作物持绿性的研究进展及育种趋势

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2025-0575

中国农学通报 ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (8): 77-83.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2025-0575

作物持绿性的研究进展及育种趋势

高莉聪(), 冯国军, 刘大军, 杨晓旭, 张泰峰, 刘畅()

黑龙江大学现代农业与生态环境学院，哈尔滨 150000

收稿日期:2025-07-07 修回日期:2025-10-11 出版日期:2026-04-25 发布日期:2026-04-23
通讯作者:
刘畅，女，1989年出生，辽宁沈阳人，副研究员，博士，研究方向：蔬菜遗传育种与生物技术。通信地址：150000 黑龙江省哈尔滨市南岗区74号黑龙江大学现代农业与生态环境学院，E-mail：lcky0909@126.com。
作者简介:
高莉聪，女，1999年出生，重庆人，硕士研究生，研究方向：蔬菜遗传育种与生物技术。通信地址：150000 黑龙江省哈尔滨市南岗区学府路74号黑龙江大学现代农业与生态环境学院，E-mail：3066864552@qq.com。
基金资助:
黑龙江省自然科学基金联合引导项目“菜豆荚壁纤维形成的主效基因筛选与候选基因功能鉴定”(LH2024C097); 黑龙江省优秀青年教师基础研究支撑计划“菜豆豆荚纤维突变基因pv-bfm的克隆与候选基因功能验证”(YQJH2024198); 黑龙江省省属本科高校基本科研业务费(2024-KYYWF-0110)

Crop Stay-green Trait: Research Progress and Breeding Trends

GAO Licong(), FENG Guojun, LIU Dajun, YANG Xiaoxu, ZHANG Taifeng, LIU Chang()

College of Modern Agriculture and Ecological Environment, Heilongjiang University, Harbin 150000

Received:2025-07-07 Revised:2025-10-11 Published:2026-04-25 Online:2026-04-23

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

持绿性状在延缓植株衰老进程、提升有效光合效率及增加作物产量等方面具有重要作用；在增强作物抗逆性、减少化肥施用等方面具有可观的应用价值。为了深入了解作物持绿性状的优势及育种潜力，本文从持绿性状生理机制、分子调控网络、育种趋势3个层面系统综述了当前该性状的研究进展：在生理层面，阐述了该性状在作物生育后期通过稳定叶绿素含量、维持光系统活性、延长灌浆期及增加碳同化物质积累等途径提升作物产量；在分子调控网络互作层面，归纳了关键目标基因（如NAC、WRKY、GLK等转录因子）的定位与激素信号互作，共同调控衰老进程与持绿表型；在育种趋势层面，持绿已广泛用于多性状整合、氮素高效利用、抗旱耐逆等改良方向。当前研究仍存在QTL环境不稳定、持绿与养分再动员平衡机制不清、过度持绿影响品质等问题。提出未来应聚焦核心基因调控网络解析，平衡“延衰”与“营养转运”，培育高产、优质、抗逆、适宜机械化的持绿新品种。

关键词: 持绿性状, 增产, 增强抗逆性, 育种趋势, 多性状整合育种

Abstract:

The stay-green traits play an important role in delaying the aging of plants, improving effective photosynthetic efficiency and increasing crop yields; it has considerable application value in enhancing crop stress resistance and reducing fertilizer application. In order to gain a deeper understanding of the advantages and breeding potential of the stay-green trait in crops, this paper systematically reviews the current research progress on the stay-green trait from three aspects: physiological mechanism, molecular regulatory network, and breeding trend. At the physiological level, it explains that this trait stabilizes chlorophyll content, maintains photosystem activity, improves crop yields by extending the grouting period and increasing the accumulation of carbon-assimilating substances; at the level of molecular regulatory network interaction, summarized the localization and hormone signal crosstalk of key target genes (e.g., transcription factors including NAC, WRKY, and GLK), which co-regulate the senescence process and stay-green phenotype. At the breeding trend level, the stay-green trait has been widely adopted for improvements in multi-trait integration, high-efficiency nitrogen utilization, drought resistance and stress tolerance. At present, there are still some problems in the research, such as unstable QTL environment, unclear balance mechanism of stay-green and nutrient remobilization, and excessive stay-green affecting quality. In the future, we should focus on the analysis of core gene regulatory network, balance “delaying aging” and “nutritional remobilization”, and cultivate high-yield, high-quality, and suitable for mechanized production through multi-trait collaborative improvement.

Key words: stay-green trait, yield enhancement, enhanced stress resistance, breeding trends, multi-trait integration breeding

中图分类号:

S603.6育种方法、技术

高莉聪, 冯国军, 刘大军, 杨晓旭, 张泰峰, 刘畅. 作物持绿性的研究进展及育种趋势[J]. 中国农学通报, 2026, 42(8): 77-83.

GAO Licong, FENG Guojun, LIU Dajun, YANG Xiaoxu, ZHANG Taifeng, LIU Chang. Crop Stay-green Trait: Research Progress and Breeding Trends[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(8): 77-83.

图/表 1

参考文献 66

[1]	LESK C, ROWHANI P, RAMANKUTTY N. Influence of extreme weather disasters on global crop production[J]. Nature, 2016, 529(7584):84-87. doi: 10.1038/nature16467
[2]	THOMAS H, HOWARTH C J. Five ways to stay green[J]. Journal of experimental botany, 2000, 51(suppl_1):329-337. doi: 10.1093/jexbot/51.suppl_1.329 URL
[3]	KAMAL N M, GORAFI Y S A, ABDELRAHMAN M, et al. Stay-green trait: a prospective approach for yield potential, and drought and heat stress adaptation in globally important cereals[J]. International journal of molecular sciences, 2019, 20(23):5837. doi: 10.3390/ijms20235837 URL
[4]	GONG Y H, ZHANG J, GAO J F, et al. Slow export of photoassimilate from stay-green leaves during late grain-filling stage in hybrid winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)[J]. Journal of agronomy and crop science, 2005, 191(4):292-299. doi: 10.1111/jac.2005.191.issue-4 URL
[5]	BACHMANN A, FERNÁNDEZ LÓPEZ J, GINSBURG S, et al. Stay-green genotypes of Phaseolus vulgaris L.: chloroplast proteins and chlorophyll catabolites during foliar senescence[J]. New phytologist, 1994, 126(4):593-600. doi: 10.1111/nph.1994.126.issue-4 URL
[6]	YOO S C, CHO S H, ZHANG H, et al. Quantitative trait loci associated with functional stay-green SNU-SG1 in rice[J]. Molecules and cells, 2007, 24:83-94. doi: 10.1016/S1016-8478(23)10759-X URL
[7]	王楠. 白菜持绿性突变的发掘与鉴定[D]. 沈阳: 沈阳农业大学, 2020.
[8]	THOMAS H, OUGHAM H. The stay-green trait[J]. Journal of experimental botany, 2014, 65(14):3889-3900. doi: 10.1093/jxb/eru037 pmid: 24600017
[9]	HÖRTENSTEINER S. Stay-green regulates chlorophyll and chlorophyll-binding protein degradation during senescence[J]. Trends in plant science, 2009, 14(3):155-162. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2009.01.002 pmid: 19237309
[10]	BORRELL A K, HAMMER G L, DOUGLAS A C L. Does maintaining green leaf area in sorghum improve yield under drought? i. leaf growth and senescence[J]. Crop science, 2000, 40(4):1026-1037. doi: 10.2135/cropsci2000.4041026x URL
[11]	武永胜, 薛晖, 刘洋, 等. 持绿型小麦叶片衰老和叶绿素荧光特征的研究[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2010, 28(4):117-122.
[12]	梁赟. “持绿型”小麦开花后旗叶的生化、光合及叶绿素荧光特性研究[D]. 雅安: 四川农业大学, 2009.
[13]	陈骏伯. “持绿型”小麦延缓衰老的光合作用机制[D]. 雅安: 四川农业大学, 2010.
[14]	张子山, 李耕, 高辉远, 等. 玉米持绿与早衰品种叶片衰老过程中光化学活性的变化[J]. 作物学报, 2013, 39(1):93-100.
[15]	刘开昌. 不同玉米基因型叶片保绿性生理机理及遗传研究[D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2003.
[16]	KICHEY T, HIREL B, HEUMEZ E, et al. In winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), post-anthesis nitrogen uptake and remobilisation to the grain correlates with agronomic traits and nitrogen physiological markers[J]. Field crops research, 2007, 102(1):22-32. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2007.01.002 URL
[17]	STOY V. The translocation of C14-labelled photosynthetic products from the leaf to the ear in wheat[J]. Physiologia plantarum, 1963, 16(4):851-866. doi: 10.1111/ppl.1963.16.issue-4 URL
[18]	BORRILL P, FAHY B, SMITH A M, et al. Wheat grain filling is limited by grain filling capacity rather than the duration of flag leaf photosynthesis: a case study using NAM RNAi plants[J]. Plos one, 2015, 10(8):e0134947. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134947 URL
[19]	SCHNYDER H. The role of carbohydrate storage and redistribution in the source-sink relations of wheat and barley during grain filling-a review[J]. New phytologist, 1993, 123(2):233-245. doi: 10.1111/nph.1993.123.issue-2 URL
[20]	MIR YEGANEH M. Senescence: The compromised time of death that plants may call on themselves[J]. Genes, 2021, 12(2):143. doi: 10.3390/genes12020143 URL
[21]	韩光明. 水稻超绿突变体光合特性研究及持绿性相关基因定位[D]. 沈阳: 沈阳农业大学, 2009.
[22]	TUINSTRA M R, GROTE E M, GOLDSBROUGH P B, et al. Genetic analysis of post-flowering drought tolerance and components of grain development in Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench[J]. Molecular breeding, 1997, 3:439-448. doi: 10.1023/A:1009673126345
[23]	HASSAN M A, YANG M, RASHEED A, et al. Quantifying senescence in bread wheat using multispectral imaging from an unmanned aerial vehicle and QTL mapping[J]. Plant physiology, 2021, 187(4):2623-2636. doi: 10.1093/plphys/kiab431 pmid: 34601616
[24]	WANG S, LIANG Z, SUN D, et al. Quantitative trait loci mapping for traits related to the progression of wheat flag leaf senescence[J]. The journal of agricultural science, 2015, 153(7):1234-1245. doi: 10.1017/S002185961400094X URL
[25]	HUANG X Q, KEMPF H, GANAL M W, et al. Advanced backcross QTL analysis in progenies derived from a cross between a German elite winter wheat variety and a synthetic wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)[J]. Theoretical and applied genetics, 2004, 109(5):933-943. doi: 10.1007/s00122-004-1708-7 URL
[26]	PINTO R S, REYNOLDS M P, MATHEWS K L, et al. Heat and drought adaptive QTL in a wheat population designed to minimize confounding agronomic effects[J]. Theoretical and applied genetics, 2010, 121(6):1001-1021. doi: 10.1007/s00122-010-1351-4 pmid: 20523964
[27]	GUO Y, GAN S. AtNAP, a NAC family transcription factor, has an important role in leaf senescence[J]. The plant journal, 2006, 46(4):601-612. doi: 10.1111/tpj.2006.46.issue-4 URL
[28]	YANG S D, SEO P J, YOON H K, et al. The Arabidopsis NAC transcription factor VNI2 integrates abscisic acid signals into leaf senescence via the COR/RD genes[J]. The plant cell, 2011, 23(6):2155-2168. doi: 10.1105/tpc.111.084913 URL
[29]	QIU T, WEI S, FANG K, et al. The atypical Dof transcriptional factor OsDes1 contributes to stay-green, grain yield, and disease resistance in rice[J]. Science advances, 2024, 10(34):eadp0345.
[30]	LI S, LI S, TAN S, et al. Transcription factors-regulated leaf senescence in major crops: insights, applications, and challenges[J]. Current plant biology, 2024, 40:100428. doi: 10.1016/j.cpb.2024.100428 URL
[31]	KIM S H, YOON J, KIM H, et al. Rice basic helix-loop-helix 079 (OsbHLH079) delays leaf senescence by attenuating ABA signaling[J]. Rice, 2023, 16(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s12284-023-00673-w
[32]	MA X, ZHANG Y, TUREČKOVÁ V, et al. The NAC transcription factor SlNAP2 regulates leaf senescence and fruit yield in tomato[J]. Plant physiology, 2018, 177(3):1286-1302. doi: 10.1104/pp.18.00292 pmid: 29760199
[33]	CHEN W, ZHENG Y, WANG J, et al. Ethylene-responsive suppresses leaf senescence by inhibition of chlorophyll degradation in sorghum[J]. New phytologist, 2023, 238(3):1129-1145. doi: 10.1111/nph.v238.3 URL
[34]	POWELL A L T, NGUYEN C V, HILL T, et al. Uniform ripening encodes a golden 2-like transcription factor regulating tomato fruit chloroplast development[J]. Science, 2012, 336(6089):1711-1715. doi: 10.1126/science.1222218 pmid: 22745430
[35]	NGUYEN C V, VERBAL J T, GAPPER N E, et al. Tomato GOLDEN2-LIKE transcription factors reveal molecular gradients that function during fruit development and ripening[J]. The plant cell, 2014, 26(2):585-601. doi: 10.1105/tpc.113.118794 pmid: 24510723
[36]	PEI Y, HE X, XUE Q, et al. The bifunctional transcription factor DEAR1 oppositely regulates chlorophyll biosynthesis and degradation in tomato fruits[J]. The plant cell, 2025, 37(7):167.
[37]	CHRISTOPHER J, VEYRA DIER M, BORRELL A, et al. Phenotyping novel stay-green traits to capture genetic variation in senescence dynamics[J]. Functional plant biology, 2014, 41:1035-1048. doi: 10.1071/FP14052 pmid: 32481056
[38]	JOSHI A K, KUMARI M, SINGH V P, et al. Stay green trait: variation, inheritance and its association with spot blotch resistance in spring wheat (Triticumae stivum L.)[J]. Euphytica, 2007, 153(1):59-71. doi: 10.1007/s10681-006-9235-z URL
[39]	COOPER M, GHO C, LEAFGREN R, et al. Breeding drought-tolerant maize hybrids for the US corn-belt: discovery to product[J]. Journal of experimental botany, 2014, 65(21):6191-6204. doi: 10.1093/jxb/eru064 pmid: 24596174
[40]	BORRELL A K, MULLET J E, GEORGE-JAEGGLI B, et al. Drought adaptation of stay-green sorghum is associated with canopy development, leaf anatomy, root growth, and water uptake[J]. Journal of experimental botany, 2014, 65(21):6251-6263. doi: 10.1093/jxb/eru232 pmid: 25381433
[41]	BORRELL A K, VAN OOSTEROM E J, MULLET J E, et al. Stay-green alleles individually enhance grain yield in sorghum under drought by modifying canopy development and water uptake patterns[J]. New phytologist, 2014, 203(3):817-830. doi: 10.1111/nph.12869 pmid: 24898064
[42]	MU X, CHEN Y. The physiological response of photosynthesis to nitrogen deficiency[J]. Plant physiology and biochemistry, 2021, 158:76-82. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2020.11.019 pmid: 33296848
[43]	LIU Z, HU C, WANG Y, et al. Nitrogen allocation and remobilization contributing to low-nitrogen tolerance in stay-green maize[J]. Field crops research, 2021, 263:108078. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2021.108078 URL
[44]	BORRELL A K, HAMMER G L. Nitrogen dynamics and the physiological basis of stay-green in sorghum[J]. Crop science, 2000, 40(5):1295-1307. doi: 10.2135/cropsci2000.4051295x URL
[45]	HOU X, XUE Q, JESSUP K E, et al. Effect of nitrogen supply on stay-green sorghum in differing post-flowering water regimes[J]. Planta, 2021, 254: 63. doi: 10.1007/s00425-021-03712-2 pmid: 34477992
[46]	郭松. 持绿性对中国玉米品种氮转移效率的影响及其作用机制[D]. 北京: 中国农业大学, 2015.
[47]	石慧清, 龚月桦, 张东武. 花后高温对持绿型小麦叶片衰老及籽粒淀粉合成相关酶的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2011, 35(7):769-778. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2011.00769
[48]	FU W, WANG Y, YE Y, et al. Grain yields and nitrogen use efficiencies in different types of stay-green maize in response to nitrogen fertilizer[J]. Plants, 2020, 9(4):474. doi: 10.3390/plants9040474 URL
[49]	GREGERSEN P L, CULETIC A, BOSCHIAN L, et al. Plant senescence and crop productivity[J]. Plant molecular biology, 2013, 82(6):603-622. doi: 10.1007/s11103-013-0013-8 pmid: 23354836
[50]	GUO J H, LIU X J, ZHANG Y, et al. Significant acidification in major Chinese croplands[J]. Science, 2010, 327(5968):1008-1010. doi: 10.1126/science.1182570 pmid: 20150447
[51]	GEORGE-JAEGGLI B, MORTLOCK M Y, BORRELL A K. Bigger is not always better: reducing leaf area helps stay-green sorghum use soil water more slowly[J]. Environmental and experimental botany, 2017, 138:119-129. doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2017.03.002 URL
[52]	KAMAL N M, GORAFI Y S A, TSUJIMOTO H, et al. Stay-green QTLs response in adaptation to post-flowering drought depends on the drought severity[J]. Biomed research international,2018(2018):7082095.
[53]	ADEYANJU A, YU J, LITTLE C, et al. Sorghum RILs segregating for stay-green QTL and leaf dhurrin content show differential reaction to stalk rot diseases[J]. Crop science, 2016, 56(6):2895-2903. doi: 10.2135/cropsci2015.10.0628 URL
[54]	DISTEL FELD A, AVNI R, FISCHER A M. Senescence, nutrient remobilization, and yield in wheat and barley[J]. Journal of experimental botany, 2014, 65(14):3783-3798. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ert477 pmid: 24470467
[55]	CHRISTOPHER J T, CHRISTOPHER M J, BORRELL A, et al. Stay-green traits to improve wheat adaptation in well-watered and water-limited environments[J]. Journal of experimental botany, 2016, 67(17):5159-5172. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erw276 pmid: 27443279
[56]	KUMAR R R, GOSWAMI S, SHAMIM M, et al. Biochemical defense response: characterizing the plasticity of source and sink in spring wheat under terminal heat stress[J]. Frontiers in plant science, 2017, 8:1603. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01603 pmid: 28979274
[57]	SHIRDELMOGHANLOO H, PAYNTER B, CHEN K, et al. Grain plumpness in barley under grain filling heat stress: association with grain growth components and stay-green[C]. Proceedings of the 19th Australian Barley Technical Symposium, Perth,WA, F 09-12, 2019.
[58]	CHRISTOPHER J, MANSCHADI A M, HAMMER G L, et al. Developmental and physiological traits associated with high yield and stay-green phenotype in wheat[J]. Crop & pasture science, 2008, 59:354-364.
[59]	GOUS P W, HASJIM J, FRANCKOWIAK J, et al. Barley genotype expressing “stay-green”-like characteristics maintains starch quality of the grain during water stress condition[J]. Journal of cereal science, 2013, 58(3):414-419. doi: 10.1016/j.jcs.2013.08.002 URL
[60]	CHRISTOPHER M, CHENU K, JENNINGS R, et al. QTL for stay-green traits in wheat in well-watered and water-limited environments[J]. Field crops research, 2018, 217:32-44. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2017.11.003 URL
[61]	ZHOU L, CHANG G, SHEN C, et al. Functional divergences of natural variations of TaNAM-A1 in controlling leaf senescence during wheat grain filling[J]. Journal of integrative plant biology, 2024, 66(6):1242-1260. doi: 10.1111/jipb.v66.6 URL
[62]	UAUY C, DISTELFELD A, FAHIMA T, et al. A NAC gene regulating senescence improves grain protein, zinc, and iron content in wheat[J]. Science, 2006, 314(5803):1298-1301. doi: 10.1126/science.1133649 pmid: 17124321
[63]	ZHENG H J, WU A Z, ZHENG C C, et al. QTL mapping of maize (Zea mays) stay-green traits and their relationship to yield[J]. Plant breeding, 2010, 128(1):54-62. doi: 10.1111/pbr.2009.128.issue-1 URL
[64]	MUNAIZ E D, MARTÍNEZ S, KUMAR A, et al. The senescence (stay-green)-an important trait to exploit crop residuals for bioenergy[J]. Energies, 2020, 13(4):790. doi: 10.3390/en13040790 URL
[65]	ZHANG L L, ZHOU X L FAN Y, FU J, et al. Post-silking nitrogen accumulation and remobilization are associated with green leaf persistence and plant density in maize[J]. Journal of integrative agriculture, 2019, 18(8):1882-1892. doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(18)62087-8
[66]	HÖRTENSTEINER S, FELLER U. Nitrogen metabolism and remobilization during senescence[J]. Journal of experimental botany, 2002, 53(370):927-937. doi: 10.1093/jexbot/53.370.927 pmid: 11912235

作物持绿性的研究进展及育种趋势

Crop Stay-green Trait: Research Progress and Breeding Trends

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 1

参考文献 66

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

关于本刊

作者中心

审者中心

在线期刊

联系我们

[1]	齐海坤, 薛建军, 朱玉, 艾爽, 白金丽, 张明才, 张钰石. 沧州市旱碱麦增产绿色调控技术研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2025, 41(21): 156-160.
[2]	梁海波, 李升东, 刘丰华, 曹永昌, 王香玲, 徐艳. 基于Meta分析的黄河三角洲玉米产量及肥效特征[J]. 中国农学通报, 2024, 40(4): 103-110.
[3]	郝展宏, 叶松林, 蔡东玉, 张丽娟, 米国华. 冬小麦-夏玉米周年“四密一稀”浅埋滴灌水肥药一体化绿色生产技术[J]. 中国农学通报, 2024, 40(29): 59-64.
[4]	吴宇凡, 王鸿睿, 樊浩杰, 郭锋骁, 徐雪人, 王峰, 李聪. 海藻寡糖在绿色农业发展中的研究与应用[J]. 中国农学通报, 2024, 40(17): 63-72.
[5]	王萍, 周宝才, 韩俊杰, 徐永清, 纪仰慧, 李秀芬, 姜丽霞, 那荣波. 气候变化背景下黑龙江省东南部水稻增产潜力评估分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2024, 40(17): 106-113.
[6]	赵加涛, 刘猛道, 付正波, 杨向红, 字尚永. 不同棱型大麦品种不同混种方式及增产作用研究初探[J]. 中国农学通报, 2023, 39(20): 1-5.
[7]	王艳, 童传洪. 药肥组合喷施玉米穗肥的研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2023, 39(15): 99-103.
[8]	郝宝强, 任立瑞, 程鸿燕, 曹坳程, 王秋霞, 李园, 颜冬冬, 欧阳灿彬, 朱文达. 20%烟嘧磺隆可分散油悬浮剂对玉米田一年生杂草的防除效果研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(7): 95-99.
[9]	宋伟丰, 韦庆慧, 刘凯, 来永才. 天然植物生长调节剂芸苔素的生物活性及应用浅析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(24): 97-101.
[10]	高春香, 张超群, 杨玉辉. 兴安盟扎赉特旗主栽作物垄膜沟种集水效果分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(11): 65-70.
[11]	陈少杰, 蒋琪, 鲁立明, 郭焕茹. 配方施肥对单季籼粳杂交稻增产增效的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2020, 36(14): 7-10.
[12]	高宇,任永峰,张剑,刁升鹏,赵沛义. 旱作向日葵垄膜种植降水蓄集效应及增产作用研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2019, 35(6): 11-19.
[13]	赵加涛,刘猛道,杨向红,付正波,字尚永. 不同棱型大麦品种混种增产效果初探[J]. 中国农学通报, 2018, 34(33): 21-24.
[14]	黄蔚,肖卫华,张立成,王强. 一种水肥气高效耦合灌溉系统的设计与试验研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2018, 34(21): 69-74.
[15]	陶志强,王炎强,王德梅,毕如田,杨玉双,张吴平,荆耀栋,马少康,温媛媛,赵广才,常旭虹. 北方冬麦区小麦产量潜力及增产技术研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2018, 34(2): 48-53.