Study on Measurement of Industrial Agglomeration of Vegetable Specialized Villages in Beijing

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2020-0849

Abstract

Abstract:

This paper takes Beijing vegetable specialized village as the research object, selects the relevant data of Beijing vegetable specialized villages and vegetable industry from 2012 to 2018, and uses the location quotient index calculation method to calculate the industrial agglomeration degree of Beijing vegetable specialized village from two aspects of time and space. Using the method of concentration index calculation, the concentration degree is calculated from the total output value of the leading industry and the number of farmers engaged in the industry in vegetable specialized villages. The results show that there is an agglomeration in vegetable specialized villages in Beijing, but the agglomeration is unstable and has certain fluctuation. Shunyi District, Tongzhou District and Pinggu District have a high degree and stable state of agglomeration. The agglomeration areas are mainly concentrated in Shunyi District and Fangshan District. The research proposes some suggestions as improving the infrastructure construction of vegetable specialized villages, building up the regional brand effect of vegetable specialized villages, giving full play to the radiating and driving role of vegetable demonstration villages, and promoting the construction of specialized towns, bases and industrial parks.

Key words: vegetable specialized village, industrial agglomeration degree, location quotient index, concentration index, the geographical distribution of agriculture

CLC Number:

Shi Jin, Xu Guangcai. Study on Measurement of Industrial Agglomeration of Vegetable Specialized Villages in Beijing[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(11): 158-164.

Figures/Tables 6

References 20

[1]	Porter M E. Clusters and the new economics of competition.[J]. Harvard business review, 1998,76(6). URL pmid: 10187242
[2]	Glenn Ellison, Edward L, Glaeser. Geographic Concentration in U S Manufacturing Industries: A Dartboard Approach[J]. Glenn Ellison;Edward L. Glaeser, 1997,105(5).
[3]	Martin Ron, Sunley Peter. Deconstructing clusters: chaotic concept or policy panacea[J]. Martin Ron;Sunley Peter, 2003,3(1).
[4]	Dan O'Donoghue, Bill Gleave. A Note on Methods for Measuring Industrial Agglomeration[J]. Regional Studies, 2004,38(4).
[5]	唐燕. 乡村振兴战略下对现代农业产业集聚的再思考[J]. 农村经济与科技, 2019,30(6):210-211.
[6]	周娇, 王慧. 蔬菜专业村的演化及影响因素研究——以寿光市为例[J]. 经济研究导刊, 2019(18):32-34.
[7]	柯丽菲. 推进现代农业产业集聚发展[N]. 广西日报, 2018-08-14(004).
[8]	徐广才, 李春媛, 张蕊, 唐衡. 北京市蔬菜专业村发展时空动态研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2019,35(20):158-164.
[9]	汪金敖. 继续推进优势农产品生产布局区域化——读《农业产业空间转移论》[J]. 湖南经济, 2003(12):18-19.
[10]	许晓东. 北京市蔬菜产业发展的政策措施、问题与发展对策[J]. 蔬菜, 2016(8):35-37.
[11]	王艳荣, 刘业政. 农业产业集聚对农民收入影响效应研究[J]. 农业技术经济, 2011(9):50-57.
[12]	任青丝. 河南农业产业集群发展的瓶颈与策略研究[J]. 粮食科技与经济, 2014,39(5):17-18,21.
[13]	刘湘辉, 孙艳华. 基于区位商法的湖南农业产业集聚发展测度与辨识[J]. 广西财经学院学报, 2015,28(6):116-122.
[14]	王畅, 李松柏. 国外农业产业集聚经验及对中国的启示[J]. 世界农业, 2018(1):13-17.
[15]	张哲晰, 穆月英. 空间视角下农业产业集聚的增收效应研究——基于蔬菜专业村的实证[J]. 农业技术经济, 2018(7):19-32.
[16]	周丕东, 黄婧. 国内促进农业产业集群发展的主要做法及经验——以寿光蔬菜、定西马铃薯、安溪茶叶为例[J]. 现代农业科技, 2019(23):247-248.
[17]	任青丝. 基于区位商模型的河南农业产业集群集聚度评价与优化措施研究[J]. 黄河水利职业技术学院学报, 2019,31(1):84-87.
[18]	郭娟. 安徽茶产业集聚程度及其影响因素分析[D]. 合肥:安徽农业大学, 2017.
[19]	毛颖, 刘宁. 产业集聚测度方法综述[J]. 商场现代化, 2015(5):260-261.
[20]	王香花, 张伟婷, 苏彩平. 山西省农业产业集群的测度[J]. 中北大学学报:社会科学版, 2014,30(6):20-24.

年份	主导产业总产值/亿元	农业经济总收入/亿元	比重	蔬菜产业总产值/亿元	农业总产值/ 亿元	比重	区位商
2012	3.39	5.28	0.64	62.37	166.3	0.38	1.71
2013	3.68	12.4	0.3	68.8	170.4	0.4	0.74
2014	3.42	5.81	0.59	65	155.1	0.42	1.4
2015	3.39	10.21	0.33	70.98	154.5	0.46	0.72
2016	2.64	9.56	0.28	69.94	145.2	0.48	0.57
2017	2.65	5.31	0.5	60.08	129.8	0.46	1.08
2018	2.68	7.6	0.35	52.28	114.7	0.45	0.78

年份	主导产业总产值/亿元	农业经济总收入/亿元	比重	蔬菜产业总产值/亿元	农业总产值/ 亿元	比重	区位商
2012	3.39	5.28	0.64	62.37	166.3	0.38	1.71
2013	3.68	12.4	0.3	68.8	170.4	0.4	0.74
2014	3.42	5.81	0.59	65	155.1	0.42	1.4
2015	3.39	10.21	0.33	70.98	154.5	0.46	0.72
2016	2.64	9.56	0.28	69.94	145.2	0.48	0.57
2017	2.65	5.31	0.5	60.08	129.8	0.46	1.08
2018	2.68	7.6	0.35	52.28	114.7	0.45	0.78

	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016	2017	2018	平均值	排名
顺义区	1.18	1.6	1.26	1.89	2.51	1.55	1.79	1.68	1
通州区	1.1	2.62	1.36	1.67	1.24	1.24	2.31	1.65	2
平谷区	0	2.39	1.22	2.06	1.99	1.1	1.85	1.52	3
怀柔区	0	2.59	1.25	1.51	2.52	1.39	0	1.32	4
大兴区	0	0	1.2	2.09	2.47	1.15	2.18	1.3	5
昌平区	0	1.72	1.28	2.97	0.84	1.79	0	1.23	6
密云区	0	0.56	0.41	1.99	2.39	0.94	1.58	1.12	7
延庆区	0.86	0	0.35	1.41	2.25	1.22	1.48	1.08	8
房山区	0.88	1.19	1.31	1.5	0.61	1.41	0.48	1.05	9

	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016	2017	2018	平均值	排名
顺义区	1.18	1.6	1.26	1.89	2.51	1.55	1.79	1.68	1
通州区	1.1	2.62	1.36	1.67	1.24	1.24	2.31	1.65	2
平谷区	0	2.39	1.22	2.06	1.99	1.1	1.85	1.52	3
怀柔区	0	2.59	1.25	1.51	2.52	1.39	0	1.32	4
大兴区	0	0	1.2	2.09	2.47	1.15	2.18	1.3	5
昌平区	0	1.72	1.28	2.97	0.84	1.79	0	1.23	6
密云区	0	0.56	0.41	1.99	2.39	0.94	1.58	1.12	7
延庆区	0.86	0	0.35	1.41	2.25	1.22	1.48	1.08	8
房山区	0.88	1.19	1.31	1.5	0.61	1.41	0.48	1.05	9

	CR₁	CR₂	CR₄	主导产业总产值排名前四的集聚区域
2012	48%	82.17%	100%	通州区、房山区、顺义区、延庆区
2013	61.22%	73.49%	89.25%	房山区、顺义区、平谷区、通州区
2014	36.70%	58.19%	87.80%	房山区、顺义区、通州区、平谷区
2015	31.19%	49.68%	76%	房山区、顺义区、平谷区、延庆区
2016	35.85%	57.06%	80.16%	房山区、延庆区、平谷区、顺义区
2017	20.39%	36.19%	64.41%	延庆区、顺义区、平谷区、房山区
2018	32.54%	56.83%	84.14%	房山区、大兴区、顺义区、密云区