Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2025, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (15): 45-50.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2024-0750
Previous Articles Next Articles
NIU Yuanfeng1(), XIONG Qian2, LIN Yunhong2, KANG Qianzhen1, LIU Zhengwan1, WU Yucong1, ZHOU Guisu1(
)
Received:
2024-11-29
Revised:
2025-04-03
Online:
2025-05-25
Published:
2025-05-29
NIU Yuanfeng, XIONG Qian, LIN Yunhong, KANG Qianzhen, LIU Zhengwan, WU Yucong, ZHOU Guisu. Effect of Combined Application of Soil Conditioner on Growth and Development of Flue-cured Tobacco[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(15): 45-50.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2024-0750
移栽后天数/d | 处理 | 株高/cm | 茎围/cm | 节距/cm | 最大叶面积/cm2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
45 | 不施肥 | 25.57±0.28c | 5.83±0.08b | 2.33±0.06bc | 525.27±9.88c | |||
当地常规施肥 | 30.50±0.34b | 6.33±0.16a | 2.43±0.05b | 570.64±22.08b | ||||
常规施肥+土壤改良剂 | 32.03±0.60a | 6.30±0.12a | 2.62±0.05a | 623.24±10.74a | ||||
减氮20%+土壤改良剂 | 29.63±0.51b | 6.33±0.08a | 2.27±0.05c | 578.42±13.81b | ||||
65 | 不施肥 | 101.53±1.84c | 8.17±0.11b | 4.13±0.08b | 1407.66±46.56b | |||
当地常规施肥 | 105.90±1.31b | 8.40±0.09b | 4.23±0.05ab | 1435.01±51.42b | ||||
常规施肥+土壤改良剂 | 115.27±1.09a | 8.77±0.14a | 4.37±0.07a | 1647.71±40.03a | ||||
减氮20%+土壤改良剂 | 107.83±1.26b | 8.33±0.06b | 4.13±0.05b | 1459.56±41.23b | ||||
120 | 不施肥 | 131.60±7.68b | 8.93±0.56b | 4.13±0.16b | 983.83±201.62c | |||
当地常规施肥 | 137.00±7.80a | 9.80±0.56a | 4.37±0.19a | 1276.49±233.08b | ||||
常规施肥+土壤改良剂 | 138.40±6.07a | 10.00±0.33a | 4.32±0.18a | 1503.81±208.64a | ||||
减氮20%+土壤改良剂 | 131.67±3.33b | 9.07±0.37b | 4.18±0.15b | 1231.40±260.06b |
移栽后天数/d | 处理 | 株高/cm | 茎围/cm | 节距/cm | 最大叶面积/cm2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
45 | 不施肥 | 25.57±0.28c | 5.83±0.08b | 2.33±0.06bc | 525.27±9.88c | |||
当地常规施肥 | 30.50±0.34b | 6.33±0.16a | 2.43±0.05b | 570.64±22.08b | ||||
常规施肥+土壤改良剂 | 32.03±0.60a | 6.30±0.12a | 2.62±0.05a | 623.24±10.74a | ||||
减氮20%+土壤改良剂 | 29.63±0.51b | 6.33±0.08a | 2.27±0.05c | 578.42±13.81b | ||||
65 | 不施肥 | 101.53±1.84c | 8.17±0.11b | 4.13±0.08b | 1407.66±46.56b | |||
当地常规施肥 | 105.90±1.31b | 8.40±0.09b | 4.23±0.05ab | 1435.01±51.42b | ||||
常规施肥+土壤改良剂 | 115.27±1.09a | 8.77±0.14a | 4.37±0.07a | 1647.71±40.03a | ||||
减氮20%+土壤改良剂 | 107.83±1.26b | 8.33±0.06b | 4.13±0.05b | 1459.56±41.23b | ||||
120 | 不施肥 | 131.60±7.68b | 8.93±0.56b | 4.13±0.16b | 983.83±201.62c | |||
当地常规施肥 | 137.00±7.80a | 9.80±0.56a | 4.37±0.19a | 1276.49±233.08b | ||||
常规施肥+土壤改良剂 | 138.40±6.07a | 10.00±0.33a | 4.32±0.18a | 1503.81±208.64a | ||||
减氮20%+土壤改良剂 | 131.67±3.33b | 9.07±0.37b | 4.18±0.15b | 1231.40±260.06b |
处理 | 总糖/% | 还原糖/% | 总植物碱/% | 氯/% | 钾/% | 总氮/% | 两糖差 | 糖碱比 | 氮碱比 | 钾氯比 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
不施肥 | 24.70±0.29c | 22.47±0.26c | 2.56±0.03c | 2.00±0.00d | 1.74±0.03a | 2.04±0.03b | 2.16±0.03ab | 9.5±0.12b | 0.79±0.01ab | 0.86±0.03a |
当地常规 施肥 | 26.63±0.32b | 24.50±0.29b | 3.35±0.03a | 2.14±0.03c | 1.80±0.00a | 2.26±0.03a | 2.14±0.03b | 7.95±0.09c | 0.69±0.01c | 0.85±0.03a |
常规施肥+ 土壤改良剂 | 28.27±0.32a | 26.00±0.29a | 2.46±0.03d | 2.54±0.03a | 1.64±0.03b | 2.05±0.03b | 2.24±0.03a | 11.4±0.12a | 0.81±0.01a | 0.65±0.03b |
减氮20%+ 土壤改良剂 | 28.33±0.32a | 26.03±0.32a | 3.05±0.03b | 2.30±0.00b | 1.46±0.03c | 2.34±0.03a | 2.26±0.03a | 9.25±0.09b | 0.75±0.03b | 0.65±0.03b |
处理 | 总糖/% | 还原糖/% | 总植物碱/% | 氯/% | 钾/% | 总氮/% | 两糖差 | 糖碱比 | 氮碱比 | 钾氯比 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
不施肥 | 24.70±0.29c | 22.47±0.26c | 2.56±0.03c | 2.00±0.00d | 1.74±0.03a | 2.04±0.03b | 2.16±0.03ab | 9.5±0.12b | 0.79±0.01ab | 0.86±0.03a |
当地常规 施肥 | 26.63±0.32b | 24.50±0.29b | 3.35±0.03a | 2.14±0.03c | 1.80±0.00a | 2.26±0.03a | 2.14±0.03b | 7.95±0.09c | 0.69±0.01c | 0.85±0.03a |
常规施肥+ 土壤改良剂 | 28.27±0.32a | 26.00±0.29a | 2.46±0.03d | 2.54±0.03a | 1.64±0.03b | 2.05±0.03b | 2.24±0.03a | 11.4±0.12a | 0.81±0.01a | 0.65±0.03b |
减氮20%+ 土壤改良剂 | 28.33±0.32a | 26.03±0.32a | 3.05±0.03b | 2.30±0.00b | 1.46±0.03c | 2.34±0.03a | 2.26±0.03a | 9.25±0.09b | 0.75±0.03b | 0.65±0.03b |
处理 | 产值/(元/hm2) | 产量/(kg/hm2) | 均价/(元/kg) | 上等烟比例/% |
---|---|---|---|---|
不施肥 | 56474.20±3069.68b | 1726.40±72.36ab | 32.69±0.60b | 57.21±8.87a |
当地常规施肥 | 64686.97±14186.83ab | 1945.90±384.84ab | 32.85±1.22ab | 58.50±9.88a |
常规施肥+土壤改良剂 | 87386.90±4957.15a | 2432.10±181.18a | 35.73±0.84a | 76.15±2.46a |
减氮20%+土壤改良剂 | 56190.30±2117.16b | 1646.47±69.49b | 34.64±0.66ab | 77.06±5.03a |
处理 | 产值/(元/hm2) | 产量/(kg/hm2) | 均价/(元/kg) | 上等烟比例/% |
---|---|---|---|---|
不施肥 | 56474.20±3069.68b | 1726.40±72.36ab | 32.69±0.60b | 57.21±8.87a |
当地常规施肥 | 64686.97±14186.83ab | 1945.90±384.84ab | 32.85±1.22ab | 58.50±9.88a |
常规施肥+土壤改良剂 | 87386.90±4957.15a | 2432.10±181.18a | 35.73±0.84a | 76.15±2.46a |
减氮20%+土壤改良剂 | 56190.30±2117.16b | 1646.47±69.49b | 34.64±0.66ab | 77.06±5.03a |
[1] |
罗仁娟, 杨旺舟, 熊理然. 云南省烤烟产量空间格局及其原因分析[J]. 现代经济信息, 2016(4):493-495.
|
[2] |
张凤元. 烤烟规模化种植存在的问题及对策分析研究[J]. 乡镇企业导报, 2024(19):6-8.
|
[3] |
李世金, 朱启法, 裴洲洋, 等. 烟草种植连作障碍产生的原因及防治对策[J]. 现代农业科技, 2018(4):54-56,58.
|
[4] |
方远鹏, 王娜, 白羽祥, 等. 长期不同种植制度下植烟土壤细菌群落特征差异分析[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2023, 28(7):20-34.
|
[5] |
马强, 孙兴祥, 牟俊达, 等. 微生物技术在烟草种植中的应用探究[J]. 农业灾害研究, 2023, 13(10):97-99.
|
[6] |
冯汝超, 刘哲, 郭绍贵, 等. 瑞康盾微生物菌剂在秋季连作西瓜上的应用效果研究[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2024, 65(2):345-349.
doi: 10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20230366 |
[7] |
吴林土, 徐火忠, 李贵松, 等. 微生物菌剂对松阳茶园土壤酸化改良及肥力提升的效果分析[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2022, 63(6):1245-1249.
doi: 10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20213291 |
[8] |
潘明锦, 彭丽娟, 李春黎, 等. 微生物菌剂对烤烟幼苗主要农艺性状与生理特征的影响[J]. 贵州农业科学, 2019, 47(9):20-25.
|
[9] |
邱岭军, 张翔, 徐敏, 等. 生物炭与豆浆灌根对植烟土壤与烟叶产质量的影响[J]. 贵州农业科学, 2021, 49(6):19-26.
|
[10] |
|
[11] |
doi: 10.1007/s10123-022-00265-6 pmid: 35857219 |
[12] |
|
[13] |
夏金保. 农用微生物菌剂对西瓜农艺性状和产量的影响[J]. 现代农业科技, 2018(22):59,61.
|
[14] |
丁钱华. 微生物菌剂对小麦抗病能力的影响[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2022, 63(8):1794-1797.
doi: 10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20220572 |
[15] |
贾海江, 冯俊喜, 吴涛, 等. 生物炭菌剂对烟草黑胫病及土壤微生物的影响[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2022, 43(6):68-75.
|
[16] |
杨梦远, 滕钊军, 孙丽英. 生物菌剂对蔬菜产量及菜地活性气态氮排放的影响[J]. 南京信息工程大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 14(4):456-460.
|
[17] |
王辉, 李小艳, 云菲, 等. 微生物菌剂对烤烟光合特性及产质量的影响[J]. 江西农业学报, 2018, 30(6):52-56.
|
[18] |
滑夏华. 不同微生物肥料对烤烟产质量及土壤肥力的影响[J]. 贵州农业科学, 2020, 48(10):38-43.
|
[19] |
朱俊俊, 唐经祥, 徐经年, 等. 烤烟品种K326上部叶烤后单叶重与感官质量的关系[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2024, 52(11):163-168,178.
|
[20] |
鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 北京: 农业出版社,1981.
|
[21] |
国家烟草专卖局. 烟草农艺性状调查测量方法:YC/T142-2010[S]. 2010.
|
[22] |
鲁如坤. 壤农业化学分析方法[M]. 北京: 中国农业科技出版社, 2000.
|
[23] |
刘青丽, 张云贵, 焦永鸽, 等. 西南烟区氮素供应与烤烟氮素吸收的关系[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2017, 23(3):757-764.
|
[24] |
张长云, 彭黔荣, 杨敏, 等. 自然醇化对贵州山地烟叶品质的影响[J]. 耕作与栽培, 2014(2):4-7.
|
[25] |
阎海涛, 常栋, 许跃奇, 等. 生物炭和微生物菌剂对烤烟产质量的影响[J]. 贵州农业科学, 2021, 49(10):21-27.
|
[26] |
钱颖颖, 任可, 陈颐, 等. 无机肥配施生物菌剂对植烟土壤质量及烤烟品质的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2024, 52(3):121-131.
|
[27] |
龚丝雨, 钟思荣, 张世川, 等. 增施生物炭对烤烟生长及产量、质量的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2018(2):154-160.
|
[1] | LI Lihua, XUE Bingjie, WANG Yale, LI Xuejun, SUN Huan, SUN Jiping. Effects of Drought-rehydration on Physiological Indexes and Drought-related Gene Expression of ‘YY021’ Seedlings [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(8): 57-62. |
[2] | YANG Ying, FAN Li, YANG Zhichao, CAO Xinbo, GE Jingping. Application of COS and Microbial Metabolites in Agricultural Production [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(8): 83-89. |
[3] | ZHANG Yang, DU Yuhai, DONG Xiaowei, LIU Yang, LIU Liwei, YAN Huifeng, KONG Decai. Analysis of Changes in Carbon Footprint of Farmland Before and After Tobacco Planting in Huang-Huai Tobacco Growing Region [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(8): 90-97. |
[4] | ZENG Duanxiang, YU Ning, DU Juan, ZENG Yao, WANG Lianying. Effects of Arbuscular Mycorrhiza Fungi Inoculated in Vitro on Growth and Development of Tree Peony Vitroplantlets [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(7): 55-60. |
[5] | DENG Yixuan, LI Zhenshan, HUANG Ruiyin, LIU Lan, LAN Jun, YANG Tianle, DING Xiaodong, FAN Miaomiao, WANG Jun. Decomposition Rate and Nutrient Release Characteristics of Different Vicia sativa Green Manure Applications in Nanxiong Tobacco Growing Area of Guangdong Province [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(7): 93-99. |
[6] | LIU Jiao, HU Xing, HUANG Xiaoxia, LIU Wenge, HE Mingxiong, LU Changyou, LUO Yigui. Planting Adaptability of New Flue-cured Tobacco Varieties ‘Yunyan 116’ and ‘Yunyan 300’ in Hechi Tobacco Region of Guangxi [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(7): 22-28. |
[7] | XU Zhihao, JIA Kai, XIE Rongrong, ZHU Chenyu, WANG Yuemin, ZENG Wenlong, LIN jianqi, XU Chensheng, TANG Lina, ZHENG Chaoyuan, LI Wenqing. Spatial and Temporal Variability of Trace-elements in Tobacco-planting Soil in Fujian Province [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(6): 100-108. |
[8] | YU Yaoying, ZHANG Lei, LIU Yong, HUANG Xiaoqin, HE Jixian, WANG Dong, ZHANG Qili, GU Huizhan. Effects of Acidic Substances on pH of Slightly Alkaline Soil and Yield and Quality of Tobacco Leaves [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(4): 10-18. |
[9] | CHEN Fen, LI Kai, ZHANG Xuemei, LI Yinglong, DUAN Kefan, CAO Hengmao, GAO Xin, ZHANG Jinghua, HUANG Min, DONG Yu. Effects of Boron and Silicon on Control Efficacy of Potato Virus Y Disease and Antioxidant Defense Activities of Flue-cured Tobacco [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(4): 108-113. |
[10] | LIU Fengfeng, BI Qingwen, ZHANG Guochao, HE Jiewang, SUN Fushan, DAI Yingpeng. Analysis of Key Influencing Factors of Upper Tobacco Leaves Quality in Stalk-Cutting and Curing [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(4): 126-133. |
[11] | LIU Zidan, HU Binbin, CHEN Yuchang, ZHANG Jinglin, FEI Lina, LIN Jinquan, CHEN Yi, HE Chenggang, JIANG Yonglei. Analysis of Baking Characteristics of Flue-cured Tobacco Variety ‘NC297’ Introduced from American [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(4): 134-143. |
[12] | YE Tianhui, YANG Xue, JIANG Chaoqiang, YANG Jianchun, YAN Fangfang, YANG Xingyou, ZU Chaolong, YAN Yifeng. Comparative Analysis of Quality of Tobacco Leaves in Different Altitude Tobacco Growing Areas of Panzhihua [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(4): 144-148. |
[13] | ZHANG Xingang. The Impact of Climate Warming on Growth, Development, and Yield of Winter Wheat in Northern Henan Province-Taking Qinyang City as an Example [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(3): 98-106. |
[14] | LI Xinghua, CAI Xingxing, WANG Huan, ZHANG Sheng, LIU Xia, ZHOU Qiang. ‘Si te’ Late Indica Rice: Breeding, Yield Advantage and Growth and Development Characteristics [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(3): 1-8. |
[15] | HE Defei, CHEN Weisheng, LIANG Jiecong, HUANG Xurong, LU Congxu, LIU Zhongzhen, HUANG Yufen. Preliminary Study on Effect of Tobacco Stalk Biochar in Passivation of Soil Cadmium [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(2): 83-90. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||