Study on Application Effect of New Fertilizer for Greenhouse Cucumber

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2022-0946

Abstract

Abstract:

To explore the application effect of new fertilizers containing different biological stimuli on cucumber, providing a basis for selecting suitable fertilizer varieties in production, cucumber 'Zhongnong 26' was used as the material to study the effects of five different fertilization treatments on the yield, quality, fertilizer partial productivity and economic benefits of greenhouse cucumber. The results showed that compared with the control, different new fertilizers could effectively promote plant growth and had a significant effect on cucumber yield, quality and income. The yield increased by 0.7% to 12.8%, soluble sugar content increased by 0.7% to 13.9%, vitamin C content increased by 1.3% to 13.4%, soluble protein content increased by 0.7% to 2.0%, and soluble solids increased by 0.8% to 14.2%, economic benefits was improved by 0.4-7.7 ten thousand yuan/hm², and fertilizer productivity increased by 25.9%-41.0%. There are significant differences in the effects of different new fertilizers, among which the application of seaweed fertilizer has the best effect.

Key words: new fertilizers, greenhouse, cucumber, yield, quality

CHEN Juan, LIU Bin, LEI Weiwei, CHEN Xiaohui, FAN Shanshan, CHEN Suxian, GAO Fei. Study on Application Effect of New Fertilizer for Greenhouse Cucumber[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(31): 50-54.

Figures/Tables 7

References 31

[1]	北京市统计局. 北京市统计年鉴[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2018.
[2]	叶芳芳. 京郊六种主栽温室蔬菜施肥现状及节肥潜力分析[D]. 北京: 中国农业大学, 2016.
[3]	沈其荣. 土壤肥料学通论[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2001:295-297.
[4]	李天来. 我国日光温室产业发展现状与前景[J]. 沈阳农业大学学报, 2005, 36(2):131-138.
[5]	刘国秀, 沈宏. 生物刺激素及其在农业中的应用[J]. 磷肥与复肥, 2020, 35(11):22-26.
[6]	张强, 常瑞雪, 胡兆平, 等. 生物刺激素及其在功能水溶性肥料中应用前景分析[J]. 农业资源与环境学报, 2018, 35(2):111-118.
[7]	张桂娟, 林雪, 陈虹, 等. 生物刺激素在春季花椰菜上的应用研究[J]. 蔬菜, 2020(5):26-31.
[8]	CHEN Y, SOLOVITCH T. Effects of humic substances on plant growth[J]. Acta horticulturae, 1988(221):412.
[9]	ZHANG X, SCHMIDT R E. Hormone-containing products' impact on antioxidant status of tall fescue and creeping bentgrass subjected to drought[J]. Crop science, 2000, 40:1344-1349. doi: 10.2135/cropsci2000.4051344x URL
[10]	陈玉林, 倪琳琳, 周园园, 等. 生物刺激素在设施番茄上的应用效果研究[J]. 上海蔬菜, 2022(1):51-55.
[11]	ALAM M Z, BRAUN G, NORRIE J, et al. Effect of Ascophyllum extract application on plant growth, fruit yield and soil microbial communities of strawberry[J]. Canadian journal of plant science, 2013, 93(1):23-36. doi: 10.4141/cjps2011-260 URL
[12]	RAYORATH P, JITHESH M N, FARID A, et al. Rapid bioassays to evaluate the plant growth promoting activity of Ascophyllum nodosum (L.) Le Jol. using a model plant, Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh[J]. Journal of applied phycology, 2008, 20(4):423-429. doi: 10.1007/s10811-007-9280-6 URL
[13]	孙锦, 韩丽君, 于庆文, 等. 海藻提取物对菠菜硝酸盐积累的影响及机理[J]. 海洋科学, 2006(4):6-9.
[14]	张运红, 吴礼树, 耿明建, 等. 几种寡糖类物质对菜心产量和品质的影响[J]. 华中农业大学学报, 2009(2):164-168.
[15]	温延臣, 袁亮, 林治安, 等. 海藻液对玉米苗期生长的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2012(30):36-39.
[16]	KLARA B, NINO F W, NARGES M T, et al. Micronutrients (Zn/Mn), seaweed extracts, and plant growth-promoting bacteria as cold-stress protectants in maize[J]. Chemical and biological technologies in agriculture, 2016, 3(1):19-28. doi: 10.1186/s40538-016-0069-1 URL
[17]	吴英. 氨基酸-多肽叶面肥料的研制与使用效果研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨理工大学, 2006.
[18]	杨晓红, 王菊香, 李贤良. 氨基酸液肥在几种叶菜上的应用效果[J]. 长江蔬菜, 1998(9):26-27
[19]	鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析(第三版)[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000:39-270.
[20]	文长存, 孙玉竹, 吴敬学. “十三五”时期中国西甜瓜产业形势分析[J]. 农业展望, 2016, 12(5):48-52.
[21]	黄继川, 彭智平, 涂玉婷, 等. 氨基酸肥料对花椰菜产量和品质的影响研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2018, 34(34):42-46. doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb17090144
[22]	孙焱, 徐青霞, 成军. 新型肥料在生菜上的应用效果试验报告[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2011, 17(20):49-50.
[23]	王强, 石伟勇. 海藻肥对番茄生长的影响及其机理研究[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2003(2):67-70.
[24]	王宁宁. 四种新型肥料对日光温室栽培番茄和黄瓜肥效的研究[D]. 沈阳: 沈阳农业大学, 2018.
[25]	王泽平, 许恒, 史秋哲, 等. 叶面喷施生物刺激素对夏玉米产量及养分吸收的影响[J]. 河南科学, 2021, 39(9):1411-1416.
[26]	贾文红. 不同新型肥料对设施小果型西瓜产量及品质的影响[J]. 中国瓜菜, 2015, 28(6):47-50.
[27]	卢林纲. 黄腐酸及其在农业上的应用[J]. 现代化农业, 2001(5):9-10.
[28]	朱迎春, 安国林, 李卫华, 等. 海藻酸水溶肥对西瓜生长及产量的影响[J]. 果树学报, 2020, 37(12):1898-1906.
[29]	欧阳寿强, 徐朗莱. 壳聚糖对不结球白菜营养品质和某些农艺性状的影响[J]. 植物生理学通讯, 2003, 39(1):21-24.
[30]	CANELLAS L P, OLIVARES F L, AUIAR N O, et al. Humic and fulvic acids as biostimulants in horticulture[J]. Scientia horticulture, 2015, 196:15-27. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2015.09.013 URL
[31]	李金鑫, 李絮花, 刘敏, 等. 海藻酸增效复混肥料在冬小麦上的施用效果[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2020(1):153-159.

试验处理	基肥		追肥						化学纯养分/(kg/hm²)
	定植前		苗期+花期			结瓜期			N	P₂O₅	K₂O
	品种	用量/(t/hm²)	配方	用量/(kg/hm²)	次数	配方	用量/(kg/hm²)	次数	N	P₂O₅	K₂O
CK	商品有机肥	30	22-6-24	240	4	20-5-30	900	15	246	63	342
T₁				192	4		720	15	197	50	274
T₂				192	4		720	15	197	50	274
T₃				192	4		720	15	197	50	274
T₄				192	4		720	15	197	50	274

试验处理	基肥		追肥						化学纯养分/(kg/hm²)
	定植前		苗期+花期			结瓜期			N	P₂O₅	K₂O
	品种	用量/(t/hm²)	配方	用量/(kg/hm²)	次数	配方	用量/(kg/hm²)	次数	N	P₂O₅	K₂O
CK	商品有机肥	30	22-6-24	240	4	20-5-30	900	15	246	63	342
T₁				192	4		720	15	197	50	274
T₂				192	4		720	15	197	50	274
T₃				192	4		720	15	197	50	274
T₄				192	4		720	15	197	50	274

试验处理	株高/cm	茎粗/mm	叶绿素/(mg/g)	叶面积/cm²
CK	118.1±4.36b	9.02±1.15b	18.45±0.36b	90.5±1.78c
T₁	133.4±2.16a	11.67±0.79a	18.50±0.25b	104.7±1.79b
T₂	139.8±2.37a	9.95±0.77ab	20.11±0.35a	104.6±4.6b
T₃	143.4±8.21a	10.05±0.44ab	19.04±0.28b	130.0±5.4a
T₄	144.5±4.66a	10.03±0.26ab	20.25±0.42a	101.2±1.6b

试验处理	株高/cm	茎粗/mm	叶绿素/(mg/g)	叶面积/cm²
CK	118.1±4.36b	9.02±1.15b	18.45±0.36b	90.5±1.78c
T₁	133.4±2.16a	11.67±0.79a	18.50±0.25b	104.7±1.79b
T₂	139.8±2.37a	9.95±0.77ab	20.11±0.35a	104.6±4.6b
T₃	143.4±8.21a	10.05±0.44ab	19.04±0.28b	130.0±5.4a
T₄	144.5±4.66a	10.03±0.26ab	20.25±0.42a	101.2±1.6b

试验处理	可滴定酸/%	可溶性糖/%	维生素C/(mg/100 g)	可溶性蛋白质/(mg/g)	可溶性固形物/%
CK	0.09±0.015abc	0.0226±0.003a	11.2±0.40b	1.801±0.065a	4.00±0.163b
T₁	0.11±0.005a	0.0227±0.001a	11.3±0.69b	1.821±0.121a	4.43±0.236a
T₂	0.10±0.008ab	0.0254±0.002a	12.7±0.85a	1.814±0.056a	4.47±0.047a
T₃	0.09±0.005bc	0.0236±0.001a	11.5±0.30b	1.815±0.062a	4.03±0.047b
T₄	0.08±0.010c	0.0257±0.001a	11.6±0.27b	1.838±0.027a	4.57±0.047a