Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2025, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (12): 61-66.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2024-0596
Previous Articles Next Articles
ZHANG Zhouna1(), ZHOU Huaping2, ZHANG Mingkui3(
)
Received:
2024-09-09
Revised:
2025-01-18
Online:
2025-04-25
Published:
2025-04-24
ZHANG Zhouna, ZHOU Huaping, ZHANG Mingkui. Effects of Different Conditioning Agents on the Stabilization of Soil Phosphorus in Phosphorus-rich Vegetable Fields[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(12): 61-66.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2024-0596
处理 | 有机质/(g/kg) | pH | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
石灰性土 | 中性土 | 酸性土 | 石灰性土 | 中性土 | 酸性土 | ||
对照 | 19.04a | 21.28a | 25.46a | 7.85b | 6.26b | 4.22bc | |
氯化钙 | 19.10a | 21.19a | 25.61a | 7.75c | 6.04c | 4.38b | |
石膏 | 18.97a | 21.22a | 25.58a | 7.62c | 5.89c | 4.18c | |
石灰石粉 | 18.89a | 21.31a | 25.43a | 8.76a | 7.87a | 5.87a | |
硫酸亚铁 | 19.08a | 21.33a | 25.51a | 7.32d | 5.56d | 4.02d | |
硫酸铝 | 19.07a | 21.25a | 25.49a | 7.02e | 5.42d | 3.87d |
处理 | 有机质/(g/kg) | pH | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
石灰性土 | 中性土 | 酸性土 | 石灰性土 | 中性土 | 酸性土 | ||
对照 | 19.04a | 21.28a | 25.46a | 7.85b | 6.26b | 4.22bc | |
氯化钙 | 19.10a | 21.19a | 25.61a | 7.75c | 6.04c | 4.38b | |
石膏 | 18.97a | 21.22a | 25.58a | 7.62c | 5.89c | 4.18c | |
石灰石粉 | 18.89a | 21.31a | 25.43a | 8.76a | 7.87a | 5.87a | |
硫酸亚铁 | 19.08a | 21.33a | 25.51a | 7.32d | 5.56d | 4.02d | |
硫酸铝 | 19.07a | 21.25a | 25.49a | 7.02e | 5.42d | 3.87d |
处理 | 全磷/(g/kg) | 有效磷/(mg/kg) | 水溶磷/(mg/kg) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
石灰性土 | 中性土 | 酸性土 | 石灰性土 | 中性土 | 酸性土 | 石灰性土 | 中性土 | 酸性土 | |||
对照 | 3.19b | 3.57b | 3.57b | 357.14a | 463.54a | 306.47b | 18.42a | 24.35a | 17.24a | ||
氯化钙 | 3.24ab | 3.61b | 3.58b | 332.14b | 389.89b | 285.87bc | 13.25c | 16.32c | 11.38b | ||
石膏 | 3.32a | 3.74a | 3.73a | 314.15c | 376.53b | 273.65c | 16.53b | 18.98b | 12.41b | ||
石灰石粉 | 3.27ab | 3.55b | 3.64ab | 328.24bc | 328.45c | 335.69a | 15.52b | 13.47a | 9.54c | ||
硫酸亚铁 | 3.17b | 3.64b | 3.59b | 226.14bc | 269.54b | 214.68d | 8.52d | 10.24e | 8.78cd | ||
硫酸铝 | 3.22b | 3.61b | 3.51b | 332.12b | 368.26b | 243.65d | 6.78e | 8.32f | 7.33d |
处理 | 全磷/(g/kg) | 有效磷/(mg/kg) | 水溶磷/(mg/kg) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
石灰性土 | 中性土 | 酸性土 | 石灰性土 | 中性土 | 酸性土 | 石灰性土 | 中性土 | 酸性土 | |||
对照 | 3.19b | 3.57b | 3.57b | 357.14a | 463.54a | 306.47b | 18.42a | 24.35a | 17.24a | ||
氯化钙 | 3.24ab | 3.61b | 3.58b | 332.14b | 389.89b | 285.87bc | 13.25c | 16.32c | 11.38b | ||
石膏 | 3.32a | 3.74a | 3.73a | 314.15c | 376.53b | 273.65c | 16.53b | 18.98b | 12.41b | ||
石灰石粉 | 3.27ab | 3.55b | 3.64ab | 328.24bc | 328.45c | 335.69a | 15.52b | 13.47a | 9.54c | ||
硫酸亚铁 | 3.17b | 3.64b | 3.59b | 226.14bc | 269.54b | 214.68d | 8.52d | 10.24e | 8.78cd | ||
硫酸铝 | 3.22b | 3.61b | 3.51b | 332.12b | 368.26b | 243.65d | 6.78e | 8.32f | 7.33d |
土壤 | 处理 | 有机磷 | Ca2-P | Ca8-P | Ca10-P | Fe-P | Al-P | O-P | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
石灰性土 | 对照 | 28.67a | 5.34a | 8.76b | 17.60c | 9.48c | 3.54cd | 26.65b | |||||||
氯化钙 | 27.89a | 4.02b | 9.14b | 21.60a | 7.73d | 2.78e | 26.88b | ||||||||
石膏 | 28.33a | 4.35b | 9.98b | 19.40b | 6.82de | 3.15de | 28.02ab | ||||||||
石灰石粉 | 26.53b | 4.46b | 11.7a | 21.60a | 5.41e | 1.98f | 28.41a | ||||||||
硫酸亚铁 | 27.93a | 3.14c | 7.14c | 16.10c | 13.40a | 4.29bc | 27.96ab | ||||||||
硫酸铝 | 28.64a | 2.78c | 6.54c | 14.2d | 10.84b | 8.42a | 28.55a | ||||||||
中性土 | 对照 | 33.87a | 4.25a | 4.76c | 8.78c | 14.24b | 5.34b | 28.76b | |||||||
氯化钙 | 32.96a | 2.86b | 5.14bc | 12.10ab | 14.81b | 4.13cd | 27.96b | ||||||||
石膏 | 33.56a | 3.02ab | 6.53a | 11.60b | 11.56c | 3.89cd | 29.98ab | ||||||||
石灰石粉 | 31.45b | 2.54bc | 6.12ab | 13.30a | 12.59c | 3.74d | 30.41a | ||||||||
硫酸亚铁 | 32.98ab | 2.14cd | 3.62d | 7.14c | 18.12a | 4.86bc | 31.14a | ||||||||
硫酸铝 | 32.14ab | 1.87d | 3.87d | 7.56c | 15.79b | 9.14a | 29.63ab | ||||||||
酸性土 | 对照 | 36.34a | 3.45a | 1.05c | 5.76b | 15.32b | 6.85bc | 31.23b | |||||||
氯化钙 | 35.98a | 2.86b | 2.49b | 6.12b | 13.75c | 7.25b | 31.55b | ||||||||
石膏 | 36.14a | 2.93b | 3.14ab | 6.87b | 12.78c | 6.13bc | 32.01ab | ||||||||
石灰石粉 | 34.25b | 2.45bc | 4.12a | 8.25a | 12.17c | 5.24c | 33.52a | ||||||||
硫酸亚铁 | 34.23b | 2.11cd | 0.67d | 4.36c | 19.72a | 5.26c | 33.65a | ||||||||
硫酸铝 | 33.98b | 1.89d | 0.73cd | 4.09c | 15.34b | 9.45a | 34.52a |
土壤 | 处理 | 有机磷 | Ca2-P | Ca8-P | Ca10-P | Fe-P | Al-P | O-P | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
石灰性土 | 对照 | 28.67a | 5.34a | 8.76b | 17.60c | 9.48c | 3.54cd | 26.65b | |||||||
氯化钙 | 27.89a | 4.02b | 9.14b | 21.60a | 7.73d | 2.78e | 26.88b | ||||||||
石膏 | 28.33a | 4.35b | 9.98b | 19.40b | 6.82de | 3.15de | 28.02ab | ||||||||
石灰石粉 | 26.53b | 4.46b | 11.7a | 21.60a | 5.41e | 1.98f | 28.41a | ||||||||
硫酸亚铁 | 27.93a | 3.14c | 7.14c | 16.10c | 13.40a | 4.29bc | 27.96ab | ||||||||
硫酸铝 | 28.64a | 2.78c | 6.54c | 14.2d | 10.84b | 8.42a | 28.55a | ||||||||
中性土 | 对照 | 33.87a | 4.25a | 4.76c | 8.78c | 14.24b | 5.34b | 28.76b | |||||||
氯化钙 | 32.96a | 2.86b | 5.14bc | 12.10ab | 14.81b | 4.13cd | 27.96b | ||||||||
石膏 | 33.56a | 3.02ab | 6.53a | 11.60b | 11.56c | 3.89cd | 29.98ab | ||||||||
石灰石粉 | 31.45b | 2.54bc | 6.12ab | 13.30a | 12.59c | 3.74d | 30.41a | ||||||||
硫酸亚铁 | 32.98ab | 2.14cd | 3.62d | 7.14c | 18.12a | 4.86bc | 31.14a | ||||||||
硫酸铝 | 32.14ab | 1.87d | 3.87d | 7.56c | 15.79b | 9.14a | 29.63ab | ||||||||
酸性土 | 对照 | 36.34a | 3.45a | 1.05c | 5.76b | 15.32b | 6.85bc | 31.23b | |||||||
氯化钙 | 35.98a | 2.86b | 2.49b | 6.12b | 13.75c | 7.25b | 31.55b | ||||||||
石膏 | 36.14a | 2.93b | 3.14ab | 6.87b | 12.78c | 6.13bc | 32.01ab | ||||||||
石灰石粉 | 34.25b | 2.45bc | 4.12a | 8.25a | 12.17c | 5.24c | 33.52a | ||||||||
硫酸亚铁 | 34.23b | 2.11cd | 0.67d | 4.36c | 19.72a | 5.26c | 33.65a | ||||||||
硫酸铝 | 33.98b | 1.89d | 0.73cd | 4.09c | 15.34b | 9.45a | 34.52a |
[1] |
杨东, 陈益, 唐静, 等. 强酸性土壤磷肥用量对莴笋产量、品质及磷素利用效率的影响[J]. 西南大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 39(1):158-164.
|
[2] |
周宝库, 张喜林. 长期施肥对黑土磷素积累、形态转化及其有效性影响的研究[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2005, 11(2):143-147.
|
[3] |
黄庆海, 李茶荀, 赖涛, 等. 长期施肥对红壤性水稻土磷素积累与形态分异的影响[J]. 土壤与环境, 2000, 9(4):290-293.
|
[4] |
李艾芬, 章明奎. 浙北平原不同种植年限蔬菜地土壤氮磷的积累及环境风险评价[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2010, 29(1):122-127.
|
[5] |
高秀美, 汪吉东, 刘兆普, 等. 集约化蔬菜地土壤磷素累积特征及流失风险[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2010, 26(1):82-86.
|
[6] |
韩张雄, 董亚妮, 王曦婕, 等. 设施蔬菜地施用磷肥对土壤及环境中磷素积累的影响研究现状[J]. 中国农业信息, 2016(20):70-72.
|
[7] |
张英鹏, 李彦, 李景超, 等. 连续淋洗对山东省主要土壤磷素有效性及磷库的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2007, 93(6):21-24,38.
|
[8] |
童文彬, 邱志腾, 章明奎. 植物有效磷与水溶性磷对土壤磷素积累的响应研究[J]. 农学学报, 2020, 10(1):37-42.
doi: 10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas18100017 |
[9] |
应金耀, 阮弋飞, 邬奇峰, 等. 钱塘江附近农田土壤磷的积累及其流失的潜在风险[J]. 农业资源与环境学报, 2019, 36(1):26-32.
|
[10] |
张汉荣. 平和‘琯溪蜜柚’果园剖面土壤磷特性及其改善措施[J]. 中国农学通报, 2011, 27(33):98-103.
|
[11] |
杨洁. 典型冬季蔬菜种植区农田土壤磷积累、固定特性及流失风险评估[D]. 南京: 南京大学, 2020.
|
[12] |
张子璐, 刘峰, 侯庭钰. 我国稻田氮磷流失现状及影响因素研究进展[J]. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(10):3292-3302.
|
[13] |
|
[14] |
|
[15] |
|
[16] |
李若楠, 武雪萍, 张彦才, 等. 减量施磷对温室菜地土壤磷素积累、迁移与利用的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2017, 50(20):3944-3952.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2017.20.010 |
[17] |
黄双勇, 李发林, 曾瑞琴, 等. 土壤富磷琯溪蜜柚果园减量化施肥技术应用[J]. 福建热作科技, 2016, 41(2):16-18.
|
[18] |
姬红利, 颜蓉, 李运东, 等. 施用土壤改良剂对磷素流失的影响研究[J]. 土壤, 2011, 43(2):203-209.
|
[19] |
马妍, 刘振海, 刘陆涵, 等. 三种环境材料复合对土壤水肥保持同步增效的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2017, 36(12):2471-2478.
|
[20] |
|
[21] |
鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2005:154-157.
|
[22] |
蒋柏藩. 石灰性土壤无机磷有效性的研究[J]. 土壤, 1992, 24(1):61-64.
|
[23] |
|
[24] |
雷宏军, 刘鑫, 朱端卫. 石灰改良对酸性土壤磷解吸动力学特征的影响[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2008(2):165-168.
|
[25] |
刘小玉, 付登强, 杨伟波, 等. 酸性土壤植物磷铝互作研究进展[J]. 现代农业科技, 2014(8):182-183,195.
|
[26] |
洪灿. 土壤改良剂对酸性土壤磷的生物有效性和土壤物理性质的影响[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2018.
|
[27] |
麻万诸, 章明奎. 改良剂降低富磷蔬菜地土壤磷和氮流失的作用[J]. 水土保持学报, 2012, 26(5):22-27.
|
[1] | YANG Zhangqing, XIN Yinping, ZHAO Qing, WANG Meng, QIN Yilang, HU Feng, LI Guoqiang. Research Progress of Rapid Detection for Available Potassium in Soil by Turbidimetry [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(9): 83-88. |
[2] | DENG Bo, GUO Peng, WEI Leijia, CHEN Shangmao, MA Ze, CHEN Dan, BI Lidong. Effects of Exogenous Additives on Soil Fertility Under Different Land Use Type [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(8): 91-100. |
[3] | WANG Zhigang, HAN Xue, LIU Yunping, LI Wei, SONG Xiao, GUO Liyue. Effects of Biogas Slurry and Straw Returning on Soil Nitrogen and Phosphorus Leaching [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(6): 107-114. |
[4] | LIANG Hui, CHEN Yunsong, LI Jie, CHEN Yulan, HUANG Rong, WANG Changquan, LI Bing. Effect of Dry and Wet Alternation on Change of Potassium Effective Form in Tobacco-planting Soil [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(27): 83-89. |
[5] | GUO Yujiao, LUO Xuan, JING Haoqi, WENG Kaiqi, CAO Zhengfeng, ZHANG Yang, WANG Xiaozhi, CHEN Guohong, XU Qi. Influence of Rice-duck Integrated Farming Systems on Soil pH and Nutrients [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(25): 84-88. |
[6] | GAO Weichang, YUAN Yubo, PAN Shouhui, ZHANG Heng, CAI Kai. Distribution Characteristics of pH Values and Available Potassium Contents in Different Soil Types in Guizhou Tobacco Fields [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(10): 88-94. |
[7] | WANG Yan, ZHU Kaidi, SUN Hongren, ZHANG Jiping, LV Yucai, WANG Jian. Abundance-deficiency Index of Soil Nutrients and Appropriate Fertilizer Application Rates for Apple Planting in China: A Preliminary Study [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(5): 69-78. |
[8] | CAO Jingxiao, LIU Junwu, CAI Jingju, FANG Yingchun, ZHU Jian, WANG Ping, ZHU Shanshan, JIANG Xiaxin. Environmental Factors Affecting the Intensity of Phosphorus Release from Sediment: A Review [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(27): 35-43. |
[9] | CHENG Guofeng, HUANG Da, ZHAO Dongli, WANG Liqiang, CHENG Zhijie. Current Situation of Soil Fertility in Fluvo-aquic Soil Region of Henan Province [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(27): 101-105. |
[10] | YANG Xiaoyan, YE Weiwei, WEI Shanqiang, ZHANG Long, HUANG Jun. Bacillus megaterium: Fermentation Medium Optimization and Phosphate Solubilization Effect [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(15): 105-112. |
[11] | SU Xinxin, HU Xiaohang, MA Yahuai, LI Yanli. Effect of Sugar Mill Filter Mud Application Rate on Yield of Sugar Beet Varieties and Contents of Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium in Soil [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(11): 38-45. |
[12] | Xue Yanling, Chen Xinping, Zhang Wei. Effect of Oscillation Modes on Soil Phosphorus Fraction [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(33): 80-86. |
[13] | . The Abundance-deficiency Indices of Soil Available P and Appropriate Phosphorus Application Rates for Wheat in China [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2019, 35(21): 30-37. |
[14] | . Effects of Biochar on Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria Number and Soil Available P Content in Red Soil Tea Plantation [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2018, 34(18): 114-118. |
[15] | . Preliminary Study on Abundance-deficiency Index of Soil Available P and Appropriate Phosphorus Application Rate for Oats in the Farming-grazing Transitional Zone of China [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2018, 34(10): 101-105. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||