The Design of Quality Supply Chain of Characteristic Agricultural Products Based on Blockchain Technology: Taking ‘Mentougou Jingbai Pear’ Pyrus ussuriensis Maxin as an Example

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2021-1188

Abstract

Abstract:

In view of the serious damage to the characteristic agricultural product brand caused by adverse economic activities, and the easy tampering of the traditional agricultural product quality traceability technology data, we design the quality supply chain technology based on blockchain, to ensure the effective role of the traceability technology in the quality supply chain of characteristic agricultural products. Taking ‘Mentougou Jingbai Pear’ as an example, this study systematically expounds the current situation of ‘Jingbai Pear’ industry in Mentougou District of Beijing and the problems existing in the quality supply chain of characteristic agricultural products, and analyzes the technical feasibility of applying blockchain to the traceability of characteristic agricultural products. Based on the characteristics of distributed storage, decentralization and immutability of blockchain technology, the overall framework of the quality, safety and traceability system for ‘Mentougou Jingbai Pear’ is designed. The realization methods of whole-process recording and traceability management of quality information in the links of planting, warehousing, transportation, consumption and supervision are expounded, in order to provide support for the construction of the quality and safety traceability technology of characteristic agricultural products based on blockchain. The established quality supply chain system of characteristic agricultural products will enable more effective protection, supervision and management of the brand and quality of characteristic agricultural products.

Key words: Pyrus ussuriensis Maxin, brand building, blockchain, traceability, design

CLC Number:

S859.84

WU Yajuan, SU Benying, LI Jing, GAO Tongyu. The Design of Quality Supply Chain of Characteristic Agricultural Products Based on Blockchain Technology: Taking ‘Mentougou Jingbai Pear’ Pyrus ussuriensis Maxin as an Example[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(33): 152-157.

Figures/Tables 4

References 30

[1]	杜瑞瑞, 田海青, 梁振旭, 等. ‘京白梨’不同序位果实发育动态及成熟期内在品质差异分析[J]. 山东农业科学, 2020, 52(7):46-49.
[2]	齐秀东. 京白梨果实软化特性与贮藏保鲜技术研究进展[J]. 河北科技师范学院学报, 2014, 28(1):11-14.
[3]	张红. 地理标志产品──门头沟京白梨[J]. 农产品市场周刊, 2012(35):41-43.
[4]	窦红梅. 6种京郊果品贴上地理标志[N]. 北京日报, 2007-06-25(6).
[5]	付凯, 宋平一. 打造绿色发展“聚宝盆”北京市门头沟区加强京白梨品牌保护和发展[J]. 中国质量监管, 2020(5):53.
[6]	杨自立, 付军利, 高同雨, 等. 北京市现代化都市型农业经营活动碳足迹研究──以门头沟区京白梨果园为例[J]. 中国农学通报, 2016, 32(3):128-134.
[7]	崔舒云, 程波, 于润林, 等. 区块链技术在水产品质量安全可追溯中的应用设计探索[J]. 中国渔业质量与标准, 2021, 11(3):64-69.
[8]	INTERNATIONAL TRADE CENTER. Traceability in food and agricultural products, The ITC Standards and Quality Bulletin No. 91 [EB/OL]. https://www.intracen.org/uploadedFiles/intracenorg/Content/Exporters/Exporting_Better/Quality_Management/Redesign/EQM%20Bulletin%2091-2015_Traceability_FINAL%2014Oct15_web.pdf, 2021-11-29.
[9]	EUROPEAN UNION LEGISLATION. Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 January 2002 laying down the general principles and requirements of food law, establishing the European Food Safety Authority and laying down procedures in matters of food safety[EB/OL], https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX%3A32002R0178, 2021-11-29.
[10]	郑宗林, 罗强, 曹升洪. 美国水产品质量安全体系概况[J]. 水产科技情报, 2008(1):14-17.
[11]	国务院办公厅. 国务院办公厅关于加快推进重要产品追溯体系建设的意见:国办发[2015]95号[EB/OL]. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2016-01/12/content_10584.html. 2015-12-30/ 2016-01-12.
[12]	国务院办公厅. 中共中央国务院关于开展质量提升行动的指导意见:国办发[2017]95号[EB/OL]. http://www.mofcom.gov.cn/article/b/g/201801/20180102693734.shtml. 2017-9-5/ 2017-12-29.
[13]	钟德福, 艾红, 张良国, 等. 区块链技术及其在农产品质量安全追溯应用的研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(19):143-150.
[14]	ALFIAN G, SYAFRUDIN M, FAROOQ U, et al. Improving efficiency of RFID-based traceability system for perishable food by utilizing IoT sensors and machine learning model[J]. Food control, 2020,110.
[15]	PIGINI D, CONTI M. NFC-based traceability in the food chain[J]. Sustainability, 2017, 9(10):1-20. doi: 10.3390/su9010001 URL
[16]	SINGH S.K, JENAMANI M. Cassandra-based data repository design for food supply chain traceability[J]. Journal of information and knowledge management systems, 2021, 51(2):193-217.
[17]	PURWANDOKO P.B, SEMINAR K.B, SUTRISNO, et al. Development of a smart traceability system for the rice agroindustry supply chain in Indonesia[J]. Information, 2019, 10(10):288. doi: 10.3390/info10100288 URL
[18]	钟聪儿. 基于RFID技术的干果类农产品质量安全追溯系统[J]. 青岛农业大学学报:自然科学版, 2020, 37(4):277-281,288.
[19]	钱建平, 吴文斌, 杨鹏. 新一代信息技术对农产品追溯系统智能化影响的综述[J]. 农业工程学报, 2020, 36(5):182-191.
[20]	夏雪, 丘耘, 胡林, 等. 农产品质量安全追溯系统中信息技术的研究及应用现状[J]. 食品研究与开发, 2014, 35(15):107-112.
[21]	徐中宴. 基于云计算的农产品全产业链追溯系统关键技术研究[D]. 北京: 华北水利水电大学, 2020.
[22]	SATOSHI N. Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system[J]. Consulted, 2008:1-30.
[23]	肖程琳, 李姝萱, 胡敏思, 等. 区块链技术在食品信息溯源中的应用研究[J]. 物流工程与管理, 2018, 40(8):83-85.
[24]	王红梅, 於跃成. 基于区块链的食品安全溯源技术研究[J]. 电子设计工程, 2019, 27(13):16-20,25.
[25]	孙志国, 李秀峰, 王文生, 等. 区块链技术在食品安全领域的应用展望[J]. 农业网络信息, 2016(12):30-31.
[26]	RESHMA K. Food traceability on blockchain: walmart’s pork and mango pilots with IBM[J]. The journal of the british blockchain association, 2019, 1(1):47-53.
[27]	FRANK Y. A new era of food transparency powered by blockchain[J]. Innovations: technology, governance, globalization, 2018, 12(1):46-56. doi: 10.1162/inov_a_00266 URL
[28]	汪蕙. “区块链+农业”推动产业发展[J]. 农经, 2018(6):42-45.
[29]	牛羿, 郭斐, 曲锴锐, 等. 五常大米品牌化发展研究[J]. 现代食品, 2018(14):16-18.
[30]	柳泉伟. 基于浙冷链系统引发的对食品可追溯体系建设状况的分析及建议[J]. 现代食品, 2021(2):82-84.

部门	主要职责	风险发生时采取措施
食品和饲料从业者	在供应链中识别和记录产品信息	立即撤回市场中受影响的产品，如有必要，实施召回措施；销毁不符合食品安全要求的产品；向主管部门报告风险及采取的应对措施。
各成员国	监控食品和饲料产品的生产、加工和分销过程，以确保运营商可追溯；对不符合欧盟可追溯性要求的运营商进行处罚和改进。	确保运营商履行其义务；采取适当措施确保食品安全；沿食物链追踪风险；向食品和饲料快速警报系统(RASFF)通报信息。
欧盟委员会	针对特定部门酌情制定可追溯性法规；欧盟委员会食品和兽医办公室进行定期检查，以确保食品和饲料经营者符合食品安全标准，确保可追溯系统有效落实。	欧盟委员会向食品和饲料快速警报系统(RASFF)中的成员国发布预警信息；要求运营商提供信息以实现可追溯性并协调当事国家采取行动；实施进口/出口限制。

部门	主要职责	风险发生时采取措施
食品和饲料从业者	在供应链中识别和记录产品信息	立即撤回市场中受影响的产品，如有必要，实施召回措施；销毁不符合食品安全要求的产品；向主管部门报告风险及采取的应对措施。
各成员国	监控食品和饲料产品的生产、加工和分销过程，以确保运营商可追溯；对不符合欧盟可追溯性要求的运营商进行处罚和改进。	确保运营商履行其义务；采取适当措施确保食品安全；沿食物链追踪风险；向食品和饲料快速警报系统(RASFF)通报信息。
欧盟委员会	针对特定部门酌情制定可追溯性法规；欧盟委员会食品和兽医办公室进行定期检查，以确保食品和饲料经营者符合食品安全标准，确保可追溯系统有效落实。	欧盟委员会向食品和饲料快速警报系统(RASFF)中的成员国发布预警信息；要求运营商提供信息以实现可追溯性并协调当事国家采取行动；实施进口/出口限制。