Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2020, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (31): 37-41.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb20191200963
Previous Articles Next Articles
Zhang Tianxiang(), Niu Xianqian
Received:
2019-12-18
Revised:
2020-02-25
Online:
2020-11-05
Published:
2020-11-20
CLC Number:
Zhang Tianxiang, Niu Xianqian. Effects of Different Treatments on the Cutting Propagation of Passiflora edulis[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(31): 37-41.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb20191200963
处理号 | 因素 | 根数/条 | 平均根长/cm | 平均根粗/mm | 新生蔓长/cm | 新生叶片数/片 | 成活率/% | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A.插穗部位 | B.NAA浓度 | C.扦插基质 | |||||||
1 | A1 | B1 | C1 | 10.4±0.6f | 7.1±0.4f | 0.52±0.03de | 4.1±0.2e | 2.3±0.1f | 32.4±1.3h |
2 | A1 | B2 | C2 | 14.6±0.7e | 11.5±0.4e | 0.40±0.03f | 4.5±0.1e | 2.9±0.2e | 57.5±0.6g |
3 | A1 | B3 | C3 | 21.7±0.7c | 12.7±0.3cd | 0.36±0.03f | 6.2±0.2c | 4.3±0.2c | 59.1±0.6g |
4 | A2 | B1 | C3 | 30.4±1.2a | 18.4±0.4a | 0.49±0.02e | 7.6±0.2b | 5.6±0.3b | 87.6±0.7b |
5 | A2 | B2 | C1 | 26.5±0.4b | 15.7±0.2b | 0.46±0.02e | 8.4±0.2a | 7.2±0.3a | 91.6±0.8a |
6 | A2 | B3 | C2 | 17.6±0.5d | 12.1±0.2de | 0.57±0.03cd | 4.4±0.2e | 3.5±0.2d | 82.5±0.9c |
7 | A3 | B1 | C2 | 16.0±0.2de | 13.3±0.3c | 0.62±0.03c | 7.4±0.2b | 5.3±0.2b | 73.5±0.4e |
8 | A3 | B2 | C3 | 9.2±0.2f | 6.2±0.4f | 0.78±0.02a | 4.3±0.1ef | 2.9±0.1e | 66.3±0.5f |
9 | A3 | B3 | C1 | 22.6±0.9c | 12.9±0.3cd | 0.71±0.02b | 5.3±0.1d | 3.4±0.2d | 77.2±0.4d |
D1 | 15.6 | 18.9 | 19.8 | ||||||
D2 | 24.8 | 16.7 | 16.1 | R(根数):插穗部位>扦插基质>NAA浓度 | |||||
D3 | 20.0 | 20.7 | 20.4 | ||||||
R | 9.2 | 4.0 | 4.3 | ||||||
E1 | 10.4 | 12.9 | 11.9 | ||||||
E2 | 15.4 | 11.1 | 12.3 | R(平均根长):插穗部位>NAA浓度>扦插基质 | |||||
E3 | 10.8 | 12.6 | 12.4 | ||||||
R | 5 | 1.8 | 0.5 | ||||||
F1 | 0.43 | 0.54 | 0.56 | ||||||
F2 | 0.51 | 0.55 | 0.53 | R(平均根粗):插穗部位>扦插基质>NAA浓度 | |||||
F3 | 0.7 | 0.55 | 0.54 | ||||||
R | 0.27 | 0.01 | 0.03 | ||||||
G1 | 4.9 | 6.4 | 5.9 | ||||||
G2 | 6.8 | 5.7 | 5.5 | R(新生蔓长):插穗部位>NAA浓度>扦插基质 | |||||
G3 | 5.7 | 5.3 | 6 | ||||||
R | 1.9 | 1.1 | 0.5 | ||||||
H1 | 3.2 | 4.4 | 4.3 | ||||||
H2 | 5.4 | 4.4 | 3.9 | R(新生叶片数):插穗部位>NAA浓度>扦插基质 | |||||
H3 | 3.9 | 3.8 | 4.3 | ||||||
R | 2.2 | 0.6 | 0.4 | ||||||
I1 | 49.3 | 65.5 | 67.5 | ||||||
I2 | 88 | 72 | 71.6 | R(成活率):插穗部位>NAA浓度>扦插基质 | |||||
I3 | 73 | 72.8 | 71.2 | ||||||
R | 38.7 | 7.3 | 4.1 |
处理号 | 因素 | 根数/条 | 平均根长/cm | 平均根粗/mm | 新生蔓长/cm | 新生叶片数/片 | 成活率/% | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A.插穗部位 | B.NAA浓度 | C.扦插基质 | |||||||
1 | A1 | B1 | C1 | 10.4±0.6f | 7.1±0.4f | 0.52±0.03de | 4.1±0.2e | 2.3±0.1f | 32.4±1.3h |
2 | A1 | B2 | C2 | 14.6±0.7e | 11.5±0.4e | 0.40±0.03f | 4.5±0.1e | 2.9±0.2e | 57.5±0.6g |
3 | A1 | B3 | C3 | 21.7±0.7c | 12.7±0.3cd | 0.36±0.03f | 6.2±0.2c | 4.3±0.2c | 59.1±0.6g |
4 | A2 | B1 | C3 | 30.4±1.2a | 18.4±0.4a | 0.49±0.02e | 7.6±0.2b | 5.6±0.3b | 87.6±0.7b |
5 | A2 | B2 | C1 | 26.5±0.4b | 15.7±0.2b | 0.46±0.02e | 8.4±0.2a | 7.2±0.3a | 91.6±0.8a |
6 | A2 | B3 | C2 | 17.6±0.5d | 12.1±0.2de | 0.57±0.03cd | 4.4±0.2e | 3.5±0.2d | 82.5±0.9c |
7 | A3 | B1 | C2 | 16.0±0.2de | 13.3±0.3c | 0.62±0.03c | 7.4±0.2b | 5.3±0.2b | 73.5±0.4e |
8 | A3 | B2 | C3 | 9.2±0.2f | 6.2±0.4f | 0.78±0.02a | 4.3±0.1ef | 2.9±0.1e | 66.3±0.5f |
9 | A3 | B3 | C1 | 22.6±0.9c | 12.9±0.3cd | 0.71±0.02b | 5.3±0.1d | 3.4±0.2d | 77.2±0.4d |
D1 | 15.6 | 18.9 | 19.8 | ||||||
D2 | 24.8 | 16.7 | 16.1 | R(根数):插穗部位>扦插基质>NAA浓度 | |||||
D3 | 20.0 | 20.7 | 20.4 | ||||||
R | 9.2 | 4.0 | 4.3 | ||||||
E1 | 10.4 | 12.9 | 11.9 | ||||||
E2 | 15.4 | 11.1 | 12.3 | R(平均根长):插穗部位>NAA浓度>扦插基质 | |||||
E3 | 10.8 | 12.6 | 12.4 | ||||||
R | 5 | 1.8 | 0.5 | ||||||
F1 | 0.43 | 0.54 | 0.56 | ||||||
F2 | 0.51 | 0.55 | 0.53 | R(平均根粗):插穗部位>扦插基质>NAA浓度 | |||||
F3 | 0.7 | 0.55 | 0.54 | ||||||
R | 0.27 | 0.01 | 0.03 | ||||||
G1 | 4.9 | 6.4 | 5.9 | ||||||
G2 | 6.8 | 5.7 | 5.5 | R(新生蔓长):插穗部位>NAA浓度>扦插基质 | |||||
G3 | 5.7 | 5.3 | 6 | ||||||
R | 1.9 | 1.1 | 0.5 | ||||||
H1 | 3.2 | 4.4 | 4.3 | ||||||
H2 | 5.4 | 4.4 | 3.9 | R(新生叶片数):插穗部位>NAA浓度>扦插基质 | |||||
H3 | 3.9 | 3.8 | 4.3 | ||||||
R | 2.2 | 0.6 | 0.4 | ||||||
I1 | 49.3 | 65.5 | 67.5 | ||||||
I2 | 88 | 72 | 71.6 | R(成活率):插穗部位>NAA浓度>扦插基质 | |||||
I3 | 73 | 72.8 | 71.2 | ||||||
R | 38.7 | 7.3 | 4.1 |
处理号 | 指标排队评分 | 综合评分 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
根数 | 平均根长 | 平均根粗 | 新生蔓长 | 新生叶片数 | 成活率 | ||
1 | 1.5 | 1.7 | 4.4 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 14.1 |
2 | 3.3 | 4.9 | 1.9 | 1.8 | 2.1 | 4.7 | 31.3 |
3 | 6.3 | 5.8 | 1.0 | 5.4 | 4.7 | 4.7 | 43.7 |
4 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 3.8 | 8.3 | 7.1 | 9.6 | 77.9 |
5 | 8.3 | 8.0 | 3.1 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 77.8 |
6 | 4.6 | 5.4 | 5.5 | 1.6 | 3.2 | 8.7 | 51.0 |
7 | 3.9 | 6.2 | 6.6 | 7.9 | 6.5 | 7.3 | 56.9 |
8 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 10.0 | 1.4 | 2.1 | 6.2 | 35.1 |
9 | 6.7 | 5.9 | 8.5 | 3.5 | 3.0 | 7.8 | 57.8 |
处理号 | 指标排队评分 | 综合评分 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
根数 | 平均根长 | 平均根粗 | 新生蔓长 | 新生叶片数 | 成活率 | ||
1 | 1.5 | 1.7 | 4.4 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 14.1 |
2 | 3.3 | 4.9 | 1.9 | 1.8 | 2.1 | 4.7 | 31.3 |
3 | 6.3 | 5.8 | 1.0 | 5.4 | 4.7 | 4.7 | 43.7 |
4 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 3.8 | 8.3 | 7.1 | 9.6 | 77.9 |
5 | 8.3 | 8.0 | 3.1 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 77.8 |
6 | 4.6 | 5.4 | 5.5 | 1.6 | 3.2 | 8.7 | 51.0 |
7 | 3.9 | 6.2 | 6.6 | 7.9 | 6.5 | 7.3 | 56.9 |
8 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 10.0 | 1.4 | 2.1 | 6.2 | 35.1 |
9 | 6.7 | 5.9 | 8.5 | 3.5 | 3.0 | 7.8 | 57.8 |
参数 | 因素 | 综合评分 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
A.插穗部位 | B.NAA浓度 | C.扦插基质 | ||
Kj1 | 89.1 | 148.9 | 149.7 | |
Kj2 | 206.7 | 144.2 | 139.2 | Σ=445.6 |
Kj3 | 149.8 | 152.5 | 156.7 | |
kj1 | 29.7 | 49.6 | 49.9 | |
kj2 | 68.9 | 48.1 | 46.4 | |
kj3 | 49.9 | 50.8 | 52.2 | |
Rj | 39.2 | 2.7 | 5.5 | |
优化方案 | A2 | B3 | C3 | A2B3C3 |
参数 | 因素 | 综合评分 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
A.插穗部位 | B.NAA浓度 | C.扦插基质 | ||
Kj1 | 89.1 | 148.9 | 149.7 | |
Kj2 | 206.7 | 144.2 | 139.2 | Σ=445.6 |
Kj3 | 149.8 | 152.5 | 156.7 | |
kj1 | 29.7 | 49.6 | 49.9 | |
kj2 | 68.9 | 48.1 | 46.4 | |
kj3 | 49.9 | 50.8 | 52.2 | |
Rj | 39.2 | 2.7 | 5.5 | |
优化方案 | A2 | B3 | C3 | A2B3C3 |
[1] | 郭艳峰, 吴惠婵, 夏雨, 等. 百香果不同发育阶段果汁挥发性成分研究[J]. 福建农业学报, 2017,32(3):299-304. |
[2] | 朱洁, 龙秀琴, 蔡国俊, 等. 两个品种百香果营养成分比较分析[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2017,56(13):2476-2478. |
[3] | 李杰, 韦中定. 4个百香果新品种引种试验探讨[J]. 农业研究与应用, 2018,31(1):21-24. |
[4] | 孙宁, 张磊, 刘玉芹, 等. 植物生长调节剂与插条类型对西番莲扦插生根的影响[J]. 天津农业科学, 2007,13(4):12-14. |
[5] | 杨妙贤, 刘颖杰, 潘金辉, 等. 不同基质和生根粉浓度对西番莲扦插生根的影响[J]. 仲恺农业工程学院学报, 2014,27(2):1-4. |
[6] | 张丽敏, 蔡国俊, 龙秀琴, 等. 不同基质和生根粉浓度对西番莲扦插苗的影响[J]. 中国南方果树, 2018,47(2):88-90. |
[7] | 黄东梅, 许奕, 潘琼玉, 等. 不同生根剂对3个南美引进黄果西番莲品种的扦插生根效果[J]. 贵州农业科学, 2018,46(5):92-95. |
[8] | 郑少华, 姜奉华. 试验设计与数据处理[M]. 北京: 中国建材工业出版社, 2005: 71-75. |
[9] | 张婷, 周晓玲, 刘海燕, 等. 小黄花茶扦插繁殖技术研究[J]. 种子, 2010,29(4):86-89. |
[10] | 闫林, 黄丽芳, 陈鹏, 等. 不同处理对中粒种咖啡扦插生根的影响[J]. 热带作物学报, 2012,33(12):2193-2198. |
[11] | 赵蕾, 陶秀冬, 宋锋惠, 等. 不同处理对平欧杂种榛嫩枝扦插生根效果的影响[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2014,42(12):22-25. |
[12] | 白岩. 浙江白术生产现状和优化农艺措施研究[D]. 保定:河北农业大学, 2009. |
[13] | 白宝璋, 杨剑平, 厉秀茹, 等. 植物生理学(上:理论教程)[M]. 北京: 中国农业科技出版社, 2003:162-165, 187-188. |
[14] | 董筱昀, 黄利斌, 吕运舟. 不同处理对浙江红花油茶扦插生根的影响[J]. 江苏林业科技, 2017,44(6):6-9. |
[15] | 张露. 豹皮樟扦插繁殖生根机理研究[D]. 贵阳:贵州师范大学, 2014. |
[16] | 史海芝, 刘惠民. 兔眼蓝莓嫩枝扦插繁殖技术[J]. 西南林学院学报, 2010,30(2):25-27,32. |
[17] | 王瑞, 陈永忠, 彭邵锋, 等. 油茶扦插生根过程的生理生化基础研究[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2013,30(4):615-619. |
[18] | 闫文涛, 佟兆庆, 魏俊, 等. 不同生长调节剂对蒙古栎嫩枝扦插生根的影响[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2017,32(3):116-121. |
[19] | 尹新彦, 储博彦, 李金霞, 等. 美国红枫‘秋火焰’扦插繁殖技术的优化[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2014,42(5):1411-1412,1437. |
[20] | 李先民, 李春牛, 卜朝阳, 等. 基质、促根剂及插穗对杜鹃红山茶扦插生根的影响[J]. 西南农业学报, 2017,30(2):426-431. |
[21] | 张巍, 刘运伟, 董振江, 等. 不同处理方法对北高丛蓝莓扦插繁育的影响[J]. 林业科技, 2020,45(1):6-8. |
[22] | Aleksandar M, Melpomena P, Viktor G. Investigation of the Possibility for Production of Some Stone Fruit Rootstocks by Rooting Cuttings[J]. Acta Agriculturae Serbica, 2015,20(39):75-83. |
[23] | 屈坤杰, 王济红, 祁翔, 等. 不同基质对豹皮樟嫩枝扦插生根能力的影响[J]. 西南农业学报, 2017,30(7):1522-1527. |
[24] | Jeaboon J, Byoungyil L, Hwayeong K, et al. Growth and Survival Rate of Softwood Cuttings Influenced by Bed Media, Cutting Length and Thickness on Several Cultivars of Highbush Bluebeny[J]. Korean Journal of Horticultural Science and Technology, 2008,26(26):134-138. |
[25] | 刘立成, 余刚, 张莹, 等. 扦插时间对蝟实插穗生根率和相关指标的影响及生根效应综合评价[J]. 植物资源与环境学报, 2016,25(2):48-54. |
[1] | PU Tianlei, HAN Xueqin, LUO Huiying, DENG Hongshan, LIAO Chengfei, FAN Jiancheng, HE Lu, JIN Jie. Pollen of Moringa oleifera: Germination in vitro [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(9): 66-70. |
[2] | ZHENG Lingling, JI Ruifeng, HAN Hongliang, LUO Yilu, LUO Jiayi, GUAN Yueqin, YAO Qisheng, ZHENG Weibing, CHEN Meilan, ZHOU Xiuteng. Determination of Five Kinds of Flavonoids in the Medicinal Herbs of Thesium chinensis [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(5): 30-36. |
[3] | Zhu Haiyun, Ma Yu, Ke Yang, Li Bo. Optimization of Culture Medium and Fermentation Parameters of Bacillus cereus MA23 Antagonistic to Kiwifruit Canker [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(7): 112-118. |
[4] | Rong Mengjie, Jin Yunqian, Wang Yanqin. Subcritical Extraction Technology of Gossypol [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(26): 9-14. |
[5] | Zhang Yan, Fang Baozhu, Ping Wenxiang, Ge Jingping. The Production of Bacteriocin Paracin1.7 by High-density Culture of Lactobacillus paracasei HD1.7: Condition Optimization [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(24): 116-124. |
[6] | Yan Liping, Wang Yinhua, Ren Fei, Shu Defeng, Liu Cuilan, Li Qinghua, Zang Zhenrong, Wu Dejun. Softwood Cutting Propagation Technique of Acer truncatum [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(19): 55-61. |
[7] | . Exogenous Hormone Treatments Affect the Rooting Rate of Amesiodendron chinense [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2019, 35(7): 54-57. |
[8] | 王凯琪,王凯,孙志宏,曹园 and 齐向英. Separation Conditions of Protoplasts of Lilium pumilum [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2019, 35(34): 64-71. |
[9] | . Atrazine Degradation Bacteria Prepared by Freeze-drying Technology: Optimization [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2018, 34(33): 84-90. |
[10] | . Sambucus williamsii Hance.: Cutting Propagation Technology of Hard Branch [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2018, 34(33): 67-73. |
[11] | . The Yeasts from Tibetan Kefir: Comparison of Glutathione Production and Extraction Optimization [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2018, 34(24): 77-81. |
[12] | . Effects of Balanced Pruning Combined with Young Fruit Thinning on the Growth and Fruiting of Longan Trees [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2018, 34(19): 62-70. |
[13] | . Effect of IBA Concentration and Application Method on Rhododendron‘Nova Zembla’Cutting Propagation [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2018, 34(14): 75-80. |
[14] | 张正一,杨丽莉,梁爽,王鑫宏 and 张浩. Optimization of Culture Medium for Fenpropathrin-degrading Bacteria [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2018, 34(1): 142-147. |
[15] | . Cutting Propagation Techniques for Betula microphylla var. paludosa [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2017, 33(34): 69-75. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||