Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2020, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (6): 121-126.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb18110042
Special Issue: 烟草种植与生产
Previous Articles Next Articles
Xie Xianbiao, Xiao Wenxiang(), Meng Jizhi, Yang Zuobin, Shen Yunfeng, Hu Chunliang
Received:
2018-11-12
Revised:
2019-01-18
Online:
2020-02-25
Published:
2020-02-22
Contact:
Xiao Wenxiang
E-mail:bsxiaowq@tom.com
CLC Number:
Xie Xianbiao, Xiao Wenxiang, Meng Jizhi, Yang Zuobin, Shen Yunfeng, Hu Chunliang. Efficacy of 22.4% Spirotetrama Suspension Against Bemisia Tabaci[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(6): 121-126.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb18110042
处理 | 重复 | 虫口基数/ 头 | 若虫虫口防效/% | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 d | 3 d | 7 d | 14 d | 21 d | ||||||||
①TTP+螺虫乙酯 100.5+208.5 mL/hm2 | Ⅰ | 347 | 62.07 | 77.21 | 80.77 | 73.27 | 51.43 | |||||
Ⅱ | 419 | 61.93 | 74.36 | 83.85 | 70.58 | 50.15 | ||||||
Ⅲ | 274 | 66.29 | 76.16 | 84.26 | 70.38 | 53.46 | ||||||
平均 | 346.67 | 63.43dD | 75.91dC | 82.96dD | 71.41cB | 51.68cC | ||||||
②TTP+螺虫乙酯 150+312 mL/hm2 | Ⅰ | 377 | 68.25 | 79.65 | 87.51 | 74.39 | 57.81 | |||||
Ⅱ | 271 | 73.44 | 82.47 | 90.12 | 78.29 | 55.86 | ||||||
Ⅲ | 333 | 68.01 | 78.75 | 87.69 | 74.63 | 57.12 | ||||||
平均 | 327.00 | 69.90bcBC | 80.29cBC | 88.44bBC | 75.77abcAB | 56.93bB | ||||||
③TTP+螺虫乙酯 199.5+417 mL/hm2 | Ⅰ | 339 | 76.18 | 88.66 | 93.63 | 82.95 | 63.05 | |||||
Ⅱ | 342 | 79.24 | 86.59 | 93.01 | 81.47 | 61.77 | ||||||
Ⅲ | 297 | 77.35 | 89.11 | 92.54 | 84.22 | 64.15 | ||||||
平均 | 326.00 | 77.59aA | 88.12aA | 93.06aA | 82.88aA | 62.99aA | ||||||
④TTP200SC 150 mL/hm2 | Ⅰ | 302 | 66.33 | 77.14 | 86.21 | 74.31 | 52.29 | |||||
Ⅱ | 307 | 64.12 | 77.19 | 86.04 | 74.38 | 51.02 | ||||||
Ⅲ | 305 | 66.71 | 78.59 | 84.19 | 75.17 | 50.83 | ||||||
平均 | 304.67 | 65.72dCD | 77.64cdC | 85.48cCD | 74.62bcAB | 51.38cC | ||||||
⑤22.4%螺虫乙酯悬浮剂 312 mL/hm2 | Ⅰ | 333 | 67.23 | 78.94 | 87.10 | 73.76 | 54.76 | |||||
Ⅱ | 416 | 65.28 | 79.36 | 85.33 | 71.15 | 53.11 | ||||||
Ⅲ | 526 | 65.97 | 77.59 | 87.52 | 73.01 | 52.69 | ||||||
平均 | 425.00 | 66.16cdBCD | 78.63cdC | 86.65bcBC | 72.64cB | 53.52cC | ||||||
⑥22.4%螺虫乙酯悬浮剂 450ml/hm2 | Ⅰ | 385 | 70.22 | 87.97 | 88.11 | 80.43 | 57.38 | |||||
Ⅱ | 404 | 73.36 | 85.59 | 90.26 | 81.06 | 58.01 | ||||||
Ⅲ | 313 | 69.78 | 84.17 | 88.00 | 79.11 | 59.06 | ||||||
平均 | 367.33 | 71.12bB | 85.91abA | 88.79bBC | 80.20abAB | 58.14bB | ||||||
⑦倍内威10% OD 900 mL/hm2 | Ⅰ | 369 | 70.29 | 82.55 | 89.36 | 82.72 | 59.57 | |||||
Ⅱ | 438 | 71.96 | 83.33 | 88.26 | 79.15 | 58.73 | ||||||
Ⅲ | 451 | 69.91 | 87.17 | 89.53 | 79.91 | 59.06 | ||||||
平均 | 419.33 | 70.72bB | 84.35bAB | 89.05bB | 80.26abAB | 59.12bB | ||||||
⑧空白CK | Ⅰ | 332 | — | — | — | — | — | |||||
Ⅱ | 240 | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||
Ⅲ | 454 | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||
平均 | 342.00 | — | — | — | — | — |
处理 | 重复 | 虫口基数/ 头 | 若虫虫口防效/% | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 d | 3 d | 7 d | 14 d | 21 d | ||||||||
①TTP+螺虫乙酯 100.5+208.5 mL/hm2 | Ⅰ | 347 | 62.07 | 77.21 | 80.77 | 73.27 | 51.43 | |||||
Ⅱ | 419 | 61.93 | 74.36 | 83.85 | 70.58 | 50.15 | ||||||
Ⅲ | 274 | 66.29 | 76.16 | 84.26 | 70.38 | 53.46 | ||||||
平均 | 346.67 | 63.43dD | 75.91dC | 82.96dD | 71.41cB | 51.68cC | ||||||
②TTP+螺虫乙酯 150+312 mL/hm2 | Ⅰ | 377 | 68.25 | 79.65 | 87.51 | 74.39 | 57.81 | |||||
Ⅱ | 271 | 73.44 | 82.47 | 90.12 | 78.29 | 55.86 | ||||||
Ⅲ | 333 | 68.01 | 78.75 | 87.69 | 74.63 | 57.12 | ||||||
平均 | 327.00 | 69.90bcBC | 80.29cBC | 88.44bBC | 75.77abcAB | 56.93bB | ||||||
③TTP+螺虫乙酯 199.5+417 mL/hm2 | Ⅰ | 339 | 76.18 | 88.66 | 93.63 | 82.95 | 63.05 | |||||
Ⅱ | 342 | 79.24 | 86.59 | 93.01 | 81.47 | 61.77 | ||||||
Ⅲ | 297 | 77.35 | 89.11 | 92.54 | 84.22 | 64.15 | ||||||
平均 | 326.00 | 77.59aA | 88.12aA | 93.06aA | 82.88aA | 62.99aA | ||||||
④TTP200SC 150 mL/hm2 | Ⅰ | 302 | 66.33 | 77.14 | 86.21 | 74.31 | 52.29 | |||||
Ⅱ | 307 | 64.12 | 77.19 | 86.04 | 74.38 | 51.02 | ||||||
Ⅲ | 305 | 66.71 | 78.59 | 84.19 | 75.17 | 50.83 | ||||||
平均 | 304.67 | 65.72dCD | 77.64cdC | 85.48cCD | 74.62bcAB | 51.38cC | ||||||
⑤22.4%螺虫乙酯悬浮剂 312 mL/hm2 | Ⅰ | 333 | 67.23 | 78.94 | 87.10 | 73.76 | 54.76 | |||||
Ⅱ | 416 | 65.28 | 79.36 | 85.33 | 71.15 | 53.11 | ||||||
Ⅲ | 526 | 65.97 | 77.59 | 87.52 | 73.01 | 52.69 | ||||||
平均 | 425.00 | 66.16cdBCD | 78.63cdC | 86.65bcBC | 72.64cB | 53.52cC | ||||||
⑥22.4%螺虫乙酯悬浮剂 450ml/hm2 | Ⅰ | 385 | 70.22 | 87.97 | 88.11 | 80.43 | 57.38 | |||||
Ⅱ | 404 | 73.36 | 85.59 | 90.26 | 81.06 | 58.01 | ||||||
Ⅲ | 313 | 69.78 | 84.17 | 88.00 | 79.11 | 59.06 | ||||||
平均 | 367.33 | 71.12bB | 85.91abA | 88.79bBC | 80.20abAB | 58.14bB | ||||||
⑦倍内威10% OD 900 mL/hm2 | Ⅰ | 369 | 70.29 | 82.55 | 89.36 | 82.72 | 59.57 | |||||
Ⅱ | 438 | 71.96 | 83.33 | 88.26 | 79.15 | 58.73 | ||||||
Ⅲ | 451 | 69.91 | 87.17 | 89.53 | 79.91 | 59.06 | ||||||
平均 | 419.33 | 70.72bB | 84.35bAB | 89.05bB | 80.26abAB | 59.12bB | ||||||
⑧空白CK | Ⅰ | 332 | — | — | — | — | — | |||||
Ⅱ | 240 | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||
Ⅲ | 454 | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||
平均 | 342.00 | — | — | — | — | — |
处理 | 重复 | 虫口基数/ 头 | 成虫虫口防效/% | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 d | 3 d | 7 d | 14 d | 21 d | ||||||||||
①TTP+螺虫乙酯 100.5+208.5 mL/hm2 | Ⅰ | 454 | 53.64 | 66.14 | 77.25 | 72.35 | 50.89 | |||||||
Ⅱ | 382 | 53.16 | 66.39 | 78.06 | 71.96 | 49.63 | ||||||||
Ⅲ | 409 | 54.12 | 64.12 | 79.11 | 71.12 | 49.75 | ||||||||
平均 | 415.00 | 53.64eC | 65.55cC | 78.14fF | 71.81fF | 50.09eD | ||||||||
②TTP+螺虫乙酯 150+312 mL/hm2 | Ⅰ | 356 | 61.80 | 76.41 | 86.12 | 79.40 | 57.33 | |||||||
Ⅱ | 408 | 62.05 | 79.93 | 85.24 | 78.45 | 56.12 | ||||||||
Ⅲ | 428 | 63.14 | 77.00 | 85.47 | 79.12 | 55.78 | ||||||||
平均 | 397.33 | 62.33cB | 76.78abABC | 85.61cC | 78.99cC | 56.41cdBC | ||||||||
③TTP+螺虫乙酯 199.5+417 mL/hm2 | Ⅰ | 390 | 79.09 | 85.85 | 91.66 | 85.14 | 63.20 | |||||||
Ⅱ | 354 | 78.12 | 87.55 | 92.05 | 85.38 | 64.03 | ||||||||
Ⅲ | 410 | 79.31 | 88.02 | 92.86 | 86.13 | 65.13 | ||||||||
平均 | 384.67 | 78.84aA | 87.14aA | 92.19aA | 85.55aA | 64.12aA | ||||||||
④TTP200SC 150 mL/hm2 | Ⅰ | 342 | 51.09 | 67.76 | 82.10 | 75.12 | 50.71 | |||||||
Ⅱ | 259 | 49.86 | 69.12 | 83.11 | 74.36 | 51.03 | ||||||||
Ⅲ | 373 | 49.56 | 67.33 | 81.69 | 74.53 | 50.39 | ||||||||
平均 | 324.67 | 50.17fD | 68.07bcBC | 82.30eE | 74.67eE | 50.71eD | ||||||||
⑤22.4%螺虫乙酯悬浮剂 312 mL/hm2 | Ⅰ | 534 | 56.19 | 74.67 | 84.11 | 77.75 | 53.28 | |||||||
Ⅱ | 598 | 54.36 | 76.12 | 82.64 | 75.84 | 54.39 | ||||||||
Ⅲ | 545 | 55.26 | 74.48 | 84.71 | 76.96 | 55.11 | ||||||||
平均 | 559.00 | 55.27dC | 75.09bABC | 83.82dDE | 76.85dD | 54.26dC | ||||||||
⑥22.4%螺虫乙酯悬浮剂 450ml/hm2 | Ⅰ | 458 | 63.25 | 77.69 | 87.97 | 80.57 | 59.71 | |||||||
Ⅱ | 435 | 65.13 | 79.13 | 89.01 | 82.22 | 59.23 | ||||||||
Ⅲ | 403 | 64.28 | 79.34 | 89.60 | 81.29 | 60.13 | ||||||||
平均 | 432.00 | 64.22bB | 78.72abABC | 88.86bB | 81.36bB | 59.69bB | ||||||||
⑦倍内威10% OD 900 mL/hm2 | Ⅰ | 480 | 63.12 | 80.36 | 86.39 | 80.12 | 58.02 | |||||||
Ⅱ | 438 | 63.33 | 80.40 | 86.33 | 79.26 | 56.82 | ||||||||
Ⅲ | 565 | 62.67 | 79.60 | 87.11 | 79.90 | 57.99 | ||||||||
平均 | 494.33 | 63.04bcB | 80.12abAB | 86.61cC | 79.76cBC | 57.61bcBC | ||||||||
⑧空白CK | Ⅰ | 476 | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||
Ⅱ | 577 | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||
Ⅲ | 403 | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||
平均 | 485.33 | — | — | — | — | — |
处理 | 重复 | 虫口基数/ 头 | 成虫虫口防效/% | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 d | 3 d | 7 d | 14 d | 21 d | ||||||||||
①TTP+螺虫乙酯 100.5+208.5 mL/hm2 | Ⅰ | 454 | 53.64 | 66.14 | 77.25 | 72.35 | 50.89 | |||||||
Ⅱ | 382 | 53.16 | 66.39 | 78.06 | 71.96 | 49.63 | ||||||||
Ⅲ | 409 | 54.12 | 64.12 | 79.11 | 71.12 | 49.75 | ||||||||
平均 | 415.00 | 53.64eC | 65.55cC | 78.14fF | 71.81fF | 50.09eD | ||||||||
②TTP+螺虫乙酯 150+312 mL/hm2 | Ⅰ | 356 | 61.80 | 76.41 | 86.12 | 79.40 | 57.33 | |||||||
Ⅱ | 408 | 62.05 | 79.93 | 85.24 | 78.45 | 56.12 | ||||||||
Ⅲ | 428 | 63.14 | 77.00 | 85.47 | 79.12 | 55.78 | ||||||||
平均 | 397.33 | 62.33cB | 76.78abABC | 85.61cC | 78.99cC | 56.41cdBC | ||||||||
③TTP+螺虫乙酯 199.5+417 mL/hm2 | Ⅰ | 390 | 79.09 | 85.85 | 91.66 | 85.14 | 63.20 | |||||||
Ⅱ | 354 | 78.12 | 87.55 | 92.05 | 85.38 | 64.03 | ||||||||
Ⅲ | 410 | 79.31 | 88.02 | 92.86 | 86.13 | 65.13 | ||||||||
平均 | 384.67 | 78.84aA | 87.14aA | 92.19aA | 85.55aA | 64.12aA | ||||||||
④TTP200SC 150 mL/hm2 | Ⅰ | 342 | 51.09 | 67.76 | 82.10 | 75.12 | 50.71 | |||||||
Ⅱ | 259 | 49.86 | 69.12 | 83.11 | 74.36 | 51.03 | ||||||||
Ⅲ | 373 | 49.56 | 67.33 | 81.69 | 74.53 | 50.39 | ||||||||
平均 | 324.67 | 50.17fD | 68.07bcBC | 82.30eE | 74.67eE | 50.71eD | ||||||||
⑤22.4%螺虫乙酯悬浮剂 312 mL/hm2 | Ⅰ | 534 | 56.19 | 74.67 | 84.11 | 77.75 | 53.28 | |||||||
Ⅱ | 598 | 54.36 | 76.12 | 82.64 | 75.84 | 54.39 | ||||||||
Ⅲ | 545 | 55.26 | 74.48 | 84.71 | 76.96 | 55.11 | ||||||||
平均 | 559.00 | 55.27dC | 75.09bABC | 83.82dDE | 76.85dD | 54.26dC | ||||||||
⑥22.4%螺虫乙酯悬浮剂 450ml/hm2 | Ⅰ | 458 | 63.25 | 77.69 | 87.97 | 80.57 | 59.71 | |||||||
Ⅱ | 435 | 65.13 | 79.13 | 89.01 | 82.22 | 59.23 | ||||||||
Ⅲ | 403 | 64.28 | 79.34 | 89.60 | 81.29 | 60.13 | ||||||||
平均 | 432.00 | 64.22bB | 78.72abABC | 88.86bB | 81.36bB | 59.69bB | ||||||||
⑦倍内威10% OD 900 mL/hm2 | Ⅰ | 480 | 63.12 | 80.36 | 86.39 | 80.12 | 58.02 | |||||||
Ⅱ | 438 | 63.33 | 80.40 | 86.33 | 79.26 | 56.82 | ||||||||
Ⅲ | 565 | 62.67 | 79.60 | 87.11 | 79.90 | 57.99 | ||||||||
平均 | 494.33 | 63.04bcB | 80.12abAB | 86.61cC | 79.76cBC | 57.61bcBC | ||||||||
⑧空白CK | Ⅰ | 476 | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||
Ⅱ | 577 | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||
Ⅲ | 403 | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||
平均 | 485.33 | — | — | — | — | — |
[1] | 许丽丽, 蔡力, 沈伟江 , 等. 中国部分地区烟粉虱生物型种类及系统发育关系分析[J]. 应用生态学报, 2014,25(4):1137-1144. |
[2] | Jones D . Plant viruses transmitted by whiteflies[J]. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 2003,109:195-219. |
[3] | Mound L A, Halsey S H . Whitefly of the World[J]. London: John Wiley & Sons, 1978: 340. |
[4] | Brown J K , Phylogenetic biology of the Bemisia tabacisibling species group // Stansly PA, Naranjo SE,eds.Bionomics and Management of A Global Pest[J]. Amsterdam:Springer, 2010: 31-67. |
[5] | De Barro P J, Liu S S, Boykin L M , et al. Bemisia tabaci:A statement of species status[J]. Annual Review of Entomology, 2011,56:1-19. |
[6] | Oliveira M R V, Henneberry T J, Anderson P . History, current status, and collaborative research projects for Bemisia tabaci[J]. Crop Protection, 2001,20:709-723. |
[7] | 万方浩, 郑小波, 郭建英 . 重要农林外来入侵物种的生物学与控制[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2005. |
[8] | 刘银泉, 刘树生 . 烟粉虱的分类地位及在中国的分布[J]. 生物安全学报, 2012,( 4):247-255. |
[9] | 金党琴, 祝树德 . 寄主植物对烟粉虱实验种群的影响[J]. 植物检疫, 2005,19(2):73-76. |
[10] | 刘曼, 王济红, 任春光 , 等. 西南地区主要粉虱害虫的分布与危害[J]. 西南农业学报, 2010,23(3):728-734. |
[11] | Iida H, Kitamura T, Honda H I . Comparison of egghatching rate, survival rate and development time of theimmature stage between B-and Q-biotypes of Bemisiatabaci (Gennadius) (Homoptera:Aleyrodidae) on various agricultural crops[J]. Applied Entomology and Zoology, 2009,44:267-273. |
[12] | Luo C, Jones C M, Devine G , et al. Insecticide resistance in Bemisia tabaci biotype Q (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) from Chin[J] Crop Protection, 2010,29:429-434. |
[13] | 谢文, 吴青君, 徐宝云 , 等. 螺虫乙酯对烟粉虱的防治效果评价[J]. 中国蔬菜, 2011,1(14):69-73. |
[14] | 张明, 吴锦霞, 路凤琴 . 倍内威防治烟粉虱田间药效试验[J]. 上海蔬菜, 2014,( 1):66-67. |
[15] | 木万福, 但忠, 麻继仙 , 等. 云南热区番茄栽培现状及主栽品种推荐[J]. 长江蔬菜, 2018. 3:16-18. |
[16] | 李慧芹, 邹云昌, 邢绍翠 , 等. 潞江坝反季种植番茄耐贮运优良品种筛选[J]. 热带农业科技, 2009,32(2). |
[17] | 张庆宽 . 双向内吸性新杀虫剂螺虫乙酯的开发[J]. 农药, 2009,48(6):445-447. |
[18] | 王小丽, 陈铁春, 李友顺 , 等. 螺虫乙酯240g/L悬浮剂高效液相色谱分析方法研究[J]. 农药科学与管理, 2009,30(1):8-10. |
[19] | 师文娟, 廖道华, 杨芳 , 等. 螺虫乙酯的合成[J]. 农药, 2010,49(4):250-251. |
[20] | 王达, 谢欣 . 季酮酸类杀虫杀螨剂品种及其合成方法[J]. 现代农药, 2010,9(6):40-44. |
[1] | ZHU Haixia, LI Xiang, WEI Youhai. 800 g/L Prosulfocarb EC: Annual Weeds’ Control Effect and Safety Analysis in Broad Bean Field [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(33): 97-102. |
[2] | CUI Yanhua, ZHOU Tingting, SHEN Yuyang, CHEN Li, LIN Guocang, YANG Anpei, ZHANG Hang, LEI Junjie, LI Guangkuo, GAO Haifeng. Ultra-low Dose Spray of Small Plant Protection UAV: Control Effect on Wheat Powdery Mildew in Desert Oasis Wheat Region [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(27): 147-150. |
[3] | CAI Yongzhan, WANG Ruibao, BAI Tao, LIU Youcai, HAN Xiaonv, WANG Bin, HUA Xiaobing, LI Cheng, MAO Minglin, ZI Wenlin. Control Effect of Three Bacillus subtilis Strains on Tobacco Powdery Mildew [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(25): 125-129. |
[4] | HU Zhongliang, WANG Jianhe, XU Kui, SU Ying, CHEN Zhiwei, JIANG Yin. Effect of Different Insecticides on Field Control of Cnaphalocrocis medinalis: An Evaluation [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(23): 116-120. |
[5] | ZU Weixi, ZHAO Xiaoxia, GAO Fen. Quality Promotion and Disease Control Effects of Bacillus Strain R57 on Astragalus membranaceus var. mongholicus and Its Identification [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(21): 129-135. |
[6] | LAI Xiaofang, YU Shanhong, YANG Changliang, LI Lin, CHENG Xu, CHEN Xiaoshang. Fungicide Screening and Control of Stem Blight of Eleocharis dulcis [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(2): 78-86. |
[7] | LIU Long, RONG Hua, ZHENG Tongtong, MA Junjie, GUO Qingyuan. Antifungal and Control Effect of Bacillus mojavensis on Pear Valsa Canker [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(18): 140-146. |
[8] | YANG Hongfu, WU Jiawen, CHEN Yuan, ZHANG Jianhua. Fungicides for Wheat Scab Control in Jiangsu Province: Effectiveness Monitoring Analysis [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(15): 139-143. |
[9] | Yu Fenghui, Cheng Daoquan, Wang Xiangchuan, Zhou Qian, Wu Wenlei, Zhang Qian, Yang Chuanlun, Han Lixia, Wu Lei, Liu Haiyu, Xu Zeping. Zinc Chitooligosaccharide: Effects on Disease Control, Fruit Quality and Yield of Greenhouse Tomato [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(9): 42-48. |
[10] | SUN Taihua, WANG Huasheng, XIONG Xijiao. Evaluation of the Control Effect of Chicken on Bactrocera dorsalis in Orchard [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(36): 130-134. |
[11] | YOU Tanggui, DUAN Yanru, ZHANG Yan, GONG Lin, CHEN Yujie, HE Shuqi, XIAO Jiafan, NI Xia, ZHA Hongbo, ZHAO Fang, ZHAO Shengchun, YANG Junzhang. Effects of Four Virus Inhibitors on Tomato Spotted Wilt Virus and Potato Virus Y in Zhaotong Tobacco Fields [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(36): 135-141. |
[12] | Chen Li, Zhou Tingting, Shen Yuyang, Lu Zifeng, Cui Yanhua, Zhao Haiyan, Liu Qi, Gao Haifeng. Control Effect of 9 Fungicides on Wheat Stripe Rust in Desert and Oasis Wheat Region [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(35): 78-81. |
[13] | Wang Xiaolin, Wu Qinyan, Peng Yanqiong, Wu Jie, Huang Jiexue, Mao Nini, Ji Muxiang. Effects of Two Inducers on Induced Resistance to Grapevine Downy Mildew [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(32): 127-131. |
[14] | Mao Xiaohong, Chen Peng, Cao Changdai, Bai Tingting, Zhang Xiuxia, Zhang Ansheng. Co-toxicity of Rotenone and Three Neonicotinoid Insecticides to Bemisia tabaci Gennadius and Myzus Persicae Sulzer [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(30): 98-105. |
[15] | Min Fanxiang, Wang Guijiang, Yang Shuai, Hu Linshuang, Wang Wenzhong, Wei Qi, Li Wenfeng. CARAH Warning Model of Potato Late Blight in Heilongjiang Province: Evaluation [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(29): 92-98. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||