant Breed, 1999,118, 82-84.
[5] 张涛, 孙万仓. 芸芥与白菜型油菜远缘杂交亲和性研究[J]. 西北农业学报, 2004,13(2):28-30.
[6] 孙万仓, 官春云, 孟亚雄, 等. 芸芥(Eruca sativa Mill.)与芸薹(Brassica L.)属3个油用种的远缘杂交[J].作物学报,2005, 31: 36-42.
[7] Omirou M, Papastefanou C, Katsarou D, et al. Relationships between nitrogen, dry matter accumulation and glucosinolates in Eruca sativa Mill[J]. The applicability of the critical NO₃-N levels approach. Plant Soil,2012, 354, 347-358.
[8] 范惠玲,罗芳芳,黄雪莲,等. 芸芥自交亲和性变异的初步研究[J]. 植物学报, 2015, 50(5)：598-604.
[9] Deinlein U, Stephan AB, Horie T, et al. Plant salt-tolerance mechanisms[J]. Trends Plant Sci, 2014,19: 371-379.
[10] Greenway H, Manns R. Mechanism of salt tolerance in non-halophytes[J]. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 1980, 31: 149-190.
[11] Dikshit SN, Pathak P K. Effect of sodicity and salinity on free and protein bound amino acids in Indian gooseberry[J]. Indian J. agr. Sci, 1992, 62: 60-63.
[12] 赵江涛, 李晓峰, 李航, 等. 可溶性糖在高等植物代谢调节中的生理作用[J].安徽农业科学, 2006,34(24): 6423- 6425,6427.
[13] 王丽媛,丁国华, 黎莉. 脯氨酸代谢的研究进展[J]. 哈尔滨师范大学自然科学学报, 2010,26(2):84-89.
[14] Maas EV, Nieman RH. Physiology of plant tolerance to salinity[M]. In: Crop Tolerance to Suboptimal Land Conditions. Pp.1978, 277-299. ASA Special Publication No. 32, Madison.
[15] Cram W J. Negative feedback regulation of transport in cells. The maintenance ofturgor, volume and nutrient supply[M].. In: LiRtge, U., Pitman, M.G. (ed.). Transport in Plants II. Part A. Cells.Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology, New Series, Pp. 1976, 284-316. Springer Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg New York.
[16] Rains DW.Salt tolerance new developments[M]. In: Manassah, J.T., Briskey, E.J. (ed.). Advances in Food Producing Systems for Arid and Semi-arid Lands. Part A. Pp. 1981,431-456. Academic Press, New York.
[17] Wyn Jones RG. Salt tolerance In: C. B. Johnson (ed.)[M]. Physiological Processes Limiting Plant Productivity. Pp. 1981,271-292. Butterworths, London Boston.
[18] Moflah AE, Michel BE. The effect of NaCI on solute potential and proline accumulation in soybean leaves[J]. Plant Physiol,1987, 83: 238-240.
[19] Ashraf M. The effect of NaCl on water relations, chlorophyll, and protein and proline contents of two cultivars of blackgram (Vigna mungo L.)[J]. Plant Soil, 1989,119: 205-210.
[20] Ashraf M, Naqvi, MI. Effect of varying Na/Ca ratios in saline sand culture on some physiological parameters of four Brassica species[J]. Acta Physio Plant,1992,14:342-349.
[21] 闫旭东. 植物耐盐性鉴定及评价技术规程[M]. 中国农业科学技术出版社,2012,6-7.
[22] Bates L S, Waldren R P, Tear I D. Rapid determination of free proline for water stress studies[J]. Plant Soil, 1973,39: 205-207.
[23] Lowry O H, Rosebrough N J, Farr A L, et al. Protein measurement with Folin phenol reagent. J biol. Chem, 1951,193: 265-275.
[24] Hamilton PB, Van Slyke, DD. Amino acid determination with ninhydrin[J]. J. biol. Chem, 1943,150:231-233.
[25] Malik C P, Srivastava A K. Text Book of Plant Physiology. Kalyani Publishers, New Delhi. 1979.
[26] 付畅, 孙玉刚, 傅桂荣. 盐生植物耐盐分子机制的研究进展[J]. 生物技术通报, 2013,1:1-7.
[27] Taji T, Seki M, Satou M. Comparative genomics in salt tolerance between Arabidopsis and Arabidopsis-related halophyte salt cress using Arabidopsis microarray[J]. Plant Physiol, 2004,135(3):1697-1709.
[28] 吴运荣, 林宏伟, 莫肖蓉. 植物抗盐分子机制及作物遗传改良耐盐性的研究进展[J]. 植物生理学报, 2014,50 (11):1621-1629.
[29] Miyama M, Tada Y. Transcriptional and physiological study of the response of Burma mangrove(Bruguiera gymnorhiza)to salt and osmotic stress[J]. Plant Mol Biol, 2008,68(1-2):119-129.
[30] Langdale G W, Thomas J R , Littleton T G. Nitrogen metabolism of star grass as affected by nitrogen and soil salinity[J]. Agron J,1973, 65:468-470.
[31] Helal M, Koch K, Mengel K. Effect of salinity and posassium on the uptake of nitrogen and on nitrogen metabolism in young barley plants[J]. Physiol. Plant, 1975,35:310-313.
[32] Dalal M, Tayal D, Chinnusamy V, et al. Abiotic stress and ABA-inducible group 4 LEA from Brassica napus plays a key role in salt and drought tolerance[J]. J Biotechnol, 2009, 139: 137-145.
[33] 王宝山. 逆境植物生物学[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2010.
[34] Ben Hassine A, Ghanem ME, Bouzid S. An inland and a coastal population of the Mediterranean xero-halophyte species Atriplex halimus L. differ in their ability to accumulate proline and glycinebetaine in response to salinity and water stress[J]. J Exp Bot, 2008,59(6):1315-1326.
[35] Lutts S, Majerus V, Kinet JM. NaCl effects on proline metabolism in rice(Oryza sativa)seedlings[J]. Physiologia Plantarum, 1999,105(3):450-458.
[36] Storey R, Ahmad N, Wyn Jones RG. Taxonomic and ecological aspects of the distribution of glycinebetaine and related compounds in plants[J]. Oecologia,1977, 27:319-332.
[37] Wyn Jones, RG, Storey R. Salt stress and comparative physiology in the Gramineae. II.Glycinebetaine and proline accumulation in two salt- and water-stressed barley cultivars[J]. Aust. J. Plant Physiol, 1978,5: 817-829.
[38] 刘欣. 植物的耐盐生物学机制研究进展[J]. 哈尔滨师范大学自然科学学报, 2015, 31(2):140-143.
[39] Ashraf M, Waheed A. Organic solute status and water relations of some salt-tolerant and salt-sensitiveaccessions of lentil (Lens culinaris)[J]. Acta bot. Neerl, 1993, 42: 63-72.
[40] Sahu BB, Shaw BP. Isolation, identification and expression analysis of salt-induced genes in Suaeda maritima, a natural halophyte using PCR-based suppression subtractive hybridization[J]. BMC Plant Biol, 2004, 9:69.