Chemical Fertilizer Reduction and Basal Application of Controlled Release Fertilizer After Green Manure Turned Down: Effects on Tobacco Yield and Quality and Soil Fertility

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb20191000700

Abstract

Abstract:

To study the rational application of chemical fertilizer after green manure (pea, Pisum sativum) turned down, a field plot experiment was adopted to clarify the effects of basal fertilizer reduction and partially replaced by controlled-release fertilizer after green manure turned down on tobacco quality and output value and soil fertility. The results showed that green manure turned down could increase the content of organic matter in low organic matter soil (the contents of soil organic matter lower than 10 g/kg), but had no significant effect on other soil chemical properties. There was no significant effect on the yield and output value of tobacco leaves and the chemical composition of tobacco leaves when the basal chemical fertilizer was reduced by 15% and 30% after green manure turned down. After reducing the base fertilizer by 15%, replacing 50% of the remaining basal fertilizer with controlled-release fertilizer could significantly increase the yield and output value, as well as the potassium content and potassium/chlorine ratio of tobacco leaves.

Key words: green manure, controlled-release fertilizer, soil fertility, tobacco quality, tobacco value

CLC Number:

S146

Xiong Weiliang, Zhang Yingjie, Yang Peng, Tang Lili, Feng Wenlong, Zhang Minmin, Yuan Jiafu, Xu Xiangyu. Chemical Fertilizer Reduction and Basal Application of Controlled Release Fertilizer After Green Manure Turned Down: Effects on Tobacco Yield and Quality and Soil Fertility[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(7): 29-36.

Figures/Tables 5

References 28

[1]	张红, 阳苇丽, 肖勇 , 等. 四川省烤烟香型风格区划及特征[J]. 四川农业科技, 2018(5):10-13.
[2]	杨军伟, 曾庆宾, 张瑞平 , 等. 攀枝花市烟区土壤有机质及氮素变化分析[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2016,55(9):2195-2197.
[3]	邓小华, 罗伟, 周米良 , 等. 绿肥在湘西烟田中的腐解和养分释放动态[J]. 烟草科技, 2015,48(6):13-18.
[4]	潘福霞, 鲁剑巍, 刘威 , 等. 三种不同绿肥的腐解和养分释放特征研究[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2011,17(1):216-223.
[5]	常帅, 闫慧峰, 杨举田 , 等. 两种禾本科冬绿肥生长规律及腐解特征比较[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2015(1):101-105.
[6]	严红星, 田飞, 刘建国 , 等. 绿肥、稻草还田对植烟土壤团聚体组成及有机质分布的影响[J]. 烟草科技, 2019,52(4):9-16.
[7]	张明发, 田峰, 王兴祥 , 等. 翻压不同绿肥品种对植烟土壤肥力及酶活性的影响[J]. 土壤, 2017,49(5):903-908.
[8]	张少搏 . 翻压黑麦草对植烟土壤化学性状及烤烟品质的影响[J]. 湖南农业科学, 2019(3):30-32,36.
[9]	李河霖, 李玉娥, 金江华 , 等. 绿肥翻压对烤烟质量的影响[J]. 延边大学农学学报, 2016,38(2):156-165.
[10]	Chen Zhifeng, Deng Xiaohua, Zhou Miliang , et al. Effects of Green Manure Mixed Cropping Patterns on Physical and Chemical Properties of Soil and Economic Characters of Flue-cured Tobacco[J]. Agricultural Science & Technology, 2015,16(8):1723-1727.
[11]	林昌华, 樊小林, 陈晓远 , 等. 控释钾配方肥对烤烟产量和烟叶含钾量的影响[J]. 华中农业大学学报, 2012,31(6):720-724.
[12]	朱换换, 符雷, 曾代龙 , 等. 缓控释肥对烟草生长和烟叶品质的影响研究进展[J]. 山东农业科学, 2014,46(10) 144-147.
[13]	陈正刚, 崔宏浩, 张钦 , 等. 光叶苕子与化肥减量配施对土壤肥力及玉米产量的影响[J]. 江西农业大学学报, 2015,37(3):411-416.
[14]	刘胜良, 赵正雄, 陈月舞 , 等. 绿肥全部还田条件下烤烟化肥氮用量调整研究[J]. 中国烟草学报2010, 16(3):57-63.
[15]	杜威, 王紫泉, 和文祥 , 等. 豆科绿肥对渭北旱塬土壤养分及生态化学计量学特征影响[J]. 土壤学报, 2017,54(4):999-1008.
[16]	邓小华, 石楠, 周米良 , 等. 不同种类绿肥翻压对植烟土壤理化性状的影响[J]. 烟草科技, 2015,48(2):7-10,20.
[17]	陈剑秋, 陈宏坤, 张民 , 等. 控释复合肥田间养分释放特征及对土壤硝态氮和铵态氮累积的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2011,25(4):110-120.
[18]	杨俊刚, 曹兵, 徐秋明 , 等. 包膜控释肥料在旱地农田的应用研究进展与展望[J]. 土壤通报, 2010,41(2):495-500.
[19]	刘飞, 张民, 诸葛玉平 , 等. 马铃薯玉米套作下控释肥对土壤养分垂直分布及养分利用率的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2011,17(6):1351-1358.
[20]	徐培智, 唐拴虎, 陈建生 , 等. 连续施用控释肥对稻田土壤养分状况的影响研究[J]. 广东农业科学, 2006(9):13-15.
[21]	周兴, 廖育林, 鲁艳红 , 等. 减量施肥下紫云英与稻草协同利用对双季稻产量和经济效益的影响[J]. 湖南农业大学学报:自然科学版, 2017,43(5):469-474.
[22]	冯海萍, 张丽娟, 曲继松 , 等. 绿肥与化肥配施对日光温室土壤养分、微生物及芹菜产量的影响[J]. 甘肃农业大学学报, 2015,40(2):66-70.
[23]	农传江, 汤利, 徐智 , 等. 有机肥部分替代化肥对土壤有机碳库和烤烟经济性状的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2016(4):70-73.
[24]	郭云周, 尹小怀, 王劲松 , 等. 翻压等量绿肥和化肥减量对红壤旱地烤烟产量产值的影响[J]. 云南农业大学学报, 2010,25(6):811-816.
[25]	施卫省, 文锦芬, 唐辉 , 等. 桐油控释复合肥配比性质及对烟草吸钾特性影响的研究[J]. 昆明理工大学学报:理工版, 2007,32(2):103-107.
[26]	黄松青, 危跃, 屠乃美 , 等. 控释肥对烤烟光合特性和产质量与氮钾利用率的影响[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2015,36(1):54-60.
[27]	陈宏坤, 陈剑秋, 解玉洪 , 等. 控释肥提高烟叶钾含量的机理研究[J]. 磷肥与复肥, 2011,26(3):7-9.
[28]	郑祥洲, 张晶, 张玉树 , 等. 控释专用肥在烤烟生产上的应用[J]. 中国农学通报, 2016,32(10):53.

处理	N	P₂O₅	K₂O
处理1	93.15	78.00	256.05
处理2	82.35	67.20	233.55
处理3	71.55	56.40	211.05
处理4	82.35	67.20	233.55
处理5	71.55	56.40	211.05

处理	N	P₂O₅	K₂O
处理1	93.15	78.00	256.05
处理2	82.35	67.20	233.55
处理3	71.55	56.40	211.05
处理4	82.35	67.20	233.55
处理5	71.55	56.40	211.05

处理		pH	有机质/(g/kg)	碱解氮/(mg/kg)	速效钾/(mg/kg)	速效磷/(mg/kg)
2017年（米易坪山）	基础土样	5.86±0.10a	25.37±1.08a	116.61±8.57a	313.58±38.56a	36.84±2.46a
	处理1	6.05±0.12a	24.96±2.47a	95.80±13.91a	284.26±59.59a	37.24±2.71a
	处理2	5.95±0.30a	25.60±0.73a	107.72±7.98a	231.34±26.94a	31.74±4.70a
	处理3	5.96±0.19a	25.66±1.74a	106.41±5.35a	251.98±46.03a	34.01±0.56a
	处理4	5.89±0.20a	25.12±1.98a	109.49±3.06a	248.54±50.86a	32.93±1.99a
	处理5	5.92±0.09a	26.24±0.79a	104.19±11.95a	264.43±41.67a	36.36±4.52a
2018年（盐边和爱）	基础土样	6.12±0.35a	6.01±0.98c	51.79±25.68c	352.2±151.23a	41.3±18.69a
	处理1	5.64±0.31a	8.74±0.60ab	92.12±38.22ab	361.33±207.23a	32.23±20.03a
	处理2	5.73±0.56a	10.28±1.24a	106.85±71.85a	354.33±150.69a	46.33±40.65a
	处理3	5.69±0.44a	9.33±0.60ab	99.93±54.65ab	389.67±250.21a	39.03±19.90a
	处理4	6.28±0.41a	7.70±3.97bc	67.80±64.45abc	358.63±141.01a	37.36±24.69a
	处理5	5.58±0.15a	7.13±1.55bc	92.76±33.57ab	387.10±191.65a	30.97±13.06a

处理		pH	有机质/(g/kg)	碱解氮/(mg/kg)	速效钾/(mg/kg)	速效磷/(mg/kg)
2017年（米易坪山）	基础土样	5.86±0.10a	25.37±1.08a	116.61±8.57a	313.58±38.56a	36.84±2.46a
	处理1	6.05±0.12a	24.96±2.47a	95.80±13.91a	284.26±59.59a	37.24±2.71a
	处理2	5.95±0.30a	25.60±0.73a	107.72±7.98a	231.34±26.94a	31.74±4.70a
	处理3	5.96±0.19a	25.66±1.74a	106.41±5.35a	251.98±46.03a	34.01±0.56a
	处理4	5.89±0.20a	25.12±1.98a	109.49±3.06a	248.54±50.86a	32.93±1.99a
	处理5	5.92±0.09a	26.24±0.79a	104.19±11.95a	264.43±41.67a	36.36±4.52a
2018年（盐边和爱）	基础土样	6.12±0.35a	6.01±0.98c	51.79±25.68c	352.2±151.23a	41.3±18.69a
	处理1	5.64±0.31a	8.74±0.60ab	92.12±38.22ab	361.33±207.23a	32.23±20.03a
	处理2	5.73±0.56a	10.28±1.24a	106.85±71.85a	354.33±150.69a	46.33±40.65a
	处理3	5.69±0.44a	9.33±0.60ab	99.93±54.65ab	389.67±250.21a	39.03±19.90a
	处理4	6.28±0.41a	7.70±3.97bc	67.80±64.45abc	358.63±141.01a	37.36±24.69a
	处理5	5.58±0.15a	7.13±1.55bc	92.76±33.57ab	387.10±191.65a	30.97±13.06a

处理		产量/(kg/hm²)	产值/(万元/hm²)	上等烟/%	中等烟/%	下等烟/%	中上等烟/%	均价/(元/kg)
2017年（米易坪山）	处理1	1864.05±167.55ab	3.36±0.13b	14.15±1.52a	75.54±8.50a	10.31±1.59a	89.69±6.26a	18.13±1.75a
	处理2	2240.55±148.33a	3.97±0.14a	13.20±1.13a	72.35±9.10a	14.45±2.56a	85.55±7.85a	17.74±0.57a
	处理3	1913.55±171.15ab	3.37±0.11b	12.31±1.25ab	72.10±10.52a	15.59±2.58a	84.41±10.25a	17.71±1.72a
	处理4	1797.15±63.3abc	3.11±0.05bc	13.25±1.05a	67.74±8.97a	19.01±2.05a	80.99±15.52a	17.34±0.41a
	处理5	1720.65±50.85abc	2.96±0.04c	11.58±1.17ab	73.12±9.87a	15.29±1.87a	84.71±9.51a	17.23±0.59a
2018年（盐边和爱）	处理1	1828.5±79.2ab	3.67±0.37b	18.15±1.98ab	55.54±6.59a	26.31±3.26a	73.69±7.89a	20.09±1.23a
	处理2	2160.6±313.65a	4.26±0.62a	22.20±2.28a	62.35±7.89a	15.45±5.89a	84.55±9.58a	19.82±1.86
	处理3	1692.3±471.75 abc	3.18±1.10bc	19.31±1.05a	52.10±9.63a	28.59±1.59a	71.41±12.45a	18.61±1.28
	处理4	1694.7±501.3 abc	3.47±0.72bc	17.25±1.53abc	47.74±11.59a	35.01±9.05a	64.99±8.95a	20.88±1.96
	处理5	1900.5±535.65a	4.14±1.04ab	23.58±1.67a	52.12±10.59a	24.30±3.56a	75.70±10.25a	21.92±0.60