Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2020, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (21): 92-97.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb20190500217
Previous Articles Next Articles
Li Yan, Luo Youjin, Yu Duan, Ma Lianjie, Zhang Hui, Liao Dunxiu()
Received:
2019-05-30
Revised:
2019-07-10
Online:
2020-07-25
Published:
2020-07-21
Contact:
Liao Dunxiu
E-mail:664852751@qq.com
CLC Number:
Li Yan, Luo Youjin, Yu Duan, Ma Lianjie, Zhang Hui, Liao Dunxiu. Biological Weeding in Abandoned Land: Effect and Its Influence on Soil Fertility[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(21): 92-97.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb20190500217
编号 | 畜禽 | 季节 | 密度/(只/hm2) | 土地类型 | 面积/hm2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
ED60S | 鹅 | 冬 | 900 | 水田 | 0.033 |
ED100S | 1500 | 水田 | 0.033 | ||
ED140S | 2100 | 水田 | 0.033 | ||
ED180S | 2700 | 水田 | 0.033 | ||
JC60H | 鸡 | 春 | 900 | 旱地 | 0.100 |
JC100H | 1500 | 旱地 | 0.100 | ||
JC140H | 2100 | 旱地 | 0.100 | ||
JC180H | 2700 | 旱地 | 0.100 | ||
EC60H | 鹅 | 春 | 900 | 旱地 | 0.100 |
ED60H | 冬 | 900 | 旱地 | 0.100 | |
JD60H | 鸡 | 冬 | 900 | 旱地 | 0.100 |
EJC60H | 鹅+鸡 | 冬 | 150+750 | 旱地 | 0.100 |
编号 | 畜禽 | 季节 | 密度/(只/hm2) | 土地类型 | 面积/hm2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
ED60S | 鹅 | 冬 | 900 | 水田 | 0.033 |
ED100S | 1500 | 水田 | 0.033 | ||
ED140S | 2100 | 水田 | 0.033 | ||
ED180S | 2700 | 水田 | 0.033 | ||
JC60H | 鸡 | 春 | 900 | 旱地 | 0.100 |
JC100H | 1500 | 旱地 | 0.100 | ||
JC140H | 2100 | 旱地 | 0.100 | ||
JC180H | 2700 | 旱地 | 0.100 | ||
EC60H | 鹅 | 春 | 900 | 旱地 | 0.100 |
ED60H | 冬 | 900 | 旱地 | 0.100 | |
JD60H | 鸡 | 冬 | 900 | 旱地 | 0.100 |
EJC60H | 鹅+鸡 | 冬 | 150+750 | 旱地 | 0.100 |
处理 | 时间 | pH | 有机质/ (g/kg) | 铵态氮/ (mg/kg) | 硝态氮/ (mg/kg) | 有效磷/ (mg/kg) | 速效钾/ (mg/kg) | 缓效钾/ (mg/kg) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
除草前 | 5.51 | 27.4 | 30.8 | 10.7 | 6.1 | 197 | 475 | |
除草后 | ED60S | 5.21 | 29.1 | 36.3 | 10.8 | 7.0 | 188 | 508 |
ED100S | 5.24 | 28.8 | 37.9 | 11.1 | 6.9 | 204 | 449 | |
ED140S | 5.28 | 30.0 | 37.5 | 10.4 | 6.6 | 231 | 476 | |
ED180S | 5.25 | 30.5 | 38.7 | 9.90 | 6.6 | 216 | 480 | |
除草前 | 5.88 | 21.4 | 16.4 | 14.3 | 9.2 | 154 | 369 | |
除草后 | JC60H | 5.42 | 25.8 | 17.1 | 15.0 | 9.8 | 162 | 399 |
JC100H | 5.50 | 26.9 | 18.1 | 15.3 | .0.2 | 160 | 351 | |
JC140H | 5.53 | 27.5 | 18.6 | 15.7 | 10.7 | 158 | 370 | |
JC180H | 5.56 | 27.7 | 20.2 | 16.1 | 11.2 | 175 | 368 |
处理 | 时间 | pH | 有机质/ (g/kg) | 铵态氮/ (mg/kg) | 硝态氮/ (mg/kg) | 有效磷/ (mg/kg) | 速效钾/ (mg/kg) | 缓效钾/ (mg/kg) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
除草前 | 5.51 | 27.4 | 30.8 | 10.7 | 6.1 | 197 | 475 | |
除草后 | ED60S | 5.21 | 29.1 | 36.3 | 10.8 | 7.0 | 188 | 508 |
ED100S | 5.24 | 28.8 | 37.9 | 11.1 | 6.9 | 204 | 449 | |
ED140S | 5.28 | 30.0 | 37.5 | 10.4 | 6.6 | 231 | 476 | |
ED180S | 5.25 | 30.5 | 38.7 | 9.90 | 6.6 | 216 | 480 | |
除草前 | 5.88 | 21.4 | 16.4 | 14.3 | 9.2 | 154 | 369 | |
除草后 | JC60H | 5.42 | 25.8 | 17.1 | 15.0 | 9.8 | 162 | 399 |
JC100H | 5.50 | 26.9 | 18.1 | 15.3 | .0.2 | 160 | 351 | |
JC140H | 5.53 | 27.5 | 18.6 | 15.7 | 10.7 | 158 | 370 | |
JC180H | 5.56 | 27.7 | 20.2 | 16.1 | 11.2 | 175 | 368 |
处理 | 时间 | pH | 有机质/ (g/kg) | 铵态氮/ (mg/kg) | 硝态氮/ (mg/kg) | 有效磷/ (mg/kg) | 速效钾/ (mg/kg) | 缓效钾/ (mg/kg) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EC60H | 除草前 | 5.95 | 23.0 | 15.3 | 15.9 | 10.9 | 161 | 489 |
除草后 | 5.73 | 25.4 | 16.2 | 16.9 | 11.7 | 186 | 481 | |
ED60H | 除草前 | 6.02 | 23.8 | 15.7 | 15.2 | 11.4 | 145 | 458 |
除草后 | 5.80 | 25.6 | 16.5 | 17.3 | 11.2 | 137 | 461 | |
JC60H | 除草前 | 5.88 | 21.4 | 16.4 | 14.3 | 9.2 | 154 | 369 |
除草后 | 5.42 | 25.8 | 17.1 | 15.0 | 9.8 | 162 | 399 | |
JD60H | 除草前 | 6.02 | 23.8 | 15.7 | 15.2 | 11.4 | 145 | 458 |
除草后 | 5.69 | 26.6 | 17.3 | 18.6 | 11.9 | 171 | 477 |
处理 | 时间 | pH | 有机质/ (g/kg) | 铵态氮/ (mg/kg) | 硝态氮/ (mg/kg) | 有效磷/ (mg/kg) | 速效钾/ (mg/kg) | 缓效钾/ (mg/kg) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EC60H | 除草前 | 5.95 | 23.0 | 15.3 | 15.9 | 10.9 | 161 | 489 |
除草后 | 5.73 | 25.4 | 16.2 | 16.9 | 11.7 | 186 | 481 | |
ED60H | 除草前 | 6.02 | 23.8 | 15.7 | 15.2 | 11.4 | 145 | 458 |
除草后 | 5.80 | 25.6 | 16.5 | 17.3 | 11.2 | 137 | 461 | |
JC60H | 除草前 | 5.88 | 21.4 | 16.4 | 14.3 | 9.2 | 154 | 369 |
除草后 | 5.42 | 25.8 | 17.1 | 15.0 | 9.8 | 162 | 399 | |
JD60H | 除草前 | 6.02 | 23.8 | 15.7 | 15.2 | 11.4 | 145 | 458 |
除草后 | 5.69 | 26.6 | 17.3 | 18.6 | 11.9 | 171 | 477 |
处理 | 时间 | pH | 有机质/(g/kg) | 铵态氮/(mg/kg) | 硝态氮/(mg/kg) | 有效磷/(mg/kg) | 速效钾/(mg/kg) | 缓效钾/(mg/kg) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EJD60H | 除草前 | 6.02 | 23.8 | 15.7 | 15.2 | 11.4 | 145 | 458 |
除草后 | 5.74 | 26.9 | 17.0 | 18.0 | 11.8 | 156 | 462 |
处理 | 时间 | pH | 有机质/(g/kg) | 铵态氮/(mg/kg) | 硝态氮/(mg/kg) | 有效磷/(mg/kg) | 速效钾/(mg/kg) | 缓效钾/(mg/kg) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EJD60H | 除草前 | 6.02 | 23.8 | 15.7 | 15.2 | 11.4 | 145 | 458 |
除草后 | 5.74 | 26.9 | 17.0 | 18.0 | 11.8 | 156 | 462 |
[1] | 段亚明, 周洪, 刘秀华, 等. 中国耕地撂荒的研究进展与展望[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2018,46(13):13-17. |
[2] | 李江国, 刘占良, 张晋国, 等. 国内外田间机械除草技术研究现状[J]. 农机化研究, 2006(10):14-16. |
[3] | 吴旺旺 .戈振扬, 于英杰, 等. 激光除草技术在陆稻田间的应用研究[J]. 农业工程, 2013,3(s1):5-7. |
[4] | 姜浩翰, 刘蕾, 尹继龙. 不同除草剂对麦田杂草的防治效果研究[J]. 研究报告, 2018(12):89-90. |
[5] | 常培艳. 化学除草技术在林业育苗中的运用[J]. 技术应用, 2019(9):84-85. |
[6] | 任廷波, 赵继献, 戴祥来, 等. 化学除草剂防除直播油菜田杂草的效果研究[J]. 耕作与栽培, 2018(5):10-12. |
[7] | 张建华, 郭瑞峰, 曹昌林, 等. 几种茎叶除草剂防除高粱田杂草药效和安全性研究[J]. 作物杂志, 2018(5):162-166. |
[8] | 路战远, 张向前, 王玉芬, 等. 化学除草剂对保护性耕作燕麦田杂草的防除效果[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2017(12):91-95. |
[9] | 李祖任, 李定华, 徐中山, 等. 不同配方生物控草有机肥的田间除草效果评价[J]. 湖南农业科学, 2017(36):252-259. |
[10] | 李东升, 张莲洁, 盖志武, 等. 国内外除草技术研究现状[J]. 森林工程, 2002,18(1):17-18. |
[11] | 罗兴录, 黄秋凤, 郑华娟. 不同地膜覆盖方式对土壤理化性状和木薯产量的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2010,26(22):372-375. |
[12] | 刘子英, 刘保明, 孟艳玲, 等. 地膜覆盖对耕层土壤盐分影响的研究[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2005,33(6):995. |
[13] | 陆海东, 薛吉全, 郝引川, 等. 黑色地膜覆盖对旱地玉米土壤环境和植株生长的影响[J]. 生态学, 2016,36(7):1997-2004. |
[14] | 朱凤连, 马友华, 周静, 等. 中国畜禽粪便污染和利用现状分析[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2008,14(13):48-50. |
[15] | 张明月, 刘策, 杨娟. 植物保护学报[J], 2018,45(3):543-551. |
[16] | 王冰, 孙成, 胡冠九. 环境中抗生素残留潜在风险及其研究进展[J]. 环境科学和技术, 2007,30(3):108-111. |
[17] | Schreiber M M. Influence of tillage, crop rotation, and weed management on giant foxtail (Setaria faberi) population dynamics and corn yield[J]. Weed science, 1992,40(4):645-653. |
[18] | Cardina J, Herms C P, Doohan D J. Crop rotation and tillage system effects on weed seedbank[J]. Weed science, 2002(50):448-460. |
[19] | 张旭臣. 浅谈生物源除草剂的研究概况[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2009,15(13):150-151. |
[20] | 魏守辉, 杨峻, 朱文达, 等. 稻鸭共作对稻田杂草的控制效果及其经济效益[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2003,52(9):2053-2056. |
[21] | 丁丽. 昆虫作除草剂[J]. 新农业, 2002(1):28. |
[22] | 华继军, 冯桂林. 农田杂草的环保型防除[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2008,14(20):41-50. |
[23] | 万方浩, 王韧. 世界杂草生防的历史成就及中国杂草生防的现状与建议[J]. 生物防治通报, 1991,7(2):81-87. |
[24] | 魏守辉, 强胜, 马波, 等. 长期稻鸭共作对稻田杂草群落组成及物种多样性的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2006,30(1):9-16. |
[25] | 李琦. 国外非化学除草方法[J]. 植物保护, 1994,20(3):34-33. |
[26] | 陈世国, 强胜. 生物除草剂研究与开发的现状及未来的发展趋势[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2015,31(5):770-779. |
[1] | CUI Yingying, ZHOU Bo, CHEN Yiyong, LIU Jiayu, LI Jianlong, TANG Hao, TANG Jinchi. Spatial-temporal Variation Analysis and Comprehensive Evaluation of Soil Fertility in Guangdong Major Tea Areas [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(1): 85-95. |
[2] | MA Meng, WANG Kehua, QU Liang, DOU Taocun, GUO Jun, WANG Xingguo, HU Yuping, LU Jian. Determination and Analysis of Slaughter Performance, Chest Muscle Quality and Composition of Different Chicken Breeds [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(9): 137-142. |
[3] | ZHANG Tengshuai, ZHANG Yanying, LIU Jingguo. Effect of Seasonal Variation on Intestinal Microflora of Free-range Luhua Chicken Analyzed by DGGE [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(8): 129-134. |
[4] | LU Lilan, WANG Yuping, YIN Xinxing, HUANG Yingkai, FAN Haikuo. Investigation and Evaluation of Soil Nutrients in Fruit Coconut Orchards in Hainan Province [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(8): 72-80. |
[5] | HAN Xiaofang, TIAN Xiaoming, YANG Yongli, ZHANG Jingzhi, ZHANG Qing, ZHANG Kai, ZHANG Tao, JIA Lin. Two Soil Compound Amendments: Improvement and Fertility Effect on Coastal Saline Soil [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(5): 54-59. |
[6] | GESANG Dunzhun. Soil Nutrient Status Analysis and Soil Fertility Comprehensive Evaluation in Luolong County of Changdu City in Tibet [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(35): 30-34. |
[7] | SUN Yanming, HUANG Shaohui, LIU Ketong, YANG Yunma, YANG Junfang, XING Suli, JIA Liangliang. Effects of Soil Fertility Difference on Summer Maize Yield in Piedmont Plain and Low Plain in Central and Southern Hebei [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(35): 35-42. |
[8] | JIANG Yuqin, XIE Xianjin, HUANG Da. Influence of Cultivated Land Quality on Cultivated Land Productivity [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(3): 75-80. |
[9] | CHAO Ying, FU Gangfeng, YAN Xianghui, HANG Zhongqiao, YANG Quangang, WANG Hui, PAN Hong, LOU Yanhong, ZHUGE Yuping. Effects of Organic Fertilizer on Crop Quality, Soil Fertility and Environment: Research Progress [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(29): 103-107. |
[10] | ZENG Quan, SHI Guoying, SU Lin, YE Xuelian, HU Chunjin. Organic Fertilizer Production with Fermentation and Composting of Chicken Manure Promoted by Flammulina Chaff [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(27): 44-50. |
[11] | LIU Zifan, SU Bimeng, HUANG Jie, WEI Yunxia, XIAO Zili. Effects of Cassava-Peanut Intercropping Patterns on Soil Fertility [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(25): 102-107. |
[12] | ZHU Shijun, WANG Lili, JIN Shuquan, ZHOU Jinbo, LU Xiaohong. Effects of Bio-organic Fertilizer and Microbial Agents on Soil Fertility and Growth and Quality of Strawberry [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(21): 36-43. |
[13] | MA Xiang, CAI Yongli, LIANG Jing. Effect of Organic Improvement Materials on the Fertility of Dredger Fill in Coastal Area [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(19): 120-127. |
[14] | WEI Jiadi, WANG Yongfen, HE Xiang, YANG Peiwen, YU Yanchun, ZHENG Sijun, XU Shengtao. Effect of Plant Covering on Soil Microbial Community Functional Diversity Under Banana Cropping System [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(17): 90-97. |
[15] | ZHAO Xiudong, CHEN Xiaofang, YUAN Ziran, YE Yin. Organic Fertilizer Substitution: Effects on Soil Nutrients [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(16): 74-80. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||