
Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2025, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (34): 23-29.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2025-0166
Previous Articles Next Articles
YUAN Chenchen1,2(
), YAN Liping1(
), LI Li1(
), ZHOU Jian1, SUN Chao1, WANG Yinhua1, LI Tianjiao1
Received:2025-03-05
Revised:2025-09-10
Online:2025-12-04
Published:2025-12-04
YUAN Chenchen, YAN Liping, LI Li, ZHOU Jian, SUN Chao, WANG Yinhua, LI Tianjiao. Salt Tolerance Response and Comprehensive Evaluation of Nine Kinds of Fraxinus at Seedling Stage[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(34): 23-29.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2025-0166
| NaCl浓度 | 青碧 | 325 | 327 | 342 | 317 | 318 | 鲁蜡6号 | 346 | 344 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0‰ | 正常 | 正常 | 正常 | 正常 | 正常 | 正常 | 正常 | 正常 | 正常 | |||
| 4‰ | 20%伤害, 无死苗 | 20%伤害, 无死苗 | 10%伤害, 无死苗 | 轻微伤害, 无死苗 | 轻微伤害, 无死苗 | 20%伤害, 无死苗 | 10%伤害, 无死苗 | 基本正常, 无死苗 | 轻微伤害, 无死苗 | |||
| 8‰ | 67%植株死亡 | 33%植株死亡 | 33%植株死亡 | 56%植株死亡 | 44%植株死亡 | 33%植株死亡 | 44%植株死亡 | 44%植株死亡 | 67%植株死亡 | |||
| 12‰ | 89%植株死亡 | 89%植株死亡 | 89%植株死亡 | 100%植株死亡 | 100%植株死亡 | 67%植株死亡 | 78%植株死亡 | 100%植株死亡 | 89%植株死亡 | |||
| NaCl浓度 | 青碧 | 325 | 327 | 342 | 317 | 318 | 鲁蜡6号 | 346 | 344 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0‰ | 正常 | 正常 | 正常 | 正常 | 正常 | 正常 | 正常 | 正常 | 正常 | |||
| 4‰ | 20%伤害, 无死苗 | 20%伤害, 无死苗 | 10%伤害, 无死苗 | 轻微伤害, 无死苗 | 轻微伤害, 无死苗 | 20%伤害, 无死苗 | 10%伤害, 无死苗 | 基本正常, 无死苗 | 轻微伤害, 无死苗 | |||
| 8‰ | 67%植株死亡 | 33%植株死亡 | 33%植株死亡 | 56%植株死亡 | 44%植株死亡 | 33%植株死亡 | 44%植株死亡 | 44%植株死亡 | 67%植株死亡 | |||
| 12‰ | 89%植株死亡 | 89%植株死亡 | 89%植株死亡 | 100%植株死亡 | 100%植株死亡 | 67%植株死亡 | 78%植株死亡 | 100%植株死亡 | 89%植株死亡 | |||
| NaCl浓度 | 青碧 | 325 | 327 | 342 | 344 | 318 | 鲁蜡6号 | 317 | 346 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0‰ | 3.056±0.132a | 3.092±0.176a | 2.844±0.24ab | 2.533±0.118a | 2.967±0.272a | 2.25±0.226ab | 2.572±0.157a | 2.967±0.283a | 3.180±0.310a | ||||||||
| 4‰ | 2.511±0.167b | 2.434±0.127b | 3.052±0.245a | 2.02±0.133b | 2.25±0.167b | 2.675±0.104a | 1.522±0.103b | 1.311±0.151b | 1.673±0.038b | ||||||||
| 8‰ | 2.209±0.127b | 2.258±0.109b | 2.398±0.128b | 1.024±0.082c | 1.567±0.241c | 2.006±0.135b | 1.607±0.173b | 1.217±0.13b | 1.247±0.169b | ||||||||
| 12‰ | 1.063±0.089c | 2.073±0.127b | 1.703±0.167c | 1.165±0.223c | 1.097±0.087c | 1.342±0.096c | 1.204±0.145b | 1.185±0.077b | 1.185±0.083b | ||||||||
| NaCl浓度 | 青碧 | 325 | 327 | 342 | 344 | 318 | 鲁蜡6号 | 317 | 346 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0‰ | 3.056±0.132a | 3.092±0.176a | 2.844±0.24ab | 2.533±0.118a | 2.967±0.272a | 2.25±0.226ab | 2.572±0.157a | 2.967±0.283a | 3.180±0.310a | ||||||||
| 4‰ | 2.511±0.167b | 2.434±0.127b | 3.052±0.245a | 2.02±0.133b | 2.25±0.167b | 2.675±0.104a | 1.522±0.103b | 1.311±0.151b | 1.673±0.038b | ||||||||
| 8‰ | 2.209±0.127b | 2.258±0.109b | 2.398±0.128b | 1.024±0.082c | 1.567±0.241c | 2.006±0.135b | 1.607±0.173b | 1.217±0.13b | 1.247±0.169b | ||||||||
| 12‰ | 1.063±0.089c | 2.073±0.127b | 1.703±0.167c | 1.165±0.223c | 1.097±0.087c | 1.342±0.096c | 1.204±0.145b | 1.185±0.077b | 1.185±0.083b | ||||||||
| NaCl 浓度 | 青碧 | 325 | 327 | 342 | 344 | 318 | 鲁蜡6号 | 317 | 346 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0‰ | 0.8012±0.3593b | 0.7882±0.1471c | 0.4075±0.1179c | 0.6813±0.0901c | 1.1572±0.134d | 0.8894±0.1229c | 0.7766±0.1317b | 0.6187±0.0352c | 0.7493±0.0678c |
| 4‰ | 0.3642±0.0315b | 1.3638±0.188b | 1.3666±0.1354b | 0.9472±0.0893bc | 1.622±0.1169c | 1.6382±0.1859b | 0.8252±0.1412b | 0.8659±0.1069c | 1.3062±0.0441b |
| 8‰ | 2.4919±0.0684a | 2.5686±0.1209a | 1.8116±0.1505b | 1.2114±0.1099b | 2.2039±0.1537b | 1.8667±0.1038b | 0.7439±0.061b | 1.435±0.0994b | 1.3604±0.1583b |
| 12‰ | 2.8744±0.1461a | 2.9593±0.1394a | 2.4124±0.2303a | 1.7553±0.1906a | 2.7764±0.1461a | 2.4228±0.1609a | 2.6301±0.3726a | 1.9024±0.1551a | 2.0081±0.1772a |
| NaCl 浓度 | 青碧 | 325 | 327 | 342 | 344 | 318 | 鲁蜡6号 | 317 | 346 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0‰ | 0.8012±0.3593b | 0.7882±0.1471c | 0.4075±0.1179c | 0.6813±0.0901c | 1.1572±0.134d | 0.8894±0.1229c | 0.7766±0.1317b | 0.6187±0.0352c | 0.7493±0.0678c |
| 4‰ | 0.3642±0.0315b | 1.3638±0.188b | 1.3666±0.1354b | 0.9472±0.0893bc | 1.622±0.1169c | 1.6382±0.1859b | 0.8252±0.1412b | 0.8659±0.1069c | 1.3062±0.0441b |
| 8‰ | 2.4919±0.0684a | 2.5686±0.1209a | 1.8116±0.1505b | 1.2114±0.1099b | 2.2039±0.1537b | 1.8667±0.1038b | 0.7439±0.061b | 1.435±0.0994b | 1.3604±0.1583b |
| 12‰ | 2.8744±0.1461a | 2.9593±0.1394a | 2.4124±0.2303a | 1.7553±0.1906a | 2.7764±0.1461a | 2.4228±0.1609a | 2.6301±0.3726a | 1.9024±0.1551a | 2.0081±0.1772a |
| 种质编号 | 叶绿素含量 | 相对电导率 | SOD活性 | MDA含量 | 株高 | 地径 | 可溶性糖含量 | 脯氨酸含量 | 均值 | 排序 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 青碧 | 0.4966 | 0.4231 | 0.3538 | 0.4672 | 0.3865 | 0.3703 | 0.5 | 0.3793 | 0.4221 | 9 |
| 325 | 0.3515 | 0.4133 | 0.7173 | 0.4624 | 0.4708 | 0.6384 | 0.5 | 0.4889 | 0.5053 | 2 |
| 327 | 0.5547 | 0.4641 | 0.5997 | 0.5322 | 0.4955 | 0.5767 | 0.5 | 0.6042 | 0.5409 | 1 |
| 342 | 0.5878 | 0.4971 | 0.5088 | 0.4832 | 0.6185 | 0.318 | 0.4999 | 0.3072 | 0.4776 | 7 |
| 344 | 0.5015 | 0.4138 | 0.46 | 0.6431 | 0.5333 | 0.35 | 0.5007 | 0.3713 | 0.4717 | 8 |
| 318 | 0.5424 | 0.3744 | 0.5062 | 0.639 | 0.5167 | 0.4666 | 0.5 | 0.3867 | 0.4915 | 4 |
| 鲁蜡6号 | 0.4136 | 0.6161 | 0.5053 | 0.5865 | 0.5055 | 0.4978 | 0.4999 | 0.4154 | 0.505 | 3 |
| 317 | 0.4868 | 0.5574 | 0.4481 | 0.6014 | 0.5357 | 0.4505 | 0.5 | 0.3472 | 0.4909 | 5 |
| 346 | 0.552 | 0.6068 | 0.4842 | 0.3841 | 0.4731 | 0.4744 | 0.4998 | 0.375 | 0.4812 | 6 |
| 种质编号 | 叶绿素含量 | 相对电导率 | SOD活性 | MDA含量 | 株高 | 地径 | 可溶性糖含量 | 脯氨酸含量 | 均值 | 排序 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 青碧 | 0.4966 | 0.4231 | 0.3538 | 0.4672 | 0.3865 | 0.3703 | 0.5 | 0.3793 | 0.4221 | 9 |
| 325 | 0.3515 | 0.4133 | 0.7173 | 0.4624 | 0.4708 | 0.6384 | 0.5 | 0.4889 | 0.5053 | 2 |
| 327 | 0.5547 | 0.4641 | 0.5997 | 0.5322 | 0.4955 | 0.5767 | 0.5 | 0.6042 | 0.5409 | 1 |
| 342 | 0.5878 | 0.4971 | 0.5088 | 0.4832 | 0.6185 | 0.318 | 0.4999 | 0.3072 | 0.4776 | 7 |
| 344 | 0.5015 | 0.4138 | 0.46 | 0.6431 | 0.5333 | 0.35 | 0.5007 | 0.3713 | 0.4717 | 8 |
| 318 | 0.5424 | 0.3744 | 0.5062 | 0.639 | 0.5167 | 0.4666 | 0.5 | 0.3867 | 0.4915 | 4 |
| 鲁蜡6号 | 0.4136 | 0.6161 | 0.5053 | 0.5865 | 0.5055 | 0.4978 | 0.4999 | 0.4154 | 0.505 | 3 |
| 317 | 0.4868 | 0.5574 | 0.4481 | 0.6014 | 0.5357 | 0.4505 | 0.5 | 0.3472 | 0.4909 | 5 |
| 346 | 0.552 | 0.6068 | 0.4842 | 0.3841 | 0.4731 | 0.4744 | 0.4998 | 0.375 | 0.4812 | 6 |
| [1] |
孙波, 朱安宁, 姚荣江, 等. 潮土、红壤和盐碱地障碍消减技术与产能提升模式研究进展[J]. 土壤学报, 2023, 60(5):1231-1247.
|
| [2] |
doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2024.119707 URL |
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
杨升, 刘正祥, 张华新, 等. 3个树种苗期耐盐性综合评价及指标筛选[J]. 林业科学, 2013, 49(1):91-98.
|
| [5] |
王友平, 刘德玺, 孙明高, 等. 白蜡良种选育研究的现状与对策[J]. 山东林业科技, 2007(6):81-83.
|
| [6] |
姚燕, 张峰. 绒毛白蜡盐碱地造林技术[J]. 宁夏农林科技, 2012, 53(7):27-28.
|
| [7] |
王友平, 刘德玺, 孙明高, 等. 绒毛白蜡营养器官中Na+、K+、Cl-的分布[J]. 石河子大学学报(自然科学版), 2009, 27(1):27-29.
|
| [8] |
常越霞. 盐胁迫对金叶白蜡生理生化特性的影响[D]. 保定: 河北农业大学, 2014.
|
| [9] |
刘翠兰, 吴德军, 王开芳, 等. NaCl胁迫下白蜡杂交苗的生长与生理响应[J]. 中国农学通报, 2016, 32(28):16-21.
doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb16010152 |
| [10] |
王因花, 燕丽萍, 吴德军, 等. 绒毛白蜡‘青碧’不同半同胞家系的耐盐性评价[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2020, 40(3):30-38.
|
| [11] |
燕丽萍, 吴德军, 王因花, 等. 绒毛白蜡耐盐生理与解剖结构研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2024, 40(2):16-24.
doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2023-0063 |
| [12] |
刘翠兰, 王开芳, 吴德军, 等. 滨海盐碱胁迫下白蜡无性系生长及生理特性的响应[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(35):7-16.
doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2021-1163 |
| [13] |
赵世杰, 刘华山, 董新纯. 植物生理实验指导[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社,1997:152-154,161-163.
|
| [14] |
李合生. 植物生理实验指导[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社,2003:134-137.
|
| [15] |
杨升, 张华新, 刘涛. 16个树种盐胁迫下的生长表现和生理特性[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2012, 29(5):744-754.
|
| [16] |
马剑, 刘贤德, 金铭, 等. NaCl胁迫对文冠果幼苗生长性状的影响[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2018, 38(1):11-15.
|
| [17] |
倪建伟, 武香, 张华新, 等. 3种白刺耐盐性的对比分析[J]. 林业科学研究, 2012, 25(1):48-53.
|
| [18] |
倪细炉, 岳延峰, 田英, 等. 4种盐生植物抗盐能力的综合评价[J]. 中国农学通报, 2010, 26(6):138-141.
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
魏秀君, 殷云龙, 芦治国, 等. NaCl胁迫对5种绿化植物幼苗生长和生理指标的影响及耐盐性综合评价[J]. 植物资源与环境学报, 2011, 20(2):35-42.
|
| [21] |
doi: 10.1111/nph.14920 pmid: 29205383 |
| [22] |
赵江涛, 李晓峰, 李航, 等. 可溶性糖在高等植物代谢调节中的生理作用[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2006, 34(24):6423-6425.
|
| [23] |
doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2009.07.015 URL |
| [24] |
doi: 10.1146/arplant.2004.55.issue-1 URL |
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
孙海菁, 王树凤, 陈益泰. 盐胁迫对6个树种的生长及生理指标的影响[J]. 林业科学研究, 2009, 22(3):315-324.
|
| [27] |
杨传宝, 孙超, 李善文, 等. 白杨派无性系苗期耐盐性综合评价及筛选[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2017, 39(10):24-32.
|
| [28] |
于金平, 俞珊, 梁有旺, 等. NaCl胁迫对美国白蜡幼苗部分生理指标的影响[J]. 植物资源与环境学报, 2014, 23(1):110-112.
|
| [1] | LIANG Wenzhao, ZHOU Shiyi, WEI Ruiyan, SHI Linya, LIU Naixin, YU Qingtao. Effect of Graphene Oxide on Rice Seed Germination Under Salt Stress [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(9): 1-7. |
| [2] | HUANG Wenyin, ZHANG Baige, CHANG Jingjing, CHEN Xiao, LI Jing, CHEN Lei, ZHAO Junhong, LUO Mouxiong, SONG Zhao. Effect of Exogenous Inositol on Yield and Quality of Tomatoes Under Salt Stress [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(9): 73-80. |
| [3] | ZHOU Bo, TANG Jinchi, LI Jianlong, CHEN Yiyong, ZHANG Man, CUI Yingying, HUANG Xiuxin. Physiological Response of Tea Tree Leaves to Drought Stress [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(7): 67-74. |
| [4] | WANG Lili, ZHU Shijun, LU Xiaohong, JIN Shuquan. Biological Effects of Trichoderma W1 Bio-organic Fertilizer on Coastal Tomato Planting [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(7): 100-106. |
| [5] | LIU Jiao, HU Xing, HUANG Xiaoxia, LIU Wenge, HE Mingxiong, LU Changyou, LUO Yigui. Planting Adaptability of New Flue-cured Tobacco Varieties ‘Yunyan 116’ and ‘Yunyan 300’ in Hechi Tobacco Region of Guangxi [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(7): 22-28. |
| [6] | ZHU Peican, LIU Yi'an, ZHOU Fangyu, LIU Bo. Toxic Effects of Salt-alkali Interaction on Corbicula fluminea [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(6): 159-164. |
| [7] | TIAN Qinyu, HU Huabing, WANG Ronghua, WANG Maoqian. Effects of L-ascorbic Selenite Immersion on Seed Germination of Sugar Beet Under Salt Stress [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(6): 53-59. |
| [8] | LIU Chang, ZHANG Yu, LI Mengyu, FENG Guojun, LIU Dajun, YANG Xiaoxu, YAN Zhishan. Cloning of PvLEA Gene in Snap Bean and Identification of Salt Tolerance Function [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(5): 44-49. |
| [9] | LI Yunxi, ZHA Yangliang, CHEN Mulan, GOU Yaowu, LIU Quan. Analysis of Climate Conditions and Suitability Zoning for Shine-Muscat Planting in Xianyang [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(5): 77-83. |
| [10] | ZHANG Yuting, HAN Xuexue, HE Fangxia, YAN Rui. Comprehensive Evaluation of Ornamental Traits of 50 Garden Chrysanthemums [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(4): 56-65. |
| [11] | DANG Haihong, HE Keyan, HE Lili, LI Jiyun, WANG Jiahao, WANG Xiaoli, WANG Qian, WEI Xiaoxing. Comprehensive Evaluation of Production Performance and Nutritional Value of Eight Oat Varieties in Maduo Region [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(34): 112-120. |
| [12] | LI Ting, PENG Chuyun, MA Daocheng, GAN Wen, YANG Mei, LONG Min. Comprehensive Evaluation of Growth, Physiological and Nutrient Accumulation Characteristics of Seven Lauraceae Species [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(34): 30-38. |
| [13] | BU Huirong, YIN Shiyu, XU Weizhou, CHANG Yuchi, SHI Lei, JIA Jianying. Selection and Comprehensive Performance Evaluation of Alfalfa Varieties in Wind-sand Grassland Area [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(31): 149-158. |
| [14] | WANG Manman, FENG Lulu, ZHANG Huimin, YAN Honglang, WANG Kang. Screening and Comprehensive Evaluation of Fusarium Wilt-Resistant Melon Grafting Rootstocks [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(30): 60-69. |
| [15] | WANG Nana, HE Zongjun, DONG Yuchen, LU Yao, LU Laifeng, ZHAO Linna, SHEN Xiaomei. Screening of Salt-Alkali-Tolerant Bacterial Strains and Evaluation of Their Growth-Promoting Effects on Maize Seedlings [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(30): 8-17. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||