Effects of Tobacco Stalk Biochar with Different Particle Sizes on Physicochemical Properties of Acidic Red Soil

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2022-0954

Abstract

Abstract:

Biochar has been widely used in agricultural production as a new soil amendment material. However, the effects of biochar with different particle sizes (DPS-BC) on the physicochemical properties of acidic red soil are rarely reported. The effects of DPS-BC (2.00-4.00 mm, 0.85-2.00 mm, 0.42-0.85 mm and <0.42 mm) on physicochemical properties of the acidic red soil were investigated by a pot experiment, and a commonly consumed vegetable Brassica rapa var. chinensis was cultivated as test crop. The results showed that the biochar with particle size of 2.00-4.00 mm was the most effective in reducing soil bulk density and increasing water holding capacity of acidic red soil, while the particle size with <0.42 mm was the most effective in increasing soil pH, EC, and available K content, and the particle size with 0.42-0.85 mm was the most effective in increasing soil organic matter, available N content and promoting crop yield (P<0.05). The DPS-BC application significantly improved the comprehensive soil quality index (P<0.05), which significantly correlated with crop yield (P<0.01). Therefore, DPS-BCs have different effects on soil improvement and crop yield, and biochar with an appropriate particle size range should be selected in agricultural production according to soil physicochemical properties.

Key words: biochar, acid red soil, crop yield, soil fertility

WANG Haoji, GUAN Huilin, SHI Mengxin, DENG Sidi, DONG Mingxing, LU Zicun, WANG Haibo, HAO Yunying, XU Wumei. Effects of Tobacco Stalk Biochar with Different Particle Sizes on Physicochemical Properties of Acidic Red Soil[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(33): 85-91.

Figures/Tables 6

References 32

[1]	黄国勤, 赵其国. 红壤生态学[J]. 生态学报, 2014, 34(18):5173-5181.
[2]	JIN Z W, CHEN C, CHEN X M, et al. The crucial factors of soil fertility and rapeseed yield - a five year field trial with biochar addition in upland red soil, China[J]. Science of the total environment, 2019, 649:1467-1480. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.412 URL
[3]	LEHMANN J, JOSEPH S. Biochar for Environmental Management[M]. London:Earthscan, 2015.
[4]	王昆艳, 官会林, 卢俊, 等. 生物质炭施用量对旱地酸性红壤理化性质的影响[J]. 土壤, 2020, 52(3):503-509.
[5]	SARA DE J D, BRUNO G, BLANCA L P P, et al. Biochar and sugar cane filter cake interaction on physical and hydrological soil properties under tropical field conditions[J]. Biochar, 2020, 2(1):195-120. doi: 10.1007/s42773-020-00045-3
[6]	MARTHA L C, MOACIR T D M, CARLOS E P, et al. Biochar amendment enhances water retention in a tropical sandy soil[J]. Agriculture, 2020, 10(3):62. doi: 10.3390/agriculture10030062 URL
[7]	陈姣, 吴凤平, 王辉, 等. 生物炭对南方红壤和水稻土水力学特性的影响分析[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2020, 39(9):73-80.
[8]	占亚楠, 王智, 孟亚利. 生物炭提高土壤磷素有效性的整合分析[J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(4):1185-1193. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202004.024
[9]	TANAWAN L, IRB K, ANCHALEE S, et al. Dissolution of K, Ca, and P from biochar grains in tropical soils[J]. Geoderma, 2018, 312:139-150. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.10.022 URL
[10]	GRAEF H, KIOBIA D, SAIDIA P, et al. Combined effects of biochar and fertilizer application on maize production in dependence on the cultivation method in a sub-humid climate[J]. Communications in soil science and plant analysis, 2018, 49(22):2905-2917. doi: 10.1080/00103624.2018.1547392 URL
[11]	LIANG L B, FENG P Y. Effects of biochar and combined application with organic, chemical fertilizer on physical and chemical properties of coal mining subsidence reclaimed soil[J]. Journal of soil and water conservation, 2017, 31(5):305-308.
[12]	ZHANG L Y, XIANG Y Z, JING Y M, et al. Biochar amendment effects on the activities of soil carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus hydrolytic enzymes: a meta-analysis[J]. Environmental science and pollution research, 2019, 26(22):22990-23001. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-05604-1
[13]	VERMA B, REDDY M S. Biochar augmentation improves ectomycorrhizal colonisation, plant growth and soil fertility[J]. Soil research, 2020, 58(7):673-682. doi: 10.1071/SR20067 URL
[14]	PEAKE L R, REID B J, TANG X Y. Quantifying the influence of biochar on the physical and hydrological properties of dissimilar soils[J]. Geoderma, 2014,235-236:182-190.
[15]	VERHEIJEN F G A, ZHURAVEL A, SILVA F C, et al. The influence of biochar particle size and concentration on bulk density and maximum water holding capacity of sandy vs sandy loam soil in a column experiment[J]. Geoderma, 2019, 347:194-202. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.03.044 URL
[16]	陈鹏崟, 王豪吉, 路文静, 等. 不同粒径烟秆炭对铅和镉离子的吸附特性研究[J]. 云南师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 42(4):55-60.
[17]	OPPONG D E, MONNIE F, ABENNEY M S, et al. Does biochar particle size, application rate and irrigation regime interact to affect soil water holding capacity, maize growth and nutrient uptake?[J]. Journal of soil science and plant nutrition, 2021, 21(4):3180-3193. doi: 10.1007/s42729-021-00597-8
[18]	鲁如坤. 土壤农业化学分析方法[M]. 北京: 中国农业科技出版社. 1999:146-195.
[19]	杨越, 赖朝圆, 王一鸣, 等. 轮作作物对连作香蕉园玄武岩砖红壤综合质量的影响[J]. 土壤, 2018, 50(3):633-639.
[20]	LIN G, YANG H, HU J, et al. Effects of the physicochemical properties of biochar and soil on moisture sorption[J]. Journal of renewable and sustainable energy, 2016, 8(6):064702. doi: 10.1063/1.4967706 URL
[21]	周溶慧, 朱成立, 黄明逸, 等. 不同粒径及用量生物炭对盐渍土和番茄的影响[J]. 中国农村水利水电, 2022(6):175-180.
[22]	勾芒芒, 屈忠义, 王凡, 等. 生物炭施用对农业生产与环境效应影响研究进展分析[J]. 农业机械学报, 2018, 49(7):1-12.
[23]	王义祥, 辛思洁, 叶菁, 等. 生物炭对强酸性茶园土壤酸度的改良效果研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2018, 34(12):108-111. doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb17030001
[24]	李佳轶, 刘文, 任天宝, 等. 植烟土壤物理特性及碳库对不同粒径生物质炭的动态响应[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2019(2):14-23.
[25]	郜礼阳, 林威鹏, 张风姬, 等. 生物炭对酸性土壤改良的研究进展[J]. 广东农业科学, 2021, 48(1):35-44.
[26]	WOLFRAM B, STINA J, ONDŘEJ M. Unexplored potential of novel biochar-ash composites for use as organo-mineral fertilizers[J]. Journal of cleaner production, 2018, 208:960-967. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.189 URL
[27]	ZHENG X D, LI X, SINGH B P, et al. Biochar protects hydrophilic dissolved organic matter against mineralization and enhances its microbial carbon use efficiency[J]. Science of the total environment, 2021, 795:148793. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148793 URL
[28]	袁帅, 赵立欣, 孟海波, 等. 生物炭主要类型、理化性质及其研究展望[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2016, 22(5):1402-1417.
[29]	王豪吉, 官会林, 施梦馨, 等. 生物炭和有机肥配施对碱性土壤特征与作物产量的影响(英文)[J]. Agricultural Science & Technology, 2021, 22(4):25-32.
[30]	张美芝, 耿煜函, 张薇, 等. 秸秆生物炭在农田中的应用研究综述[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(21):59-65. doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2020-0616
[31]	EDEH I G, MAŠEK O. The role of biochar particle size and hydrophobicity in improving soil hydraulic properties[J]. European journal of soil science, 2021, 73(1):13138.
[32]	胡蓉花, 尼金玉, 肖子康, 等. 基于主成分及聚类分析江西吉安植烟区土壤主要养分含量[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2021, 49(15):231-238.

	青菜鲜重	pH	电导率	容重	田间持水量	有机质	水解氮	有效磷
pH	0.336
电导率	0.256	0.504^*
容重	-0.185	-0.269	0.089
田间持水量	0.098	0.411^*	0.086	-0.844^**
有机质	0.446^*	0.682^**	0.811^**	-0.078	0.160
水解氮	0.428^*	0.654^**	0.577^**	-0.376	0.427^*	0.792^**
有效磷	0.289	0.417^*	0.085	0.100	-0.076	0.120	0.209
速效钾	0.218	0.703^**	0.688^**	-0.355	0.544^**	0.686^**	0.718^**	0.087

	青菜鲜重	pH	电导率	容重	田间持水量	有机质	水解氮	有效磷
pH	0.336
电导率	0.256	0.504^*
容重	-0.185	-0.269	0.089
田间持水量	0.098	0.411^*	0.086	-0.844^**
有机质	0.446^*	0.682^**	0.811^**	-0.078	0.160
水解氮	0.428^*	0.654^**	0.577^**	-0.376	0.427^*	0.792^**
有效磷	0.289	0.417^*	0.085	0.100	-0.076	0.120	0.209
速效钾	0.218	0.703^**	0.688^**	-0.355	0.544^**	0.686^**	0.718^**	0.087

土壤因子	主成分1	主成分2	主成分3
有机质	0.955	0.015	0.062
电导率	0.911	-0.149	-0.044
速效钾	0.848	0.378	0.113
水解氮	0.793	0.361	0.189
pH	0.673	0.312	0.501
容重	-0.039	-0.958	0.034
田间持水量	0.183	0.935	-0.013
有效磷	0.071	-0.095	0.970

土壤因子	主成分1	主成分2	主成分3
有机质	0.955	0.015	0.062
电导率	0.911	-0.149	-0.044
速效钾	0.848	0.378	0.113
水解氮	0.793	0.361	0.189
pH	0.673	0.312	0.501
容重	-0.039	-0.958	0.034
田间持水量	0.183	0.935	-0.013
有效磷	0.071	-0.095	0.970