小波分析在大豆叶绿素含量高光谱反演中的应用

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 实测了不同水肥耦合作用下，大豆冠层高光谱反射率与叶绿素含量数据，并对光谱反射率、微分光谱与叶绿素含量进行了相关分析；采用叶绿素A与叶绿素B诊断波段构建了特定植被指数，对叶绿素A、叶绿素B进行了回归分析；采用小波分析对采集的光谱反射率数据进行了能量系数提取，并以小波能量系数作为自变量进行了单变量与多变量回归分析，对叶绿素含量进行估算。经分析发现，叶绿素A、B与光谱反射率在可见光与近红外波段的相关系数的变化趋势基本一致——在可见光谱波段呈负相关，近红外波段呈正相关，红边处相关系数由负变正。特定色素植被指数可以提高大豆叶绿素估算精度（R2>0.73）；小波能量系数回归模型可以进一步提高大豆叶绿素含量的估算水平，以一个特定小波能量系数作为自变量的回归模型，叶绿素A其确定性系数R2为0.76，叶绿素B为0.78；以4变量与9变量回归分析结果表明：叶绿素A实测值与预测值的线性回归确定性系数R2分别大于0.85、0.89；叶绿素B实测值与预测值的线性回归确定性系数R2分别为0.86、0.90。

关键词: 密度, 密度, 氮肥, 玉米品质

Abstract: Soybean canopy reflectance data collected with ASD spectroradiometers (350~1050nm) which were cultivated in water-fertilizer coupled control conditions, and chlorophyll-A and chlorophyll-B content data were collected simultaneously. First, correlation between reflectance, derivative reflectance against chl-A and chl-B were analyzed. Secondly, RVI, RARSa and PSSRb regressed against chl-A and chl-B. Finally, wavelet energy coefficients of spectral reflectance were extracted, and then those energy coefficients regress against chl-A, chl-B with different method. It was found that soybean canopy reflectance showed a negative relation with chl-A and chl-B, while it showed a positive relation with chl-A and chl-B in near infrared region. Reflectance derivative has an intimate relation with chl-A and chl-B in blue, green and red edge spectral region, and got maximum correlation coefficient in red edge region. Chlorophyll specified absorption vegetation index have intimate relation with chl-A and chl-B, with regression determination coefficient R2 greater than 0.736. Regression model established with single wavelet energy coefficient obtained and determination coefficient R2 greater than 0.76 and 0.78 for chl-A and chl-B respectively. Step wise regression with 4 and 9 wavelet energy coefficients were also done, the result showed that the relation between regression model, with 4 and 9 independents, predicted chl-A and measured chl-A with a determination coefficient R2 of 0.85 and 0.89 respectively, however, for chl-B, the model predicted chl-B and measured chl-B with a determination coefficient R2 of 0.86 and 0.90 respectively. By above analysis, it indicated that wavelet transform can be applied to in-situ collected hyperspectral data processing and model establishing with quite accurate model prediction, and in the future, wavelet transform still should be applied to hyperspectral data for other vegetation biophysical and biochemical parameters inversion.

中图分类号:

S127

宋开山,张柏,王宗明,李方,刘焕军. 小波分析在大豆叶绿素含量高光谱反演中的应用[J]. 中国农学通报, 2006, 22(9): 101-101.

Song Kaishan, Zhang Bai, Wang Zongming, Li Fang, Liu Huanjun. Application of Wavelet Transformation in In-situ Measured Hyperspectral Data for Soybean LAI Estimation[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2006, 22(9): 101-101.

参考文献

1 Lichtenthaler H K. The stress concept in plants: An introduction. Annals of the New York Academy of Science, 1998, ((851):187~198
2 Niinemets U, Tenhunen J D. A model separating leaf structural and physiological effects on carbon gain along light gradients for the shade-tolerant species Acer saccharum. Plant, Cell and Environment, 1997,(20):845~866
3 Blackburn G A. Spectral indices for estimating photosynthetic pigment concentrations: A test using senescent tree leaves. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 1998,19(4):657~675
4 Daughtry C T, Walthal C L, et al. Estimating Corn Leaf Chlorophyll Concentrationfrom Leaf and Canopy Reflectance. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2000, 74:229~239
5 Haboudanea D, Miller J R, Pattey E, Zarco-Tejadad P J. Hyperspectral vegetation indices and novel algorithms for predicting green LAI of crop canopies: Modeling and validation in thecontext of precision agriculture. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2004,90(1):337~352
6 Markwell J, Osterman J, and Mitchell J L. Calibration of the Minolta SPAD-502 leaf chlorophyll meter. Photosynthesis Research, 1995,(46):467~472
7 Jiminez, L., Landgrebe, D. Hyperspctral data analysis and supervised feature reduction via project pur4suit. IEEE Trans on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 1999,(37):2653~2667
8 Lori Mann Bruce, Cliff H. Koger, Jiang Li. Dimensionality reduction of hyperspectral data using discrete transform feature extraction. IEEE Transactoins on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2002,40(10):2331~2338
9 L. Bruce and J.Li. Wavelet for computationally efficient hyperspectral derivative analysis. IEEE Transactoins on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2001,39(7): 1540~1546
10 Ruiliang Pu, Peng Gong. Wavelet transform applied to EO-1 hyperspectral data for forest LAI and crown closure mapping. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2004, (91):212~224
11 Adams M L, Norvell W A, Peverly J H, Philpot W D. Fluorescence and reflectance characteristics of manganese deficient soybean leaves: Effects of leaf age and choice of leaflet. Plant Soil, 1993,(155/156):235~238
12 Milton N M, Ager C M, Eiswerth B A, Power M S. Arsenic- and Selenium-induced changes in spectral reflectance and morphology of soybean plants. Remote Sens. Environ, 1989,30(3):263~269
13 Wang D, Wilson C, Shannon M. Interpretation of salinity and irrigation effects on soybean canopy reflectance in visible and near-infrared spectrum domain. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2002,23(5):811~824
14 王秀珍,黄敬峰,等.高光谱数据与水稻农学参数之间的相关分析[J].浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版),2002,28(3):283~288
15 赵春江,黄文江,等.不同品种、肥水条件下冬小麦光谱红边参数研究[J].中国农业科学,2002,35(8):980~987
16 黄文江,王纪华,刘良云,等.小麦品质指标与冠层光谱特征的相关性的初步研究[J].农业工程学报,2004, 20(4):203~207
17 宋开山,张柏,李方,等.高光谱反射率与大豆叶面积及地上生物量的相关分析[J].农业工程学报,2005,21(1):36~40
18 段正兴.小波分析算法与应用[M].西安:西安交通大学出版社,1998.72
19 Chappelle E W, Moon S, KimJames E, McMurtrey III. Ratio analysis of reflectance spectra (RARS): An algorithm for the remote estimation of the concentrations of chlorophyll A, chlorophyll B, and carotenoids in soybean leaves. Remote Sensing of Environment, 1992,39(3):239~247

[1]	周冬冬, 张军, 葛梦婕, 刘忠红, 朱晓欢, 李春燕. 不同氮肥处理对稻茬晚播小麦‘淮麦36’产量、氮素利用率和品质的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2023, 39(1): 1-7.
[2]	李兴华, 王欢, 张盛, 蔡星星, 周强, 周楠. 氮肥用量与运筹方式对晚籼稻产量及花后干物质积累与转运的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(9): 6-13.
[3]	刘海英, 王增, 徐耀文, 葛晓改, 周本智, 蒋仲龙. 不同林分密度毛竹林生态系统碳储量特征[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(35): 17-21.
[4]	何孟霞, 崔顺立, 郑宝智, 毕志乐, 路随增, 齐丽雅, 李新娜, 刘红, 韩鹏, 王瑾, 刘立峰. 不同花生品种适宜单粒精播密度研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(33): 23-27.
[5]	许丹阳, 李虹颖, 孙义祥, 邬刚, 王家宝, 袁嫚嫚, 王佩旋, 张祥明, 束孝海. 不同比例有机无机肥配施对水稻产量与氮素利用率的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(31): 1-5.
[6]	郎漫, 袁晓航, 李平. 不同施氮水平对农田黑土净氮转化速率和温室气体排放的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(31): 93-100.
[7]	毛思帅, 李仁崑, 周继华, 王俊英. 种植密度对北方设施叶用甘薯茎尖、产量和效益的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(27): 13-18.
[8]	丁明亮, 刘佳, 李绍祥, 杨忠慧, 白应文, 张艳军, 李宏生, 熊世安, 杨木军, 刘琨. 小麦新品种‘云麦110’产量和品质性状对不同种植密度的响应[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(24): 1-7.
[9]	侯俊峰, 陈斌, 包斐, 谭禾平, 韩海亮, 王桂跃, 赵福成. 秸混肥不同处理对‘浙甜19’生长特性和产量的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(23): 6-14.
[10]	程鸿雁, 张兰英, 王凤, 杜振宇. 山东省赤松人工林土壤理化特性与综合肥力[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(23): 70-76.
[11]	李可可, 董永彬, 汪丽爽, 王寒, 李亚永, 张龙, 李玉玲. 宜机收玉米新品种‘豫单132’适宜种植密度的筛选[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(23): 1-5.
[12]	郭丽琢, 杨波, 高玉红, 牛俊义. 施氮对胡麻磷素营养状况的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(21): 24-31.
[13]	聂大杭, 陈蕾蕾, 刘淑艳. 不同氮肥、有机肥用量配比对番茄产量及养分分布的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(21): 32-35.
[14]	金彦刚, 丁锦峰, 袁权, 夏中华, 殷静, 杨永乐, 刘海浪, 任仰涛, 陈伟, 李珍富, 赵其兵, 卫万娟, 郑雅月. 播期和密度对江苏淮北强筋小麦籽粒产量和品质的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(18): 1-7.
[15]	程建梅, 赵树政, 杨美丽, 苏玉杰, 王帮太, 鹿红卫, 秦贵文. 种植密度对玉米品种植株及籽粒相关性状的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(18): 20-27.