Effects of different silage Lactic acid bacteria inoculants on silage quality of Myriophyllum quaticum

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb17100114

Abstract

Abstract: [Objective]In order to investigate the effects of different silage inoculants on silage quality of Myriophyllum quaticum, this study was based on the Myriophyllum quaticum and Lactococcus lactis (LL), Lactobacillus plantarum(LP) inoculants. [Method]The treatments were control (without additives), LL, LP, and FH(LL+LP) . The samples were taken on 1,3,7,15 and 30 days after ensiling and the nutritional composition and the silage quality were analysed in the laboratory. [Result]The results showed that : compared with the control, the pH value of the LL treatment decreased significantly(P<0.05), and the neutral detergent fiber content had a decrease of 17.23% ,while the lactic acid content was increased significantly(P<0.05),with an increase of 131.2%.The acid detergent fiber content of the LL treatment decreased by 24.56%(P<0.05).And the crude protein content of the FH treatment was increased by 12.6% (P<0.05). [Conclusion]In conclusion, the Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) inoculants could improve the silage quality, the nutritional value and the digestibility of Myriophyllum quaticum silage which provided a data basis for the resource utilization of the Myriophyllum quaticum.

References

[1]王守伟. 我国肉类产业发展现状与趋势[J]. 北方牧业, 2017(10):10-10.
[2]吴诗樵, 章世元, 戚如鑫. 我国青绿饲料生产与应用的研究进展[J]. 饲料广角, 2016(12):48-51.
[3]Zhang S, Liu F, Xiao R, et al. Nitrogen removal in Myriophyllum aquaticum wetland microcosms for swine wastewater treatment: 15N‐labelled nitrogen mass balance analysis[J]. Journal of the Science of Food Agriculture, 2017, 97(2):1511-20.
[4]Zhang H, Xu G, Zeng Z, et al. Nitrogen removal of a Myriophyllum elatinoides purification system for treating piggery wastewater in karst region[C]// International Conference on Sustainable Energy and Environment Engineering. 2016.
[5]张树楠. 绿狐尾藻湿地对养殖废水氮去除效应及其机理研究[D]. 中国科学院大学, 2016.
[6]Liu F, Zhang S, Wang Y, et al. Nitrogen removal and mass balance in newly-formed Myriophyllum aquaticum mesocosm during a single 28-day incubation with swine wastewater treatment[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2016, 166:596-604.
[7]何洋. 绿狐尾藻对养猪废水氮磷的吸收及收割管理模式研究[D]. 中国科学院大学, 2016.
[8]孙婉婧, 杨颖姿, 罗晶晶,等. 绿狐尾藻生物学特性及其在养殖业中的应用[J]. 饲料研究, 2017(15).
[9]陈绍中. 生物发酵技术在饲料加工中的应用[J]. 畜禽业, 2016(7):38-39.
[10]柴英. 制作优质青贮饲料的技术要领[J]. 当代畜牧, 2017(3):29-30
[11]张养东, 杨军香, 王宗伟,等. 青贮饲料理化品质评定研究进展[J]. 中国畜牧杂志, 2016, 52(12):37-42.
[12]汪宴廷, 赵晶晶, 周磊,等. 绿狐尾藻蛋白饲料对川藏黑猪产子性能的影响研究[J]. 甘肃畜牧兽医, 2016, 46(21):93-94.
[13]白云峰, 朱江宁, 严少华,等. 水葫芦青贮对肉鹅规模养殖效益的影响[J]. 中国家禽, 2011, 33(7):49-50.
[14]庄益芬, 张文昌, 张丽,等. 添加剂对水葫芦青贮品质的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2007, 23(9):32-35.
[15]陈鑫珠, 庄益芬, 张建国,等. 生物添加剂对水葫芦与甜玉米秸秆混合青贮品质的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2011, 20(6):195-202.
[16]纪苗苗. 青贮水葫芦作为反刍动物饲料的研究[D]. 浙江大学, 2010.
[17] Weinberg Z G, Muck R E. New trends and opportunities in the development and use of inoculants for silage[J]. Fems Microbiology Reviews, 2010, 19(1):53-68.
[18]赵士萍, 周敏, 蒋林树. 青贮饲料添加剂的研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2016, 32(20):6-10.
[19]Liu C, Lai Y J, Xiao-Nan L U, et al. Effect of lactic acid bacteria inoculants on alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) silage quality: assessment of degradation (in situ) and gas production(in vitro)[J]. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2016, 15(12):2834-2841.
[20]Zielińska K, Fabiszewska, Agata, Stefańska, Ilona. Different aspects of Lactobacillus inoculants on the improvement of quality and safety of alfalfa silage[J]. Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research, 2015, 75(3):298-306.
[21]Arasu M V, Jung M W, Da H K, et al. Enhancing Nutritional Quality of Silage by Fermentation with Lactobacillus plantarum[J]. Indian Journal of Microbiology, 2014, 54(4):396-402.
[22]Braman W L, Kurtz J E, Bryan K A. 055 Effect of fermented corn silage density and bacterial inoculants on corn silage pH and fermentation end products.[J]. Journal of Animal Science, 2016, 94(supplement1):27.
[23]Gollop N, Zakin V, Weinberg Z G. Antibacterial activity of lactic acid bacteria included in inoculants for silage and in silages treated with these inoculants[J]. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 2005, 98(3):662–666.
[24]Sucu E, ?ifci, Esra Aydo?an, Sucu E, et al. Effects of lines and inoculants on nutritive value and production costs of triticale silages[J]. R.bras.zootec, 2016, 45(7).
[25]Jatkauskas J, Vrotniakiene V, Lanckriet A. The effect of different types of inoculants on the characteristics of alfalfa, ryegrass and red clover/ryegrass/timothy silage.[J]. Zemdirbyste-agriculture, 2015, 102(1):95-102.