Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2024, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (23): 45-52.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2023-0794
Previous Articles Next Articles
ZHOU Guoqin1(), ZHANG Yanhong1, WANG Na1, WANG Ge1, HU Hai2, PENG Shengqiang2, ZHANG Pengyuan2, LI Fuyuan2, MU Wenpo2, ZHOU Yanbin2(
)
Received:
2023-11-08
Revised:
2024-02-20
Online:
2024-08-15
Published:
2024-08-09
ZHOU Guoqin, ZHANG Yanhong, WANG Na, WANG Ge, HU Hai, PENG Shengqiang, ZHANG Pengyuan, LI Fuyuan, MU Wenpo, ZHOU Yanbin. Effect of Different Soil Modification Materials on the Yield and Quality of Flue-cured Tobacco and the Chemical Properties of Tobacco Planting Soil[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(23): 45-52.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2023-0794
处理 | 移栽期(日/月) | 团棵期(日/月) | 现蕾期(日/月) | 脚叶成熟期(日/月) | 顶叶成熟期(日/月) | 生育期/d |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
S0 | 25/4 | 11/6 | 8/7 | 21/7 | 16/8 | 113 |
S1 | 25/4 | 11/6 | 8/7 | 23/7 | 18/8 | 115 |
S2 | 25/4 | 11/6 | 8/7 | 19/7 | 15/8 | 112 |
S3 | 25/4 | 11/6 | 8/7 | 22/7 | 18/8 | 115 |
处理 | 移栽期(日/月) | 团棵期(日/月) | 现蕾期(日/月) | 脚叶成熟期(日/月) | 顶叶成熟期(日/月) | 生育期/d |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
S0 | 25/4 | 11/6 | 8/7 | 21/7 | 16/8 | 113 |
S1 | 25/4 | 11/6 | 8/7 | 23/7 | 18/8 | 115 |
S2 | 25/4 | 11/6 | 8/7 | 19/7 | 15/8 | 112 |
S3 | 25/4 | 11/6 | 8/7 | 22/7 | 18/8 | 115 |
调查时期 | 编号 | pH | 有机质/(g/kg) | 碱解氮/(mg/kg) | 有效磷/(mg/kg) | 速效钾/(mg/kg) | 氯/(mg/kg) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
30 d | S0 | 7.16a | 34.73b | 122.14b | 74.86c | 384.7c | 2.55b |
S1 | 6.90a | 47.43a | 150.03a | 100.47a | 441.92a | 3.55a | |
S2 | 6.25b | 31.36b | 148.32a | 84.63b | 455.89a | 2.00b | |
S3 | 6.93a | 35.43b | 152.15a | 83.04b | 385.63b | 2.25b | |
60 d | S0 | 6.99a | 35.19a | 127.35b | 102.89a | 482.93b | 5.55a |
S1 | 7.12a | 33.11a | 155.84a | 73.28b | 556.99a | 1.90c | |
S2 | 6.00b | 25.88b | 150.42a | 100.86a | 402.39c | 2.85b | |
S3 | 6.33b | 39.03a | 169.73a | 102.10a | 421.50c | 3.10b | |
90 d | S0 | 5.40b | 36.55a | 79.37c | 115.35a | 414.14c | 4.64a |
S1 | 7.23a | 31.15b | 151.09a | 76.23c | 458.49b | 2.95c | |
S2 | 7.05a | 31.19b | 115.37b | 94.78b | 579.65a | 2.52c | |
S3 | 5.52b | 29.37b | 144.08a | 116.61a | 478.54b | 3.86b |
调查时期 | 编号 | pH | 有机质/(g/kg) | 碱解氮/(mg/kg) | 有效磷/(mg/kg) | 速效钾/(mg/kg) | 氯/(mg/kg) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
30 d | S0 | 7.16a | 34.73b | 122.14b | 74.86c | 384.7c | 2.55b |
S1 | 6.90a | 47.43a | 150.03a | 100.47a | 441.92a | 3.55a | |
S2 | 6.25b | 31.36b | 148.32a | 84.63b | 455.89a | 2.00b | |
S3 | 6.93a | 35.43b | 152.15a | 83.04b | 385.63b | 2.25b | |
60 d | S0 | 6.99a | 35.19a | 127.35b | 102.89a | 482.93b | 5.55a |
S1 | 7.12a | 33.11a | 155.84a | 73.28b | 556.99a | 1.90c | |
S2 | 6.00b | 25.88b | 150.42a | 100.86a | 402.39c | 2.85b | |
S3 | 6.33b | 39.03a | 169.73a | 102.10a | 421.50c | 3.10b | |
90 d | S0 | 5.40b | 36.55a | 79.37c | 115.35a | 414.14c | 4.64a |
S1 | 7.23a | 31.15b | 151.09a | 76.23c | 458.49b | 2.95c | |
S2 | 7.05a | 31.19b | 115.37b | 94.78b | 579.65a | 2.52c | |
S3 | 5.52b | 29.37b | 144.08a | 116.61a | 478.54b | 3.86b |
处理 | 产量/(kg/hm2) | 产值/(元/hm2) | 均价/(元/kg) | 中上等烟比例/% |
---|---|---|---|---|
S0 | 2403.96ab | 54714.13b | 22.76b | 75.04b |
S1 | 2088.61b | 39955.11c | 19.13c | 67.63b |
S2 | 2226.90ab | 50350.21b | 22.61b | 71.73b |
S3 | 2500.00a | 65500.00a | 26.20a | 83.11a |
处理 | 产量/(kg/hm2) | 产值/(元/hm2) | 均价/(元/kg) | 中上等烟比例/% |
---|---|---|---|---|
S0 | 2403.96ab | 54714.13b | 22.76b | 75.04b |
S1 | 2088.61b | 39955.11c | 19.13c | 67.63b |
S2 | 2226.90ab | 50350.21b | 22.61b | 71.73b |
S3 | 2500.00a | 65500.00a | 26.20a | 83.11a |
处理 | 总糖/% | 还原糖/% | 烟碱/% | 总氮/% | 氯/% | 钾/% | 糖碱比 | 钾氯比 | 氮碱比 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
S0 | 27.52a | 23.78b | 3.53a | 3.28a | 0.73a | 1.53d | 6.74b | 2.09d | 0.93b |
S1 | 28.60a | 26.30a | 3.78a | 3.36a | 0.60b | 2.31b | 6.96b | 3.85b | 0.89b |
S2 | 24.81b | 22.70b | 2.92b | 3.21a | 0.36c | 2.89a | 7.78a | 8.01a | 1.10a |
S3 | 28.83a | 27.93a | 3.59a | 3.22a | 0.55b | 1.83c | 7.78a | 3.32c | 0.90b |
云南优质标准 | 24~33 | 20~28 | 2.0~3.0 | 1.8~2.4 | 0.1~0.6 | >1.7 | 10~15 | ≥8 | 0.7~1.0 |
处理 | 总糖/% | 还原糖/% | 烟碱/% | 总氮/% | 氯/% | 钾/% | 糖碱比 | 钾氯比 | 氮碱比 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
S0 | 27.52a | 23.78b | 3.53a | 3.28a | 0.73a | 1.53d | 6.74b | 2.09d | 0.93b |
S1 | 28.60a | 26.30a | 3.78a | 3.36a | 0.60b | 2.31b | 6.96b | 3.85b | 0.89b |
S2 | 24.81b | 22.70b | 2.92b | 3.21a | 0.36c | 2.89a | 7.78a | 8.01a | 1.10a |
S3 | 28.83a | 27.93a | 3.59a | 3.22a | 0.55b | 1.83c | 7.78a | 3.32c | 0.90b |
云南优质标准 | 24~33 | 20~28 | 2.0~3.0 | 1.8~2.4 | 0.1~0.6 | >1.7 | 10~15 | ≥8 | 0.7~1.0 |
[1] |
鲁如坤. 土壤-植物营养学[M]. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 1998:61.
|
[2] |
姜超强, 董建江, 徐经年, 等. 改良剂对土壤酸碱度和烤烟生长及烟叶中重金属含量的影响[J]. 土壤, 2015, 47(1):171-176.
|
[3] |
汤佳仪. 生物炭和堆肥对重金属污染土壤的金属有效性、理化性质和酶活性的影响[D]. 长沙: 湖南农业大学, 2020.
|
[4] |
秦松. 贵州植烟土壤氯素特征与含氯钾肥施用探讨[J]. 西南农业学报, 2001(5):471-473.
|
[5] |
尤晓莹, 周方, 邢雪霞, 等. 水肥一体化对烤烟叶片氯含量及烟田土壤氯离子迁移的影响[J]. 扬州大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2019, 40(4):38-43.
|
[6] |
刘光辉, 李迪秦, 陈一凡, 等. 烤烟生长发育特性及产质量对施肥技术的响应[J]. 核农学报, 2017, 31(10):2032-2038.
doi: 10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2017.10.2032 |
[7] |
|
[8] |
曲成闯, 陈效民, 韩召强, 等. 生物有机肥对潮土物理性状及微生物量碳的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2018, 38(5):70-76.
|
[9] |
何虓, 王强义, 王明旭, 等. 生物有机肥与烟草专用复合肥配施对植烟土壤理化性质、微生物数量及酶活性的影响[J]. 耕作与栽培, 2017(1):22-24,47.
|
[10] |
侯会静, 韩正砥, 杨雅琴, 等. 生物有机肥的应用及其农田环境效应研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2019, 35(14):82-88.
doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb18040088 |
[11] |
刘汉军, 刘蕾, 刘轶豪, 等. 不同生物有机肥对烤烟产质量及土壤养分的影响[J]. 生态科学, 2018, 37(6):91-96.
|
[12] |
张峰. 蚯蚓粪肥对水稻土磷形态转化以及固定态磷活化的影响[D]. 贵阳: 贵州大学, 2019.
|
[13] |
仓龙, 李辉信, 胡锋, 等. 蚯蚓堆制处理牛粪的腐熟度指标初步研究[J]. 农村生态环境, 2003(4):35-49.
|
[14] |
肖和友, 朱伟, 王海军, 等. 连续施用不同生物质炭对植烟土壤特性和烤烟品质的影响[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2021, 42(3):19-25.
|
[15] |
国家烟草专卖局. 烟草农艺性状调查测量方法:YC/T 142—2010[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2010.
|
[16] |
中国烟草总公司青州烟草研究所. GB/T 23222—2008,烟草病虫害分级及调查方法[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2008.
|
[17] |
郑州烟草研究院. GB 2635—1992,烤烟[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 1992.
|
[18] |
邓小华, 张龙辉, 陈金, 等. 改良剂对酸性土壤理化特性及烤烟生长和品质的影响[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2018, 39(6):14-20.
|
[19] |
万海涛. 烤烟发育和产量品质及植烟土壤理化性状对生物炭的响应研究[D]. 郑州: 河南农业大学, 2014.
|
[20] |
邓小华, 向清慧, 刘勇军, 等. 施用改良剂对山地土壤pH和烤烟生长及产质量的效应[J]. 核农学报, 2020, 34(7):1568-1577.
doi: 10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2020.07.1568 |
[21] |
毕明飞. 一种含有蚯蚓粪的新型育苗基质对烟草育苗效果研究[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2016.
|
[22] |
李司童, 毛凯伦, 韦成才, 等. 蚯蚓粪肥替代部分化肥对连作烟田土壤肥力的影响及评价[J]. 华北农学报, 2018, 33(S1):238-245.
doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.2018.S1.038 |
[23] |
成延鳌, 伍仁军, 吴纯奎. 四川烤烟区土壤氯的动态与施氯量的确定[J]. 中国烟草学报, 1995, 3(4):21-28.
|
[24] |
贾孟, 印瀚, 王铎, 等. 不同烟秆生物质炭施用量对烤烟产质量及土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 江西农业学报, 2021, 33(5):56-62.
|
[25] |
陈世军, 潘文杰, 孟玉山, 等. 石灰和聚丙烯酰胺处理的酸性土壤对烤烟生长及生理特性的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2012, 18(5):1243-1251.
|
[26] |
张弘, 李影, 张玉军, 等. 生物炭对不同氮水平下植烟土壤碳氮转化的影响[J]. 农学学报, 2018, 8(9):27-32.
doi: 10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas17110018 |
[27] |
张小良, 郭维, 向鹏华, 等. 蚯蚓粪肥对烤烟农艺性状及产质量的影响[J]. 湖南农业科学, 2015(12):44-46.
|
[28] |
毛家伟, 张翔, 司贤宗. 不同碳肥水平对土壤肥力及烤烟养分吸收和产质量的影响[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2015, 36(2):43-48.
|
[1] | SUN Jiping, WANG Yale, LI Lihua, LI Xuejun, LV Wenjun, SUN Huan. Study on Curing Characteristics of ‘YY021’ and Its Heterosis [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(9): 42-47. |
[2] | ZHANG Shijie, YANG Bo, WANG Bingang, LIU Yun, ZHANG Xifeng, WANG Wenli, WANG Zeli, LI Shan. Effect of Organic Fertilizer on Yield and Quality of Flue-cured Tobacco in Weibei Loess Tableland [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(8): 38-46. |
[3] | GONG Xia, CHEN Mengmeng, WANG Zhaojie, DING Xiaodong. Effects of Biochar and Modified Biochar Application on Phosphorus Leaching in the Coastal Saline-alkaline Paddy Soil [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(8): 57-62. |
[4] | ZHAN Wenjie, ZHOU Ben, ZHU Linxing, WANG Min, ZHU Changtai, SHEN Qirong, GUO Shiwei. Effects of Trichoderma Bio-organic Fertilizer on Salinized Soil Fertility and Yield and Quality of Hang Cabbage [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(7): 108-117. |
[5] | CHEN Rui, CUI Zeyuan, LI Zhi, GENG Gui, YU Lihua. The Effect of AM Fungi on Crop Growth in Continuous Cropping Soils: A Review [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(6): 1-8. |
[6] | ZHA Hongbo, ZHAO Fang, LV Jiafeng, GONG Lin, CHEN Hua, GAO Shunbo, WANG Wendong, ZHENG Xingqi, SUN Haochen, ZHANG Bei. Effects of Optimizing Fertilization Regulation on Agronomic Characters, Yield and Quality of Continuous Cropping Flue-cured Tobacco [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(6): 53-56. |
[7] | QIAO Yue, HU Cheng, WAN Jianhua, XU Hualin, LIU Maojun, GUO Weihong, DAI Li, ZHANG Chunhua, DENG Chaoran. Effects of Different Fertilization Patterns on Rice Yield and Nutrient Use Efficiency [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(6): 9-15. |
[8] | YE Yang, XIANG Guiqin, GUO Xiaowen, MIN Wei, GUO Huijuan. Regulation Effect of Biochar on Bacterial Community in Cotton Field Soil under Saline Water Drip Irrigation [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(6): 91-100. |
[9] | DONG Yao, YU Huwei, LIU Zhishuo, ZHAO Xiufang, RONG Yuping. Research on the Characteristics of River Substrates in Dongguan and Their Feasibility as Greening Planting Soil [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(5): 69-73. |
[10] | ZHANG Liying, LIU Yuxuan, LIN Yunhong, XIONG Qian, XU Wei, DUAN Jiyou, XI Jiaxin, ZHOU Peng, DU Yu, BAI Yuxiang, WANG Ge, WANG Na. Adaptability Analysis of ‘Zhusha 2’ and ‘NC297’ in Chuxiong Tobacco Area [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(4): 32-38. |
[11] | LIAO Yimin, ZHENG Mingjie, ZHANG Mingkui. Effects of Topography and Land-use Modes on Properties of Purple Soils [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(3): 81-86. |
[12] | ZHU Shuai, LI Shiyong, JIANG Boyu, ZHAO Wenyi, ZHAO Maojie, CHEN Yimin, SUI Yueyu, JIAO Xiaoguang. Effect of Freeze-thaw Cycles on Distribution of Soil Aggregates and Their Organic Carbon Content in Arable Mollisol [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(23): 53-59. |
[13] | HONG Facai, ZOU Qianmei, ZHANG Min, CHEN Jiangzheng, XU Jun, LI Hanmei, WANG Ge, WANG Na, BAI Yuxiang, ZHOU Peng, DU Yu, ZHENG Shaogeng, ZENG Hao, KANG Zheng, LI Jie. Effect of Agents on Control of Root Knot Nematode Disease and Yield and Quality of Flue-cured Tobacco [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(22): 131-136. |
[14] | ZHANG Huihong, ZHANG Yaheng, SHEN Xie, WANG Wei, LIU Shengchuan, WU Fanglian, ZHANG Shixiang, CHEN Fayuan. Correlation Evaluation of Chemical Components, Appearance Quality and Sensory Quality of Flue-cured Tobacco Leaves in Southwestern Guizhou [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(22): 149-157. |
[15] | WU Yuanhua, LIU Guangliang, LIU Yang, LUO Zhongfeng, LI Airan, SONG Wenjing, TAO Dexin, WANG Chengdong, BAO Zichao, SHANG Bin. Evaluation Indicator System of Appearance Quality of Flue-cured Tobacco Based on Digital Description [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(22): 158-164. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||