Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2025, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (24): 69-78.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2025-0114
Previous Articles Next Articles
TENZIN Tarchen1,2(), TUDENG Qunpei1,2, CI Zhen1,2, YIXI Yangzong1,2, NIMA Cangjue3, SANG Dan1,2, DORJEEH Tondrob1,2(
)
Received:
2025-02-14
Revised:
2025-07-16
Online:
2025-08-25
Published:
2025-09-05
TENZIN Tarchen, TUDENG Qunpei, CI Zhen, YIXI Yangzong, NIMA Cangjue, SANG Dan, DORJEEH Tondrob. Effects of Plantation Duration on Soil Nutrient Level and Microbial Community Characteristics of Alfalfa Artificial Grassland in Xizang River Valley Region[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(24): 69-78.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2025-0114
指标 | 项目 | 7 a | 6 a | 5 a | 4 a | 2 a | Oat | CK |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
覆盖度% | 细菌 | 96.7%±0.9% | 94.6%±2.1% | 96.0%±1.0% | 95.1%±1.3% | 96.5%±0.9% | 95.2%±1.3% | 95.1%±1.5% |
真菌 | 99.9%±0.1% | 99.9%±0.1% | 99.9%±0.1% | 99.9%±0.1% | 99.9%±0.1% | 99.9%±0.1% | 99.9%±0.1% | |
物种数 | 细菌 | 2803.1±379.9a | 2566.9±303.6a | 2488.4±381.4a | 2439.2±208.4a | 2474.9±344.4a | 2394.1±213.3a | 2278.4±462.6a |
真菌 | 403.5±23.8a | 370.9±13.0ab | 350.6±38.9ab | 339.2±15.1abc | 331.4±37.6bc | 281.9±42.8c | 282.4±62.3c | |
Shannon- Wiener指数 | 细菌 | 9.76±0.38a | 10.01±0.36a | 9.96±0.13a | 9.90±0.20a | 9.63±0.12a | 9.93±0.17a | 9.45±0.99a |
真菌 | 6.18±0.63a | 6.08±0.88a | 6.19±0.07a | 5.26±0.69ab | 5.67±0.37ab | 4.90±0.48b | 5.44±0.08ab | |
Simpson指数 | 细菌 | 0.99±0.01a | 1.00±0.00a | 1.00±0.0a | 1.00±0.00a | 0.99±0.01a | 0.99±0.00a | 0.98±0.02a |
真菌 | 0.96±0.02a | 0.94±0.02ba | 0.91±0.04a | 0.96±0.01a | 0.93±0.04a | 0.90±0.06a | 0.94±0.01a | |
Chao1指数 | 细菌 | 3454.5±629.8a | 3257.1±606.7a | 3105.1±516.9a | 3099.54±345.7a | 2885.5±619.6a | 2859.8±452.5a | 2819.8±701.8a |
真菌 | 407.7±22.7a | 371.5±12.7a | 360.0±33.2ab | 352.1±26.8ab | 336.3±41.5ab | 293.6±53.7b | 286.6±63.7b | |
Pielou均匀度 指数 | 细菌 真菌 | 0.85±0.02a 0.71±0.07a | 0.89±0.01a 0.71±0.09a | 0.88±0.1a 0.73±0.01a | 0.88±0.01a 0.63±0.09ab | 0.85±0.02a 0.68±0.03ab | 0.89±0.02a 0.58±0.06b | 0.85±0.07a 0.67±0.03ab |
指标 | 项目 | 7 a | 6 a | 5 a | 4 a | 2 a | Oat | CK |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
覆盖度% | 细菌 | 96.7%±0.9% | 94.6%±2.1% | 96.0%±1.0% | 95.1%±1.3% | 96.5%±0.9% | 95.2%±1.3% | 95.1%±1.5% |
真菌 | 99.9%±0.1% | 99.9%±0.1% | 99.9%±0.1% | 99.9%±0.1% | 99.9%±0.1% | 99.9%±0.1% | 99.9%±0.1% | |
物种数 | 细菌 | 2803.1±379.9a | 2566.9±303.6a | 2488.4±381.4a | 2439.2±208.4a | 2474.9±344.4a | 2394.1±213.3a | 2278.4±462.6a |
真菌 | 403.5±23.8a | 370.9±13.0ab | 350.6±38.9ab | 339.2±15.1abc | 331.4±37.6bc | 281.9±42.8c | 282.4±62.3c | |
Shannon- Wiener指数 | 细菌 | 9.76±0.38a | 10.01±0.36a | 9.96±0.13a | 9.90±0.20a | 9.63±0.12a | 9.93±0.17a | 9.45±0.99a |
真菌 | 6.18±0.63a | 6.08±0.88a | 6.19±0.07a | 5.26±0.69ab | 5.67±0.37ab | 4.90±0.48b | 5.44±0.08ab | |
Simpson指数 | 细菌 | 0.99±0.01a | 1.00±0.00a | 1.00±0.0a | 1.00±0.00a | 0.99±0.01a | 0.99±0.00a | 0.98±0.02a |
真菌 | 0.96±0.02a | 0.94±0.02ba | 0.91±0.04a | 0.96±0.01a | 0.93±0.04a | 0.90±0.06a | 0.94±0.01a | |
Chao1指数 | 细菌 | 3454.5±629.8a | 3257.1±606.7a | 3105.1±516.9a | 3099.54±345.7a | 2885.5±619.6a | 2859.8±452.5a | 2819.8±701.8a |
真菌 | 407.7±22.7a | 371.5±12.7a | 360.0±33.2ab | 352.1±26.8ab | 336.3±41.5ab | 293.6±53.7b | 286.6±63.7b | |
Pielou均匀度 指数 | 细菌 真菌 | 0.85±0.02a 0.71±0.07a | 0.89±0.01a 0.71±0.09a | 0.88±0.1a 0.73±0.01a | 0.88±0.01a 0.63±0.09ab | 0.85±0.02a 0.68±0.03ab | 0.89±0.02a 0.58±0.06b | 0.85±0.07a 0.67±0.03ab |
项目 | 有机碳 | 有效磷 | 全氮 | 铵态氮 | 硝态氮 | 碳氮比 | 可溶性总氮 | 溶解有机碳 | 溶解有机氮 | 微生物量碳 | 微生物量氮 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
细菌 | 0.670 | -0.294 | 0.771* | 0.726 | 0.850* | 0.422 | 0.831* | 0.897** | 0.896** | 0.567 | 0.780* |
真菌 | 0.910** | -0.115 | 0.775* | 0.698 | 0.790* | 0.534 | 0.874* | 0.772* | 0.919** | 0.666 | 0.859* |
项目 | 有机碳 | 有效磷 | 全氮 | 铵态氮 | 硝态氮 | 碳氮比 | 可溶性总氮 | 溶解有机碳 | 溶解有机氮 | 微生物量碳 | 微生物量氮 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
细菌 | 0.670 | -0.294 | 0.771* | 0.726 | 0.850* | 0.422 | 0.831* | 0.897** | 0.896** | 0.567 | 0.780* |
真菌 | 0.910** | -0.115 | 0.775* | 0.698 | 0.790* | 0.534 | 0.874* | 0.772* | 0.919** | 0.666 | 0.859* |
指标 | 细菌 | 真菌 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Subgroup_6 | 鞘脂单孢菌 Sphingomonas | 假单胞菌 Pseudomonas | 芽殖球菌 Blastococcus | 赤霉菌 Gibberella | 孢霉菌 Mortierella | 亚隔孢壳 Alternaria | 假裸囊菌 Pseudogvmnoascus | ||
有机碳 | -0.411 | 0.055 | 0.901** | 0.269 | -0.524 | 0.858* | -0.851* | -0.226 | |
有效磷 | 0.755* | 0.624 | -0.308 | -0.918** | -0.528 | -0.110 | 0.413 | -0.659 | |
全氮 | 0.018 | 0.200 | 0.488 | -0.036 | -0.556 | 0.378 | -0.451 | -0.207 | |
铵态氮 | -0.162 | -0.036 | 0.498 | 0.201 | -0.362 | 0.313 | -0.448 | 0.017 | |
硝态氮 | -0.007 | 0.247 | 0.484 | 0.013 | -0.530 | 0.489 | -0.563 | -0.164 | |
碳氮比 | -0.609 | 0.121 | 0.690 | 0.420 | -0.059 | 0.781* | -0.848* | -0.199 | |
可溶性总氮 | -0.140 | 0.261 | 0.654 | 0.068 | -0.674 | 0.885** | -0.741 | -0.186 | |
溶解有机碳 | -0.612 | 0.108 | 0.702 | 0.517 | -0.245 | 0.895** | -0.893** | 0.010 | |
溶解有机氮 | -0.357 | 0.434 | 0.750 | 0.083 | -0.609 | 0.830* | -0.728 | -0.476 | |
微生物量碳 | -0.394 | 0.066 | 0.668 | 0.307 | -0.393 | 0.935** | -0.787* | -0.040 | |
微生物量氮 | -0.265 | 0.465 | 0.729 | 0.055 | -0.399 | 0.632 | -0.839* | -0.553 |
指标 | 细菌 | 真菌 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Subgroup_6 | 鞘脂单孢菌 Sphingomonas | 假单胞菌 Pseudomonas | 芽殖球菌 Blastococcus | 赤霉菌 Gibberella | 孢霉菌 Mortierella | 亚隔孢壳 Alternaria | 假裸囊菌 Pseudogvmnoascus | ||
有机碳 | -0.411 | 0.055 | 0.901** | 0.269 | -0.524 | 0.858* | -0.851* | -0.226 | |
有效磷 | 0.755* | 0.624 | -0.308 | -0.918** | -0.528 | -0.110 | 0.413 | -0.659 | |
全氮 | 0.018 | 0.200 | 0.488 | -0.036 | -0.556 | 0.378 | -0.451 | -0.207 | |
铵态氮 | -0.162 | -0.036 | 0.498 | 0.201 | -0.362 | 0.313 | -0.448 | 0.017 | |
硝态氮 | -0.007 | 0.247 | 0.484 | 0.013 | -0.530 | 0.489 | -0.563 | -0.164 | |
碳氮比 | -0.609 | 0.121 | 0.690 | 0.420 | -0.059 | 0.781* | -0.848* | -0.199 | |
可溶性总氮 | -0.140 | 0.261 | 0.654 | 0.068 | -0.674 | 0.885** | -0.741 | -0.186 | |
溶解有机碳 | -0.612 | 0.108 | 0.702 | 0.517 | -0.245 | 0.895** | -0.893** | 0.010 | |
溶解有机氮 | -0.357 | 0.434 | 0.750 | 0.083 | -0.609 | 0.830* | -0.728 | -0.476 | |
微生物量碳 | -0.394 | 0.066 | 0.668 | 0.307 | -0.393 | 0.935** | -0.787* | -0.040 | |
微生物量氮 | -0.265 | 0.465 | 0.729 | 0.055 | -0.399 | 0.632 | -0.839* | -0.553 |
指标 | 细菌 | 真菌 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
物种数 | Shannon- Wiener指数 | Simpson 指数 | Chao1 指数 | Pielou 均匀度指数 | 物种数 | Shannon- Wiener指数 | Simpson 指数 | Chao1 指数 | Pielou 均匀度指数 | ||
有机碳 | 0.673 | 0.522 | 0.598 | 0.831* | 0.196 | 0.688 | 0.571 | 0.272 | 0.728 | 0.448 | |
有效磷 | 0.085 | 0.453 | 0.023 | -0.096 | 0.476 | -0.258 | -0.548 | -0.602 | -0.209 | -0.714 | |
全氮 | 0.279 | 0.694 | 0.860* | 0.488 | 0.549 | 0.446 | 0.252 | 0.037 | 0.489 | 0.212 | |
铵态氮 | 0.149 | 0.505 | 0.759* | 0.414 | 0.409 | 0.409 | 0.342 | 0.174 | 0.433 | 0.361 | |
硝态氮 | 0.441 | 0.640 | 0.812* | 0.610 | 0.421 | 0.565 | 0.321 | 0.122 | 0.609 | 0.266 | |
碳氮比 | 0.732 | 0.036 | 0.148 | 0.636 | -0.353 | 0.657 | 0.567 | 0.363 | 0.667 | 0.468 | |
可溶性总氮 | 0.799* | 0.618 | 0.648 | 0.955** | 0.259 | 0.806* | 0.559 | 0.338 | 0.848* | 0.405 | |
溶解有机碳 | 0.758* | 0.244 | 0.525 | 0.864* | -0.161 | 0.953** | 0.851* | 0.680 | 0.950** | 0.781* | |
溶解有机氮 | 0.670 | 0.676 | 0.857* | 0.764* | 0.310 | 0.859* | 0.656 | 0.362 | 0.881* | 0.525 | |
微生物量碳 | 0.836* | 0.253 | 0.251 | 0.917** | -0.126 | 0.769* | 0.647 | 0.478 | 0.789* | 0.500 | |
微生物量氮 | 0.635 | 0.580 | 0.778* | 0.579 | 0.219 | 0.636 | 0.335 | 0.002 | 0.687 | 0.240 |
指标 | 细菌 | 真菌 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
物种数 | Shannon- Wiener指数 | Simpson 指数 | Chao1 指数 | Pielou 均匀度指数 | 物种数 | Shannon- Wiener指数 | Simpson 指数 | Chao1 指数 | Pielou 均匀度指数 | ||
有机碳 | 0.673 | 0.522 | 0.598 | 0.831* | 0.196 | 0.688 | 0.571 | 0.272 | 0.728 | 0.448 | |
有效磷 | 0.085 | 0.453 | 0.023 | -0.096 | 0.476 | -0.258 | -0.548 | -0.602 | -0.209 | -0.714 | |
全氮 | 0.279 | 0.694 | 0.860* | 0.488 | 0.549 | 0.446 | 0.252 | 0.037 | 0.489 | 0.212 | |
铵态氮 | 0.149 | 0.505 | 0.759* | 0.414 | 0.409 | 0.409 | 0.342 | 0.174 | 0.433 | 0.361 | |
硝态氮 | 0.441 | 0.640 | 0.812* | 0.610 | 0.421 | 0.565 | 0.321 | 0.122 | 0.609 | 0.266 | |
碳氮比 | 0.732 | 0.036 | 0.148 | 0.636 | -0.353 | 0.657 | 0.567 | 0.363 | 0.667 | 0.468 | |
可溶性总氮 | 0.799* | 0.618 | 0.648 | 0.955** | 0.259 | 0.806* | 0.559 | 0.338 | 0.848* | 0.405 | |
溶解有机碳 | 0.758* | 0.244 | 0.525 | 0.864* | -0.161 | 0.953** | 0.851* | 0.680 | 0.950** | 0.781* | |
溶解有机氮 | 0.670 | 0.676 | 0.857* | 0.764* | 0.310 | 0.859* | 0.656 | 0.362 | 0.881* | 0.525 | |
微生物量碳 | 0.836* | 0.253 | 0.251 | 0.917** | -0.126 | 0.769* | 0.647 | 0.478 | 0.789* | 0.500 | |
微生物量氮 | 0.635 | 0.580 | 0.778* | 0.579 | 0.219 | 0.636 | 0.335 | 0.002 | 0.687 | 0.240 |
[1] |
杨晓, 李锦华, 朱新强, 等. 西藏“一江两河”地区紫花苜蓿生产性能灰色关联综合评价[J]. 中国农学通报, 2015, 31(2):80-84.
doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.2014-1545 |
[2] |
杨晓, 刘乐乐, 朱新强, 等. 西藏河谷地区紫花苜蓿产量与气象因子灰色关联分析[J]. 草地学报, 2016, 24(1):198-203.
doi: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2016.01.027 |
[3] |
郭仰东, 赵利, 王敬龙, 等. 西藏拉萨地区引进紫花苜蓿品种的产量与品质分析[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(4):1164-1167.
doi: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2020.04.036 |
[4] |
李裕元, 邵明安. 黄土高原北部紫花苜蓿人工草地退化过程与植物多样性研究[J]. 应用生态学报, 2005, 16(12):2321-2327.
|
[5] |
杨恒山, 曹敏建, 范富, 等. 紫花苜蓿生长年限对土壤化学性状的影响[J]. 中国草地学报, 2006, 28(6):29-32.
|
[6] |
|
[7] |
翟辉, 张海, 张超, 等. 黄土峁状丘陵区不同类型林分土壤微生物功能多样性[J]. 林业科学, 2016, 52(12):84-91.
|
[8] |
周丽霞, 丁明懋. 土壤微生物学特性对土壤健康的指示作用[J]. 生物多样性, 2017, 15(2):162-171.
|
[9] |
耿德洲, 黄菁华, 霍娜, 等. 黄土高原半干旱区不同种植年限紫花苜蓿人工草地土壤微生物和线虫群落特征[J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(4):1365-1377.
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202004.034 |
[10] |
齐文娟, 龙瑞军, 冯瑞章, 等. 江河源区不同建植年限人工草地土壤微生物及酶活性研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 2007, 21(4):145-149.
|
[11] |
张文文, 刘秉儒, 牛宋芳. 引黄灌区不同种植年限紫花苜蓿土壤养分与细菌群落特征研究[J]. 草业学报, 2019, 28(5):46-54.
doi: 10.11686/cyxb2018781 |
[12] |
张杰雪, 王占青, 全小龙, 等. 高寒地区人工草地土壤微生物群落对不同种植方式和年限的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(2):270-280.
doi: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2021.02.008 |
[13] |
|
[14] |
|
[15] |
赵彤, 黄懿梅, 温鹏飞. 高通量测序技术研究南山区不同植被恢复对土壤细菌的影响[J]. 西部大开发(土地开发工程研究), 2016(4):19-26.
|
[16] |
吴东辉, 尹文英, 卜照义. 松嫩草原中度退化草地不同植被恢复方式下土壤线虫的群落特征[J]. 生态学报, 2008, 28(1):1-12.
|
[17] |
|
[18] |
徐丽君, 王波, 辛晓平. 紫花苜蓿人工草地土壤养分及土壤微生物特性[J]. 草地学报, 2011, 19(3):406-411.
doi: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2011.03.008 |
[19] |
孙华方, 李希来, 金立群, 等. 黄河源人工草地土壤微生物多样性对建植年限的响应[J]. 草业学报, 2021, 30(2):46-58.
doi: 10.11686/cyxb2020105 |
[20] |
|
[21] |
李贤松, 侯向阳, 纪磊, 等. 不同生境来源羊草对同质园土壤养分及其生态化学计量特征的影响[J]. 中国草地学报, 2021, 43(7):45-53.
|
[22] |
江舟, 魏臻武. 淮河流域不同豆科牧草生产性能及对土壤养分的影响[J]. 中国草地学报, 2021, 43(7):45-53.
|
[23] |
|
[24] |
|
[25] |
|
[26] |
张春霞, 郝明德, 王旭刚, 等. 黄土高原地区紫花苜蓿生长过程中土壤养分的变化规律[J]. 西北植物学报, 2004, 24(6):1107-1111.
|
[27] |
孙铁军, 滕文军, 王淑琴, 等. 紫花苜蓿种植对山地荒沟客土理化学性质的影响[J]. 山地学报, 2007, 25(5):596-601.
|
[28] |
胡发成. 种植苜蓿改良培肥地力的研究初报[J]. 草业科学, 2005, 22(8):47-49.
|
[29] |
韩清芳, 周芳, 贾珺, 等. 施肥对不同品种苜蓿生产力及土壤肥力的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2009, 15(6):1413-1418.
|
[30] |
舒维花, 蒋齐, 王占军, 等. 植被恢复对土壤微生物的影响[J]. 农业科学研究, 2012, 33(1):73-78.
|
[31] |
曹红雨, 高广磊, 丁国栋, 等. 呼伦贝尔沙区4种生境土壤真菌群落结构和多样性[J]. 林业科学, 2019, 55(8):118-127.
|
[32] |
李娜, 韩晓增, 尤孟阳, 等. 土壤团聚体与微生物相互作用研究[J]. 生态环境学报, 2013, 22(9):1625-1632.
|
[33] |
邰继承. 种植年限对紫花苜蓿地土壤理化特性及其微生物影响的研究[D]. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古民族大学, 2008.
|
[34] |
杨希智, 王长庭, 字洪标, 等. 三江源区不同建植年限人工草地土壤微生物群落结构特征[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2015, 21(2):341-349.
|
[35] |
赵辉, 赵铭钦, 程玉渊, 等. 土壤微生物影响因子研究综述[J]. 江西农业学报, 2009, 21(12):52-56.
|
[36] |
赵轻舟, 王艳芬, 崔骁勇, 等. 草地土壤微生物多样性影响因素研究进展[J]. 生态科学, 2018, 37(3):204-212.
|
[37] |
龙健, 赵畅, 张明江, 等. 不同坡向凋落物分解对土壤微生物群落的影响[J]. 生态报, 2019, 39(8):2696-2704.
|
[38] |
张彦军, 郭胜利. 环境因子对土壤微生物呼吸及其温度敏感性变化特征的影响[J]. 环境科学, 2019, 40(3):1446-1456.
|
[39] |
南丽丽, 师尚礼, 郁继华. 荒漠灌区不同种植年限苜蓿草地土壤微生物特性[J]. 草地学报, 2016, 24(5):975-980.
doi: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2016.05.007 |
[40] |
刘雯雯. 喀斯特植被恢复不同阶段土壤微生物组成及氮磷土壤酶对生境响应[D]. 贵阳: 贵州大学, 2019.
|
[41] |
|
[42] |
章家恩, 刘文高, 胡刚. 不同土地利用方式下土壤微生物数量与土壤肥力的关系[J]. 土壤与环境, 2002, 11(2):140-143.
|
[1] | ZHANG Jian, ZHOU Ling. Research on Status of Cotton Straw Crushing and Decomposition in Xinjiang Region [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(3): 48-58. |
[2] | SHAO Qinglong, MA Xiqing, WEI Junmei, WANG Wanrong, YAO Xiaoqin, WU Yurong, ZHANG Donghai, SHAO Ming. Analysis of Adaptability of Eight Introduced Alfalfa Varieties in Tumushuke Reclamation Area [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(23): 117-124. |
[3] | LI Delu, ZHANG Jinchun, YUAN Hongbo, CAO Lei, ZHAO Qianyun. Study on Community Characteristics of Artemisia ordosica in Shiyang River Basin [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(22): 41-46. |
[4] | LIU Yanchao, WENG Shiyang, WEI Cong. Comparative Study on Gut Microbial Diversity of Three Fish Species in Nujiang River in Xizang [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(2): 149-156. |
[5] | SONG Haiyun, ZHANG Tao, HE Peng, ZHENG Shufang, CHEN Xi, YANG Di, WEI Yuanrong, WANG Wenlin. Analysis of Microbial Diversity in Naturally Fermented Organic Fertilizers from Macadamia Peels [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(13): 122-129. |
[6] | TIAN Xiaoqin, LI Zhuo, LIU Yonghong. Effects of Combined Application of Biochar and Urea on Soil Nutrient, Respiration and Rape Yield in Dryland Purple Soil [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(13): 13-18. |
[7] | ZHANG Guangdong, SHANG Zhiwei, ZHAO Mengdi, YANG Chunhua, WANG Ting, RUAN Haiming, ZHANG Xuefeng, ZHOU Fangfang. Analysis of Spatial Distribution Characteristics of Soil pH and Its Potential Regulatory Factorsin in Tobacco Planting Areas of Shiping County [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(12): 80-87. |
[8] | QIN Xinke, LI Qi, LI Yuhang, ZHANG Huiyuan, HE Changlong, HUANG Xinrui, ZHANG Weizhen, LEI Ningfei, PEI Xiangjun. Impact of “Moss-Algae-SJP” on Restoration of Biological Soil Crusts in Sandy Land [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(11): 64-73. |
[9] | SONG Guangtong, WANG Fen, XU Xiaona, ZHU Chengjun, CHEN Zhu, LI Xiang, ZHOU Xiang, YE Shengtao, JIANG Yelin. Evolution of Plankton Community Structure During the Pond Aquaculture of Chinese Softshell Turtle, Pelodiscus sinensis [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(8): 157-164. |
[10] | YANG Han, HUANG Zhimou, QU Heping, CHAI Shasha, LI Yuwei, ZHAO Qingchun, QIN Xiaoyin. Effects of Optimal Fertilization on Yield, Nutrient Utilization and Soil Fertility of Edible Sweet Potato [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(8): 63-67. |
[11] | LI Rulai, FENG Peng, ZHENG Haiyan, NIU Zhonglin, JIN Xiaochun, WU Lili, JIANG Baifu, JIANG Xueqi. Alfalfa Cold-resistant Mutant: Analysis of Physiological and Biochemical Characteristics [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(5): 122-126. |
[12] | ZHU Shijun, LUO Youjun, JIN Shuquan, ZHOU Jinbo, WANG Feng. Succession of Soil Microbial Community in Ganoderma lucidum-Rice Rotation System [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(5): 39-46. |
[13] | ZHANG Tianci, LI Sixuan, CHEN Yanyun. Effects of Smash Ridging Tillage on Soil Nutrients and Growth of Astragalus Membranaceus [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(35): 43-48. |
[14] | ZHOU Xiao, HE Fuying, YU Ziyun, LU Xin, DONG Junzhong, WANG Yue, WANG Bingbing, LI Tian, LIU Yan. Influence of Altitude on Quality and Microbial Community Structure of Yunnan Produced Cigar Tobacco Leaves [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(34): 8-14. |
[15] | YANG Xiaolin, GUO Shanshan, LV Liang, CHANG Xiangqian, ZHANG Shu, ZHANG Youhong, LIU Xinqiong. Analysis of Soil Microbial Community Structure of Burgamot Yam Under Different Production Conditions [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(32): 91-98. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||