Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2024, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (35): 89-98.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2024-0117
Previous Articles Next Articles
REYIHANGULI Kadier(), ZHOU Yinuo, ZHANG Yi, ZHANG Ziwei, XING Ruping, MA Xin, XU Chong, LIU Wenli(
), WU Jinggui, LI Jianming
Received:
2024-02-06
Revised:
2024-10-22
Online:
2024-12-15
Published:
2024-12-12
REYIHANGULI Kadier, ZHOU Yinuo, ZHANG Yi, ZHANG Ziwei, XING Ruping, MA Xin, XU Chong, LIU Wenli, WU Jinggui, LI Jianming. Difference in Effects of Different Manure Application on Soil Physical Properties of Sloping Farmland in Black Soil Area[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(35): 89-98.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2024-0117
供试材料 | pH | 有机碳/(g/kg) | 全氮/(g/kg) | 全磷/(g/kg) | 全钾/(g/kg) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
土壤 | 6.12 | 42.20 | 3.40 | 1.10 | 19.99 |
牛粪 | 7.27 | 302.34 | 13.92 | 3.60 | 8.32 |
猪粪 | 7.63 | 268.91 | 21.18 | 7.03 | 8.22 |
鸡粪 | 8.03 | 240.11 | 17.07 | 8.79 | 14.09 |
供试材料 | pH | 有机碳/(g/kg) | 全氮/(g/kg) | 全磷/(g/kg) | 全钾/(g/kg) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
土壤 | 6.12 | 42.20 | 3.40 | 1.10 | 19.99 |
牛粪 | 7.27 | 302.34 | 13.92 | 3.60 | 8.32 |
猪粪 | 7.63 | 268.91 | 21.18 | 7.03 | 8.22 |
鸡粪 | 8.03 | 240.11 | 17.07 | 8.79 | 14.09 |
指标 | 处理 | 天数 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
30 d | 60 d | 90 d | 120 d | 150 d | ||
GMD/mm | CK | 0.32±0.05a | 0.42±0.06a | 0.37±0.09a | 0.38±0.04a | 0.40±0.03a |
猪粪 | 0.41±0.07a | 0.37±0.09a | 0.43±0.04a | 0.39±0.04a | 0.42±0.04a | |
鸡粪 | 0.35±0.01a | 0.36±0.02a | 0.38±0.06a | 0.42±0.01a | 0.44±0.03a | |
牛粪 | 0.32±0.02a | 0.48±0.11a | 0.41±0.04a | 0.35±0.01a | 0.35±0.04a | |
MWD/mm | CK | 0.92±0.09ab | 1.52±0.10ab | 1.04±0.05a | 1.13±0.07a | 1.34±0.09a |
猪粪 | 1.28±0.08a | 1.04±0.05ab | 1.22±0.07a | 1.11±0.07a | 1.43±0.09a | |
鸡粪 | 0.93±0.09ab | 0.89±0.08b | 0.93±0.04a | 1.20±0.05a | 1.36±0.06a | |
牛粪 | 0.75±0.06b | 1.66±0.06a | 1.16±0.08a | 0.87±0.08a | 0.93±0.08a | |
WR>0.25/% | CK | 45.27±5.35a | 48.82±1.87a | 53.02±5.40a | 51.33±0.92b | 49.83±0.92b |
猪粪 | 50.64±5.69a | 53.02±5.40a | 55.38±4.69a | 52.99±0.67ab | 50.03±0.55b | |
鸡粪 | 52.25±1.78a | 54.63±3.34a | 57.15±3.61a | 55.39±0.26a | 54.83±0.95a | |
牛粪 | 50.83±2.12a | 53.73±6.93a | 56.68±2.15a | 53.32±1.82ab | 52.02±1.10b |
指标 | 处理 | 天数 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
30 d | 60 d | 90 d | 120 d | 150 d | ||
GMD/mm | CK | 0.32±0.05a | 0.42±0.06a | 0.37±0.09a | 0.38±0.04a | 0.40±0.03a |
猪粪 | 0.41±0.07a | 0.37±0.09a | 0.43±0.04a | 0.39±0.04a | 0.42±0.04a | |
鸡粪 | 0.35±0.01a | 0.36±0.02a | 0.38±0.06a | 0.42±0.01a | 0.44±0.03a | |
牛粪 | 0.32±0.02a | 0.48±0.11a | 0.41±0.04a | 0.35±0.01a | 0.35±0.04a | |
MWD/mm | CK | 0.92±0.09ab | 1.52±0.10ab | 1.04±0.05a | 1.13±0.07a | 1.34±0.09a |
猪粪 | 1.28±0.08a | 1.04±0.05ab | 1.22±0.07a | 1.11±0.07a | 1.43±0.09a | |
鸡粪 | 0.93±0.09ab | 0.89±0.08b | 0.93±0.04a | 1.20±0.05a | 1.36±0.06a | |
牛粪 | 0.75±0.06b | 1.66±0.06a | 1.16±0.08a | 0.87±0.08a | 0.93±0.08a | |
WR>0.25/% | CK | 45.27±5.35a | 48.82±1.87a | 53.02±5.40a | 51.33±0.92b | 49.83±0.92b |
猪粪 | 50.64±5.69a | 53.02±5.40a | 55.38±4.69a | 52.99±0.67ab | 50.03±0.55b | |
鸡粪 | 52.25±1.78a | 54.63±3.34a | 57.15±3.61a | 55.39±0.26a | 54.83±0.95a | |
牛粪 | 50.83±2.12a | 53.73±6.93a | 56.68±2.15a | 53.32±1.82ab | 52.02±1.10b |
[1] |
韩晓增, 邹文秀. 我国东北黑土地保护与肥力提升的成效与建议[J]. 中国科学院院刊, 2018, 33(2):206-212.
|
[2] |
梁爱珍, 张延, 陈学文, 等. 东北黑土区保护性耕作的发展现状与成效研究[J]. 地理科学, 2022, 42(8):1325-1335.
doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2022.08.001 |
[3] |
王世豪, 徐新良, 黄麟, 等. 1980s-2010s东北农田土壤养分时空变化特征[J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(4):865-875.
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202304.010 |
[4] |
邹文秀, 韩晓增, 陆欣春, 等. 不同土地利用方式对黑土剖面土壤物理性质的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2015, 29(5):187-193.
|
[5] |
王迎春, 杨黎, 王立刚. 黑土带土壤有机质研究进展[C]// 中国农业资源与区划学会.2015年中国农业资源与区划学会学术年会论文集.中国农业科学院农业资源与农业区划研究所, 2015:9.
|
[6] |
郝小雨, 马星竹, 周宝库. 长期单施有机肥黑土大豆产量和土壤理化性质演变特征[J]. 土壤与作物, 2018, 7(2):222-228.
|
[7] |
赵占辉, 张丛志, 蔡太义, 等. 不同稳定性有机物料对砂姜黑土理化性质及玉米产量的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2015, 23(10):1228-1235.
|
[8] |
刘晓林, 陈伟, 吴雅薇, 等. 秸秆颗粒改良剂对川西北高寒沙地土壤氮素和黑麦草生长的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2018, 32(6):229-235.
|
[9] |
|
[10] |
|
[11] |
|
[12] |
孙万春, 周家昊, 俞巧钢, 等. 豆渣、猪粪有机肥施用水平对梨产量品质及土壤肥力的影响[J]. 果树学报, 2022, 39(9):1628-1638.
|
[13] |
候健勋, 张水梅, 袁静超, 等. 玉米秸秆源有机物料对黑土养分有效性与酶活性的提升效应[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2021, 27(4):610-618.
|
[14] |
周连仁, 曾宪楠, 孟庆峰, 等. 不同培肥措施下盐碱旱地土壤肥力特征综合评价[J]. 东北农业大学学报, 2015, 46(6):34-39.
|
[15] |
王娜, 王璐, 宋昌海. 东北黑土区坡耕地土壤侵蚀及其治理研究进展[J]. 南方农业,. 2022, 16(17):160-162,166.
|
[16] |
张兴义, 李健宇, 郭孟洁, 等. 连续14年黑土坡耕地秸秆覆盖免耕水土保持效应[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022, 36(3):44-50.
|
[17] |
盖浩, 刘平奇, 张梦璇, 等. 黑土坡耕地横坡垄作对减少径流及土壤有机碳流失的作用[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022, 36(2):300-304.
|
[18] |
胡海清, 陆昕, 孙龙. 土壤活性有机碳分组及测定方法[J]. 森林工程, 2012, 28(5):18-22.
|
[19] |
亢晨波, 郭汉清, 张垚, 等. 复垦区不同土地利用类型土壤入渗特征及其影响因素[J]. 中国水土保持科学(中英文), 2023, 21(5):71-80.
|
[20] |
黄怡婷, 陈俊熹, 高钰淏, 等. 长期耕作对典型黑土水力性质的影响[J]. 土壤学报, 2024, 61(4):998-1008.
|
[21] |
徐军生. 克山县黑土区退化坡耕地综合治理技术研究[D]. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2011.
|
[22] |
侯淑艳, 刘绪军, 刘建新, 等. 水土保持措施对黑土坡耕地产流产沙的影响[J]. 中国水土保持科学(中英文), 2022, 20(4):26-33.
|
[23] |
|
[24] |
丛聪, 王天舒, 岳龙凯, 等. 深松配施有机物料还田对黑土区坡耕地土壤物理性质的改良效应[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2021(3):227-236.
|
[25] |
|
[26] |
赵欣宇, 吴景贵, 刘文利, 等. 农业有机废弃物对黑土腐殖质元素组成的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2016, 30(02):301-306.
|
[27] |
张陆, 曹玉博, 王惟帅, 等. 鸡粪添加对蔬菜废弃物堆肥腐殖化过程的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2022, 30(2):258-267.
|
[28] |
魏宇轩, 蔡红光, 张秀芝, 等. 不同种类有机肥施用对黑土团聚体有机碳及腐殖质组成的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2018, 32(3):258-263.
|
[29] |
|
[30] |
曾宪楠. 不同有机培肥措施对退化黑土肥力的影响[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北农业大学, 2014.
|
[31] |
刘殿民, 沈海鸥, 武佳龙, 等. 黑土坡面垄侧少耕措施的土壤侵蚀特征分析[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022, 36(4):1-6.
|
[32] |
李威闻, 黄金权, 齐瑜洁, 等. 土壤侵蚀条件下土壤微生物生物量碳含量变化及其影响因素的Meta分析[J]. 生态环境学报, 2023, 32(1):47-55.
doi: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2023.01.006 |
[33] |
|
[34] |
|
[35] |
江恒. 有机物输入量对黑土结构性质及其季节性变化的影响[D]. 长春: 中国科学院大学(中国科学院东北地理与农业生态研究所), 2019.
|
[36] |
|
[37] |
|
[38] |
郝近羽, 刘瑾, 陈源泉, 等. 施用不同有机物料对砂质土壤玉米成熟期根际细菌群落变化的影响[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2022, 27(10):65-79.
|
[39] |
王欢欢, 元野, 任天宝, 等. 生物炭对东北黑土理化性质影响研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2018, 34(35):67-71.
doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb18060099 |
[40] |
王笃超, 吴景贵. 不同有机物料对连作大豆土壤养分及团聚体组成的影响[J]. 土壤学报, 2018, 55(4):825-834.
|
[41] |
侯建勋, 张水梅, 袁静超, 等. 玉米秸秆源有机物料对黑土养分有效性与酶活性的提升效应[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2021, 27(4):610-618.
|
[42] |
|
[43] |
|
[1] | ZHAO Yunyun, HE Fen, YIN Yilei, PAN Shoujiang, JIAN Baoquan, QI Yue, ZHU Limei. Risk and Microbial Community Characteristics of Antibiotics in Soil of Solar Greenhouse with Pig Manure Application: A Case Study of Solar Greenhouse in Yongqing County, Hebei Province [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(35): 82-88. |
[2] | ZHU Xiaoyue, FANG Yan, SHANGGUAN Zhouping. Mechanism and Technology of Soil Fertility Cultivation in Loess Desert: A Review [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(7): 95-101. |
[3] | YIN Liping, LIU Siyuan, CAI Chengmei, SHI Xiaoli, ZHU Xiaojuan, YUAN Guoming, WANG Jidong, ZHANG Hui, XU Cong, MA Hongbo. Effects of Jiabowen Soil Conditioner on Radish Yield and Quality and Soil Physical and Chemical Properties [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(6): 64-71. |
[4] | WAN Haixia, XU Hao, GUO Yongzhong, HAN Xinsheng, XIAN Hailong. Study on the Effect of Earthworm Treatment on Cattle Manure [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(32): 158-164. |
[5] | LI Qiang, LIU Mengxue, LI Yunliang, AN Yifang, ZHANG Haotian, WANG Peng, ZHANG Yulong, LI Yongtao, ZHANG Zhen. PEST Analysis of Resource Utilization of Livestock Manure in China [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(17): 92-98. |
[6] | Zheng Hongbing, Luo Yang, Li Ruiping, Sui Pengxiang, Wang Hao, Yuan Ye, Liu Wuren, Zheng Jinyu. Effect of Tillage Methods on Interaction Relationship of Soil and Root Structure and Application of CT Technology [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(33): 83-87. |
[7] | Yan Jianli, Zhang Mingkui, Wang Daoze. Different Amendments: Effect on Soil Physical Properties of Newly Reclaimed Land in Low Hilly Region [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(2): 67-73. |
[8] | Yao Li, Xin Shurong, Zhao Zichao. Matrix Utilization of Livestock Manure: Research Progress of Typical Technology Models [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(1): 90-93. |
[9] | Dong Wen, Zhang Qing, Luo Tao, Wang Huangping. Effects of Continuous Application of Different Organic Fertilizers on Soil Quality [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(28): 106-110. |
[10] | . Removal of Heavy Metal From Livestock Manure Using Electroreduction Method [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2019, 35(8): 39-45. |
[11] | . Livestock Manure Resources and Their Replace Potential Fertilizer in China [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2019, 35(26): 121-128. |
[12] | Xu Wenzhi,Ouyang Ping,Luo Fuxiang,Liu Haitao,Zhu Yongqun and Lin Chaowen. Livestock Manure Treatment in China: Utilization Status and Countermeasures [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2017, 33(23): 106-112. |
[13] | . Fractal study on soil fertilize in different silvicultural density of Cyclpbalanopsis elevaticostata plantation in east Fujian Mountain [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2015, 31(31): 7-11. |
[14] | . Effects of Different Planting Years on Soil Structure in Vegetable Fields [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2015, 31(13): 236-243. |
[15] | Wang Qingjiang, Cheng Fuhou, Zhao Zhijun. Effects of Grassing and Mulching on Soil Water and Structure of Pear Orchard [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2010, 26(9): 259-262. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||