Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2022, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (25): 158-164.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2021-0738
LU Jian1,2(), WANG Dong3(
), WANG Qun1, FU Dejun4, WU Dongfen4, LIU Yu2,5, ZHU Jianjie1, LUO Yaoping2
Received:
2021-08-03
Revised:
2021-09-19
Published:
2022-08-26
Contact:
WANG Dong
E-mail:lu84124jian@qq.com;734591125@qq.com
CLC Number:
LU Jian, WANG Dong, WANG Qun, FU Dejun, WU Dongfen, LIU Yu, ZHU Jianjie, LUO Yaoping. Comparison Analysis of Aromatic Constituents of Jasmine Scented Tea During Orthodox and Isolated Scenting Process[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(25): 158-164.
组分 | 序号 | 物质 | 鉴定方法 | 实测 保留 指数 | 参考 保留 指数 | 参考 文献 | 一窨烘前 | 一窨烘后 | 二窨烘前 | 二窨烘后 | 成品 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
传统 窨制 | 隔离 窨制 | 传统 窨制 | 传统 窨制 | 隔离 窨制 | 传统 窨制 | 隔离 窨制 | 传统 窨制 | 隔离 窨制 | |||||||||||
烯烃类化合物 | 1 | 月桂烯 | MS,RI | 1162 | 1166 | [16] | 0.08 | 0.16 | 0.08 | 0.07 | 0.10 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.05 | 0.08 | ||||
2 | 顺式-β-罗勒烯 | MS,RI | 1249 | 1247 | [14] | 0.11 | 0.16 | 0.11 | 0.07 | 0.08 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.03 | 0.08 | |||||
3 | α-荜澄茄油烯 | MS,RI | 1447 | 1450 | [14] | 0.21 | 0.10 | 0.14 | 0.15 | 0.10 | 0.13 | 0.14 | 0.15 | 0.09 | |||||
4 | 古巴烯 | MS,RI | 1478 | 1480 | [14] | 0.14 | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.08 | 0.06 | 0.10 | 0.07 | |||||
5 | β-荜澄茄烯 | MS,RI | 1526 | 1531 | [14] | 0.15 | 0.08 | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.14 | 0.12 | 0.05 | 0.14 | 0.14 | |||||
6 | β-榄香烯 | MS,RI | 1582 | 1576 | [14] | 0.21 | 0.36 | 0.17 | 0.13 | 0.38 | 0.14 | 0.35 | 0.14 | 0.33 | |||||
7 | (+)-香橙烯 | MS | 1594 | 0.09 | 0.04 | - | 0.03 | - | 0.01 | - | 0.02 | ||||||||
8 | (+)-表-双环倍半水芹烯 | MS,RI | 1648 | 1648 | [14] | 0.43 | - | 0.25 | 0.25 | - | 0.22 | - | 0.22 | - | |||||
9 | α-石竹烯 | MS,RI | 1654 | 1654 | [14] | 0.21 | 0.24 | 0.18 | 0.24 | 0.24 | 0.14 | 0.21 | 0.18 | 0.22 | |||||
10 | γ-依兰油烯 | MS,RI | 1676 | 1677 | [14] | 0.27 | 0.19 | 0.15 | 0.20 | 0.15 | 0.14 | 0.13 | 0.14 | 0.13 | |||||
11 | 大根香叶烯D | MS,RI | 1693 | 1698 | [14] | 0.37 | 0.49 | 0.25 | 0.26 | 0.77 | 0.22 | 0.74 | 0.25 | 0.76 | |||||
12 | naphthalene,1,2,3,4,4a,7-hexahydro- 1,6-dimethyl-4-(1-methylethyl)- | MS | 1707 | 0.14 | - | 0.10 | 0.09 | - | 0.08 | - | 0.08 | - | |||||||
13 | α-衣兰油烯 | MS,RI | 1713 | 1721 | [14] | 0.25 | 0.19 | 0.16 | 0.17 | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.11 | 0.14 | 0.10 | |||||
14 | γ-Pyronene | MS | 1718 | 0.11 | 0.15 | - | 0.07 | 0.18 | 0.05 | 0.23 | 0.06 | 0.14 | |||||||
15 | α-法尼烯 | MS,RI | 1758 | 1758 | [17] | 28.78 | 25.96 | 25.83 | 29.00 | 33.47 | 28.11 | 31.86 | 32.14 | 31.11 | |||||
16 | (-)-α-杜松烯 | MS | 1783 | 0.26 | 0.12 | 0.18 | 0.18 | 0.07 | 0.18 | 0.05 | 0.19 | 0.08 | |||||||
小计 | 31.78 | 28.35 | 27.80 | 31.11 | 35.94 | 29.91 | 34.11 | 34.03 | 33.34 | ||||||||||
酯类化合物 | 17 | 乙酸顺-3-己烯酯 | MS,RI | 1317 | 1318 | [14] | 0.52 | 0.62 | 0.47 | 0.36 | 0.59 | 0.40 | 0.68 | 0.15 | 0.37 | ||||
18 | 丁酸顺-3-己烯酯 | MS,RI | 1458 | 1463 | [14] | 0.44 | 0.81 | 0.55 | 0.38 | 0.52 | 0.47 | 0.87 | 0.25 | 0.62 | |||||
19 | 苯甲酸甲酯 | MS,RI | 1618 | 1615 | [14] | 1.42 | 2.57 | 1.53 | 1.09 | 2.10 | 1.20 | 2.48 | 0.79 | 2.12 | |||||
20 | 乙酸苄酯 | MS,RI | 1730 | 1741 | [14] | 16.57 | 22.13 | 19.19 | 15.73 | 18.39 | 15.94 | 20.14 | 12.84 | 21.48 | |||||
21 | 水杨酸甲酯 | MS,RI | 1767 | 1798 | [14] | 1.35 | 2.21 | 1.52 | 1.08 | 1.58 | 1.14 | 1.77 | 0.84 | 1.55 | |||||
22 | 苯甲酸丁酯 | MS,RI | 1855 | 1839 | [18] | 0.09 | 0.11 | 0.09 | 0.08 | 0.12 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.09 | |||||
23 | 丁酸苄酯 | MS,RI | 1865 | 1853 | [19] | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.09 | 0.07 | 0.05 | 0.08 | 0.06 | 0.08 | 0.06 | |||||
24 | 苯甲酸顺-3-己烯酯 | MS,RI | 2097 | 2117 | [20] | 15.56 | 6.43 | 13.61 | 17.58 | 8.80 | 16.91 | 8.47 | 21.34 | 8.31 | |||||
25 | 棕榈酸甲酯 | MS,RI | 2217 | 2208 | [21] | 0.06 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.03 | 0.09 | 0.02 | |||||
26 | 苯甲酸苄酯 | MS,RI | 2608 | 2632 | [19] | 0.27 | 0.02 | 0.26 | 0.27 | 0.03 | 0.27 | 0.02 | 0.37 | 0.03 | |||||
小计 | 36.35 | 35.01 | 37.35 | 36.69 | 32.22 | 36.55 | 34.61 | 36.82 | 34.64 |
组分 | 序号 | 物质 | 鉴定方法 | 实测 保留 指数 | 参考 保留 指数 | 参考 文献 | 一窨烘前 | 一窨烘后 | 二窨烘前 | 二窨烘后 | 成品 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
传统 窨制 | 隔离 窨制 | 传统 窨制 | 传统 窨制 | 隔离 窨制 | 传统 窨制 | 隔离 窨制 | 传统 窨制 | 隔离 窨制 | |||||||||||
烯烃类化合物 | 1 | 月桂烯 | MS,RI | 1162 | 1166 | [16] | 0.08 | 0.16 | 0.08 | 0.07 | 0.10 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.05 | 0.08 | ||||
2 | 顺式-β-罗勒烯 | MS,RI | 1249 | 1247 | [14] | 0.11 | 0.16 | 0.11 | 0.07 | 0.08 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.03 | 0.08 | |||||
3 | α-荜澄茄油烯 | MS,RI | 1447 | 1450 | [14] | 0.21 | 0.10 | 0.14 | 0.15 | 0.10 | 0.13 | 0.14 | 0.15 | 0.09 | |||||
4 | 古巴烯 | MS,RI | 1478 | 1480 | [14] | 0.14 | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.08 | 0.06 | 0.10 | 0.07 | |||||
5 | β-荜澄茄烯 | MS,RI | 1526 | 1531 | [14] | 0.15 | 0.08 | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.14 | 0.12 | 0.05 | 0.14 | 0.14 | |||||
6 | β-榄香烯 | MS,RI | 1582 | 1576 | [14] | 0.21 | 0.36 | 0.17 | 0.13 | 0.38 | 0.14 | 0.35 | 0.14 | 0.33 | |||||
7 | (+)-香橙烯 | MS | 1594 | 0.09 | 0.04 | - | 0.03 | - | 0.01 | - | 0.02 | ||||||||
8 | (+)-表-双环倍半水芹烯 | MS,RI | 1648 | 1648 | [14] | 0.43 | - | 0.25 | 0.25 | - | 0.22 | - | 0.22 | - | |||||
9 | α-石竹烯 | MS,RI | 1654 | 1654 | [14] | 0.21 | 0.24 | 0.18 | 0.24 | 0.24 | 0.14 | 0.21 | 0.18 | 0.22 | |||||
10 | γ-依兰油烯 | MS,RI | 1676 | 1677 | [14] | 0.27 | 0.19 | 0.15 | 0.20 | 0.15 | 0.14 | 0.13 | 0.14 | 0.13 | |||||
11 | 大根香叶烯D | MS,RI | 1693 | 1698 | [14] | 0.37 | 0.49 | 0.25 | 0.26 | 0.77 | 0.22 | 0.74 | 0.25 | 0.76 | |||||
12 | naphthalene,1,2,3,4,4a,7-hexahydro- 1,6-dimethyl-4-(1-methylethyl)- | MS | 1707 | 0.14 | - | 0.10 | 0.09 | - | 0.08 | - | 0.08 | - | |||||||
13 | α-衣兰油烯 | MS,RI | 1713 | 1721 | [14] | 0.25 | 0.19 | 0.16 | 0.17 | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.11 | 0.14 | 0.10 | |||||
14 | γ-Pyronene | MS | 1718 | 0.11 | 0.15 | - | 0.07 | 0.18 | 0.05 | 0.23 | 0.06 | 0.14 | |||||||
15 | α-法尼烯 | MS,RI | 1758 | 1758 | [17] | 28.78 | 25.96 | 25.83 | 29.00 | 33.47 | 28.11 | 31.86 | 32.14 | 31.11 | |||||
16 | (-)-α-杜松烯 | MS | 1783 | 0.26 | 0.12 | 0.18 | 0.18 | 0.07 | 0.18 | 0.05 | 0.19 | 0.08 | |||||||
小计 | 31.78 | 28.35 | 27.80 | 31.11 | 35.94 | 29.91 | 34.11 | 34.03 | 33.34 | ||||||||||
酯类化合物 | 17 | 乙酸顺-3-己烯酯 | MS,RI | 1317 | 1318 | [14] | 0.52 | 0.62 | 0.47 | 0.36 | 0.59 | 0.40 | 0.68 | 0.15 | 0.37 | ||||
18 | 丁酸顺-3-己烯酯 | MS,RI | 1458 | 1463 | [14] | 0.44 | 0.81 | 0.55 | 0.38 | 0.52 | 0.47 | 0.87 | 0.25 | 0.62 | |||||
19 | 苯甲酸甲酯 | MS,RI | 1618 | 1615 | [14] | 1.42 | 2.57 | 1.53 | 1.09 | 2.10 | 1.20 | 2.48 | 0.79 | 2.12 | |||||
20 | 乙酸苄酯 | MS,RI | 1730 | 1741 | [14] | 16.57 | 22.13 | 19.19 | 15.73 | 18.39 | 15.94 | 20.14 | 12.84 | 21.48 | |||||
21 | 水杨酸甲酯 | MS,RI | 1767 | 1798 | [14] | 1.35 | 2.21 | 1.52 | 1.08 | 1.58 | 1.14 | 1.77 | 0.84 | 1.55 | |||||
22 | 苯甲酸丁酯 | MS,RI | 1855 | 1839 | [18] | 0.09 | 0.11 | 0.09 | 0.08 | 0.12 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.09 | |||||
23 | 丁酸苄酯 | MS,RI | 1865 | 1853 | [19] | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.09 | 0.07 | 0.05 | 0.08 | 0.06 | 0.08 | 0.06 | |||||
24 | 苯甲酸顺-3-己烯酯 | MS,RI | 2097 | 2117 | [20] | 15.56 | 6.43 | 13.61 | 17.58 | 8.80 | 16.91 | 8.47 | 21.34 | 8.31 | |||||
25 | 棕榈酸甲酯 | MS,RI | 2217 | 2208 | [21] | 0.06 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.03 | 0.09 | 0.02 | |||||
26 | 苯甲酸苄酯 | MS,RI | 2608 | 2632 | [19] | 0.27 | 0.02 | 0.26 | 0.27 | 0.03 | 0.27 | 0.02 | 0.37 | 0.03 | |||||
小计 | 36.35 | 35.01 | 37.35 | 36.69 | 32.22 | 36.55 | 34.61 | 36.82 | 34.64 |
样品 | 外形 | 汤色 | 香气 | 滋味 | 叶底 | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
评语 | 得分 | 评语 | 得分 | 评语 | 得分 | 评语 | 得分 | 评语 | 得分 | |||||||||||||
传统窨制 | 紧实,有茎梗,深绿尚润 | 88 | 黄亮 | 89 | 浓郁,较鲜 | 92 | 鲜爽(汤里有香) | 89 | 较软,多茎,黄绿明亮 | 87 | ||||||||||||
隔离窨制 | 紧实,有茎梗,深绿尚润 | 88 | 黄亮 | 88 | 较浓 | 88 | 较醇 | 88 | 较软,多茎,黄绿明亮 | 87 |
样品 | 外形 | 汤色 | 香气 | 滋味 | 叶底 | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
评语 | 得分 | 评语 | 得分 | 评语 | 得分 | 评语 | 得分 | 评语 | 得分 | |||||||||||||
传统窨制 | 紧实,有茎梗,深绿尚润 | 88 | 黄亮 | 89 | 浓郁,较鲜 | 92 | 鲜爽(汤里有香) | 89 | 较软,多茎,黄绿明亮 | 87 | ||||||||||||
隔离窨制 | 紧实,有茎梗,深绿尚润 | 88 | 黄亮 | 88 | 较浓 | 88 | 较醇 | 88 | 较软,多茎,黄绿明亮 | 87 |
[1] | LU J, FU D J, WU D F, et al. Analysis of volatile compounds of jasmine scented tea during the orthodox manufacturing process using HS-SPME/GC-MS[J]. Journal of the Korean Tea Society 2015 Special Issue, 2015:132-140. |
[2] | 马静. 茉莉花茶窨制过程香气及其它理化因子变化规律的研究[D]. 杭州: 中国农业科学院, 2001. |
[3] | 张钰婷, 叶秋萍, 程淑华, 等. 茉莉花茶加工技术与吸香机理研究现状[J]. 热带作物学报, 2016, 37(1):203-207. |
[4] | 胡苑. 花茶加工技术讲座.第三讲,花茶加工机械[J]. 茶叶机械, 1988(3):30-32. |
[5] | 胡苑. 花茶加工技术讲座.第四讲,花茶生产技术装备的研究及应用[J]. 茶叶机械, 1988(4):34-37. |
[6] | 陈仕英. 花茶气流窨花机[P]. 中国专利, CN2427976Y,2001-05-02. |
[7] | 谢大高. 茉莉花茶自动循环窨花机[P]. 中国专利, CN202456287U,2012-10-03. |
[8] | 谭和平, 徐海卫, 曹江萍, 等. 花茶窨制设备[P]. 中国专利, CN102793033A,2012-11-28. |
[9] | 莫东冬, 雷大焰. 隔离式茉莉花茶自动窨制机[P]. 中国专利, CN208783690U,2019-04-26. |
[10] | 杨庆新, 刘仲华, 黄建安, 等. 一种茉莉花茶的窨制方法[P]. 中国专利, CN111919916A,2020-11-13. |
[11] | 郭雅玲, 赖凌凌, 刁鑫, 等. 特种茉莉花茶及其品质影响因素的研究现状[J]. 食品安全质量检测学报, 2017, 8(1):156-162. |
[12] | 浙江大学, 中华全国供销合作总社杭州茶叶研究院, 中国农业科学院茶叶研究所, 等.茶叶感官审评方法,GB/T 23776—2018[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2018. |
[13] | 林杰, 陈莹, 施元旭, 等. 保留指数在茶叶挥发物鉴定中的应用及保留指数库的建立[J]. 茶叶科学, 2014, 34(3):261-270. |
[14] | LIN J, CHEN Y, ZHANG P, et al. A novel quality evaluation index and strategies to identify scenting quality of jasmine tea based on headspace volatiles analysis[J]. Food science and biotechnology, 2013, 22(2):331-340. |
[15] | 唐夏妮, 夏益民, 雷永宏, 等. 利用茉莉花茶香气指数鉴定其窨制品质及构建决策树模型[J]. 茶叶科学, 2016, 36(6):646-654. |
[16] | LARIBI B, BETTAIEB I, KOUKI K, et al. Water deficit effects on caraway (Carum carvi L.) growth, essential oil and fatty acid composition[J]. Industrial crops and products, 2009, 30(3):372-379. |
[17] | TABANCA N, DEMIRCI B, BASER K H C, et al. Chemical composition and antifungal activity of Salvia macrochlamys and Salvia recognita essential oils[J]. Journal of agricultural and food chemistry, 2006, 54(18):6593-6597. |
[18] | NARAIN N, GALVÃO M S. Volatile aroma compounds in mango fruit cv. ‘Tommy Atkins’- a preliminary study[J]. Acta horticulturae, 2004, 645:671-676. |
[19] | SAÏDANA D, MAHJOUB M A, BOUSSAADA O, et al. Chemical composition and antimicrobial activity of volatile compounds of Tamarix boveana (Tamaricaceae)[J]. Microbiological research, 2008, 163(4):445-455. |
[20] | De SOUSA GALVÃO M, NARAIN N, Do SOCORRO PORTO DOS SANTOS M, et al. Volatile compounds and descriptive odor attributes in umbu (Spondias tuberosa) fruits during maturation[J]. Food research international, 2011, 44(7):1919-1926. |
[21] | SENATORE F, FORMISANO C, RIGANO D, et al. Chemical composition of the essential oil from aerial parts of Stachys palustris L. (Lamiaceae) growing wild in Southern Italy[J]. Croatica chemica acta, 2007, 80(1):135-139. |
[22] | De MARTINO L, De FEO V, NAZZARO F. Chemical composition and in vitro antimicrobial and mutagenic activities of seven lamiaceae essential oils[J]. Molecules, 2009, 14(10):4213-4230. |
[23] | KOMES D, ULRICH D, LOVRIC T. Characterization of odor-active compounds in Croatian Rhine Riesling wine, subregion Zagorje[J]. European food research and technology, 2006, 222:1-7. |
[24] | FERRETTI G, MAGGI F, TIRILLINI B. Essential oil composition of Hypericum richeri Vill. from Italy[J]. Flavour and fragrance journal, 2005, 20(3):295-298. |
[25] | SORIA A C, SANZ J, MARTÍNEZ-CASTRO I. SPME followed by GC-MS: a powerful technique for qualitative analysis of honey volatiles[J]. European food research and technology, 2009, 228(4):579-590. |
[26] | BOUSSAADA O, AMMAR S, SAIDANA D, et al. Chemical composition and antimicrobial activity of volatile components from capitula and aerial parts of Rhaponticum acaule DC growing wild in Tunisia[J]. Microbiological research, 2008, 163:87-95. |
[27] | PAIBON W, YIMNOI C A, TEMBAB N, et al. Comparison and evaluation of volatile oils from three different extraction methods for some Thai fragrant flowers[J]. International journal of cosmetic science, 2011, 33(2):150-156. |
[28] | 傅天龙, 郭晨, 傅天甫, 等. 福州8种主要茉莉花茶特征香气成分比较与分析[J]. 茶叶科学, 2020, 40(5):656-664. |
[29] | 安会敏, 欧行畅, 熊一帆, 等. 茉莉花茶特征香气成分研究[J]. 茶叶科学, 2020, 40(2):225-237. |
[30] | 骆少君, 郭雯飞, 濮荷娟, 等. 茉莉花茶香气挥发油与窨次、配花量的相关性[J]. 福建茶叶, 1987(3):18-21. |
[31] | 张丽霞. 茉莉花释香过程中香气变化规律及其细胞学、生物化学基础研究[D]. 长沙: 湖南农业大学, 1997. |
[32] | 黄宜豪. 茉莉花茶窨制新技术[J]. 茶业通报, 1994(3):25-27. |
[33] | 何文斌, 杨伟丽. 茉莉花茶窨制工艺技术研究[J]. 贵州茶叶, 1995(2):14-18. |
[34] | 李明. 茉莉花茶窨制过程的茶叶含水量控制[J]. 福建茶叶, 1999(1):29-30. |
[35] | 郭友嘉, 戴亮, 任清, 等. 用吸附——热脱捕集进样法研究茉莉花香释放过程中化学成分[J]. 色谱, 1994, 12(2):110-113. |
[36] | 刘建军, 周顺玉, 司辉清, 等. 晴天茉莉花与最佳开放条件下雨水茉莉花香气成分比较分析[J]. 西南农业学报, 2011, 24(2):722-727. |
[1] | Guo Xiangyang. Volatile Compositions Analysis and Beverage Application of Chamomile Essential Oil from Matricaria recutita [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(4): 138-145. |
[2] | Bu Yaqiang, Zhang Wang, Li Meizhu, Luo Yucai, Yu Shuqi, Peng Xinmei, Xie Yangui, Lu Chao, Wu Fuping, Xie Jing. Formula of Eleusine coracana Cereal: Based on Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(29): 125-131. |
[3] | Zhang Wen, Han Shou’an, Wang Min, , AIermaike· Caikasim, Zhong Haixia, Wang Huan, Pan Mingqi, Xie Hui. Drying Standard and Rapid Detection Technology of Green Raisin Based on Texture and Sensory Evaluation Method [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(28): 128-135. |
[4] | Xia Chun, Zhao Jinchao, Zhang Mingjin, Xia Jianhua, Zhang Yonghui, Wang Fei, Hu Yongtao, Wang Jian’an, Song Zhaopeng. Effects of Harvesting Method and Maturity on Physiological and Sensory Quality of Upper Tobacco Leaves [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(25): 14-18. |
[5] | . Correlation and Cluster Analysis of Agronomic Characters of 35 Wheat Varieties [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2019, 35(29): 8-13. |
[6] | . Correlation Analysis of Main Maillard Reaction Components and Sensory Evaluation Indices of Flue-Cured Tobacco of Different Flavor Types [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2016, 32(7): 179-184. |
[7] | . Quality Components Variation and Fermenting Degree Discrimination During Fermentation Process of Congou Black Tea Based on Dynamic Cluster Analysis [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2016, 32(7): 196-204. |
[8] | Wang Weiwei,Jiang Heyuan,Jiang Yongwen and Zhang Jianyong. Effect of Withering Time on CTC Black Tea Quality [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2016, 32(4): 129-135. |
[9] | . Optimizing the Formula of the Maca Buccal tablets by Orthogonal Test [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2014, 30(18): 315-320. |
[10] | . Comparison Study of Biomass Pellet and Pellet Feed [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2011, 27(8): 328-333. |
Viewed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Full text 68
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract 465
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||