
Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (11): 39-49.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2025-0684
Previous Articles Next Articles
WANG Jiaojiao1(
), LI Jing1, WANG Hongli1,2, ZHAO Jing1, SUN Kun1, CHEN Dawei1(
)
Received:2025-08-13
Revised:2025-12-11
Online:2026-06-12
Published:2026-06-12
CLC Number:
WANG Jiaojiao, LI Jing, WANG Hongli, ZHAO Jing, SUN Kun, CHEN Dawei. Optimization of Solid-state Fermentation of Trichoderma citrinoviride HT-1 Conidia and Its Effect on Two Crop Seedlings Growth[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(11): 39-49.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2025-0684
| 序号 | 因素 | 产孢量/(×1010个/g) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 玉米秸秆 | 麦麸 | 花生壳 | 棉籽壳 | ||
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7.45±0.23 b |
| 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4.83±0.13 d |
| 3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4.83±0.28 d |
| 4 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6.87±0.08 c |
| 5 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 8.57±0.32 a |
| 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 2.42±0.28 f |
| 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 3.55±0.05 e |
| 8 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 3.90±0.22 e |
| 9 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 6.53±0.60 c |
| 序号 | 因素 | 产孢量/(×1010个/g) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 玉米秸秆 | 麦麸 | 花生壳 | 棉籽壳 | ||
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7.45±0.23 b |
| 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4.83±0.13 d |
| 3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4.83±0.28 d |
| 4 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6.87±0.08 c |
| 5 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 8.57±0.32 a |
| 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 2.42±0.28 f |
| 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 3.55±0.05 e |
| 8 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 3.90±0.22 e |
| 9 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 6.53±0.60 c |
| 编号 | A | B | C | D | E | F | G | 产孢量/(×1010个/g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | 1.77±0.11i |
| 2 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 4.43±0.10f |
| 3 | -1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | 6.80±0.05b |
| 4 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 3.68±0.09g |
| 5 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 2.05±0.03h |
| 6 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 6.53±0.12c |
| 7 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 9.78±0.14a |
| 8 | -1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 6.12±0.02d |
| 9 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 5.17±0.02e |
| 10 | 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1.05±0.03j |
| 11 | -1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 4.20±0.08f |
| 12 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1.00±0.10j |
| 编号 | A | B | C | D | E | F | G | 产孢量/(×1010个/g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | 1.77±0.11i |
| 2 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 4.43±0.10f |
| 3 | -1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | 6.80±0.05b |
| 4 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 3.68±0.09g |
| 5 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 2.05±0.03h |
| 6 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 6.53±0.12c |
| 7 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 9.78±0.14a |
| 8 | -1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 6.12±0.02d |
| 9 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 5.17±0.02e |
| 10 | 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1.05±0.03j |
| 11 | -1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 4.20±0.08f |
| 12 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1.00±0.10j |
| 编号 | A:接种量/% | B:含水量/% | C:发酵时间/d | 产孢量/(×1010个/g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 15 | 20 | 7 | 3.87±0.06f |
| 2 | 12.5 | 30 | 10 | 5.23±0.19e |
| 3 | 10 | 40 | 14 | 9.90±0.10a |
| 4 | 7.5 | 50 | 17 | 6.58±0.04b |
| 5 | 5 | 60 | 21 | 6.18±0.09c |
| 6 | 2.5 | 70 | 24 | 5.60±0.16d |
| 编号 | A:接种量/% | B:含水量/% | C:发酵时间/d | 产孢量/(×1010个/g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 15 | 20 | 7 | 3.87±0.06f |
| 2 | 12.5 | 30 | 10 | 5.23±0.19e |
| 3 | 10 | 40 | 14 | 9.90±0.10a |
| 4 | 7.5 | 50 | 17 | 6.58±0.04b |
| 5 | 5 | 60 | 21 | 6.18±0.09c |
| 6 | 2.5 | 70 | 24 | 5.60±0.16d |
| 编号 | 接种量/% | 含水量/% | 发酵时间/d | 产孢量/(×1010个/g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | -1 | -1 | 0 | 6.48±0.04fg |
| 2 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 6.02±0.02h |
| 3 | -1 | 1 | 0 | 5.98±0.02h |
| 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 9.28±0.02c |
| 5 | -1 | 0 | -1 | 6.55±0.06f |
| 6 | 1 | 0 | -1 | 7.27±0.14e |
| 7 | -1 | 0 | 1 | 6.47±0.07fg |
| 8 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6.65±0.08f |
| 9 | 0 | -1 | -1 | 6.30±0.09g |
| 10 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 8.28±0.06d |
| 11 | 0 | -1 | 1 | 5.60±0.00i |
| 12 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 7.38±0.10e |
| 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10.63±0.03ab |
| 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10.72±0.02ab |
| 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10.87±0.04a |
| 编号 | 接种量/% | 含水量/% | 发酵时间/d | 产孢量/(×1010个/g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | -1 | -1 | 0 | 6.48±0.04fg |
| 2 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 6.02±0.02h |
| 3 | -1 | 1 | 0 | 5.98±0.02h |
| 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 9.28±0.02c |
| 5 | -1 | 0 | -1 | 6.55±0.06f |
| 6 | 1 | 0 | -1 | 7.27±0.14e |
| 7 | -1 | 0 | 1 | 6.47±0.07fg |
| 8 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6.65±0.08f |
| 9 | 0 | -1 | -1 | 6.30±0.09g |
| 10 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 8.28±0.06d |
| 11 | 0 | -1 | 1 | 5.60±0.00i |
| 12 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 7.38±0.10e |
| 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10.63±0.03ab |
| 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10.72±0.02ab |
| 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10.87±0.04a |
| 来源 | 均方和 | 自由度 | 均方 | F值 | P值 | 显著性 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 模型 | 47.65 | 9 | 5.29 | 36.7 | 0.0005 | 显著 |
| A | 1.74 | 1 | 1.74 | 12.07 | 0.0178 | |
| B | 5.34 | 1 | 5.34 | 36.98 | 0.0017 | |
| C | 0.66 | 1 | 0.66 | 4.58 | 0.0852 | |
| AB | 3.55 | 1 | 3.55 | 24.58 | 0.0043 | |
| AC | 0.071 | 1 | 0.071 | 0.49 | 0.514 | |
| BC | 0.01 | 1 | 0.01 | 0.069 | 0.8029 | |
| A2 | 14.44 | 1 | 14.44 | 100.1 | 0.0002 | |
| B2 | 12.22 | 1 | 12.22 | 84.71 | 0.0003 | |
| C2 | 15.18 | 1 | 15.18 | 105.22 | 0.0002 | |
| 残差 | 0.72 | 5 | 0.14 | |||
| 失拟 | 0.69 | 3 | 0.23 | 16.53 | 0.0576 | 不显著 |
| 纯误差 | 0.028 | 2 | 0.014 | |||
| 合计 | 48.38 | 14 |
| 来源 | 均方和 | 自由度 | 均方 | F值 | P值 | 显著性 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 模型 | 47.65 | 9 | 5.29 | 36.7 | 0.0005 | 显著 |
| A | 1.74 | 1 | 1.74 | 12.07 | 0.0178 | |
| B | 5.34 | 1 | 5.34 | 36.98 | 0.0017 | |
| C | 0.66 | 1 | 0.66 | 4.58 | 0.0852 | |
| AB | 3.55 | 1 | 3.55 | 24.58 | 0.0043 | |
| AC | 0.071 | 1 | 0.071 | 0.49 | 0.514 | |
| BC | 0.01 | 1 | 0.01 | 0.069 | 0.8029 | |
| A2 | 14.44 | 1 | 14.44 | 100.1 | 0.0002 | |
| B2 | 12.22 | 1 | 12.22 | 84.71 | 0.0003 | |
| C2 | 15.18 | 1 | 15.18 | 105.22 | 0.0002 | |
| 残差 | 0.72 | 5 | 0.14 | |||
| 失拟 | 0.69 | 3 | 0.23 | 16.53 | 0.0576 | 不显著 |
| 纯误差 | 0.028 | 2 | 0.014 | |||
| 合计 | 48.38 | 14 |
| 作物 | 处理 | 株高/cm | 根长/cm | 整株鲜重/mg | 整株干重/mg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 小麦 | 菌肥 | 29.59±1.32 a | 16.14±1.22 a | 244.92±14.38 a | 36.09±1.11 a |
| CK | 20.38±1.04 b | 12.15±0.77 b | 176.66±9.74 b | 21.90±1.25 b | |
| 番茄 | 菌肥 | 18.56±0.75 a | 6.43±0.35 a | 1432.35±23.97 a | 134.88±7.62 a |
| CK | 12.31±0.94 b | 2.56±0.19 b | 1100.61±14.09 b | 108.83±1.86 b |
| 作物 | 处理 | 株高/cm | 根长/cm | 整株鲜重/mg | 整株干重/mg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 小麦 | 菌肥 | 29.59±1.32 a | 16.14±1.22 a | 244.92±14.38 a | 36.09±1.11 a |
| CK | 20.38±1.04 b | 12.15±0.77 b | 176.66±9.74 b | 21.90±1.25 b | |
| 番茄 | 菌肥 | 18.56±0.75 a | 6.43±0.35 a | 1432.35±23.97 a | 134.88±7.62 a |
| CK | 12.31±0.94 b | 2.56±0.19 b | 1100.61±14.09 b | 108.83±1.86 b |
| [1] |
杨丹丹, 杨传伦, 张心青, 等. 响应面法优化绿色木霉产孢子固体发酵培养基[J]. 中国农学通报, 2020, 36(36):84-92.
doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb20200100045 |
| [2] |
阮盈盈, 刘峰. 木霉菌生物防治作用机制与应用研究进展[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2020, 61(11):2290-2294.
doi: 10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20201130 |
| [3] |
陈建妙, 曹英建, 瞿金旺, 等. 哈茨木霉对黑麦草气体交换和生长发育的影响[J]. 北方园艺, 2023, 1(4):53-59.
|
| [4] |
廉华, 刘静依, 马光恕, 等. 生物炭和木霉菌对黄瓜生长及枯萎病防治效果的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2024, 42(6):206-215.
|
| [5] |
尤佳琪, 杨红娟, 朱丽华, 等. 拟康宁木霉T-51的固体发酵参数优化[J]. 微生物学通报, 2024, 51(10):4149-4161.
|
| [6] |
杨小龙, 石朝慧, 乔燚, 等. 基于聚氨酯海绵载体的棘孢木霉固体发酵培养基筛选[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2022, 38(1):88-96.
doi: 10.16409/j.cnki.2095-039x.2021.08.004 |
| [7] |
商美妮. 木霉固体发酵培养条件优化及含木霉生物基质育苗效应研究[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2020.
|
| [8] |
doi: 10.1016/j.funbio.2023.06.007 pmid: 37495305 |
| [9] |
doi: 10.1186/s12896-022-00772-4 pmid: 36694155 |
| [10] |
王永迪, 邱孟娇, 张晓华, 等. 内生真菌LZY9固体发酵丹参茎叶产纤维素酶的工艺条件优化[J]. 山东第一医科大学学报, 2021, 42(5):375-379.
|
| [11] |
李高强, 张旭斌, 牛俊轲, 等. 枯草芽孢杆菌BYA-KC-4产表面活性素发酵条件的优化[J]. 饲料研究, 2024, 47(14):107-112.
|
| [12] |
doi: 10.1007/s10658-023-02745-5 |
| [13] |
doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2024.132017 URL |
| [14] |
高立红, 江志阳, 尹微. 淡紫拟青霉固体发酵工艺研究[J]. 微生物学杂志, 2020, 40(6):36-43.
|
| [15] |
杨昌发, 唐彩艳, 孙冰, 等. 橘绿木霉GF-11发酵刺梨渣的响应面法优化[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2024, 40(2):448-457.
doi: 10.16409/j.cnki.2095-039x.2024.02.014 |
| [16] |
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236739 URL |
| [17] |
廖钫哲, 白国栋, 李如华, 等. 基于响应面的生防真菌AH-1固体发酵条件优化[J]. 陆地生态系统与保护学报, 2024, 4(4):27-33,77.
|
| [18] |
doi: 10.3390/agronomy11040726 URL |
| [19] |
李艳娟, 刘博, 庄正, 等. 哈茨木霉与绿色木霉对杉木种子萌发和幼苗生长的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2017, 28(9):2961-2966.
|
| [20] |
谢琳淼, 常春丽, 姚志红, 等. 哈茨木霉对紫羊茅和草地早熟禾的促生及抗性诱导作用[J]. 草业科学, 2018, 35(9):2079-2086.
|
| [21] |
袁扬, 王胤晨, 曾兵, 等. 5株木霉菌株对鸭茅生长及营养品质的影响[J]. 草业科学, 2018, 35(2):391-397.
|
| [22] |
赵兴丽, 陶刚, 赵玳琳, 等. 钩状木霉ACCC31649的GFP标记及其对辣椒定殖和促生作用[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2017, 23(5):1276-1285.
|
| [23] |
doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.3c07658 URL |
| [24] |
doi: 10.3390/jof9111123 URL |
| [25] |
陈阳, 洪厚胜. 响应面法优化紫色红曲霉产酸式MonacolinK发酵条件[J]. 中国酿造, 2025, 44(2):219-225.
doi: 10.11882/j.issn.0254-5071.2025.02.032 |
| [26] |
杨丹丹, 王建平, 马娜娜, 等. 绿色木霉固体发酵产孢子的条件优化[J]. 中国农学通报, 2020, 36(12):111-119.
doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb18120119 |
| [27] |
doi: 10.1007/s00449-025-03189-3 |
| [28] |
孙萌, 宁松瑞, 颜安, 等. 生物菌肥下小麦苗期生长及土壤微生物的特征[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2024, 63(4):24-29.
|
| [1] | WANG Lina, QI Guochao, REN Cuimei, GU Xin, ZHANG Hongyu, WANG Di, RUI Haiying. Study on Improvement Effects of Three Agricultural Wastes on Soda Saline-alkali Wasteland [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(9): 76-81. |
| [2] | SHEN Huifang, YANG Qiyun, ZHANG Jingxin, PU Xiaoming, SUN Dayuan, LIU Pingping, LIN Birun. Growth-promoting Effect of Bacillus velenzensis GDND-2 on Tobacco [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(16): 14-20. |
| [3] | YANG Bo, MA Cong, SHA Yuexia. Screening and Application Effect Evaluation of Rhizobia in Chinese Herbal Medicines [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(14): 41-46. |
| [4] | ZHOU Xiao, XU Zhengrong, LU Xin, YANG Gang, DONG Junzhong, WANG Yue, WANG Bingbing, LI Tian, LIU Yan. Optimization of Fermentation Process for Yunnan Produced Cigar Tobacco Leaves Using Response Surface Methodology [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(1): 141-147. |
| [5] | WU Shaobo, XING Liyuan, WANG Jinchao, JIA Mengke, LIU Chunhui, ZHOU Qiongqiong, WANG Long. Domestic and Foreign Research Hotspots and Development Trend of Agricultural Waste Resource Utilization [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(8): 148-156. |
| [6] | ZHANG Xinxin, HUANG Yong, CHEN Jingyi, ZOU Hongda, LUO Zhongxia, WANG Zhangying, HUANG Lifei. Elsinoe batatas Causing Sweetpotato Scab: Biological Characteristics and Conidia Production [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(3): 112-119. |
| [7] | ZHAO Jia, HU Xiaohang, LI Yanli. Effects of Combined Application of Sugar Mill Sludge and Biochar on Basic Properties and Organic Carbon Components of Black Soil in Northeast China [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(26): 38-45. |
| [8] | WEI Jiqian, LI Dan, WANG Jingwen, HUANG Yue, MO Jianchu. Resource Utilization of Agricultural and Forestry Wastes: Research Progress [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(6): 77-81. |
| [9] | XUE Rui, SHEN Shaoyun, DENG Xizhou, CHEN Cong, PENG Yuejin, DU Guangzu, CHEN Bin. Metarhizium rileyi SL Strain Liquid Fermentation Conditions: Optimization by Response Surface Methodology [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(6): 135-143. |
| [10] | AO Yuan, YANG Chengde, GUO Zhuangyuan, CAI Fengfeng, CUI Lingxiao. Bacillus subtilis 262XY2' Bacterial Fertilizer: Effects on the Growth and Physiological Characteristics of Tomato Seedlings [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(3): 42-48. |
| [11] | HE Zhipeng, WANG Shibao, HU Benxiang, ZHANG Hui, CHEN Yuan, TANG Wenqiang, HU Yagang. Extraction Process of Iridoid Glycosides Based on Response Surface Methodology [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(25): 130-138. |
| [12] | ZHANG Shuangyan, REN Hao, DING Wenqing, WU Yutao. Research Progress on Material Utilization of Agricultural Waste Rice Husk [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(9): 101-108. |
| [13] | REN Xvrui, WANG Yihui, YANG Hongyu, YUAN Liang, ZHAO Yue. Resource Utilization System of Agricultural Organic Waste After Centralized Recovery and Treatment: A Case Study of Xingxian Village in Gannan County [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(33): 74-79. |
| [14] | WANG Wenxuan, LI Yunpeng, XU Hening, ZHAO Xin, MA Rou, ZHANG Lina, ZHANG Yingying. Ultrasonic Extraction Process of Total Saponins from Leaves of Solanum torvum Swartz. [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(30): 118-125. |
| [15] | LIU Lilan, QIU Qinqin, FAN Wenrong, TANG Jiao, HU Xiaobing, XIAO Wei, CHEN Ke. The Removal Process of Organophosphorus Pesticide Residues on the Surface of Commercial Fruits by Alkaline Electrolyzed Water [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(2): 133-140. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||