Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2021, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (21): 91-97.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2020-0542
Special Issue: 资源与环境
Previous Articles Next Articles
Fan Chongxiu(), Li Huaide, Cui Tongxia, Yao Youxu, Hui Heping, Cai Wei
Received:
2020-10-10
Revised:
2020-12-12
Online:
2021-07-25
Published:
2021-07-29
CLC Number:
Fan Chongxiu, Li Huaide, Cui Tongxia, Yao Youxu, Hui Heping, Cai Wei. Soil Properties and Economic Properties of Codonopsis pilosula in Main Production Areas[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(21): 91-97.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2020-0542
2014年 | 2015年 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
调查地点 | 海拔/m | 经度(E) | 纬度(N) | 土壤类型 | 调查地点 | 海拔/m | 经度(E) | 纬度(N) | 土壤类型 | |
宕昌 | 阿坞 | 2293.3 | 104°10´ | 34°15´ | 山地棕褐土 | 韩院 | 2105.3 | 104°43´ | 33°58´ | 山地棕褐土 |
哈达铺 | 2175.4 | 104°13´ | 34°13´ | 山地褐土 | 南阳 | 1945.6 | 104°37´ | 33°57´ | 山地棕褐土 | |
韩院 | 1932.9 | 104°42´ | 33°57´ | 石灰性褐土 | 木耳 | 2449.6 | 104°21´ | 34°14´ | 黑土 | |
岷县 | 中寨 | 2222.3 | 103°35´ | 34°36´ | 黄绵土 | 中寨 | 2204.2 | 103°57´ | 34°37´ | 黑麻土 |
西江 | 2215.2 | 104°0´ | 34°33´ | 山地褐土 | 梅川 | 2488.6 | 104°7´ | 34°32´ | 黑土 | |
茶埠 | 2262.5 | 104°5´ | 34°29´ | 黑麻土 | 禾驮 | 2424.9 | 104°11´ | 34°28´ | 黑土 | |
漳县 | 三岔 | 1961.9 | 104°20´ | 34°52´ | 红壤土 | 四族 | 2275.1 | 104°25´ | 34°43´ | 黄绵土 |
马泉 | 2177.4 | 104°32´ | 34°43´ | 黑土 | 马泉 | 2231.8 | 104°27´ | 34°43´ | 黑麻土 | |
武当 | 1971.7 | 104°33´ | 37°45´ | 黄绵土 | 武当 | 2003.6 | 104°33´ | 34°42´ | 黄绵土 | |
通渭 | 鸡川 | 1837.5 | 105°26´ | 35°8´ | 黄绵土 | 鸡川 | 1818.0 | 105°25´ | 35°8´ | 黑麻土 |
碧玉 | 1708.4 | 105°23´ | 35°9´ | 黄绵土 | 碧玉 | 1793.2 | 105°24´ | 35°8´ | 黄绵土 | |
襄南 | 1983.2 | 105°24´ | 35°1´ | 黄白绵土 | 北城铺 | 1971.6 | 105°11´ | 35°17´ | 黄绵土 | |
陇西 | 双泉 | 1939.4 | 104°25´ | 35°7´ | 黄绵土 | 双泉 | 1920.3 | 104°24´ | 35°8´ | 黄绵土 |
碧岩 | 1900.5 | 104°26´ | 35°1´ | 黄绵土 | 福星 | 2005.8 | 104°35´ | 35°05´ | 黄绵土 | |
福星 | 2166.1 | 104°34´ | 35°8´ | 黄绵土 | 德兴 | 2400.2 | 104°27´ | 35°14´ | 黄绵土 | |
渭源 | 路园 | 1941.1 | 104°18´ | 35°6´ | 黄绵土 | 新寨 | 2440.5 | 104°09´ | 35°16´ | 黄绵土 |
新寨 | 2407.1 | 104°10´ | 35°16´ | 黄绵土 | 清源 | 2353.4 | 104°10´ | 35°09´ | 黄绵土 | |
北寨 | 2017.8 | 104°19´ | 35°15´ | 黄绵土 | 北寨 | 2384.6 | 104°20´ | 35°13´ | 黄绵土 | |
临洮 | 窑店 | 2043.6 | 104°2´ | 35°17´ | 黄绵土 | 玉井 | 1965.4 | 103°49´ | 35°15´ | 黄绵土 |
康家集 | 2174.8 | 104°0´ | 35°14´ | 黄绵土 | 康家集 | 2205.5 | 104°0´ | 35°14´ | 黄绵土 | |
龙门 | 1902.4 | 103°56´ | 35°21´ | 黄绵土 | 窑店 | 2015.7 | 104°03´ | 35°18´ | 黄绵土 |
2014年 | 2015年 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
调查地点 | 海拔/m | 经度(E) | 纬度(N) | 土壤类型 | 调查地点 | 海拔/m | 经度(E) | 纬度(N) | 土壤类型 | |
宕昌 | 阿坞 | 2293.3 | 104°10´ | 34°15´ | 山地棕褐土 | 韩院 | 2105.3 | 104°43´ | 33°58´ | 山地棕褐土 |
哈达铺 | 2175.4 | 104°13´ | 34°13´ | 山地褐土 | 南阳 | 1945.6 | 104°37´ | 33°57´ | 山地棕褐土 | |
韩院 | 1932.9 | 104°42´ | 33°57´ | 石灰性褐土 | 木耳 | 2449.6 | 104°21´ | 34°14´ | 黑土 | |
岷县 | 中寨 | 2222.3 | 103°35´ | 34°36´ | 黄绵土 | 中寨 | 2204.2 | 103°57´ | 34°37´ | 黑麻土 |
西江 | 2215.2 | 104°0´ | 34°33´ | 山地褐土 | 梅川 | 2488.6 | 104°7´ | 34°32´ | 黑土 | |
茶埠 | 2262.5 | 104°5´ | 34°29´ | 黑麻土 | 禾驮 | 2424.9 | 104°11´ | 34°28´ | 黑土 | |
漳县 | 三岔 | 1961.9 | 104°20´ | 34°52´ | 红壤土 | 四族 | 2275.1 | 104°25´ | 34°43´ | 黄绵土 |
马泉 | 2177.4 | 104°32´ | 34°43´ | 黑土 | 马泉 | 2231.8 | 104°27´ | 34°43´ | 黑麻土 | |
武当 | 1971.7 | 104°33´ | 37°45´ | 黄绵土 | 武当 | 2003.6 | 104°33´ | 34°42´ | 黄绵土 | |
通渭 | 鸡川 | 1837.5 | 105°26´ | 35°8´ | 黄绵土 | 鸡川 | 1818.0 | 105°25´ | 35°8´ | 黑麻土 |
碧玉 | 1708.4 | 105°23´ | 35°9´ | 黄绵土 | 碧玉 | 1793.2 | 105°24´ | 35°8´ | 黄绵土 | |
襄南 | 1983.2 | 105°24´ | 35°1´ | 黄白绵土 | 北城铺 | 1971.6 | 105°11´ | 35°17´ | 黄绵土 | |
陇西 | 双泉 | 1939.4 | 104°25´ | 35°7´ | 黄绵土 | 双泉 | 1920.3 | 104°24´ | 35°8´ | 黄绵土 |
碧岩 | 1900.5 | 104°26´ | 35°1´ | 黄绵土 | 福星 | 2005.8 | 104°35´ | 35°05´ | 黄绵土 | |
福星 | 2166.1 | 104°34´ | 35°8´ | 黄绵土 | 德兴 | 2400.2 | 104°27´ | 35°14´ | 黄绵土 | |
渭源 | 路园 | 1941.1 | 104°18´ | 35°6´ | 黄绵土 | 新寨 | 2440.5 | 104°09´ | 35°16´ | 黄绵土 |
新寨 | 2407.1 | 104°10´ | 35°16´ | 黄绵土 | 清源 | 2353.4 | 104°10´ | 35°09´ | 黄绵土 | |
北寨 | 2017.8 | 104°19´ | 35°15´ | 黄绵土 | 北寨 | 2384.6 | 104°20´ | 35°13´ | 黄绵土 | |
临洮 | 窑店 | 2043.6 | 104°2´ | 35°17´ | 黄绵土 | 玉井 | 1965.4 | 103°49´ | 35°15´ | 黄绵土 |
康家集 | 2174.8 | 104°0´ | 35°14´ | 黄绵土 | 康家集 | 2205.5 | 104°0´ | 35°14´ | 黄绵土 | |
龙门 | 1902.4 | 103°56´ | 35°21´ | 黄绵土 | 窑店 | 2015.7 | 104°03´ | 35°18´ | 黄绵土 |
年份 | 地点 | 有机质/(g/kg) | 碱解氮/(mg/kg) | 速效磷/(mg/kg) | 速效钾/(mg/kg) | pH | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
土层 | 0~25 cm | 25~50 cm | 0~25 cm | 25~50 cm | 0~25 cm | 25~50 cm | 0~25 cm | 25~50 cm | 0~25 cm | 25~50 cm | |||||
2014 | 宕昌 | 18.13a | 18.30a | 49.48a | 50.68a | 22.96ab | 32.78a | 135.39a | 106.15ab | 8.16 | 8.39 | ||||
岷县 | 16.33ab | 14.93ab | 26.40b | 28.97ab | 26.43ab | 24.44ab | 77.81c | 75.92ab | 8.37 | 8.47 | |||||
漳县 | 18.07a | 15.03ab | 40.39ab | 26.69b | 34.66a | 22.34ab | 108.58abc | 98.68ab | 8.38 | 8.48 | |||||
通渭 | 10.97b | 9.27b | 35.30ab | 39.40ab | 13.79b | 12.50b | 125.43ab | 118.13a | 8.11 | 8.26 | |||||
陇西 | 13.23ab | 13.80ab | 21.03b | 19.69b | 15.65b | 10.94b | 135.10a | 109.66ab | 8.54 | 8.58 | |||||
渭源 | 11.87ab | 8.27b | 31.88ab | 27.35ab | 21.07ab | 14.37b | 87.84bc | 73.15b | 8.69 | 8.66 | |||||
临洮 | 10.83b | 9.93ab | 39.48ab | 32.48ab | 23.85ab | 14.94b | 138.13a | 106.39ab | 8.51 | 8.58 | |||||
2015 | 宕昌 | 15.23ab | 15.33a | 16.05b | 18.52ab | 21.07b | 11.97ab | 98.40cd | 95.44ab | 8.09 | 8.14 | ||||
岷县 | 15.17ab | 14.07ab | 36.44a | 20.61ab | 39.21a | 24.06a | 139.95ab | 98.72ab | 8.18 | 8.07 | |||||
漳县 | 16.93a | 12.50ab | 39.52a | 28.03a | 22.56b | 18.21ab | 148.23a | 107.39a | 8.10 | 7.95 | |||||
通渭 | 14.87ab | 13.33ab | 27.16ab | 25.93a | 17.80b | 8.92b | 98.62cd | 81.10ab | 8.01 | 8.11 | |||||
陇西 | 11.37b | 12.30ab | 27.17ab | 20.91ab | 17.73b | 14.69ab | 120.05bc | 76.62b | 8.13 | 8.13 | |||||
渭源 | 12.40ab | 10.73ab | 18.52b | 11.78b | 19.65b | 11.55ab | 78.99d | 88.29ab | 8.02 | 8.03 | |||||
临洮 | 12.30ab | 8.57b | 33.26a | 18.19ab | 25.54b | 12.88ab | 113.29c | 96.64ab | 7.93 | 7.99 | |||||
平均 | 宕昌 | 16.68a | 16.82a | 32.77ab | 34.60a | 22.01bc | 17.45abc | 116.89a | 100.80a | 8.13 | 8.27 | ||||
岷县 | 15.75ab | 14.50ab | 31.42ab | 24.79ab | 32.82a | 24.25a | 108.88ab | 87.32ab | 8.28 | 8.27 | |||||
漳县 | 17.50a | 13.77abc | 39.96a | 27.36ab | 28.61ab | 20.27ab | 128.40a | 103.04a | 8.24 | 8.22 | |||||
通渭 | 12.92bc | 11.30bc | 31.23ab | 32.66a | 15.79c | 10.71c | 112.02ab | 99.97ab | 8.06 | 8.18 | |||||
陇西 | 12.30bc | 13.05abc | 24.10b | 23.63ab | 16.69c | 12.81bc | 127.57a | 93.14ab | 8.33 | 8.36 | |||||
渭源 | 12.13bc | 9.50c | 25.20ab | 19.56b | 20.36bc | 12.96bc | 83.42b | 80.73b | 8.36 | 8.35 | |||||
临洮 | 11.57c | 9.25c | 36.37ab | 25.33ab | 24.69abc | 13.91bc | 125.71a | 101.51a | 8.22 | 8.29 |
年份 | 地点 | 有机质/(g/kg) | 碱解氮/(mg/kg) | 速效磷/(mg/kg) | 速效钾/(mg/kg) | pH | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
土层 | 0~25 cm | 25~50 cm | 0~25 cm | 25~50 cm | 0~25 cm | 25~50 cm | 0~25 cm | 25~50 cm | 0~25 cm | 25~50 cm | |||||
2014 | 宕昌 | 18.13a | 18.30a | 49.48a | 50.68a | 22.96ab | 32.78a | 135.39a | 106.15ab | 8.16 | 8.39 | ||||
岷县 | 16.33ab | 14.93ab | 26.40b | 28.97ab | 26.43ab | 24.44ab | 77.81c | 75.92ab | 8.37 | 8.47 | |||||
漳县 | 18.07a | 15.03ab | 40.39ab | 26.69b | 34.66a | 22.34ab | 108.58abc | 98.68ab | 8.38 | 8.48 | |||||
通渭 | 10.97b | 9.27b | 35.30ab | 39.40ab | 13.79b | 12.50b | 125.43ab | 118.13a | 8.11 | 8.26 | |||||
陇西 | 13.23ab | 13.80ab | 21.03b | 19.69b | 15.65b | 10.94b | 135.10a | 109.66ab | 8.54 | 8.58 | |||||
渭源 | 11.87ab | 8.27b | 31.88ab | 27.35ab | 21.07ab | 14.37b | 87.84bc | 73.15b | 8.69 | 8.66 | |||||
临洮 | 10.83b | 9.93ab | 39.48ab | 32.48ab | 23.85ab | 14.94b | 138.13a | 106.39ab | 8.51 | 8.58 | |||||
2015 | 宕昌 | 15.23ab | 15.33a | 16.05b | 18.52ab | 21.07b | 11.97ab | 98.40cd | 95.44ab | 8.09 | 8.14 | ||||
岷县 | 15.17ab | 14.07ab | 36.44a | 20.61ab | 39.21a | 24.06a | 139.95ab | 98.72ab | 8.18 | 8.07 | |||||
漳县 | 16.93a | 12.50ab | 39.52a | 28.03a | 22.56b | 18.21ab | 148.23a | 107.39a | 8.10 | 7.95 | |||||
通渭 | 14.87ab | 13.33ab | 27.16ab | 25.93a | 17.80b | 8.92b | 98.62cd | 81.10ab | 8.01 | 8.11 | |||||
陇西 | 11.37b | 12.30ab | 27.17ab | 20.91ab | 17.73b | 14.69ab | 120.05bc | 76.62b | 8.13 | 8.13 | |||||
渭源 | 12.40ab | 10.73ab | 18.52b | 11.78b | 19.65b | 11.55ab | 78.99d | 88.29ab | 8.02 | 8.03 | |||||
临洮 | 12.30ab | 8.57b | 33.26a | 18.19ab | 25.54b | 12.88ab | 113.29c | 96.64ab | 7.93 | 7.99 | |||||
平均 | 宕昌 | 16.68a | 16.82a | 32.77ab | 34.60a | 22.01bc | 17.45abc | 116.89a | 100.80a | 8.13 | 8.27 | ||||
岷县 | 15.75ab | 14.50ab | 31.42ab | 24.79ab | 32.82a | 24.25a | 108.88ab | 87.32ab | 8.28 | 8.27 | |||||
漳县 | 17.50a | 13.77abc | 39.96a | 27.36ab | 28.61ab | 20.27ab | 128.40a | 103.04a | 8.24 | 8.22 | |||||
通渭 | 12.92bc | 11.30bc | 31.23ab | 32.66a | 15.79c | 10.71c | 112.02ab | 99.97ab | 8.06 | 8.18 | |||||
陇西 | 12.30bc | 13.05abc | 24.10b | 23.63ab | 16.69c | 12.81bc | 127.57a | 93.14ab | 8.33 | 8.36 | |||||
渭源 | 12.13bc | 9.50c | 25.20ab | 19.56b | 20.36bc | 12.96bc | 83.42b | 80.73b | 8.36 | 8.35 | |||||
临洮 | 11.57c | 9.25c | 36.37ab | 25.33ab | 24.69abc | 13.91bc | 125.71a | 101.51a | 8.22 | 8.29 |
年份 | 地点 | 单根鲜质量/g | 单根干质量/g | 干鲜比/% | 根长/cm | 根粗/mm |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2014 | 宕昌 | 12.87bc | 3.67b | 32.25a | 26.36b | 9.96ab |
岷县 | 21.40a | 5.90a | 27.44b | 32.54ab | 10.66a | |
漳县 | 15.67bc | 4.23b | 26.91b | 31.45ab | 9.91ab | |
通渭 | 15.80b | 4.47ab | 28.31b | 32.04ab | 9.45abc | |
陇西 | 14.88bc | 4.08b | 27.22b | 34.58a | 9.63ab | |
渭源 | 11.60bc | 3.20b | 27.54b | 27.64b | 8.78bc | |
临洮 | 10.80bc | 3.40b | 29.28a | 30.09ab | 7.97c | |
2015 | 宕昌 | 13.64a | 4.36a | 29.80ab | 32.82b | 7.32a |
岷县 | 14.96a | 4.37a | 29.28ab | 38.45a | 7.20ab | |
漳县 | 7.99b | 2.45b | 30.65ab | 29.59b | 5.96ab | |
通渭 | 9.98ab | 2.84ab | 28.31b | 31.27b | 6.31ab | |
陇西 | 9.12b | 2.82ab | 30.81ab | 29.63b | 5.81ab | |
渭源 | 10.49ab | 3.58ab | 34.13a | 29.71b | 5.54b | |
临洮 | 9.54ab | 2.73ab | 28.69b | 28.76b | 5.51b | |
平均 | 宕昌 | 13.75a | 4.02ab | 31.02a | 29.59b | 8.64a |
岷县 | 18.18a | 5.14a | 28.36a | 35.49a | 8.93a | |
漳县 | 11.83b | 3.34b | 28.78a | 30.52b | 7.94ab | |
通渭 | 12.89b | 3.65b | 28.31a | 31.65ab | 7.88ab | |
陇西 | 12.00b | 3.45b | 29.01a | 32.11ab | 7.72ab | |
渭源 | 11.05b | 3.39b | 30.84a | 28.67b | 7.16b | |
临洮 | 10.17b | 3.07b | 28.99a | 29.43b | 6.74b |
年份 | 地点 | 单根鲜质量/g | 单根干质量/g | 干鲜比/% | 根长/cm | 根粗/mm |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2014 | 宕昌 | 12.87bc | 3.67b | 32.25a | 26.36b | 9.96ab |
岷县 | 21.40a | 5.90a | 27.44b | 32.54ab | 10.66a | |
漳县 | 15.67bc | 4.23b | 26.91b | 31.45ab | 9.91ab | |
通渭 | 15.80b | 4.47ab | 28.31b | 32.04ab | 9.45abc | |
陇西 | 14.88bc | 4.08b | 27.22b | 34.58a | 9.63ab | |
渭源 | 11.60bc | 3.20b | 27.54b | 27.64b | 8.78bc | |
临洮 | 10.80bc | 3.40b | 29.28a | 30.09ab | 7.97c | |
2015 | 宕昌 | 13.64a | 4.36a | 29.80ab | 32.82b | 7.32a |
岷县 | 14.96a | 4.37a | 29.28ab | 38.45a | 7.20ab | |
漳县 | 7.99b | 2.45b | 30.65ab | 29.59b | 5.96ab | |
通渭 | 9.98ab | 2.84ab | 28.31b | 31.27b | 6.31ab | |
陇西 | 9.12b | 2.82ab | 30.81ab | 29.63b | 5.81ab | |
渭源 | 10.49ab | 3.58ab | 34.13a | 29.71b | 5.54b | |
临洮 | 9.54ab | 2.73ab | 28.69b | 28.76b | 5.51b | |
平均 | 宕昌 | 13.75a | 4.02ab | 31.02a | 29.59b | 8.64a |
岷县 | 18.18a | 5.14a | 28.36a | 35.49a | 8.93a | |
漳县 | 11.83b | 3.34b | 28.78a | 30.52b | 7.94ab | |
通渭 | 12.89b | 3.65b | 28.31a | 31.65ab | 7.88ab | |
陇西 | 12.00b | 3.45b | 29.01a | 32.11ab | 7.72ab | |
渭源 | 11.05b | 3.39b | 30.84a | 28.67b | 7.16b | |
临洮 | 10.17b | 3.07b | 28.99a | 29.43b | 6.74b |
性状 | 有机质 (X1) | 碱解氮 (X2) | 速效磷 (X3) | 速效钾 (X4) | pH (X5) | 单根鲜质量(Y1) | 单根干质量(Y2) | 干鲜比 (Y3) | 根长 (Y4) | 根粗 (Y5) | 海拔 (Z1) | 经度 (Z2) | 纬度 (Z3) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
X1 | 1 | ||||||||||||
X2 | 0.161 | 1 | |||||||||||
X3 | 0.580* | 0.568* | 1 | ||||||||||
X4 | -0.072 | 0.671** | 0.327 | 1 | |||||||||
X5 | -0.011 | 0.037 | 0.063 | 0.307 | 1 | ||||||||
Y1 | 0.495 | 0.052 | 0.399 | -0.099 | 0.365 | 1 | |||||||
Y2 | 0.468 | -0.029 | 0.374 | -0.213 | 0.315 | 0.979** | 1 | ||||||
Y3 | -0.219 | -0.406 | -0.258 | -0.509 | -0.517 | -0.53 | -0.363 | 1 | |||||
Y4 | 0.269 | -0.435 | 0.086 | -0.156 | 0.074 | 0.49 | 0.514 | -0.176 | 1 | ||||
Y5 | 0.418 | 0.475 | 0.415 | 0.325 | 0.591* | 0.787** | 0.710** | -0.700** | 0.052 | 1 | |||
Z1 | 0.167 | -0.4 | 0.335 | -0.42 | -0.058 | 0.069 | 0.192 | 0.552* | 0.191 | -0.243 | 1 | ||
Z2 | 0.159 | 0.064 | -0.341 | 0.152 | -0.368 | -0.039 | -0.076 | -0.067 | 0.022 | 0.013 | -0.615* | 1 | |
Z3 | -0.811** | -0.106 | -0.594* | 0.168 | 0.122 | -0.388 | -0.402 | 0.039 | -0.163 | -0.286 | -0.43 | 0.081 | 1 |
性状 | 有机质 (X1) | 碱解氮 (X2) | 速效磷 (X3) | 速效钾 (X4) | pH (X5) | 单根鲜质量(Y1) | 单根干质量(Y2) | 干鲜比 (Y3) | 根长 (Y4) | 根粗 (Y5) | 海拔 (Z1) | 经度 (Z2) | 纬度 (Z3) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
X1 | 1 | ||||||||||||
X2 | 0.161 | 1 | |||||||||||
X3 | 0.580* | 0.568* | 1 | ||||||||||
X4 | -0.072 | 0.671** | 0.327 | 1 | |||||||||
X5 | -0.011 | 0.037 | 0.063 | 0.307 | 1 | ||||||||
Y1 | 0.495 | 0.052 | 0.399 | -0.099 | 0.365 | 1 | |||||||
Y2 | 0.468 | -0.029 | 0.374 | -0.213 | 0.315 | 0.979** | 1 | ||||||
Y3 | -0.219 | -0.406 | -0.258 | -0.509 | -0.517 | -0.53 | -0.363 | 1 | |||||
Y4 | 0.269 | -0.435 | 0.086 | -0.156 | 0.074 | 0.49 | 0.514 | -0.176 | 1 | ||||
Y5 | 0.418 | 0.475 | 0.415 | 0.325 | 0.591* | 0.787** | 0.710** | -0.700** | 0.052 | 1 | |||
Z1 | 0.167 | -0.4 | 0.335 | -0.42 | -0.058 | 0.069 | 0.192 | 0.552* | 0.191 | -0.243 | 1 | ||
Z2 | 0.159 | 0.064 | -0.341 | 0.152 | -0.368 | -0.039 | -0.076 | -0.067 | 0.022 | 0.013 | -0.615* | 1 | |
Z3 | -0.811** | -0.106 | -0.594* | 0.168 | 0.122 | -0.388 | -0.402 | 0.039 | -0.163 | -0.286 | -0.43 | 0.081 | 1 |
[1] | 汪淑霞, 宋振华. 党参新品种渭党3号选育报告[J]. 甘肃农业科技, 2015(11):11-13. |
[2] | 晋小军, 王刚, 安小勇, 等. 硫磺熏制对党参二氧化硫残留量的影响[J]. 甘肃农业科技, 2013(11):46-48. |
[3] | 国家药典委员会. 中华人民共和国药典[M]. 北京: 中国医药科技出版社, 2010. |
[4] | 陕北建设委员会、西北植物研究所. 黄土高原植物志(第五卷)[M]. 西安: 科学技术文献出版社, 1977.130-131. |
[5] | 刘源. 甘肃省桔梗科植物系统分类与区系地理[D]. 兰州:甘肃农业大学, 2016. |
[6] | 何春雨, 张延红. 党参栽培技术研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2005, 21(12):295-295. |
[7] | 赵云生, 李占林, 田洪岭, 等. 党参种质资源生态多样性研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2007, 23(11):361-361. |
[8] | 刘书斌. 甘肃地产党参商品等级划分合理性分析及相关性的研究[D]. 兰州:甘肃中医药大学, 2016. |
[9] | 赵汝能. 甘肃中草药资源志[M]. 兰州: 甘肃科学技术出版社, 2007. |
[10] | 杜刚. 九寨沟县党参土壤肥力特征研究[D]. 雅安:四川农业大学, 2010. |
[11] | 李怀德, 杨俊海, 范重秀, 等. 不同覆盖材料和定植方式对党参土壤水热状况及药材产量的影响[J]. 中药材, 2107, 40(6):1258-1262. |
[12] | 张茂康, 马俊贤 .等. 甘肃土壤[M]. 北京: 农业出版社, 1993. |
[13] | 鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000. |
[14] | 郑翔, 李真真, 郑利亚 .等. 武功山不同海拔高度土壤速效钾与植物全钾分布格局及相关性[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2017, 45(4):211-214. |
[15] | 胡佳栋. 栽培措施对党参生长和有效成分含量影响研究[D]. 咸阳:西北农林科技大学, 2019. |
[16] | 王晓霞, 孔瑾, 杨海雁, 等. 甘肃民乐县党参品质与土壤相关性研究[J]. 现代中药研究与实践, 2020, 34(01):5-8. |
[17] | 张楠阳. 黄土高原不同人工生态林对土壤营养元素影响的研究[D]. 咸阳:西北农林科技大学, 2010. |
[18] | 杨帆, 徐洋, 崔勇, 等. 近30年中国农田耕层土壤有机质含量变化[J]. 土壤学报, 2017, 54(05):1047-1056. |
[19] | 王桂琴. 陇西县耕地土壤养分状况评价[J]. 甘肃农业, 2013(13):25-27. |
[20] | 王惠珍, 连中学, 陆国弟, 等. 党参种苗等级与药材产量及质量的关系[J]. 中国中药杂志, 2016, 41(21):3950-3955. |
[21] | 康传志, 周涛, 郭兰萍, 等. 根及根茎类中药材商品规格及等级标准的划分现状分析[J]. 贵州农业科学, 2014, 42(8):217-220. |
[22] | 彭锐. 川党参质量及影响其质量的遗传和环境因素研究[D]. 成都:成都中医药大学, 2008. |
[23] | 曹樱子, 王小丹. 藏北高寒草原样带土壤有机碳分布及其影响因素[J]. 生态环境学报, 2012, 21(2):213-219. |
[24] | 辛博. 产地气候、土壤因子及生长年限对黄芪药材质量的影响研究[D]. 北京:北京中医药大学, 2015. |
[25] | 刘书田. 中国农田土壤有机碳时空分布规律及影响因素研究[D]. 长春:吉林农业大学, 2016. |
[1] | JIN Meijuan, SHE Xudong, SHEN Mingxing, LU Changying, TAO Yueyue, WANG Haihou. Production Effect of Strawberry Cultured by Constructing Ridge-type Soil Groove Coupling Substrate in Paddy Field [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(1): 71-76. |
[2] | CUI Yingying, ZHOU Bo, CHEN Yiyong, LIU Jiayu, LI Jianlong, TANG Hao, TANG Jinchi. Spatial-temporal Variation Analysis and Comprehensive Evaluation of Soil Fertility in Guangdong Major Tea Areas [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(1): 85-95. |
[3] | SUN Shuqing, DING Wei, SUN Rui, ZHANG Xicai, LAN Guoyu, CHEN Wei, YANG Chuan, WU Zhixiang. Soil Bacterial Community of Rubber Plantations of Different Ages of Stand: Composition and Diversity Study [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(9): 93-100. |
[4] | ZENG Jie, YU Lang, DABU Xilatu, LI Yunju. Effects of Phosphorus-based Soil Conditioner on Growth of Chinese Cabbage in Low-phosphorus Red Soil [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(9): 81-87. |
[5] | HUANG Hao, XIE Jin, YUAN Wenbin, WANG Chuliang, CHEN Kunhua, ZENG Fandong, LIANG Zengfa, SU Zhao, WANG Wei. Effects of Different Organic Materials on Root Characteristics and Accumulation of Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium in Flue-cured Tobacco [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(8): 51-57. |
[6] | QIN Naiqun, MA Qiaoyun, GAO Jingwei, YANG Pu, CAI Jinlan, HAO Yingchun, LI Yanmei, JI Hongce, LIAO Xiangzheng. Effects of Biogas Residue Application on Nutrient and Heavy Metal Content in Soil and Yield of Crops Under Peanut-wheat Rotation [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(8): 58-63. |
[7] | LU Lilan, WANG Yuping, YIN Xinxing, HUANG Yingkai, FAN Haikuo. Investigation and Evaluation of Soil Nutrients in Fruit Coconut Orchards in Hainan Province [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(8): 72-80. |
[8] | WANG Lina, YANG Ying, Du Su. Effects of Biochar Application on Saline-alkali Soil: Research Status [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(8): 81-87. |
[9] | ZHAO Shuangmei, LIU Xianbin, LI Hongmei, DONG Wencai, SHEN Jianping, BAO Jinmei, LIANG Fang, LU Mei. Distributional Characteristics of Soil Carbon in Moist Evergreen Broad-leaved Forest in Ailao Mountains of Yunnan Province [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(8): 88-95. |
[10] | DENG Yushuai, WANG Yuguang, YU Lihua, GENG Gui. Effects of Waterlogging Stress on Growth and Photosynthetic Characteristics of Sugar Beet Seedlings Under Different Soil Salinity and Alkalinity [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(7): 18-23. |
[11] | ZHANG Mengjia, WEN Fangfang, ZHANG Xuelian, ZHAO Qingchun, GUO Jianming, LIAO Hong, LIU Zifei, ZHU Wen, HAN Bao, GE Yaoke, LIAO Shangqiang, LU Jing. Preliminary Construction and Application of Soil Health Assessment Method of Facility Vegetable Fields on the Field Scale [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(7): 74-79. |
[12] | CHEN Hui, ZHOU Xiaoyue, TAN Cheng, ZHANG Yongchun, WANG Jidong, MA Hongbo. Effects of Milk Vetch Returning to Field on the Content of Soil Nutrient and Heavy Metal [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(7): 80-85. |
[13] | CHEN Ruiying, ZHAO Peirong, LIU Hongjin, ZHANG Lei, GUO Xiaoyu. The Application Effect of Degradable Film in Potato Production [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(6): 37-41. |
[14] | BAO Guangling, TAO Ronghao, YANG Qingbo, HU Hanxiu, LI Ding, MA Youhua. Microbial Remediation of Heavy Metal Pollution in Farmland Soil: Research Progress [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(6): 69-74. |
[15] | SUN Yangcun, YIN Ziliang, GE Jingping. Accumulation of Heavy Metal Pollutants in Soil: Sources and Treatment Methods [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(6): 75-79. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||