
Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (4): 8-16.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2025-0376
Previous Articles Next Articles
WANG Ping1(
), WANG Lei1, XIE Chengjun1(
), SUN Zhenrong1, CHEN Juan2
Received:2025-05-21
Revised:2025-10-11
Online:2026-02-27
Published:2026-02-27
WANG Ping, WANG Lei, XIE Chengjun, SUN Zhenrong, CHEN Juan. Comprehensive Evaluation of Drought Resistance of Potato Varieties in Longzhong Region[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(4): 8-16.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2025-0376
| 品种 | 干旱胁迫 | 灌水 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 大薯产量/(kg/24 m2) | 小薯产量/(kg/24 m2) | 商品率/% | 大薯产量/(kg/24 m2) | 小薯产量/(kg/24 m2) | 商品率/% | ||
| 冀张薯12号 | 46.15f | 36.22c | 56.03b | 93.53b | 27.71d | 77.14b | |
| L14140-5 | 78.55b | 49.75a | 61.22b | 96.87b | 62.29a | 60.86cd | |
| 甘引9号 | 69.74a | 19.65d | 83.54a | 107.30a | 18.13h | 85.54a | |
| Ly1742-2 | 62.84d | 49.75a | 55.81b | 83.35c | 40.58c | 67.25c | |
| 陇薯10号 | 70.69c | 50.62a | 58.27b | 82.25c | 40.91b | 66.78c | |
| Ly1725-1 | 54.98e | 41.13b | 57.21b | 68.18d | 53.45b | 56.05d | |
| 陇薯红1号 | 37.75d | 41.45b | 47.66c | 56.18e | 40.36c | 58.19d | |
| 沃土5号 | 33.93d | 27.60cd | 55.14b | 65.78d | 42.44c | 60.79c | |
| Ly1912-1 | 32.29d | 23.48d | 57.90b | 40.15f | 31.85d | 55.76d | |
| 陇薯23号 | 35.56d | 40.15b | 46.97c | 42.98f | 39.93c | 51.84d | |
| 富达1号 | 11.35i | 22.69d | 33.33d | 29.13h | 26.73d | 52.15d | |
| 希森6号 | 21.27h | 35.45c | 37.50d | 39.82g | 22.80d | 63.59cd | |
| 品种 | 干旱胁迫 | 灌水 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 大薯产量/(kg/24 m2) | 小薯产量/(kg/24 m2) | 商品率/% | 大薯产量/(kg/24 m2) | 小薯产量/(kg/24 m2) | 商品率/% | ||
| 冀张薯12号 | 46.15f | 36.22c | 56.03b | 93.53b | 27.71d | 77.14b | |
| L14140-5 | 78.55b | 49.75a | 61.22b | 96.87b | 62.29a | 60.86cd | |
| 甘引9号 | 69.74a | 19.65d | 83.54a | 107.30a | 18.13h | 85.54a | |
| Ly1742-2 | 62.84d | 49.75a | 55.81b | 83.35c | 40.58c | 67.25c | |
| 陇薯10号 | 70.69c | 50.62a | 58.27b | 82.25c | 40.91b | 66.78c | |
| Ly1725-1 | 54.98e | 41.13b | 57.21b | 68.18d | 53.45b | 56.05d | |
| 陇薯红1号 | 37.75d | 41.45b | 47.66c | 56.18e | 40.36c | 58.19d | |
| 沃土5号 | 33.93d | 27.60cd | 55.14b | 65.78d | 42.44c | 60.79c | |
| Ly1912-1 | 32.29d | 23.48d | 57.90b | 40.15f | 31.85d | 55.76d | |
| 陇薯23号 | 35.56d | 40.15b | 46.97c | 42.98f | 39.93c | 51.84d | |
| 富达1号 | 11.35i | 22.69d | 33.33d | 29.13h | 26.73d | 52.15d | |
| 希森6号 | 21.27h | 35.45c | 37.50d | 39.82g | 22.80d | 63.59cd | |
| 品种 | 干旱胁迫产量/(kg/hm2) | 灌水产量/(kg/hm2) | DC | DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 冀张薯12号 | 34335.34cB | 50540.41bA | 0.68 | 0.656 |
| L14140-5 | 53481.27aB | 66351.34aA | 0.81 | 1.213 |
| 甘引9号 | 37245.83aB | 52290.00bA | 0.95 | 0.747 |
| Ly1742-2 | 46932.55abB | 51662.18bA | 0.91 | 1.200 |
| 陇薯10号 | 50570.73aA | 51343.84bA | 0.98 | 1.402 |
| Ly1725-1 | 40065.48bB | 50707.16bA | 0.79 | 0.891 |
| 陇薯红1号 | 33016.50cB | 40247.39cA | 0.82 | 0.762 |
| 沃土5号 | 25649.18dB | 45113.45cA | 0.57 | 0.410 |
| Ly1912-1 | 23247.98dB | 30015.00deA | 0.77 | 0.507 |
| 陇薯23号 | 31561.23cdB | 34562.73dA | 0.91 | 0.811 |
| 富达1号 | 14188.91eB | 23284.36eA | 0.61 | 0.243 |
| 希森6号 | 23648.18dB | 26103.95eA | 0.91 | 0.603 |
| 品种 | 干旱胁迫产量/(kg/hm2) | 灌水产量/(kg/hm2) | DC | DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 冀张薯12号 | 34335.34cB | 50540.41bA | 0.68 | 0.656 |
| L14140-5 | 53481.27aB | 66351.34aA | 0.81 | 1.213 |
| 甘引9号 | 37245.83aB | 52290.00bA | 0.95 | 0.747 |
| Ly1742-2 | 46932.55abB | 51662.18bA | 0.91 | 1.200 |
| 陇薯10号 | 50570.73aA | 51343.84bA | 0.98 | 1.402 |
| Ly1725-1 | 40065.48bB | 50707.16bA | 0.79 | 0.891 |
| 陇薯红1号 | 33016.50cB | 40247.39cA | 0.82 | 0.762 |
| 沃土5号 | 25649.18dB | 45113.45cA | 0.57 | 0.410 |
| Ly1912-1 | 23247.98dB | 30015.00deA | 0.77 | 0.507 |
| 陇薯23号 | 31561.23cdB | 34562.73dA | 0.91 | 0.811 |
| 富达1号 | 14188.91eB | 23284.36eA | 0.61 | 0.243 |
| 希森6号 | 23648.18dB | 26103.95eA | 0.91 | 0.603 |
| 品种 | 株高 | SPAD值 | LAI | 单株干物质 | 商品率 | 产量 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 冀张薯12号 | 0.948 | 0.713 | 0.830 | 0.915 | 0.726 | 0.679 |
| L14140-5 | 0.990 | 0.896 | 0.965 | 0.914 | 1.006 | 0.806 |
| 甘引9号 | 0.729 | 0.771 | 0.782 | 0.903 | 0.912 | 0.712 |
| Ly1742-2 | 0.912 | 0.992 | 0.845 | 0.954 | 0.830 | 0.908 |
| 陇薯10号 | 0.956 | 0.691 | 0.971 | 0.955 | 0.873 | 0.985 |
| Ly1725-1 | 0.992 | 0.546 | 0.961 | 0.902 | 1.021 | 0.790 |
| 陇薯红1号 | 0.884 | 0.722 | 0.924 | 0.886 | 0.819 | 0.820 |
| 沃土5号 | 0.596 | 0.896 | 0.780 | 0.859 | 0.907 | 0.569 |
| Ly1912-1 | 0.756 | 0.913 | 0.810 | 0.911 | 1.038 | 0.775 |
| 陇薯23号 | 0.920 | 0.988 | 0.866 | 0.938 | 0.906 | 0.913 |
| 富达1号 | 0.601 | 0.808 | 0.850 | 0.846 | 0.639 | 0.609 |
| 希森6号 | 0.829 | 0.868 | 0.756 | 0.869 | 0.590 | 0.906 |
| 品种 | 株高 | SPAD值 | LAI | 单株干物质 | 商品率 | 产量 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 冀张薯12号 | 0.948 | 0.713 | 0.830 | 0.915 | 0.726 | 0.679 |
| L14140-5 | 0.990 | 0.896 | 0.965 | 0.914 | 1.006 | 0.806 |
| 甘引9号 | 0.729 | 0.771 | 0.782 | 0.903 | 0.912 | 0.712 |
| Ly1742-2 | 0.912 | 0.992 | 0.845 | 0.954 | 0.830 | 0.908 |
| 陇薯10号 | 0.956 | 0.691 | 0.971 | 0.955 | 0.873 | 0.985 |
| Ly1725-1 | 0.992 | 0.546 | 0.961 | 0.902 | 1.021 | 0.790 |
| 陇薯红1号 | 0.884 | 0.722 | 0.924 | 0.886 | 0.819 | 0.820 |
| 沃土5号 | 0.596 | 0.896 | 0.780 | 0.859 | 0.907 | 0.569 |
| Ly1912-1 | 0.756 | 0.913 | 0.810 | 0.911 | 1.038 | 0.775 |
| 陇薯23号 | 0.920 | 0.988 | 0.866 | 0.938 | 0.906 | 0.913 |
| 富达1号 | 0.601 | 0.808 | 0.850 | 0.846 | 0.639 | 0.609 |
| 希森6号 | 0.829 | 0.868 | 0.756 | 0.869 | 0.590 | 0.906 |
| 变量 | 第1主成分 | 第2主成分 |
|---|---|---|
| 株高 | 0.897 | -0.084 |
| SPAD值 | -0.168 | 0.899 |
| LAI | 0.749 | -0.5 |
| 单株干物质 | 0.858 | 0.335 |
| 产量 | 0.784 | 0.381 |
| 商品率 | 0.447 | -0.163 |
| DI | 0.937 | 0.094 |
| 特征值 | 3.823 | 1.357 |
| 方差贡献率/% | 54.615 | 19.390 |
| 累积贡献率/% | 54.615 | 74.005 |
| 变量 | 第1主成分 | 第2主成分 |
|---|---|---|
| 株高 | 0.897 | -0.084 |
| SPAD值 | -0.168 | 0.899 |
| LAI | 0.749 | -0.5 |
| 单株干物质 | 0.858 | 0.335 |
| 产量 | 0.784 | 0.381 |
| 商品率 | 0.447 | -0.163 |
| DI | 0.937 | 0.094 |
| 特征值 | 3.823 | 1.357 |
| 方差贡献率/% | 54.615 | 19.390 |
| 累积贡献率/% | 54.615 | 74.005 |
| 品种 | 综合指标值 | 隶属函数值 | D值 | 抗旱性排名 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PC1 | PC2 | μ(x1) | μ(x2) | ||||
| 冀张薯12号 | -0.512 | 0.465 | 0.489 | 0.479 | 0.486 | 7 | |
| L14140-5 | 1.349 | 0.526 | 0.846 | 0.494 | 0.736 | 2 | |
| 甘引9号 | -0.991 | -0.198 | 0.397 | 0.311 | 0.370 | 9 | |
| Ly1742-2 | 2.140 | -1.424 | 0.998 | 0.000 | 0.686 | 5 | |
| 陇薯10号 | 2.152 | 1.012 | 1.000 | 0.617 | 0.880 | 1 | |
| Ly1725-1 | 0.099 | 2.521 | 0.606 | 1.000 | 0.729 | 3 | |
| 陇薯红1号 | -0.236 | 0.959 | 0.542 | 0.604 | 0.561 | 6 | |
| 沃土5号 | -2.598 | -0.645 | 0.088 | 0.197 | 0.122 | 11 | |
| Ly1912-1 | 0.156 | -0.744 | 0.617 | 0.172 | 0.478 | 8 | |
| 陇薯23号 | 2.020 | -1.099 | 0.975 | 0.082 | 0.696 | 4 | |
| 富达1号 | -3.057 | -0.048 | 0.000 | 0.349 | 0.109 | 12 | |
| 希森6号 | -0.522 | -1.325 | 0.487 | 0.025 | 0.342 | 10 | |
| 权重 | 0.687 | 0.313 | |||||
| 品种 | 综合指标值 | 隶属函数值 | D值 | 抗旱性排名 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PC1 | PC2 | μ(x1) | μ(x2) | ||||
| 冀张薯12号 | -0.512 | 0.465 | 0.489 | 0.479 | 0.486 | 7 | |
| L14140-5 | 1.349 | 0.526 | 0.846 | 0.494 | 0.736 | 2 | |
| 甘引9号 | -0.991 | -0.198 | 0.397 | 0.311 | 0.370 | 9 | |
| Ly1742-2 | 2.140 | -1.424 | 0.998 | 0.000 | 0.686 | 5 | |
| 陇薯10号 | 2.152 | 1.012 | 1.000 | 0.617 | 0.880 | 1 | |
| Ly1725-1 | 0.099 | 2.521 | 0.606 | 1.000 | 0.729 | 3 | |
| 陇薯红1号 | -0.236 | 0.959 | 0.542 | 0.604 | 0.561 | 6 | |
| 沃土5号 | -2.598 | -0.645 | 0.088 | 0.197 | 0.122 | 11 | |
| Ly1912-1 | 0.156 | -0.744 | 0.617 | 0.172 | 0.478 | 8 | |
| 陇薯23号 | 2.020 | -1.099 | 0.975 | 0.082 | 0.696 | 4 | |
| 富达1号 | -3.057 | -0.048 | 0.000 | 0.349 | 0.109 | 12 | |
| 希森6号 | -0.522 | -1.325 | 0.487 | 0.025 | 0.342 | 10 | |
| 权重 | 0.687 | 0.313 | |||||
| [1] |
王钧, 李广, 闫丽娟, 等. 气候变化背景下甘肃农牧交错带玉米气候生产潜力和资源利用效率变化特征[J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(1):160-168.
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202301.023 |
| [2] |
王平, 陈娟, 王镭, 等. 不同种植方式对土壤水热及马铃薯产量的影响[J]. 中国瓜菜, 2025, 38(10):148-155.
|
| [3] |
姚玉璧, 杨金虎, 肖国举, 等. 气候变暖对马铃薯生长发育及产量影响研究进展与展望[J]. 生态环境学报, 2017, 26(3):538-546.
doi: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2017.03.025 |
| [4] |
王丽, 熊兴耀, 蔡柳, 等. 我国不同产区马铃薯栽培品种的主要品质性状比较分析[J]. 南方农业学报, 2023, 54(1):80-89.
|
| [5] |
尹智宇, 封永生, 肖关丽. 干旱胁迫对马铃薯不同生育时期生理生化指标的影响[J]. 云南农业大学学报(自然科学), 2018, 33(1):26-33.
|
| [6] |
张瑞玖, 马恢, 籍立杰, 等. 干旱胁迫对马铃薯品种生长及生理生化指标的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(15):34-39.
doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2021-1175 |
| [7] |
史田斌, 刘震, 李志涛, 等. 不同生育期干旱胁迫对马铃薯生长特性、块茎产量和水分利用效率的影响[J]. 江苏农业学报, 2024, 40(2):193-202.
|
| [8] |
李佳欣, 张天赐, 任晓月, 等. 不同生育期马铃薯根系构型及生理指标对干旱胁迫的响应[J]. 西北植物学报, 2024, 44(12):1848-1855.
|
| [9] |
doi: 10.1186/s40538-021-00266-z |
| [10] |
doi: 10.3390/agronomy14061131 URL |
| [11] |
秦天元, 孙超, 毕真真, 等. 马铃薯不同耐旱品系管栽苗及其根尖显微结构对干旱胁迫的响应[J]. 生物技术通报, 2018, 34(12):102-109.
doi: 10.13560/j.cnki.biotech.bull.1985.2018-0674 |
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
孙梦晴, 叶佳丽, 刘溢健, 等. 不同马铃薯品种干旱适应性与其钾素营养特性的关系[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2024, 42(4):1-12.
|
| [14] |
姚岭柏, 韩海霞, 梁婷, 等. 不同品种马铃薯生长及光合指标对干旱胁迫的反应[J]. 东北农业科学, 2024, 49(2):55-58.
|
| [15] |
王平, 谢成俊, 孙振荣, 等. 冷凉灌区马铃薯施肥量与种植密度对马铃薯生长及产量的影响[J]. 农学学报, 2023, 13(6):17-24.
doi: 10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas2022-0062 |
| [16] |
苏日古嘎, 邬春雨, 刘荣跃, 等. 硫酸钾和氯化钾对马铃薯生长及产量的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2023, 39(18):34-42.
doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2022-0422 |
| [17] |
杜培兵, 杨文静. 马铃薯抗旱品种筛选及鉴定试验[J]. 中国蔬菜, 2018(9):29-34.
|
| [18] |
李亚杰, 李德明, 李丰先, 等. 西北旱作区马铃薯多点试验中高代品系稳定性分析[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2020, 38(5):218-225.
|
| [19] |
邓振镛, 王强, 张强, 等. 中国北方气候暖干化对粮食作物的影响及应对措施[J]. 生态学报, 2010, 30(22):6278-6288.
|
| [20] |
李京栋, 宋周莺, 李先德, 等. 价格波动下中国马铃薯主产区产业扶贫效果评价[J]. 经济地理, 2019, 39(10):162-171.
doi: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2019.10.021 |
| [21] |
崔勇, 李培贵, 李珍, 等. 马铃薯干旱胁迫响应及抗旱综合技术研究进展[J]. 中国蔬菜, 2023(4):20-28.
|
| [22] |
丁凯鑫, 王立春, 田国奎, 等. 马铃薯生长及生理特性对水分胁迫的响应研究综述[J]. 作物杂志, 2023(4):16-21.
|
| [23] |
秦天元, 刘玉汇, 孙超, 等. 马铃薯StIgt基因家族的鉴定及其对干旱胁迫的响应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(4):780-786.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2021.04122 |
| [24] |
李保成, 康文钦, 任永峰, 等. 干旱对不同马铃薯品种生长和产量的影响[J]. 北方农业学报, 2023, 51(5):40-50.
doi: 10.12190/j.issn.2096-1197.2023.05.04 |
| [25] |
doi: 10.1093/plcell/koac321 URL |
| [26] |
|
| [1] | LI Xingxing, OU Huan, YANG Jian, ZHANG Yongjie, CHEN Juan, LI Chunyan, MA Hui, LIU Rongsen, LI Jinhong. Adaptability Screening Test of Maize Varieties for Spring Sowing in Southern Xinjiang [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(4): 1-7. |
| [2] | DU Xingyao, GUO Huiting, LUO Mingyang, ZHANG Hongxia, ZHANG Yanbin, DONG Yiming, LIU Zhongjian, TIAN Fuping. Research on Drought Resistance of Leymus secalinus and Its Application in Ecological Restoration [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(4): 126-132. |
| [3] | ZHU Yao, WANG Shunwang, YUAN Luyi, LI Wanxian, LI Yonghui, WANG Changmei, WU Kai, JIANG Jinhe, ZHANG Wudi, YIN Fang. Effects of Irrigation Volume of Vegetable Residues Biogas Slurry on Yield and Quality, Soil Enzyme Activity and Nutrients of Edible Dock [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(4): 139-145. |
| [4] | LIU Yiming, ZOU Zongqing, XU Zhiqiang, WANG Qiye, CHEN Xiangdeng, HAO Xianwei, WU Xiaoping, MENG Lin. Study on Optimal Aging Period of Tobacco Lamina ‘CB-1’ Under Northern Climatic Conditions [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(4): 204-209. |
| [5] | XIONG Ying, YANG Junjie, JIANG Jiazhu, LI Qiang, WANG Yong, ZHANG Yang, DONG Xiaowei, ZHANG Dongdong. Analysis of Differences and Usability of Chemical Components in Flue-cured Tobacco from Different Production Areas of Shandong Province [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(4): 210-218. |
| [6] | FAN Yongxin, SONG Yuyang, LI Ruirui, FAN Shaopeng, ZOU Xiaoxia, FAN Yijie, YU Xiaona, ZHANG Xiaojun, SI Tong, NI Yu. Study on Optimal Sowing Dates for Rapeseed in Saline-alkali Soil of Yellow River Delta and Effects of Wood Vinegar in Alleviating Salt Stress [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(4): 27-33. |
| [7] | FU Kairui, SHI Haoliang, ZHOU Shunbao, WANG Zhongyuan, ZHOU Hongxia, LI Wenting, YANG Yunli, LI Guangyang, TIAN Minghui, FU Limei, YU Lei, HUANG Feiyan, ZHOU Houfa. Effects of Different Cultivation Measures on Growth and Quality of ‘Yunyan 116’ in Shuangjiang of Yunnan [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(4): 34-45. |
| [8] | LI Xinjian, LEI Ting, WEI Xingqi, YOU Andi, ZHOU Yangheng, LUO Mingquan, MO Zegang, LIU Xiaoang, ZHU Yinghua, TANG Xinggui. Influence of Leaf Pruning on Key Indicators of Cellar Transplanting Tobacco Seedlings [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(4): 46-51. |
| [9] | LU Xinyuan, QIAN Pin, XU Yongxian, WANG Yiliu, WANG Huoyan, LU Dianjun, ZHENG Le. Effects of Machinery Application in Integrated Ridging and Root-zone Fertilization on Tobacco Yield and Nutrient Uptake in Fuxian Lake Basin [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(4): 52-58. |
| [10] | LI Yuan, KANG Huiru, PENG Bo, WU Lianxia, XIA Weixin, BI Haiyan. Effects of Different Drip Irrigation Rates on Growth, Yield and Quality of Walnut Trees in Southern Xinjiang [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(4): 75-82. |
| [11] | XIAO Ting, NIE Qing, LIU Lei, LI Ting, YANG Meng, QU Mingshan. Effects of Combined Application of Compound Microbial Fertilizer and Chemical Fertilizer on Yield and Quality of Mini Chinese Cabbage [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(4): 90-96. |
| [12] | LIU Guimin, SU Lei, ZHENG Xiaoning, CHEN Di, LIU Binghua, SUN Mingjie, LIU Xinghong, XU Yingmei. Effects of Inoculating Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria on Physiological Characteristics of Maize Leaves in Medium- and Low-yield Soils [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(3): 119-124. |
| [13] | WANG Ying, LI Lu, ZHU Jiayi, JIA Yuanyuan, GAO Qi, HU Zhichao. Research on Identification and Yield Estimation of Artificial Alfalfa in Green-up Period in Hohhot Based on Satellite Remote Sensing [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(3): 125-132. |
| [14] | HUANG Wei, PAN Huixiao, WU Xuanke, HE Yan, TAN Mengxiang, LIU Yongyu. Analysis of Risk Zoning and Meteorological Factors of Double Cropping Rice Yield Disaster in Guangxi [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(3): 144-154. |
| [15] | ZHAO Jiatao, GUO Mianyan, LIU Mengdao, FU Zhengbo, YU Qi. Effects of Planting Density and Cutting Period on Forage Yield and Quality of 'Baopimai 28' [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(3): 177-182. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||