The Soil Chemical Characteristics Analysis of ‘Zezhouhong’ Ancient Hawthorn Trees in Shanxi

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb14110012

Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2015, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (5): 171-176.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb14110012

Special Issue: 园艺

Previous Articles Next Articles

The Soil Chemical Characteristics Analysis of ‘Zezhouhong’ Ancient Hawthorn Trees in Shanxi

Yang Mingxia^1,2, Liu Wei², Wen Yinghong², Cui Keqiang², Pang Chuanming², Chen Mingchang^1,3

(¹Institute of Loess Plateau, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006；²Pomology Institute, Shanxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Taigu Shanxi 030815；³Shanxi Department of Agriculture, Taiyuan 030002)

Received:2014-11-03 Revised:2015-02-06 Accepted:2014-12-04 Online:2015-03-20 Published:2015-03-20

Abstract

Abstract: In order to research the relationship between growth situation and soil chemical characteristics of ancient hawthorn tree ‘Zezhouhong’, the author analyzed soil chemical characteristics of 42 ancient trees of hundreds years old in Shanxi Jincheng through collecting soil sample, laboratory test and data treatment. The results showed that most soil samples of 42 ancient hawthorn trees were neutral saline and a few were alkaline or acid. There were some differences in soil organic matter and available nutrient content. The normal standards of pH value, salt content, organic matter, available nitrogen and available potassium for growth were pH 6.92-7.29, 0.05%-0.06%, 20.11-28.05 g/kg, 40.81-50.99 mg/kg, and 117.85-147.06 mg/kg, respectively. The standard of available phosphorus was not given because the content did not conform to normal distribution law and could not be graded. This means that the soil condition of the ancient trees needed to be improved urgently.

Yang Mingxia,Liu Wei,Wen Yinghong,Cui Keqiang,Pang Chuanming and Chen Mingchang. The Soil Chemical Characteristics Analysis of ‘Zezhouhong’ Ancient Hawthorn Trees in Shanxi[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2015, 31(5): 171-176.

References

[1] 傅雨露.浅论古树、名木及其保护[J].安徽农业,2004(6):43.
[2] 傅雨露.古树名木保护措施[J].四川农业科技,2004(9):25-27.
[3] 赖钟雄,李焕苓.古树名木基因资源的挖掘与利用[J].国土绿化,2007(5):6-7.
[4] 杨世勇,周小康,程亮,等.甘肃天水核桃古树及其生存状况调查[J].中国果树,2012(3):71-72.
[5] 谢慧,戈祎迎,刘朔.探讨古果树的保护及发展前景[J].现代装饰:理论,2014(5):255.
[6] 李焕苓.福州市荔枝古树遗传多样性的RAPD分析及离休保存研究[D].福州:福建农林大学硕士学位论文,2009:1-25.
[7] 蔡爱萍,赖钟雄.龙眼古树胚性愈伤组织Dlwrky44基因的克隆及分析[J].热带作物学报,2013,34(5):884-891.
[8] 赵迎谆,丰宝田,主编.中国果树志(山楂卷)[M].北京:中国林业出版社,1996:1-7.
[9] 赵伟.浅析山楂的药用价值[J].内蒙古中医药,2011(24):44-45.
[10] 张晋元,张宏平.晋城山楂发展现状与对策研究[J].宁夏农林科技,2013,54(9):92-93.
[11] 张宏平,张晋元,刘群龙.我国山楂种质资源及选育品种研究进展[J].中国种业,2014(2):15-17.
[12] 文璐,刘晶岚,习研,等.北京不同古树类型和级别对土壤物理性质的影响[J].环境科学与技术,2011(S2):66-70.
[13] 鲍士旦.土壤农化分析(第3版).北京:中国农业出版社,2000,22-24.
[14] 王慎强,余位培.影响碱化土壤pH测定的主要因素[J].土壤通报,1994(6):252-255.
[15] Dick W A, Cheng L, Wang P. Soil acid and alkaline phosphatase activity as pH adjustment indicators[J].Soil Biol Biochem,2000,32:1915-919.
[16] 李建国,濮励杰,朱明,等.土壤盐渍化研究现状及未来研究热点[J].地理学报,2012(9):1233-1245.
[17] 张容,刘晶岚,张振明,等.不同区域古树土壤化学特性分析[J].中国农学通报,2012(31):57-60.
[18] Sebastiana M, Engracia M, Carlos R J, et al. Chemical and biochemical properties of a clay soil under dryland agriculture system as affected by organic fertilization[J].Eur J Agron,2007(26):327-334.
[19] 张建杰,张强,杨治平,等.山西临汾盆地土壤有机质和全氮的空间变异特征及其影响因素[J].土壤通报,2010,04:839-844.
[20] 邹瑀琦,刘晶岚,杨兴康,等.北京古树土壤主要矿质元素特征及对古树健康响应分析[J].中国农学通报,2014(1):63-67.
[21] Wang M, Wu C, Cheng Z, et al. Soil Chemical Property Changes in Eggplant/Garlic Relay Intercropping Systems under Continuous Cropping[J].PLOS ONE,2014,9(10):e111040.
[22] 贾文龙,邢国明.土壤矿质元素含量与古侧柏生存状态的相关性[J].山西农业科学,2010(9):45-47.
[23] 刘占锋,傅伯杰,刘国华,等.土壤质量与土壤质量指标及其评价[J].生态学报,2006(3):901-913.
[24] 晋城市土壤.太行农网[EB/OL]. http://www.thnw.gov.cn/asp/detail.asp?ID=7C4AF84D-8B2D-45B0-B953-11DA128D3BA5.

The Soil Chemical Characteristics Analysis of ‘Zezhouhong’ Ancient Hawthorn Trees in Shanxi

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 0

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

For authors

For reviewers

Reader center

Contact us