Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2020, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (26): 62-68.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2020-0035
Previous Articles Next Articles
Liu Kailin1(), Li Xuemin1,2, Wan Xiang1(
), Liu Shujuan1, Li Jingjing1, Xu Xianying1,2, Liu Hujun1
Received:
2020-04-23
Revised:
2020-06-28
Online:
2020-09-15
Published:
2020-09-14
Contact:
Wan Xiang
E-mail:gscourse@163.com;1659867375@qq.com
CLC Number:
Liu Kailin, Li Xuemin, Wan Xiang, Liu Shujuan, Li Jingjing, Xu Xianying, Liu Hujun. Study on the Leaf Microstructure and Dust Retention Ability of 3 Plants in Minqin Botanical Garden[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(26): 62-68.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2020-0035
月份 | 降水量/mm | 平均气温/℃ | 平均风速/(m/s) | 最大风速/(m/s) | 沙尘暴日/d | 扬沙日数/d | 浮尘日数/d |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 6.5 | -10.3 | 1.0 | 6.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
2 | 0.0 | -5.5 | 1.3 | 8.0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
3 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 1.6 | 8.0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
4 | 4.8 | 13.4 | 1.3 | 13.0 | 1 | 3 | 3 |
5 | 30.1 | 15.2 | 1.7 | 10.0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
6 | 17.2 | 21.6 | 1.6 | 10.0 | 0 | 2 | 1 |
7 | 13.3 | 23.1 | 1.4 | 10.5 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
8 | 19.6 | 21.5 | 1.0 | 7.0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
9 | 25.7 | 17.1 | 0.8 | 6.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
10 | 13.0 | 7.2 | 1.4 | 9.0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
11 | 1.8 | -0.4 | 0.7 | 7.0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
12 | 0.7 | -6.9 | 0.9 | 8.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
合计/平均 | 132.7 | 8.2 | 0.9 | 8.0 | 2 | 14 | 9 |
月份 | 降水量/mm | 平均气温/℃ | 平均风速/(m/s) | 最大风速/(m/s) | 沙尘暴日/d | 扬沙日数/d | 浮尘日数/d |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 6.5 | -10.3 | 1.0 | 6.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
2 | 0.0 | -5.5 | 1.3 | 8.0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
3 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 1.6 | 8.0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
4 | 4.8 | 13.4 | 1.3 | 13.0 | 1 | 3 | 3 |
5 | 30.1 | 15.2 | 1.7 | 10.0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
6 | 17.2 | 21.6 | 1.6 | 10.0 | 0 | 2 | 1 |
7 | 13.3 | 23.1 | 1.4 | 10.5 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
8 | 19.6 | 21.5 | 1.0 | 7.0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
9 | 25.7 | 17.1 | 0.8 | 6.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
10 | 13.0 | 7.2 | 1.4 | 9.0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
11 | 1.8 | -0.4 | 0.7 | 7.0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
12 | 0.7 | -6.9 | 0.9 | 8.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
合计/平均 | 132.7 | 8.2 | 0.9 | 8.0 | 2 | 14 | 9 |
序号 | 树种 | 叶面积/mm2 | 周长/mm | 叶长/mm | 叶宽/mm | 叶宽/叶长比值 | 叶形 | 单位面积与单叶滞尘量 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
mg/cm2 | mg/叶 | ||||||||
1 | 蒙古扁桃 | 178.04 | 45.28 | 19.67 | 12.67 | 0.64 | 宽椭圆形 | 1.44 | 2.56 |
2 | 中华钙果 | 871.11 | 130.65 | 46.51 | 28.97 | 0.62 | 长圆形 | 0.70 | 6.08 |
3 | 山桃 | 1552.06 | 192.44 | 91.67 | 26.83 | 0.29 | 卵状披针形 | 0.03 | 0.54 |
变异系数/% | 68.64 | 45.12 | 46.07 | 41.44 | 25.99 | 69.42 | 90.50 |
序号 | 树种 | 叶面积/mm2 | 周长/mm | 叶长/mm | 叶宽/mm | 叶宽/叶长比值 | 叶形 | 单位面积与单叶滞尘量 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
mg/cm2 | mg/叶 | ||||||||
1 | 蒙古扁桃 | 178.04 | 45.28 | 19.67 | 12.67 | 0.64 | 宽椭圆形 | 1.44 | 2.56 |
2 | 中华钙果 | 871.11 | 130.65 | 46.51 | 28.97 | 0.62 | 长圆形 | 0.70 | 6.08 |
3 | 山桃 | 1552.06 | 192.44 | 91.67 | 26.83 | 0.29 | 卵状披针形 | 0.03 | 0.54 |
变异系数/% | 68.64 | 45.12 | 46.07 | 41.44 | 25.99 | 69.42 | 90.50 |
[1] | 董雪玲. 大气可吸入颗粒物对环境和人体健康的危害[J]. 资源产业, 2004,6(5):50-53. |
[2] | 陈颖佳, 刘中兵. 城市道路大气中粉尘浓度的时空变异及滞尘植物配置研究[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2018,57(4):51-57. |
[3] |
Wedding J.B., R.W. Carlson J. J. Stukel, F.A. Bazzaz. Aerosol deposition on plant leaves[J]. Environ. Sci. Tech, 1975,9:151-153.
doi: 10.1021/es60100a004 URL |
[4] | 唐敏忠, 汉瑞英, 陈健. 植物叶片吸附大气颗粒物的研究综述[J]. 北方园艺, 2015(11):187-192. |
[5] | 郭伟, 申屠雅瑾, 郑述强, 等. 城市绿地滞尘作用机理和规律的研究进展[J]. 生态环境学报, 2010,19(6):1465-1470. |
[6] | 胡舒, 肖昕, 贾含帅, 等. 徐州市主要落叶绿化树种滞尘能力比较与分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2012,28(16):95-98. |
[7] | 郭鑫, 张秋良, 唐力, 等. 呼和浩特市几种常绿树种滞尘能力的研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2009,25(17):62-65. |
[8] | 俞学如. 南京市主要绿化树种叶面滞尘特征及其与叶面结构的关系[D]. 南京:南京林业大学, 2008. |
[9] | 李海梅, 刘霞. 青岛市城阳区主要园林树种叶片表皮形态与滞尘量的关系[J]. 生态学杂志, 2008,27(10):1659-1662. |
[10] | 李艳梅, 陈奇伯, 王邵军, 等. 昆明市主要绿化树种叶片滞尘能力的叶表微形态学解释[J]. 林业科学,2008, 124(5):18-28. |
[11] |
王会霞, 石辉, 王彦辉. 典型天气下植物叶面滞尘动态变化[J]. 生态学报, 2015,35(6):1696-1705.
doi: 10.5846/stxb201306051356 URL |
[12] | 王会霞, 石辉, 李秧秧. 城市绿化植物叶片表面特征对滞尘能力的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2010,21(12):3077-3082. |
[13] |
刘璐, 管东生, 陈永勤. 广州市常见行道树种叶片表面形态与滞尘能力[J]. 生态学报, 2013,33(8):2604-2614.
doi: 10.5846/stxb201201100054 URL |
[14] | 刘玲, 方炎明, 王顺昌, 等. 7种树木的叶片微形态与空气悬浮颗粒吸附及重金属累积特征[J]. 环境科学, 2013,34(6):2361-2367. |
[15] | Nowak D J, Crane D E, Stevens J C. Air pollution removal by urban trees and shrubs in the united states[J]. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2006,4:115-123. |
[16] | Beckett K P, Freer smith P, Taylor G. Effective tree species for local air-quality management[J]. Journal of Arboriculture, 2000,26(1):12-19. |
[17] | 康富贵, 李耀辉. 2010年春季民勤沙地近地面沙尘气溶胶浓度特征[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2010,26(6):6-12. |
[18] | 孙同兴. 9种榆科植物叶表皮结构特征研究[J]. 亚热带植物科学, 2008(4):1-8. |
[19] | 柴一新, 祝宁, 韩焕金. 城市绿化树种的滞尘效应-以哈尔滨市为例[J]. 应用生态学报, 2002,13(9):1121-1126. |
[20] | 卢仝. 主要绿化植物滞尘能力的研究-以泰州学院绿化建设为例[J]. 宿州教育学院学报, 2013,16(6):178-180. |
[21] | 纪惠芳, 张立娟, 阎海霞. 几种我国北方绿化树种滞尘能力的研究[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2008,36(25):10869-10871. |
[22] | 康博文, 刘建军, 王得祥, 等. 陕西20种主要绿化树种滞尘能力的研究[J]. 陕西林业科学, 2003(4):54-56. |
[23] | 张桐, 洪秀玲, 孙立炜, 等. 6种植物叶片的滞尘能力与其叶面结构的关系[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2017. |
[24] | 陆锡东, 李萍娇, 贺庆梅, 等. 宜州城区5种行道树叶表面特征及滞尘效果比较[J]. 河池学院学报, 2014,34(5):37-43. |
[25] | 谢子瑞, 赵锦慧, 黄超. 武汉市公园绿化植物滞尘能力的初步研究[J]. 湖北大学学报, 2018,40(4):424-428. |
[26] | 刘欢欢. 基于超声清洗的北京5种乡土树种叶表面颗粒物滞纳特征研究[D]. 北京:北京林业大学, 2017. |
[27] | 杨丽. 兰州城区不同绿化植物滞尘效应分析[J]. 广东农业科学,2015, 42(10):34-39. |
[28] | 陈俊刚, 余新晓, 毕华兴, 等. 典型森林树种对大气颗粒物湿沉降的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2016,30(4):312-317. |
[29] | 王雅静, 卓立环. 植物滞尘能力的研究进展[C]. 中国林学会树木学分会第十二届学术研讨会. 2006: 55-58. |
[30] | 段嵩岚, 闫淑君, 吴艳芳, 等. 福州市11种绿化灌木春季滞留颗粒物效应研究[J]. 西南林业大学学报, 2017,37(4):47-55. |
[31] | 冯向东. 民勤近地面沙尘暴气溶胶变化规律初步研究[D]. 兰州:甘肃农业大学, 2010. |
[1] | SHI Yonghai, CAO Xiangde, XU Jiabo. Effect of COVID-19 Epidemic on Alosa sapidissima Production in China and the Countermeasures [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(9): 151-156. |
[2] | WANG Feng, SHI Hongqing, JIANG Qiumin. Policy Discussion on Consolidating and Expanding the Effect of Poverty Alleviation by Economic Forest Industry [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(8): 147-151. |
[3] | SONG Zengwen, CHEN Jinyan, HE Jian, LUO Xi. The Development Path of Rural Tourism in Resource-based Villages Under Rural Industrial Revitalization: A Case Study of Qiyang Village [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(6): 158-164. |
[4] | WANG Xuejiao, LI Liang, MAO Zhaoqing, LI Longwei, CHEN Liangzheng. The Construction of Regional Grain Industry Chain and Supply Chain in Yunnan Province [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(5): 157-164. |
[5] | ZHAO Kaili, LI Fulong, LUO Can, WU Fanhua, CAI Zeping, YU Xudong. Current Situation and Development Prospects of Wampee (Clausena lansium) Industry in Danzhou [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(33): 52-59. |
[6] | LIU Dong, LIU Ruijin. Development Strategy of Tropical Crop Industry in China Based on SWOT- PEST Analysis [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(32): 139-147. |
[7] | GAN Yangying, XIAO Guangjiang, CAI Shike, LAI Duo, LIU Weina. Phyllanthus emblica L. Industry in China: Current Situation and Development Suggestions [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(32): 148-154. |
[8] | YUAN Hetao. Sci-tech Innovation Empowering Industrial Revitalization Under Rural Revitalization: Paths and Countermeasures [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(30): 158-164. |
[9] | LI Dan, LIN Zhong. Study on International Trade and Industrial Competitiveness of Asparagus in China Since 2000 [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(26): 158-164. |
[10] | HOU Junfeng, CHEN Bin, BAO Fei, TAN Heping, HAN Hailiang, WANG Guiyue, ZHAO Fucheng. Effects of Different Straw Chemical Mixed Fertilizer Treatments on Growth Characteristics and Yield of Sweet Corn ‘Zhetian 19’ [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(23): 6-14. |
[11] | WANG Xuejiao, LI Longwei, DU Chunyan. Status Quo and Comparative Advantages of Mutton Sheep Industry in Yunnan Province [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(2): 141-149. |
[12] | LI Liang, DONG Xiaobo, MAO Zhaoqing. The Path to Speed up the Whole Vegetable Industrial Chain Cultivation in Yunnan [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(17): 121-127. |
[13] | LIU Xinyong, CHI Minqing, LIN Guohua, MA Qiufeng, YI Zewen, LI Qisheng. SWOT Analysis and Development Strategy of Tea Industry in Ninghua [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(17): 128-133. |
[14] | YUAN Congjun, YANG Guangneng, HU Hong, HUANG Anxiang, YANG Shoulu, LI Xun, ZHAO Yong. Functional Utilization of Zanthoxylum bungeanum Waste: Research Progress [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(17): 75-81. |
[15] | CHEN Hong. Spatial-temporal Difference and Dynamic Evolution of Green Technology Innovation Efficiency in the Tertiary Industry [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(14): 124-129. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||