Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2024, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (26): 38-45.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2024-0231
Previous Articles Next Articles
ZHAO Jia1(), HU Xiaohang1,2(
), LI Yanli1,2
Received:
2024-03-27
Revised:
2024-07-21
Online:
2024-09-15
Published:
2024-09-11
ZHAO Jia, HU Xiaohang, LI Yanli. Effects of Combined Application of Sugar Mill Sludge and Biochar on Basic Properties and Organic Carbon Components of Black Soil in Northeast China[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(26): 38-45.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2024-0231
处理 | 处理方法 |
---|---|
CK1 | 无物料还田 |
CK2 | 20000 kg/hm2生物炭 |
T1 | 16.67 kg/hm2滤泥+0 kg/hm2生物炭 |
T2 | 16.67 kg/hm2滤泥+20000 kg/hm2生物炭 |
T3 | 33.33 kg/hm2滤泥+0 t/hm2生物炭 |
T4 | 33.33 kg/hm2滤泥+20000 kg/hm2生物炭 |
T5 | 50 kg/hm2滤泥+0 kg/hm2生物炭 |
T6 | 50 kg/hm2滤泥+20000 kg/hm2生物炭 |
处理 | 处理方法 |
---|---|
CK1 | 无物料还田 |
CK2 | 20000 kg/hm2生物炭 |
T1 | 16.67 kg/hm2滤泥+0 kg/hm2生物炭 |
T2 | 16.67 kg/hm2滤泥+20000 kg/hm2生物炭 |
T3 | 33.33 kg/hm2滤泥+0 t/hm2生物炭 |
T4 | 33.33 kg/hm2滤泥+20000 kg/hm2生物炭 |
T5 | 50 kg/hm2滤泥+0 kg/hm2生物炭 |
T6 | 50 kg/hm2滤泥+20000 kg/hm2生物炭 |
时期 | 处理 | 碱解氮/(mg/kg) | 有效磷/(mg/kg) | 速效钾/(mg/kg) | 脲酶/[mg/(24h·g)] | 蔗糖酶/[mg/(24h·g)] | 磷酸酶/[mg/(24h·g)] | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
块根积累期 | CK1 | 98.00±22.95a | 64.75±4.51cd | 215.35±33.89a | 36.35±6.76b | 22.46±0.72bc | 41.11±4.64b | |||||||
CK2 | 99.17±14.57a | 61.83±3.93d | 245.46±26.87a | 49.74±7.71ab | 24.36±0.76a | 56.73±7.82a | ||||||||
T1 | 95.67±21.39a | 64.91±1.12cd | 215.79±21.12a | 56.32±10.39ab | 22.07±0.72bc | 42.45±3.25b | ||||||||
T2 | 96.83±2.02a | 71.62±6.91bc | 203.94±22.19a | 43.91±9.52ab | 22.95±0.77ab | 45.87±5.78b | ||||||||
T3 | 88.67±4.04a | 76.86±6.07ab | 215.14±34.04a | 75.43±26.16a | 21.18±0.08c | 41.89±3.64b | ||||||||
T4 | 81.67±7.29a | 84.72±8.43a | 207.44±10.97a | 63.66±18.98ab | 24.29±0.80a | 57.77±5.27a | ||||||||
T5 | 94.50±10.50a | 81.23±6.46a | 219.83±18.34a | 62.19±21.13ab | 21.34±1.32c | 40.19±2.91b | ||||||||
T6 | 89.83±7.29a | 83.68±1.54a | 204.24±21.93a | 54.58±14.78ab | 24.02±0.46a | 55.90±6.92a | ||||||||
收获期 | CK1 | 102.67±12.29a | 64.71±5.79ab | 273.40±78.49a | 35.97±1.73bc | 22.23±0.48a | 49.59±2.63a | |||||||
CK2 | 115.50±26.42a | 59.49±6.67b | 242.97±87.64a | 37.75±5.39bc | 22.07±2.91a | 49.38±10.70a | ||||||||
T1 | 100.33±14.57a | 68.74±12.66ab | 224.19±1.43a | 29.53±3.44c | 21.90±2.44a | 50.84±5.20a | ||||||||
T2 | 115.50±19.49a | 64.82±3.35ab | 243.49±70.77a | 41.68±4.56abc | 22.72±1.12a | 48.16±8.96a | ||||||||
T3 | 84.00±10.50a | 74.08±6.62ab | 211.91±19.29a | 44.78±6.16ab | 22.32±1.14a | 43.14±5.07a | ||||||||
T4 | 114.33±37.42a | 76.21±5.66a | 282.95±92.16a | 55.07±10.95a | 24.14±1.09a | 43.91±5.06a | ||||||||
T5 | 92.17±4.04a | 76.92±2.75a | 198.35±18.91a | 55.30±3.44a | 26.38±8.34a | 43.64±5.60a | ||||||||
T6 | 96.83±10.10a | 67.20±13.15ab | 279.89±117.83a | 48.00±15.62ab | 24.38±1.13a | 44.95±6.95a |
时期 | 处理 | 碱解氮/(mg/kg) | 有效磷/(mg/kg) | 速效钾/(mg/kg) | 脲酶/[mg/(24h·g)] | 蔗糖酶/[mg/(24h·g)] | 磷酸酶/[mg/(24h·g)] | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
块根积累期 | CK1 | 98.00±22.95a | 64.75±4.51cd | 215.35±33.89a | 36.35±6.76b | 22.46±0.72bc | 41.11±4.64b | |||||||
CK2 | 99.17±14.57a | 61.83±3.93d | 245.46±26.87a | 49.74±7.71ab | 24.36±0.76a | 56.73±7.82a | ||||||||
T1 | 95.67±21.39a | 64.91±1.12cd | 215.79±21.12a | 56.32±10.39ab | 22.07±0.72bc | 42.45±3.25b | ||||||||
T2 | 96.83±2.02a | 71.62±6.91bc | 203.94±22.19a | 43.91±9.52ab | 22.95±0.77ab | 45.87±5.78b | ||||||||
T3 | 88.67±4.04a | 76.86±6.07ab | 215.14±34.04a | 75.43±26.16a | 21.18±0.08c | 41.89±3.64b | ||||||||
T4 | 81.67±7.29a | 84.72±8.43a | 207.44±10.97a | 63.66±18.98ab | 24.29±0.80a | 57.77±5.27a | ||||||||
T5 | 94.50±10.50a | 81.23±6.46a | 219.83±18.34a | 62.19±21.13ab | 21.34±1.32c | 40.19±2.91b | ||||||||
T6 | 89.83±7.29a | 83.68±1.54a | 204.24±21.93a | 54.58±14.78ab | 24.02±0.46a | 55.90±6.92a | ||||||||
收获期 | CK1 | 102.67±12.29a | 64.71±5.79ab | 273.40±78.49a | 35.97±1.73bc | 22.23±0.48a | 49.59±2.63a | |||||||
CK2 | 115.50±26.42a | 59.49±6.67b | 242.97±87.64a | 37.75±5.39bc | 22.07±2.91a | 49.38±10.70a | ||||||||
T1 | 100.33±14.57a | 68.74±12.66ab | 224.19±1.43a | 29.53±3.44c | 21.90±2.44a | 50.84±5.20a | ||||||||
T2 | 115.50±19.49a | 64.82±3.35ab | 243.49±70.77a | 41.68±4.56abc | 22.72±1.12a | 48.16±8.96a | ||||||||
T3 | 84.00±10.50a | 74.08±6.62ab | 211.91±19.29a | 44.78±6.16ab | 22.32±1.14a | 43.14±5.07a | ||||||||
T4 | 114.33±37.42a | 76.21±5.66a | 282.95±92.16a | 55.07±10.95a | 24.14±1.09a | 43.91±5.06a | ||||||||
T5 | 92.17±4.04a | 76.92±2.75a | 198.35±18.91a | 55.30±3.44a | 26.38±8.34a | 43.64±5.60a | ||||||||
T6 | 96.83±10.10a | 67.20±13.15ab | 279.89±117.83a | 48.00±15.62ab | 24.38±1.13a | 44.95±6.95a |
时期 | 处理 | CPI | A | AI | CPMI | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
块根积累期 | CK1 | 1.00±0.09a | 0.32±0.04ab | 1.00±0.13ab | 99.30±5.13b | ||||
CK2 | 1.06±0.08a | 0.18±0.04c | 0.57±0.13c | 59.73±9.04cd | |||||
T1 | 1.03±0.07a | 0.31±0.05ab | 0.98±0.15ab | 100.28±13.46b | |||||
T2 | 1.20±0.20a | 0.25±0.05bc | 0.77±0.17bc | 90.35±11.11b | |||||
T3 | 1.03±0.06a | 0.16±0.02c | 0.51±0.05c | 52.65±5.01d | |||||
T4 | 1.22±0.26a | 0.37±0.10a | 1.15±0.33a | 133.70±13.56a | |||||
T5 | 1.05±0.03a | 0.24±0.05bc | 0.76±0.17bc | 79.66±16.19bc | |||||
T6 | 1.12±0.10a | 0.37±0.10a | 1.16±0.32a | 127.31±22.99a | |||||
收获期 | CK1 | 1.00±0.05a | 0.14±0.00b | 1.00±0.02b | 99.95±4.23b | ||||
CK2 | 1.01±0.06a | 0.13±0.02b | 0.91±0.15b | 92.15±10.51b | |||||
T1 | 1.00±0.04a | 0.22±0.02a | 1.54±0.11a | 154.06±15.94a | |||||
T2 | 1.00±0.05a | 0.21±0.03a | 1.44±0.22a | 143.09±14.03a | |||||
T3 | 0.97±0.02a | 0.14±0.02b | 0.96±0.11b | 93.23±10.41b | |||||
T4 | 0.99±0.01a | 0.20±0.06a | 1.37±0.41a | 135.14±41.76a | |||||
T5 | 1.01±0.05a | 0.13±0.01b | 0.94±0.05b | 95.30±9.32b | |||||
T6 | 1.00±0.06a | 0.22±0.03a | 1.52±0.22a | 151.53±14.18a |
时期 | 处理 | CPI | A | AI | CPMI | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
块根积累期 | CK1 | 1.00±0.09a | 0.32±0.04ab | 1.00±0.13ab | 99.30±5.13b | ||||
CK2 | 1.06±0.08a | 0.18±0.04c | 0.57±0.13c | 59.73±9.04cd | |||||
T1 | 1.03±0.07a | 0.31±0.05ab | 0.98±0.15ab | 100.28±13.46b | |||||
T2 | 1.20±0.20a | 0.25±0.05bc | 0.77±0.17bc | 90.35±11.11b | |||||
T3 | 1.03±0.06a | 0.16±0.02c | 0.51±0.05c | 52.65±5.01d | |||||
T4 | 1.22±0.26a | 0.37±0.10a | 1.15±0.33a | 133.70±13.56a | |||||
T5 | 1.05±0.03a | 0.24±0.05bc | 0.76±0.17bc | 79.66±16.19bc | |||||
T6 | 1.12±0.10a | 0.37±0.10a | 1.16±0.32a | 127.31±22.99a | |||||
收获期 | CK1 | 1.00±0.05a | 0.14±0.00b | 1.00±0.02b | 99.95±4.23b | ||||
CK2 | 1.01±0.06a | 0.13±0.02b | 0.91±0.15b | 92.15±10.51b | |||||
T1 | 1.00±0.04a | 0.22±0.02a | 1.54±0.11a | 154.06±15.94a | |||||
T2 | 1.00±0.05a | 0.21±0.03a | 1.44±0.22a | 143.09±14.03a | |||||
T3 | 0.97±0.02a | 0.14±0.02b | 0.96±0.11b | 93.23±10.41b | |||||
T4 | 0.99±0.01a | 0.20±0.06a | 1.37±0.41a | 135.14±41.76a | |||||
T5 | 1.01±0.05a | 0.13±0.01b | 0.94±0.05b | 95.30±9.32b | |||||
T6 | 1.00±0.06a | 0.22±0.03a | 1.52±0.22a | 151.53±14.18a |
[1] |
夏龙龙, 颜晓元, 蔡祖聪, 等. 我国农田土壤温室气体减排和有机碳固定的研究进展及展望[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2020, 39(4):834-841.
|
[2] |
曹丽花, 刘合满, 杨东升. 农田土壤固碳潜力的影响因素及其调控[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2016, 44(10):16-20.
|
[3] |
田胄. 不同管理措施对棉田氨气、温室气体排放及土壤有机碳固定的影响研究[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2017.
|
[4] |
|
[5] |
马慧霞, 张桥, 陈会巧, 等. 长期有机培肥对南方红壤区稻田土壤碳循环功能基因的影响[J]. 南方农业学报, 2023, 54(5):1405-1416.
|
[6] |
|
[7] |
|
[8] |
吴萍萍, 王静, 李录久, 等. 化肥减施下有机物料对砂姜黑土有机碳组分和养分含量的影响[J]. 核农学报, 2022, 36(11):2286-2294.
doi: 10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2022.11.2286 |
[9] |
魏夏新, 熊俊芬, 李涛, 等. 有机物料还田对双季稻田土壤有机碳及其活性组分的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(7):2373-2380.
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202007.021 |
[10] |
刘昊, 曹国军, 耿玉辉, 等. 不同农业废弃物还田对土壤碳排放及碳固定的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2016, 30(3):239-243.
|
[11] |
|
[12] |
|
[13] |
|
[14] |
|
[15] |
|
[16] |
贺美, 王迎春, 王立刚, 等. 应用DNDC模型分析东北黑土有机碳演变规律及其与作物产量之间的协同关系[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2017, 23(1):9-19.
|
[17] |
林秋莲, 韦芳宁, 林华, 等. 糖厂滤泥处置现状与对策研究[J]. 云南化工, 2019, 46(1):69-70.
|
[18] |
刘向东. 元素分析仪同时测定土壤中碳、氮、硫含量的方法研究[J]. 湖南有色金属, 2022, 38(1):78-80.
|
[19] |
|
[20] |
|
[21] |
|
[22] |
鲁如坤. 土壤农业化学分析方法[M]. 北京: 中国农业科技出版社, 2000.
|
[23] |
丁苏雅, 马姜明, 覃云斌, 等. 生物炭对毛竹林土壤有机碳组分及碳库管理指数的影响[J]. 广西师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 42(1):180-190.
|
[24] |
郭戎博, 李国栋, 潘梦雨, 等. 秸秆还田与施氮对耕层土壤有机碳储量、组分和团聚体的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(20):4035-4048.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2023.20.009 |
[25] |
关一凡, 孟会生, 王帅兵, 等. 有机肥配施菌剂对复垦土壤有机碳和碳库管理指数的影响[J]. 天津农业科学, 2023, 29(12):62-68.
|
[26] |
彭家豪, 林少颖, 王维奇, 等. 秸秆与生物炭施加对茉莉园土壤真菌群落及有机碳库特征的影响[J]. 环境科学, 2024, 45(7):4228-4240.
|
[27] |
|
[28] |
蒋如, 宁诗琪, 隋宗明, 等. 长期轮作施肥处理对植烟土壤有机碳组分和酶活性的影响[J]. 土壤, 2024, 56(3):510-516.
|
[29] |
杨凯, 李延锋, 张西兴, 等. 化肥与不同有机物料配施对土壤有机碳组分及土壤水稳性团聚体的影响[J]. 土壤通报, 2024, 55(3):707-715.
|
[30] |
刘强, 梁鑫, 董佩丽, 等. 不同施肥措施对黄土丘陵区农田土壤有机碳组分和碳库管理指数的影响[J]. 土壤, 2023, 55(2):446-452.
|
[31] |
李廷亮, 王嘉豪, 黄璐, 等. 秸秆还田替代化肥对土壤有机碳组分及冬小麦产量的影响[J]. 山西农业科学, 2022, 50(6):771-780.
|
[32] |
郭茹. 旱区农田秸秆碳和氮肥施用的固碳减排效应及水氮利用机制[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2023.
|
[33] |
陈晓东, 吴景贵. 不同有机物料施用下土壤颗粒有机碳红外光谱特征[J]. 分析化学, 2021, 49(3):468-473.
|
[34] |
胡雪纯, 解文艳, 马晓楠, 等. 长期秸秆还田对旱地玉米土壤有机碳及碳库管理指数的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(34):8-13.
doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2021-1181 |
[35] |
曹培, 徐莹, 朱杰, 等. 不同种植模式对稻田土壤活性有机碳组分及产量的短期影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 2019, 38(9):2788-2798.
|
[1] | WU Shaobo, XING Liyuan, WANG Jinchao, JIA Mengke, LIU Chunhui, ZHOU Qiongqiong, WANG Long. Domestic and Foreign Research Hotspots and Development Trend of Agricultural Waste Resource Utilization [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(8): 148-156. |
[2] | GONG Xia, CHEN Mengmeng, WANG Zhaojie, DING Xiaodong. Effects of Biochar and Modified Biochar Application on Phosphorus Leaching in the Coastal Saline-alkaline Paddy Soil [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(8): 57-62. |
[3] | YE Yang, XIANG Guiqin, GUO Xiaowen, MIN Wei, GUO Huijuan. Regulation Effect of Biochar on Bacterial Community in Cotton Field Soil under Saline Water Drip Irrigation [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(6): 91-100. |
[4] | QIAO Yue, HU Cheng, WAN Jianhua, XU Hualin, LIU Maojun, GUO Weihong, DAI Li, ZHANG Chunhua, DENG Chaoran. Effects of Different Fertilization Patterns on Rice Yield and Nutrient Use Efficiency [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(6): 9-15. |
[5] | LIAO Yimin, ZHENG Mingjie, ZHANG Mingkui. Effects of Topography and Land-use Modes on Properties of Purple Soils [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(3): 81-86. |
[6] | GUI Yiyun, LI Haibi, WEI Jinju, ZHU Kai, ZHOU Hui, LIU Xihui. Review on Application of Biochar in Sugarcane Cultivation [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(25): 18-23. |
[7] | ZHOU Guoqin, ZHANG Yanhong, WANG Na, WANG Ge, HU Hai, PENG Shengqiang, ZHANG Pengyuan, LI Fuyuan, MU Wenpo, ZHOU Yanbin. Effect of Different Soil Modification Materials on the Yield and Quality of Flue-cured Tobacco and the Chemical Properties of Tobacco Planting Soil [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(23): 45-52. |
[8] | MA Danni, SHENG Jiandong, ZHANG Kun, MAO Jiefei, CHANG Song, WANG Yaofeng. Effect of Biochar Combined with Organic Fertilizer on Soil Nutrients: A Review [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(2): 42-51. |
[9] | ZHANG Lijun, ZHANG Mingkui. Increase of Organic Carbon Accumulation in Deep Soil of Paddy Fields by Long Term Continuous Cropping of Zizania latifolia [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(15): 88-95. |
[10] | CHEN Guiyun, WANG Huifang, WANG Duo, SHI Dingguo, ZHANG Zhijun, XU Dongya, LI Yunchuan, KONG Decui, WANG Na, WANG Ge, DING Yi, BAI Yuxiang. Effects of Tobacco Stem Biochar Based Fertilizer Application on Production and Quality of Flue-cured Tobacco [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(1): 12-19. |
[11] | MIAO Huan, QIAO Yunfa, LI Qing, MIAO Shujie. The Responses of Nitrogen Loss from Paddy Field to Simulated Rainfall and Restored Materials [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(9): 85-91. |
[12] | TENG Bingqin, MA Qianqian, WU Jun, DUAN Xuejiao, BI Dongmei, CAI Liqun. Effects of Biochar Addition on Cd Enrichment in Lettuce [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(6): 90-96. |
[13] | WEI Jiqian, LI Dan, WANG Jingwen, HUANG Yue, MO Jianchu. Resource Utilization of Agricultural and Forestry Wastes: Research Progress [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(6): 77-81. |
[14] | WANG Haoji, GUAN Huilin, SHI Mengxin, DENG Sidi, DONG Mingxing, LU Zicun, WANG Haibo, HAO Yunying, XU Wumei. Effects of Tobacco Stalk Biochar with Different Particle Sizes on Physicochemical Properties of Acidic Red Soil [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(33): 85-91. |
[15] | CHEN Hongsen, HONG Ciqing, MO Wenjing, CAI Xinkai, GUI Fangze, GUAN Xiong, PAN Xiaohong. Study on the Adsorption of Heavy Metal Nickel by Biochar Prepared from Three Kinds of Bran [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(32): 40-46. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||