Study on Regulation of Emergence Water of ‘Dry Sowing and Wet Emergence’ in Cotton Field of Southern Xinjiang Based on Different Soil Water Content in Sandy Soil

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2025-0519

Abstract

Abstract:

Quantitative analysis of the regulation mechanism of drip frequency of emergence water on cotton seedling growth under different water content conditions in the ‘dry sowing and wet emergence’ model of sandy soil in southern Xinjiang was conducted, screening the optimal frequency suitable for sandy soil, and providing theoretical support for the optimization of cotton water-saving irrigation system in arid areas. ‘J8031’ was used as the test variety, and three soil relative water contents (W1: 10%-15%; W2: 15%-20%; W3: 20%-25%) and three drip frequency of emergence water (F1: 1 time; F2: 2 times; F3: 3 times) were set to explore its effects on soil physical properties, physiological and ecological indexes and root development of cotton seedlings. The results showed that soil water content, drip frequency and their interaction had significant effects on soil physical and chemical properties, plant growth and root development of cotton seedlings. With the increase of drip frequency, the soil compaction decreased significantly, while the soil EC value of each soil layer showed the opposite trend. In terms of seedling growth, the comprehensive performance of F1 treatment was the best under each water content condition, the seedling emergence rate was 85%-95%, the plant height was 24.94 cm in W2F1 combination, the stem diameter was 3.16 mm in W1F1 combination, and the dry matter accumulation was significantly higher than that of F2 and F3 treatments. In terms of root development, root weight, root mass density, root length density and other indicators were also the highest in F1 treatment. At the same time, the number of root tips in deep soil was more. The comprehensive fuzzy evaluation showed that the fuzzy comprehensive index of F1 treatment was the largest among the 10 indexes, which was the optimal drip management strategy to promote the emergence, strong seedling and root healthy development of cotton under different soil water contents. Under the condition of sandy soil in southern Xinjiang, the application of one-time seedling water in ‘dry sowing and wet emergence’ cotton field can effectively promote the emergence of cotton seedlings and is conducive to the growth and development of seedling stage.

Key words: cotton, dry sowing and wet emergence, sand soil, soil moisture content, regulation of seedling emergence water

LUO Dan, YANG Jian, MA Hui, ABUDUAINI Abuduweili, ZHOU Lun, TANG Qiuxiang, OU Huan, LI Xingxing, AIMAIERJIANG Abulitifu, LI Jinhong, FU Yongqiang, AZIGULI Abulizi. Study on Regulation of Emergence Water of ‘Dry Sowing and Wet Emergence’ in Cotton Field of Southern Xinjiang Based on Different Soil Water Content in Sandy Soil[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(30): 34-45.

Figures/Tables 14

References 31

[1]	梁飞, 李云霞, 关新元, 等. 长期大田滴灌对新疆农田水盐环境影响的研究进展[J]. 华中农业大学学报, 2023, 42(5):1-11.
[2]	丁宇, 张江辉, 白云岗, 等. 双膜条件下不同干播湿出水分处理对棉花生理、生长特性的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(4):810-822. doi: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2023.04.004
[3]	韩政宇, 张江辉, 白云岗, 等. 土壤改良剂对南疆棉田“干播湿出”模式土壤性状和出苗率的影响研究[J]. 节水灌溉, 2022, 47(8):46-52,59.
[4]	DING Y, MA J Q, ZHANG J H, et al. Response of photosynthesis, population physiological indexes, and yield of cotton in dry areas to the new technology of “dry sowing and wet emergence”[J]. Frontiers in plant science, 2024, 15:1487832-1487832.
[5]	曹文洋, 陈小康, 杨涛, 等. 南疆棉花“干播湿出”模式适应性评价[J]. 中国农学通报, 2025, 41(17):96-102. doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2024-0757
[6]	王宁, 冯克云, 南宏宇, 等. 不同水分条件下有机无机肥配施对棉花根系特征及产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(11):2187-2201. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2022.11.009
[7]	王伏琴, 岳健敏, 赫文文, 等. 节水灌溉对次生盐渍化耕地玉米苗期生长、气孔特征及光合性能的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2025, 36(4):1013-1023. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202504.011
[8]	录亚丹, 赵战胜, 杨六六. 北疆棉花正封土与侧封土播种方式的合理选用[J]. 中国棉花, 2021, 48(10):35-36,41. doi: 10.11963/cc2021015
[9]	董明, 祁虹, 张谦, 等. 播种方式对种子萌发环境及棉花出苗、生长的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(12):2346-2357. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2025.12.006
[10]	焦润兴, 卜东升, 邵延慧, 等. “干播湿出”对不同盐碱化土壤水盐分布、养分及棉花产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2025, 62(3):572-583. doi: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2025.03.006
[11]	邵晶晶, 李鹏程, 郑苍松, 等. 盐胁迫对干播湿出棉花出苗率和苗期生长发育的影响[J]. 棉花学报, 2023, 35(4):288-301. doi: 10.11963/cs20230010
[12]	陈兵, 孔宪辉, 余渝, 等. 南疆盐碱地棉花微量多次滴水控盐增温成苗节水增产新技术[J]. 中国棉花, 2023, 50(2):40-42. doi: 10.11963/cc20220147
[13]	袁席天, 白云岗, 孙三民, 等. 干播湿出模式下不同出苗水对棉花生理性状及产量的影响[J]. 节水灌溉, 2022, 47(9):46-51.
[14]	郑明, 白云岗, 张江辉, 等. 干播湿出灌水量和灌水频率对棉田土壤板结、水盐分布及出苗的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2022, 40(6):100-107.
[15]	李星星, 阿布都艾尼·阿布都维力, 周仑, 等. 基于壤土含水量的南疆“干播湿出”棉田出苗水调控研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2025, 41(1):25-32. doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2024-0521
[16]	胡琼娟, 郑明. 南疆棉田“干播湿出”的土壤生境指标与棉花出苗率的相关性研究[J]. 黑龙江农业科学, 2023, 46(10):6-12.
[17]	王晓艳, 白云岗, 柴仲平, 等. 滴灌冬灌调控下干播湿出对棉田水盐分布及棉花出苗率的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(4):823-834. doi: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2024.04.005
[18]	JERZY L, ALDO F, VALTER G, et al. Response of structure to simulated trampling of woodland soil[J]. Adventure geoecol, 2002, 35:133-140.
[19]	王亮, 吾买尔江·库尔班, 郭仁松, 等. 深松耕作下灌溉定额对棉田水分利用效率及产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(10):2374-2383. doi: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2022.10.005
[20]	贾耀宇, 黄伟斌, 杨北方, 等. 亏缺灌溉对中国棉花产量和灌溉水分生产力影响的元分析[J]. 棉花学报, 2023, 35(3):195-210. doi: 10.11963/cs20220065
[21]	董欣, 柴仲平, 白云岗, 等. 不同“干播湿出”处理方式对南疆棉田土壤水热盐和产量的影响研究[J]. 节水灌溉, 2024(2):33-40. doi: 10.12396/jsgg.2023343
[22]	牛媛, 杨相昆, 张占琴, 等. 揭膜种植方式下不同灌水量对棉花干物质积累及产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(2):291-301. doi: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2022.02.004
[23]	江柱, 张江辉, 白云岗, 等. 膜下咸水滴灌水肥盐调控对棉花盐离子、养分吸收及干物质分配的影响[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2022, 41(2):59-67.
[24]	王仕婧, 邢蕊萍, 田亚捷, 等. 干播湿出模式下不同灌水量和灌水频次对棉苗生长及产量的影响[J]. 山东农业科学, 2025, 57(7):53-59.
[25]	车庆轩, 王娟红, 马悦, 等. 新疆南疆盐碱地棉花干播湿出与双膜覆盖降碱抑盐保水保苗技术[J]. 中国棉花, 2025, 52(3):47-49. doi: 10.11963/cc20240143
[26]	王伟, 李光永, 傅臣家, 等. 水质与灌溉频率对棉花苗期根系分布的影响[J]. 山东农业大学学报:自然科学版, 2006, 37(4):603-608.
[27]	冯广龙, 刘昌明, 王立. 土壤水分对作物根系生长及分布的调控作用[J]. 生态农业研究, 1996, 4(3):5-9.
[28]	张玉芹, 杨恒山, 李从锋, 等. 条带耕作错位种植对灌区春玉米产量形成与冠根特征的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(6):902-913. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2020.93053
[29]	JIE H, CASSANDER T, LIN Q. Root-zone heat priming effects on maximum quantum efficiency of PSII, productivity, root morphology and nutritional quality of two aeroponically grown leafy greens in a tropical greenhouse[J]. Plants, 2022, 11(13):1684-1684.
[30]	骆磊, 肖琼, 董合林, 等. 南疆一膜三行栽培棉花根系分布对灌水频次的响应[J]. 棉花学报, 2023, 35(1):51-62. doi: 10.11963/cs20220029
[31]	吉光鹏, 陈兵, 常学艳, 等. 多次微量滴水控盐增温成苗新技术在南疆盐碱地棉田的应用效果[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2024, 52(7):79-86.

处理	土壤相对含水量/%	滴水频次/(次/10 d)	滴水量/(m³/hm²)	木箱滴水量/L
W1F1	10~15	滴1次出苗水	331.5	20.18
W1F2		滴2次出苗水	331.5+181.5	20.18+11.07
W1F3		滴3次出苗水	331.5+181.5+166.5	20.18+11.07+10.15
W2F1	15~20	滴1次出苗水	313.5	19.03
W2F2		滴2次出苗水	313.5+198	19.03+12
W2F3		滴3次出苗水	313.5+198+178.5	19.03+12+10.84
W3F1	20~25	滴1次出苗水	294	17.88
W3F2		滴2次出苗水	294+208.5	17.88+12.69
W3F3		滴3次出苗水	294+208.5+198	17.88+12.69+12

处理	土壤相对含水量/%	滴水频次/(次/10 d)	滴水量/(m³/hm²)	木箱滴水量/L
W1F1	10~15	滴1次出苗水	331.5	20.18
W1F2		滴2次出苗水	331.5+181.5	20.18+11.07
W1F3		滴3次出苗水	331.5+181.5+166.5	20.18+11.07+10.15
W2F1	15~20	滴1次出苗水	313.5	19.03
W2F2		滴2次出苗水	313.5+198	19.03+12
W2F3		滴3次出苗水	313.5+198+178.5	19.03+12+10.84
W3F1	20~25	滴1次出苗水	294	17.88
W3F2		滴2次出苗水	294+208.5	17.88+12.69
W3F3		滴3次出苗水	294+208.5+198	17.88+12.69+12

处理	根重/g		根质量密度/(mg/cm³)
处理	0~10 cm	10~20 cm	0~10 cm	10~20 cm
W1F1	0.47±0.006	0.24±0.009	0.12±0.001	0.06±0.003
W1F2	0.46±0.005	0.18±0.009^***	0.12±0.001	0.05±0.003^***
W1F3	0.38±0.003^***	0.20±0.015^*	0.09±0.001^***	0.05±0.004^*
W2F1	0.51±0.002	0.27±0.005	0.14±0.001	0.07±0.001
W2F2	0.34±0.002^***	0.15±0.006^***	0.08±0.001^***	0.04±0.003^***
W2F3	0.49±0.002^**	0.20±0.009^***	0.13±0.002^**	0.05±0.003^***
W3F1	1.05±0.008	0.56±0.011	0.28±0.002	0.15±0.003
W3F2	0.44±0.003^***	0.27±0.023^***	0.12±0.001^***	0.07±0.006^***
W3F3	0.43±0.003^***	0.15±0.004^***	0.11±0.001^***	0.04±0.001^***

处理	根重/g		根质量密度/(mg/cm³)
处理	0~10 cm	10~20 cm	0~10 cm	10~20 cm
W1F1	0.47±0.006	0.24±0.009	0.12±0.001	0.06±0.003
W1F2	0.46±0.005	0.18±0.009^***	0.12±0.001	0.05±0.003^***
W1F3	0.38±0.003^***	0.20±0.015^*	0.09±0.001^***	0.05±0.004^*
W2F1	0.51±0.002	0.27±0.005	0.14±0.001	0.07±0.001
W2F2	0.34±0.002^***	0.15±0.006^***	0.08±0.001^***	0.04±0.003^***
W2F3	0.49±0.002^**	0.20±0.009^***	0.13±0.002^**	0.05±0.003^***
W3F1	1.05±0.008	0.56±0.011	0.28±0.002	0.15±0.003
W3F2	0.44±0.003^***	0.27±0.023^***	0.12±0.001^***	0.07±0.006^***
W3F3	0.43±0.003^***	0.15±0.004^***	0.11±0.001^***	0.04±0.001^***

处理	根长/(cm/cm³)		平均直径/(mm/cm³)		根尖数/(个/cm³)		表面积/(cm²/cm³)		体积/(cm³/cm³)
处理	0~10 cm	10~20 cm	0~10 cm	10~20 cm	0~10 cm	10~20 cm	0~10 cm	10~20 cm	0~10 cm	10~20 cm
W1F1	0.54±0.05	0.43±0.02	0.46±0.06	0.3±0.01^*	2.2±0.03	2.29±0.03	0.08±0.02	0.05±0.002^*	0.0034±0	0.0006±0^***
W1F2	0.51±0.05	0.37±0.02^*	0.34±0.04	0.31±0.02^*	2.04±0.02^***	2.11±0.02^***	0.08±0.01	0.04±0.003^**	0.0026±0	0.0006±0^***
W1F3	0.42±0.03^*	0.41±0.02	0.41±0.03	0.36±0.03	1.83±0.03^***	1.83±0.02^***	0.06±0.01	0.05±0.003	0.0018±0^*	0.0008±0
W2F1	0.54±0.03	0.54±0.03	0.58±0.08	0.35±0.03	2.3±0.03	2.44±0.03	0.09±0.01	0.06±0.004	0.0037±0	0.0008±0
W2F2	0.32±0.03^***	0.44±0.03^**	0.4±0.04^**	0.27±0.03^*	1.51±0.02^***	2.23±0.02^***	0.05±0.01^**	0.05±0.003^***	0.0017±0^***	0.0006±0^***
W2F3	0.5±0.03	0.44±0.02	0.64±0.07	0.28±0.03^*	2.16±0.02^***	2.03±0.03^***	0.06±0.01^*	0.05±0.003^***	0.0023±0^***	0.0006±0^***
W3F1	0.59±0.04	0.63±0.03	0.66±0.05	0.54±0.03	2.22±0.02	2.19±0.03	0.08±0.01	0.07±0.002	0.0044±0	0.001±0
W3F2	0.44±0.03^**	0.54±0.02^**	0.6±0.06	0.27±0.01^***	1.63±0.02^***	2.08±0.01^***	0.07±0.01	0.06±0.003	0.0023±0^***	0.0007±0^***
W3F3	0.2±0.03^***	0.34±0.03^***	0.47±0.02^**	0.36±0.03^***	0.58±0.03^***	1.31±0.02^***	0.03±0.01^***	0.03±0.003^***	0.0013±0^***	0.0003±0^***