Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2024, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (15): 124-131.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2023-0350
Previous Articles Next Articles
PAN Dongmei1(), YANG Chuanlun1, ZHANG Xinqing1, GUO Nannan1, ZHANG Xiaoxiao1, GAO Baojun1, WANG Xiuzhi1, SI Genghua1, HE Fuming1, FU Yingxun1, TIAN Jiewei1, LIU Guangbin1, ZHAO Hui2
Received:
2023-05-09
Revised:
2023-08-15
Online:
2024-05-23
Published:
2024-05-23
PAN Dongmei, YANG Chuanlun, ZHANG Xinqing, GUO Nannan, ZHANG Xiaoxiao, GAO Baojun, WANG Xiuzhi, SI Genghua, HE Fuming, FU Yingxun, TIAN Jiewei, LIU Guangbin, ZHAO Hui. Zygosaccharomyces rouxii Culture Medium: Optimization Based on Response Surface Methodology[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(15): 124-131.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2023-0350
试验号 | A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | J | 酵母活菌数/(×108cfu/mL) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 9.28 |
2 | -1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 7.89 |
3 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 9.57 |
4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 11.19 |
5 | 1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 11.20 |
6 | 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 11.82 |
7 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 8.43 |
8 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 12.29 |
9 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 11.69 |
10 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 8.68 |
11 | -1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | 8.66 |
12 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | 11.87 |
试验号 | A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | J | 酵母活菌数/(×108cfu/mL) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 9.28 |
2 | -1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 7.89 |
3 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 9.57 |
4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 11.19 |
5 | 1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 11.20 |
6 | 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 11.82 |
7 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 8.43 |
8 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 12.29 |
9 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 11.69 |
10 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 8.68 |
11 | -1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | 8.66 |
12 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | 11.87 |
因素 | 回归系数 | 标准误 | F值 | P值 | 显著性 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | 1.38 | 0.041 | 1148.44 | 0.0009 | 显著 |
B | 0.086 | 0.041 | 4.45 | 0.1694 | 不显著 |
C | -0.13 | 0.041 | 10.87 | 0.0810 | 不显著 |
D | 0.43 | 0.041 | 112.94 | 0.0087 | 显著 |
E | 4.167E-003 | 0.041 | 0.010 | 0.9278 | 不显著 |
F | 0.086 | 0.041 | 4.45 | 0.1694 | 不显著 |
G | 0.071 | 0.041 | 3.03 | 0.2239 | 不显著 |
H | -0.20 | 0.041 | 25.17 | 0.0375 | 显著 |
J | 0.036 | 0.041 | 0.78 | 0.4715 | 不显著 |
因素 | 回归系数 | 标准误 | F值 | P值 | 显著性 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | 1.38 | 0.041 | 1148.44 | 0.0009 | 显著 |
B | 0.086 | 0.041 | 4.45 | 0.1694 | 不显著 |
C | -0.13 | 0.041 | 10.87 | 0.0810 | 不显著 |
D | 0.43 | 0.041 | 112.94 | 0.0087 | 显著 |
E | 4.167E-003 | 0.041 | 0.010 | 0.9278 | 不显著 |
F | 0.086 | 0.041 | 4.45 | 0.1694 | 不显著 |
G | 0.071 | 0.041 | 3.03 | 0.2239 | 不显著 |
H | -0.20 | 0.041 | 25.17 | 0.0375 | 显著 |
J | 0.036 | 0.041 | 0.78 | 0.4715 | 不显著 |
试验号 | 葡萄糖/ (g/L) | 豆粕/ (g/L) | 硫酸锰/ (g/L) | 酵母活菌数/ (×108cfu/mL) |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 45 | 30 | 0.06 | 9.45 |
2 | 48 | 33 | 0.055 | 9.98 |
3 | 51 | 36 | 0.05 | 11.25 |
4 | 54 | 39 | 0.045 | 11.70 |
5 | 57 | 42 | 0.04 | 12.51 |
6 | 60 | 45 | 0.035 | 10.54 |
试验号 | 葡萄糖/ (g/L) | 豆粕/ (g/L) | 硫酸锰/ (g/L) | 酵母活菌数/ (×108cfu/mL) |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 45 | 30 | 0.06 | 9.45 |
2 | 48 | 33 | 0.055 | 9.98 |
3 | 51 | 36 | 0.05 | 11.25 |
4 | 54 | 39 | 0.045 | 11.70 |
5 | 57 | 42 | 0.04 | 12.51 |
6 | 60 | 45 | 0.035 | 10.54 |
试验号 | A | B | C | 酵母活菌数/(×108cfu/mL) |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 12.33 |
2 | -1 | 0 | -1 | 12.23 |
3 | -1 | 0 | 1 | 11.56 |
4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 12.38 |
5 | 0 | -1 | -1 | 12.01 |
6 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 11.94 |
7 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 12.22 |
8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12.57 |
9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12.78 |
10 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 12.06 |
11 | -1 | -1 | 0 | 11.38 |
12 | -1 | 1 | 0 | 12.03 |
13 | 0 | -1 | -1 | 12.09 |
14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12.73 |
15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12.87 |
16 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12.73 |
17 | 1 | 0 | -1 | 11.77 |
试验号 | A | B | C | 酵母活菌数/(×108cfu/mL) |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 12.33 |
2 | -1 | 0 | -1 | 12.23 |
3 | -1 | 0 | 1 | 11.56 |
4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 12.38 |
5 | 0 | -1 | -1 | 12.01 |
6 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 11.94 |
7 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 12.22 |
8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12.57 |
9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12.78 |
10 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 12.06 |
11 | -1 | -1 | 0 | 11.38 |
12 | -1 | 1 | 0 | 12.03 |
13 | 0 | -1 | -1 | 12.09 |
14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12.73 |
15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12.87 |
16 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12.73 |
17 | 1 | 0 | -1 | 11.77 |
方差来源 | 平方和 | 自由度 | 均方 | F值 | P值 | 显著性 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
模型 | 2.74 | 9 | 0.30 | 9.84 | 0.0032 | 显著 |
A | 0.22 | 1 | 0.22 | 7.25 | 0.0310 | 显著 |
B | 0.13 | 1 | 0.13 | 4.28 | 0.0773 | 不显著 |
C | 0.012 | 1 | 0.012 | 0.39 | 0.5532 | 不显著 |
AB | 0.027 | 1 | 0.027 | 0.88 | 0.3797 | 不显著 |
AC | 0.38 | 1 | 0.38 | 12.21 | 0.0101 | 显著 |
BC | 0.032 | 1 | 0.032 | 1.05 | 0.3405 | 不显著 |
A2 | 0.79 | 1 | 0.79 | 25.48 | 0.0015 | 显著 |
B2 | 0.49 | 1 | 0.49 | 15.76 | 0.0054 | 显著 |
C2 | 0.46 | 1 | 0.46 | 14.85 | 0.0063 | 显著 |
残差 | 0.22 | 7 | 0.031 | - | - | - |
失拟项 | 0.17 | 3 | 0.056 | 4.75 | 0.0832 | 不显著 |
纯误差 | 0.048 | 14 | 0.012 | - | - | - |
总离差 | 2.96 | 16 | - | - | - | - |
方差来源 | 平方和 | 自由度 | 均方 | F值 | P值 | 显著性 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
模型 | 2.74 | 9 | 0.30 | 9.84 | 0.0032 | 显著 |
A | 0.22 | 1 | 0.22 | 7.25 | 0.0310 | 显著 |
B | 0.13 | 1 | 0.13 | 4.28 | 0.0773 | 不显著 |
C | 0.012 | 1 | 0.012 | 0.39 | 0.5532 | 不显著 |
AB | 0.027 | 1 | 0.027 | 0.88 | 0.3797 | 不显著 |
AC | 0.38 | 1 | 0.38 | 12.21 | 0.0101 | 显著 |
BC | 0.032 | 1 | 0.032 | 1.05 | 0.3405 | 不显著 |
A2 | 0.79 | 1 | 0.79 | 25.48 | 0.0015 | 显著 |
B2 | 0.49 | 1 | 0.49 | 15.76 | 0.0054 | 显著 |
C2 | 0.46 | 1 | 0.46 | 14.85 | 0.0063 | 显著 |
残差 | 0.22 | 7 | 0.031 | - | - | - |
失拟项 | 0.17 | 3 | 0.056 | 4.75 | 0.0832 | 不显著 |
纯误差 | 0.048 | 14 | 0.012 | - | - | - |
总离差 | 2.96 | 16 | - | - | - | - |
[1] |
龚大春. 酵母生物学[M]. 北京: 中国水利水电出版社, 2015.
|
[2] |
|
[3] |
闫美. 高耐盐酱油酵母的选育及其在酱油酿造中的应用[D]. 武汉: 湖北工业大学, 2014.
|
[4] |
朱志鑫, 吴惠勤, 黄晓兰. 酱油香气成分GC/MS分析[J]. 食品研究与开发, 2008, 28(12):135-138.
|
[5] |
窦冰然, 郭会明, 骆海燕, 等. 活性干酵母及其在食品工业中的应用[J]. 中国酿造, 2016, 35(8):1-4.
doi: 10.11882/j.issn.0254-5071.2016.08.001 |
[6] |
陈彬, 鲁绊, 王夫杰, 等. 耐盐酵母菌对发酵酱油风味作用及其应用的研究进展[J]. 中国酿造, 2010(6):1-3.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0254-5071.2010.06.001 |
[7] |
李学伟, 陈强, 朱新贵. 添加生香酵母改善酱油风味的研究[J]. 中国酿造, 2014, 33(3):121-124.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0254-5071.2014.03.029 |
[8] |
吴雅男. 酱油鲁氏酵母S、S3-2关键风味代谢物对比研究[D]. 天津: 天津科技大学, 2015.
|
[9] |
张珊. 耐盐酵母的添加对高盐稀态酱油的影响[D]. 天津: 天津科技大学, 2015.
|
[10] |
|
[11] |
pmid: 17900732 |
[12] |
刘翠翠, 胡梦蝶. 鲁氏酵母胞内海藻糖积累过程的代谢特征分析[J]. 中国生物工程杂志, 2017, 37(9):41-47.
|
[13] |
胡梦蝶, 陈雄. 不同胁迫条件对鲁氏酵母胞内海藻糖积累的影响研究[J]. 食品工业科技, 2016, 37(11):130-133.
|
[14] |
王继花. 盐胁迫下酿酒酵母生理生化特性的研究[J]. 大连:大连工业大学, 2008.
|
[15] |
南博. 活性酿酒酵母的真空干燥技术研究[D]. 西安: 西北农林科技大学, 2014.
|
[16] |
|
[17] |
|
[18] |
|
[19] |
|
[20] |
|
[1] | PAN Dongmei, ZHANG Xinqing, YANG Chuanlun, TIAN Jiewei, WANG Hongxia, YANG Dandan, GUO Nannan, YU Shuaishuai, HAN Lixia, MA Chunfeng, BU Liqun, CAI Qianqian, GUO Zhongrui. A High-yield Nattokinase Strain: ARTP Mutation Breeding and Medium Optimization [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(9): 115-122. |
[2] | CHEN Lulu, MENG Xianghe. Study on the Best Brewing Technology of Sweet Ferment Rice [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(3): 148-155. |
[3] | Yan Jiajia, Wan Lu, Wu Tong, Zheng Chunying. Application of Pressurized Solvent Extraction Technology in the Extraction of Polysaccharide from Two Kinds of Edible and Medicinal Fungi [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(16): 150-155. |
[4] | . Optimizing Fermentation Condition for SY286 Strain [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2015, 31(25): 157-163. |
[5] | Zhang Peng1,2,3, Gong Lingfeng3,4, Zhuang Weidong1, Zheng Jinshui1, Zhu Jian2,3. Preliminary Study on Separation of Pleurotus eryngii Protoplast [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2013, 29(31): 91-95. |
[6] | . Use of Polygonum cuspidatum Cultivation of Pleurotus eryngii Cultivation Medium Optimization and Recycling of Mushroom-planted Analysis [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2013, 29(13): 182-186. |
[7] | Zhong Haifeng 1,2, Huang Yuxiang 1,2, Deng Zhaosheng3, Jiang Bin3. Medium optimization of rapid propagation and viruses elimination techniques of oriental lily [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2009, 25(17): 168-173. |
[8] | Yang Chaoying, Tao Yugui, Xu Xianlu, Ye Lianbin, Wang Yaoming. Optimization of Solid-state Fermentation Medium Components for Producing Bacillus thringiensis by Response Surface Analysis [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2008, 24(7): 69-73. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||