Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2025, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (3): 1-8.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2024-0112
LI Xinghua1(), CAI Xingxing1, WANG Huan1, ZHANG Sheng1, LIU Xia2, ZHOU Qiang1
Received:
2024-02-20
Revised:
2024-05-15
Online:
2025-01-20
Published:
2025-01-20
LI Xinghua, CAI Xingxing, WANG Huan, ZHANG Sheng, LIU Xia, ZHOU Qiang. ‘Si te’ Late Indica Rice: Breeding, Yield Advantage and Growth and Development Characteristics[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(3): 1-8.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2024-0112
品种 | 全生育期/d | 产量/(kg/hm2) | 稻瘟病抗性等级 | 米质等级 |
---|---|---|---|---|
玺优447 | 110.3(-2.2) | 9399.6(+5.2%) | 5 | 2 |
玺优442 | 114.5(-3.9) | 9333.8(+1.7%) | 5 | 2 |
玺优650 | 122.2(-2.6) | 8869.5(+3.7%) | 5 | 2 |
玺优651 | 110.5(-1.7) | 9261.0(+4.3%) | 5 | 3 |
益9优447 | 109.6(-2.8) | 9250.8(+2.3%) | 5 | 2 |
益9优443 | 112.4(-4.6) | 8721.6(+3.3%) | 3 | 3 |
益9优650 | 118.5(-7.2) | 9109.7(-1.4%) | 5 | 1 |
益9优629 | 110.6(-1.1) | 9087.0(+3.3%) | 7 | 3 |
益9优晚占 | 110.1(-1.6) | 8860.5(+0.7%) | 5 | 2 |
品种 | 全生育期/d | 产量/(kg/hm2) | 稻瘟病抗性等级 | 米质等级 |
---|---|---|---|---|
玺优447 | 110.3(-2.2) | 9399.6(+5.2%) | 5 | 2 |
玺优442 | 114.5(-3.9) | 9333.8(+1.7%) | 5 | 2 |
玺优650 | 122.2(-2.6) | 8869.5(+3.7%) | 5 | 2 |
玺优651 | 110.5(-1.7) | 9261.0(+4.3%) | 5 | 3 |
益9优447 | 109.6(-2.8) | 9250.8(+2.3%) | 5 | 2 |
益9优443 | 112.4(-4.6) | 8721.6(+3.3%) | 3 | 3 |
益9优650 | 118.5(-7.2) | 9109.7(-1.4%) | 5 | 1 |
益9优629 | 110.6(-1.1) | 9087.0(+3.3%) | 7 | 3 |
益9优晚占 | 110.1(-1.6) | 8860.5(+0.7%) | 5 | 2 |
品种 | 干物质积累量/ (kg/hm2) | 产量构成因素 | 产量/(kg/hm2) | 收获指数 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
有效穗数/(个/m2) | 总粒数/(粒/穗) | 结实率/% | 千粒重/g | ||||
玺优447 | 17398.1±402.3 a | 274.2±16.2 a | 276.8±17.9 a | 76.42±0.69 b | 25.93±0.05 a | 9279.6±177.1 a | 0.53±0.00 a |
金优207 | 16025.6±468.0 a | 326.1±17.0 a | 175.6±17.7 b | 82.03±1.69 a | 25.85±0.08 a | 7873.7±382.8 b | 0.49±0.01 b |
品种 | 干物质积累量/ (kg/hm2) | 产量构成因素 | 产量/(kg/hm2) | 收获指数 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
有效穗数/(个/m2) | 总粒数/(粒/穗) | 结实率/% | 千粒重/g | ||||
玺优447 | 17398.1±402.3 a | 274.2±16.2 a | 276.8±17.9 a | 76.42±0.69 b | 25.93±0.05 a | 9279.6±177.1 a | 0.53±0.00 a |
金优207 | 16025.6±468.0 a | 326.1±17.0 a | 175.6±17.7 b | 82.03±1.69 a | 25.85±0.08 a | 7873.7±382.8 b | 0.49±0.01 b |
年份 | 品种 | 生育时期(月-日) | 生育期/d | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
始穗期 | 成熟期 | 播始历期 | 全生育期 | |||
2018 | 玺优447 | 8-26 | 10-13 | 65 | 112 | |
金优207 | 8-29 | 10-18 | 68 | 117 | ||
2019 | 玺优447 | 8-27 | 10-15 | 64 | 112 | |
金优207 | 8-29 | 10-18 | 66 | 115 | ||
2020 | 玺优447 | 8-24 | 10-16 | 64 | 117 | |
金优207 | 8-27 | 10-18 | 67 | 119 | ||
2021 | 玺优447 | 8-27 | 10-16 | 64 | 113 | |
金优207 | 8-30 | 10-20 | 67 | 117 | ||
2022 | 玺优447 | 8-25 | 10-15 | 64 | 115 | |
金优207 | 8-29 | 10-18 | 68 | 118 |
年份 | 品种 | 生育时期(月-日) | 生育期/d | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
始穗期 | 成熟期 | 播始历期 | 全生育期 | |||
2018 | 玺优447 | 8-26 | 10-13 | 65 | 112 | |
金优207 | 8-29 | 10-18 | 68 | 117 | ||
2019 | 玺优447 | 8-27 | 10-15 | 64 | 112 | |
金优207 | 8-29 | 10-18 | 66 | 115 | ||
2020 | 玺优447 | 8-24 | 10-16 | 64 | 117 | |
金优207 | 8-27 | 10-18 | 67 | 119 | ||
2021 | 玺优447 | 8-27 | 10-16 | 64 | 113 | |
金优207 | 8-30 | 10-20 | 67 | 117 | ||
2022 | 玺优447 | 8-25 | 10-15 | 64 | 115 | |
金优207 | 8-29 | 10-18 | 68 | 118 |
品种 | 模型 | 标准差 | 决定系数(R2) | |
---|---|---|---|---|
干物质 | 玺优447 | Y=1.11e-exp(2.61-6.13t) | 0.0807 | 0.9779 |
金优207 | Y=1.14e-exp(2.55-10.14t) | 0.0965 | 0.9667 | |
氮 | 玺优447 | Y=1.14e-exp(2.54-9.86t) | 0.0964 | 0.9667 |
金优207 | Y=1.17e-exp(1.93-8.80t) | 0.1315 | 0.9314 | |
磷 | 玺优447 | Y=1.14e-exp(3.17-9.77t) | 0.0970 | 0.9722 |
金优207 | Y=1.19e-exp(2.67-9.19t) | 0.1324 | 0.9483 | |
钾 | 玺优447 | Y=1.00e-exp(1.71-6.67t) | 0.1125 | 0.9353 |
金优207 | Y=0.98e-exp(1.18-7.87t) | 0.0513 | 0.9851 |
品种 | 模型 | 标准差 | 决定系数(R2) | |
---|---|---|---|---|
干物质 | 玺优447 | Y=1.11e-exp(2.61-6.13t) | 0.0807 | 0.9779 |
金优207 | Y=1.14e-exp(2.55-10.14t) | 0.0965 | 0.9667 | |
氮 | 玺优447 | Y=1.14e-exp(2.54-9.86t) | 0.0964 | 0.9667 |
金优207 | Y=1.17e-exp(1.93-8.80t) | 0.1315 | 0.9314 | |
磷 | 玺优447 | Y=1.14e-exp(3.17-9.77t) | 0.0970 | 0.9722 |
金优207 | Y=1.19e-exp(2.67-9.19t) | 0.1324 | 0.9483 | |
钾 | 玺优447 | Y=1.00e-exp(1.71-6.67t) | 0.1125 | 0.9353 |
金优207 | Y=0.98e-exp(1.18-7.87t) | 0.0513 | 0.9851 |
干物质 | 品种 | 快速积累期 | 最大积累速率 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
始期d | 末期d | 历时/d | 平均速率/(g/株/d) | 速率/(g/株/d) | 出现时间/d | ||
玺优447 | 27.3 | 59.2 | 31.9 | 1.611 | 3.843 | 43.2 | |
金优207 | 18.5 | 40.9 | 22.4 | 1.560 | 5.211 | 29.7 | |
氮 | 玺优447 | 18.5 | 40.9 | 22.4 | 0.025 | 0.082 | 29.7 |
金优207 | 13.0 | 38.8 | 25.8 | 0.020 | 0.063 | 25.9 | |
磷 | 玺优447 | 26.0 | 48.6 | 22.6 | 0.004 | 0.012 | 37.3 |
金优207 | 21.9 | 46.6 | 24.7 | 0.003 | 0.010 | 34.3 | |
钾 | 玺优447 | 12.9 | 46.1 | 33.2 | 0.011 | 0.025 | 29.5 |
金优207 | 3.3 | 32.1 | 28.8 | 0.010 | 0.028 | 17.7 |
干物质 | 品种 | 快速积累期 | 最大积累速率 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
始期d | 末期d | 历时/d | 平均速率/(g/株/d) | 速率/(g/株/d) | 出现时间/d | ||
玺优447 | 27.3 | 59.2 | 31.9 | 1.611 | 3.843 | 43.2 | |
金优207 | 18.5 | 40.9 | 22.4 | 1.560 | 5.211 | 29.7 | |
氮 | 玺优447 | 18.5 | 40.9 | 22.4 | 0.025 | 0.082 | 29.7 |
金优207 | 13.0 | 38.8 | 25.8 | 0.020 | 0.063 | 25.9 | |
磷 | 玺优447 | 26.0 | 48.6 | 22.6 | 0.004 | 0.012 | 37.3 |
金优207 | 21.9 | 46.6 | 24.7 | 0.003 | 0.010 | 34.3 | |
钾 | 玺优447 | 12.9 | 46.1 | 33.2 | 0.011 | 0.025 | 29.5 |
金优207 | 3.3 | 32.1 | 28.8 | 0.010 | 0.028 | 17.7 |
[1] |
徐春春, 纪龙, 陈中督, 等. 中国水稻生产、市场与进出口贸易的回顾与展望[J]. 中国稻米, 2021, 27(4):17-21.
|
[2] |
彭少兵. 对转型时期水稻生产的战略思考[J]. 中国科学:生命科学, 2014, 44:845-850.
|
[3] |
胡忠孝. 中国水稻生产形势分析[J]. 杂交水稻, 2009, 24(6):1-7.
|
[4] |
刘书通. 长江中下游地区水稻生产能力分析[D]. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2014.
|
[5] |
董啸波, 霍中洋, 张洪程, 等. 南方双季晚稻籼改粳优势及技术关键[J]. 中国稻米, 2012, 18(1):25-28.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8082.2012.01.005 |
[6] |
陶诗顺, 王学春, 徐健蓉. 秧龄对超稀播旱育秧模式杂交中稻的产量效应[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报, 2012, 40(8):69-76.
|
[7] |
|
[8] |
刘琦, 胡剑锋, 周伟, 等. 四川盆地不同类型水稻品种机插栽培的干物质生产及产量特性分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2019, 33(1):37-48.
|
[9] |
马均, 朱庆森, 马文波, 等. 重穗型水稻光合作用、物质积累与运转的研究[J]. 中国农业科学, 2003, 36(4):375-381.
|
[10] |
凌启鸿, 张洪程, 戴其根, 等. 水稻精确定量施氮研究[J]. 中国农业科学, 2005, 38(12):2457-2467.
|
[11] |
|
[12] |
|
[13] |
|
[14] |
|
[15] |
徐雨昌, 王增远, 李震, 等. 不同水稻品种对稻田甲烷排放量的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 1999, 5(1):94-97.
|
[16] |
pmid: 21046997 |
[17] |
江瑜, 管大海, 张卫建. 水稻植株特性对稻田甲烷排放的影响及其机制的研究进展[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2018, 26(2):175-181.
|
[18] |
周强, 王欢, 李兴华, 等. “四特”水稻系列组合的选育及其意义[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2019, 58(21):15-21.
|
[19] |
DB4211/T7-2020.“四特”晚籼稻系列品种栽培技术规程[S].
|
[20] |
杨罗浩, 彭福燕, 高俊阳, 等. 不同种植密度和施肥水平下湖北二季晚粳群体物质生产特征及其与产量形成的关系[J]. 华中农业大学学报, 2020, 39(5):76-84.
|
[21] |
陈璐, 陈灿, 黄璜, 等. 厢作免耕下生态种养对稻田CH4和N2O排放的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2021, 40(6):1354-1365.
|
[22] |
|
[23] |
|
[24] |
|
[25] |
李国辉, 钟旭华, 田卡, 等. 施氮对水稻茎秆抗倒伏能力的影响及其形态和力学机理[J]. 中国农业科学, 2013, 46(7):1323-1334.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2013.07.003 |
[26] |
陆展华, 王晓飞, 刘维, 等. 优质稻粤农丝苗抗倒伏影响因素和遗传分析[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2021, 22(3):638-645.
|
[1] | LIU Yan, HAN Wei. Field Control Effect of Different Chemical Treatments on Potato Late Blight [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(2): 117-122. |
[2] | LIU Chunxiao, WANG Liming, DONG Rui, LIU Tieshan. Effects of Planting Density on Growth and Yield of Machine Harvested Maize Variety ‘Ludan 608’ [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(2): 23-27. |
[3] | FANG Baihan, LIU Jingjing, GUO Xiaowen, YE Yang, YANG Maoqi, ZHANG Nan, GUO Huijuan, MIN Wei. Effects of Equal Carbon Amounts of Straw and Straw Charcoal Incorporation on Soil Physical and Chemical Properties and Enzyme Activity in Cotton Fields [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(2): 69-82. |
[4] | CHEN Hailong, CHEN Zhaohui, WEI Tingbang. Regulation Mechanism of Nitrogen Fertilizer Reduction Combined with Organic Fertilizer on Dry Matter Accumulation and Yield of Maize [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(2): 7-16. |
[5] | YANG Shan, LI Qingchao, CHEN Xiaocui, LIU Jianxin, LUO Guocai, ZENG Wenbing, YANG Hong, XIA Yuqiong. Correlation Analysis and Path Analysis of Agronomic Characters and Yield of Pepper [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(1): 48-54. |
[6] | HONG Ziqiang, WANG Xiaoping, SU Ming, SU Li, BAI Liujing, ZHANG Zhengzhen, YANG Juan, WU Hongliang, KANG Jianhong. Effects of Ground Covers on Photosynthetic Characteristics, Antioxidant Indexes and Yield of Lycium barbarum [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(1): 63-68. |
[7] | SHEN Yujiang, DU Chunyu, LIU Shuxia, GUAN Xiangjun, XU Haijun, WANG Xiaofei, XIAO Yu. Adaptability Evaluation of Astragalus Introduction in Daqing of Heilongjiang Province [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(1): 82-88. |
[8] | WANG Miaomiao, WANG Beibei, LI Mingfang, ZHANG Zhihong, YAN Xue. Research Progress on Winter Wheat Growth Period Recognition Methods [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(1): 1-7. |
[9] | QI Chiheng, ZENG Yuting, XU Juanni, NIMAZHUOGA. Effects of Density and Nitrogen Fertilizer on Potato Yield and Quality in High Altitude Area [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(1): 19-24. |
[10] | GUO Chunmei, XIAO Haojun, QIN Xingli, DING Yingfeng, SHEN Hui, DU Yanping, ZHANG Hong, YANG Zheng’an. Effects of Formula Fertilization on Tomato Quality and Yield Cultivated in Facility Substrates [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(1): 42-47. |
[11] | YAO Jinbao, YANG Xueming, ZHANG Peng, FAN Xiangyun, YU Guihong, HE Yi, WANG Huadun. Analysis of Yield and Quality Traits of New Weak-Gluten Wheat Cultivar ‘Ningmai 36’ [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(9): 20-24. |
[12] | LI Qian, ZHANG Yangli, YAN Miaomiao, HAO Shuangkui, NIE Song, SUN Jie, CAO Sanchao, WANG Na. Effect of Sowing Date, Planting Density and Nitrogen Application on Population Structure and Grain Quality of ‘Weimai 9’ [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(9): 25-29. |
[13] | ZHANG Yaowen, DONG Yuhong, GUAN Zhoubo, WEI Shihao, LI Dianrong, LI Shaoqin, LIANG Fengzhi. CMS with High Linolenic Acid Content in Brassica napus L.: Rapid Breeding Method and Effect [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(9): 30-36. |
[14] | HOU Mengyuan. Cotton Yield Forecast in Shandong Province Based on Meteorological Key Factors [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(9): 37-41. |
[15] | LIU Yu, YAN Shi, ZHAO Kaili, YU Yueyue, HAN Bao, ZHANG Jing, GUO Ning. Recommendation of Appropriate Phosphorus Application Rate for Lettuce in Vegetable Fields with Different Phosphorus Levels [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(9): 55-59. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||