Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2023, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (11): 50-56.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2022-0326
Previous Articles Next Articles
TIAN Yixin(), GAO Fengju, ZHU Guanxiong, CAO Pengpeng, WANG Chunyu, GAO Qi, HUA Fangjing
Received:
2022-04-19
Revised:
2022-07-23
Online:
2023-04-15
Published:
2023-04-10
TIAN Yixin, GAO Fengju, ZHU Guanxiong, CAO Pengpeng, WANG Chunyu, GAO Qi, HUA Fangjing. Effects of Different Fertilization Modes on Agronomic Traits, Yield and Fertilizer Agronomic Efficiency of Summer Soybean[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(11): 50-56.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2022-0326
品种 | 施肥 | 株高/cm | 主茎节数/个 | 有效分枝/个 | 单株荚数/个 | 单株粒数/个 | 百粒重/g |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
J12 | CK | 57.08c | 15.02c | 2.23b | 36.57c | 70.12c | 22.53c |
FH | 64.52b | 16.24b | 3.21a | 44.39b | 87.56b | 23.15b | |
KS | 68.87a | 17.23a | 3.57a | 50.62a | 98.37a | 25.12a | |
S18 | CK | 71.31c | 16.53b | 1.11b | 26.25c | 56.37b | 23.14b |
FH | 76.12b | 17.20a | 2.32a | 34.44b | 74.23a | 24.62a | |
KS | 80.12a | 17.71a | 2.51a | 38.71a | 79.78a | 24.86a | |
S24 | CK | 73.21c | 14.87b | 1.11b | 32.42c | 65.17b | 23.01b |
FH | 79.11b | 15.50a | 1.56ab | 34.44b | 82.33a | 24.22a | |
KS | 82.13a | 16.02a | 2.03a | 38.26a | 87.53a | 24.89a | |
Q34 | CK | 61.04c | 16.21b | 1.67b | 30.62c | 65.65c | 25.12b |
FH | 68.45b | 17.12a | 2.13ab | 35.78b | 74.78b | 26.56a | |
KS | 72.17a | 17.53a | 2.67a | 42.23a | 88.66a | 26.77a | |
H37 | CK | 74.27c | 16.21b | 1.33b | 27.63c | 60.11c | 24.56b |
FH | 80.97b | 17.53a | 1.67ab | 35.23b | 76.67b | 26.72a | |
KS | 83.65a | 17.77a | 2.02a | 40.34a | 85.68a | 26.77a | |
H38 | CK | 77.45c | 15.22b | 1.87b | 34.43c | 68.23c | 24.21b |
FH | 81.26b | 16.37a | 2.22a | 38.78b | 77.22b | 25.45a | |
KS | 85.59a | 16.78a | 2.56a | 43.23a | 88.69a | 25.87a | |
W97 | CK | 81.11c | 16.22b | 1.62b | 39.12c | 78.21c | 19.86b |
FH | 86.18b | 17.53a | 2.33a | 48.89b | 92.37b | 21.87a | |
KS | 89.92a | 18.02a | 2.77a | 55.21a | 107.31a | 22.03a |
品种 | 施肥 | 株高/cm | 主茎节数/个 | 有效分枝/个 | 单株荚数/个 | 单株粒数/个 | 百粒重/g |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
J12 | CK | 57.08c | 15.02c | 2.23b | 36.57c | 70.12c | 22.53c |
FH | 64.52b | 16.24b | 3.21a | 44.39b | 87.56b | 23.15b | |
KS | 68.87a | 17.23a | 3.57a | 50.62a | 98.37a | 25.12a | |
S18 | CK | 71.31c | 16.53b | 1.11b | 26.25c | 56.37b | 23.14b |
FH | 76.12b | 17.20a | 2.32a | 34.44b | 74.23a | 24.62a | |
KS | 80.12a | 17.71a | 2.51a | 38.71a | 79.78a | 24.86a | |
S24 | CK | 73.21c | 14.87b | 1.11b | 32.42c | 65.17b | 23.01b |
FH | 79.11b | 15.50a | 1.56ab | 34.44b | 82.33a | 24.22a | |
KS | 82.13a | 16.02a | 2.03a | 38.26a | 87.53a | 24.89a | |
Q34 | CK | 61.04c | 16.21b | 1.67b | 30.62c | 65.65c | 25.12b |
FH | 68.45b | 17.12a | 2.13ab | 35.78b | 74.78b | 26.56a | |
KS | 72.17a | 17.53a | 2.67a | 42.23a | 88.66a | 26.77a | |
H37 | CK | 74.27c | 16.21b | 1.33b | 27.63c | 60.11c | 24.56b |
FH | 80.97b | 17.53a | 1.67ab | 35.23b | 76.67b | 26.72a | |
KS | 83.65a | 17.77a | 2.02a | 40.34a | 85.68a | 26.77a | |
H38 | CK | 77.45c | 15.22b | 1.87b | 34.43c | 68.23c | 24.21b |
FH | 81.26b | 16.37a | 2.22a | 38.78b | 77.22b | 25.45a | |
KS | 85.59a | 16.78a | 2.56a | 43.23a | 88.69a | 25.87a | |
W97 | CK | 81.11c | 16.22b | 1.62b | 39.12c | 78.21c | 19.86b |
FH | 86.18b | 17.53a | 2.33a | 48.89b | 92.37b | 21.87a | |
KS | 89.92a | 18.02a | 2.77a | 55.21a | 107.31a | 22.03a |
变异 | 来源 | 自由度 | 平方和 | 均方 | F值 | F0.05 | F0.01 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
主区 | 区组 | 2 | 314278 | 157139 | 1537 | 3.89 | 6.93 |
主处理 | 6 | 2275845 | 379308 | 3711** | 3.00 | 4.82 | |
误差 | 12 | 1226.66 | 102.22 | ||||
总变异 | 20 | 2591350 | |||||
副区 | 副处理 | 2 | 6079645 | 3039823 | 7588** | 3.34 | 5.45 |
主×副 | 12 | 155833 | 12986 | 32.4** | 2.12 | 2.90 | |
误差 | 28 | 11217.5 | 400.63 | ||||
总变异 | 62 | 8838045 |
变异 | 来源 | 自由度 | 平方和 | 均方 | F值 | F0.05 | F0.01 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
主区 | 区组 | 2 | 314278 | 157139 | 1537 | 3.89 | 6.93 |
主处理 | 6 | 2275845 | 379308 | 3711** | 3.00 | 4.82 | |
误差 | 12 | 1226.66 | 102.22 | ||||
总变异 | 20 | 2591350 | |||||
副区 | 副处理 | 2 | 6079645 | 3039823 | 7588** | 3.34 | 5.45 |
主×副 | 12 | 155833 | 12986 | 32.4** | 2.12 | 2.90 | |
误差 | 28 | 11217.5 | 400.63 | ||||
总变异 | 62 | 8838045 |
品种 | 施肥 | FCR/% | FAE/(kg/kg) |
---|---|---|---|
J12 | FH | 15.06 | 1.17 |
KS | 21.67 | 1.82 | |
S18 | FH | 13.04 | 0.87 |
KS | 17.60 | 1.24 | |
S24 | FH | 13.79 | 0.99 |
KS | 18.58 | 1.41 | |
Q34 | FH | 18.15 | 1.48 |
KS | 23.14 | 2.01 | |
H37 | FH | 14.48 | 1.09 |
KS | 21.48 | 1.76 | |
H38 | FH | 14.19 | 1.04 |
KS | 19.40 | 1.51 | |
W97 | FH | 15.29 | 1.20 |
KS | 21.76 | 1.85 |
品种 | 施肥 | FCR/% | FAE/(kg/kg) |
---|---|---|---|
J12 | FH | 15.06 | 1.17 |
KS | 21.67 | 1.82 | |
S18 | FH | 13.04 | 0.87 |
KS | 17.60 | 1.24 | |
S24 | FH | 13.79 | 0.99 |
KS | 18.58 | 1.41 | |
Q34 | FH | 18.15 | 1.48 |
KS | 23.14 | 2.01 | |
H37 | FH | 14.48 | 1.09 |
KS | 21.48 | 1.76 | |
H38 | FH | 14.19 | 1.04 |
KS | 19.40 | 1.51 | |
W97 | FH | 15.29 | 1.20 |
KS | 21.76 | 1.85 |
[1] |
王瑞元. 创新抢占大豆蛋白开发利用的至高点[J]. 中国油脂, 2021, 46(3):1-2.
|
[2] |
左武荣. 我国大豆进口贸易的影响及对策研究[J]. 分子植物育种, 2022, 20(2):601-606.
|
[3] |
田艺心, 高凤菊, 曹鹏鹏, 等. 播期对高蛋白大豆新品种(系)农艺性状、品质及产量的影响[J]. 核农学报, 2021, 35(8):1900-1907.
doi: 10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2021.08.1900 |
[4] |
梁建秋, 安建刚, 王嘉, 等. 不同种植密度对四川大豆农艺性状及产量的影响[J]. 大豆科学, 2021, 40(5):653-661.
|
[5] |
王小林, 张盼盼, 张静, 等. 黄土塬区施肥模式对大豆根系形态构建及产量形成的调控作用[J]. 大豆科学, 2021, 40(6):813-820.
|
[6] |
牟保民, 刘雅, 郑殿峰, 等. 不同时期高氮施肥对大豆光合生理特性及产量的影响[J]. 黑龙江八一农垦大学学报, 2021, 33(6):7-13.
|
[7] |
翟彩娇, 崔士友, 张蛟, 等. 缓/控释肥发展现状及在农业生产中的应用前景[J]. 农学学报, 2022, 12(1):22-27.
doi: 10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas2020-0028 |
[8] |
吴周周, 刘佳欣, 陈粤彤, 等. 缓控释肥研究现状及其在水稻上的应用[J]. 中国稻米, 2022, 28(1):13-17.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8082.2022.01.003 |
[9] |
徐峰, 钟文, 胡昕, 等. 不同品种缓控释肥对玉米产量性状·养分吸收及籽粒品质的影响[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2021, 49(24):172-174.
|
[10] |
张明伟, 马泉, 陈京都, 等. 缓控释肥在冬小麦上的应用研究进展及展望[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2022, 50(2):15-21.
|
[11] |
谢春生, 唐拴虎, 徐培智, 等. 一次性施用控释肥对水稻植株生长及产量的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2006(2):2177-2182.
|
[12] |
刘苹, 李庆凯, 林海涛, 等. 不同缓控释肥品种对玉米养分吸收、氮肥利用率及产量的影响[J]. 江西农业学报, 2020, 32(4):73-77.
|
[13] |
郑文魁, 李成亮, 窦兴霞, 等. 不同包膜类型控释氮肥对小麦产量及土壤生化性质的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2016, 30(2):162-167,174.
|
[14] |
高文胜, 范玲超, 秦旭, 等. 缓控释肥在果树生产中的应用与展望[J]. 北方园艺, 2012(16):128-130.
|
[15] |
肖晨星, 张蕾, 侯欢欢. 新型肥料在花卉产业中的应用前景[J]. 磷肥与复肥, 2022, 37(1):49-52.
|
[16] |
唐拴虎, 张发宝, 黄旭, 等. 缓/控释肥料对辣椒生长及养分利用率的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2008(5):986-991.
|
[17] |
张秋英, 刘晓冰, 金剑, 等. 缓释、控释肥料对大豆植株养分吸收及产量的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2002(4):47-49.
|
[18] |
孟庆英, 于忠和, 贾会彬, 等. 控释肥对大豆根际土壤微生物数目、肥力及大豆农艺性状的影响[J]. 大豆科学, 2011, 30(5):827-829.
|
[19] |
吕娇. 包膜控释尿素对玉米、大豆氮素吸收和产量的影响[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北农业大学, 2013:21-23.
|
[20] |
朱宝国, 张春峰, 于忠和, 等. 控释尿素和普通尿素配施对土壤氮含量及大豆产量和品质影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2012, 28(18):140-143.
|
[21] |
卢海燕, 薛小勤, 沈军华, 等. 缓控释肥在小麦上的应用效果研究[J]. 现代农工业科技, 2019(22):1-3.
|
[22] |
苏舜. 不同施肥方式对小麦产量及肥料利用率的影响[J]. 现代农业科技, 2022(1):12-14.
|
[23] |
高鹏. 缓控释肥对夏玉米产量及其农艺性状的效应[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2020:25-27.
|
[24] |
邹成林, 翟瑞宁, 张丰哲, 等. 常规施肥与缓控释肥对广西3个主推玉米品种产量的影响[J]. 现代农业科技, 2018(23):4-5.
|
[25] |
李祎成, 熊远福, 文祝友, 等. 缓控释肥的研究及其在水稻上的应用进展[J]. 湖南农业科学, 2021(12):98-101.
|
[26] |
张欢, 潘贤, 刘晓霞, 等. 侧深施肥搭配缓控释肥对水稻生长及其产量的影响[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2020, 61(7):1323-1325.
|
[1] | CHEN Shujian, CHEN Jingdu, YANG Chengqin, XU Meigang, GAO Jianbo. Effects of Nitrogen Application Rates on Yield and Quality of Rice with Mechanical Sowing in Line Under Water [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(9): 1-6. |
[2] | HU Baigeng, LI Xueyang, KONG Haiming, SUN Shasha, WANG Kexiu, HU Jianjun, HE Wei, TANG Mingxia. Different Calcium Concentrations Under Aeroponics: Effects on Growth and Yield of Potato [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(9): 33-39. |
[3] | QIAN Shuanghong, CAI Shikun, ZHU Hanyong, WANG Shaobin, LI Zhengrun, WANG Yingmei, LI Shaoyun. Maize Varieties (Strains) in Different Ecological Regions in Yunnan Province: Analysis of High Yield Potential, Yield Stability and Variety Adaptability [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(9): 7-15. |
[4] | LIU Yu, LI Ping, ZHAO Kaili, YAN Shi, LIU Jipei, LIU Lei, GUO Ning. Effects of Chemical Fertilizer Reduction Combined with Application of Bio-organic Fertilizer on Yield, Quality and Soil Nutrients of Celery [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(8): 63-68. |
[5] | JIANG Wanyue, HU Xiaohang, MA Yahuai, LI Yanli. GGE-biplot Based on R Language: Application in Regional Trial of Sugar Beet Varieties [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(8): 7-14. |
[6] | ZHANG Zihao, LI Xiangcheng, WU Haotian, FU Penghao, GAO Chunbao, ZHANG Yunbo, ZOU Juan. The Appropriate Sowing Rate of Wheat Under the Climate Conditions of Jianghan Plain [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(7): 1-9. |
[7] | JIA Limin, ZHAO Xiaoyu, WANG Xuejiao, SU Erhu, LI Qiang, GUO Jiahua. Changes of Agronomic Characters, Quality and Yield of Soybean Varieties Approved in Different Years in Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(7): 10-18. |
[8] | CHEN Yuli, YANG Ping, BI Haibin, ZHAI Huabo, WANG Dongfeng, ZHUO Ma, GAO Minghui, GONG Fajiang. Response of Main Growth Indexes of Summer Soybean Canopy to Nitrogen [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(7): 19-23. |
[9] | ZUO Hongjuan, CAO Hui, ZHANG Hongrui, WANG Feng, ZHANG Xiaoshen. Effects of Planting Date and Number of Topping Times on the Yield of Chrysanthemum morifolium ‘Gongju’ [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(7): 51-54. |
[10] | BAI Yulin, WANG Chengqiang, DU Bin, LIU Lu, LIU Xia. The Response of Sea-island Cotton Strains to the Spraying Time and Frequency of Defoliants [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(6): 26-34. |
[11] | LI Yali, BAI Jing, WU Zhenghu, HALIHASH Yibati, LI Qingjun. Effects of N, P and K Application Time on Yield, Quality and Nutrient Uptake of Processing Tomato Under Chemical Fertilizer Reduction [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(6): 58-63. |
[12] | ZHANG Kexin, YU Xiao, ZHANG Moucao. Effects of Sowing Date on Growth and Yield of Spring Maize in East Gansu [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(6): 6-12. |
[13] | YIN Liping, LIU Siyuan, CAI Chengmei, SHI Xiaoli, ZHU Xiaojuan, YUAN Guoming, WANG Jidong, ZHANG Hui, XU Cong, MA Hongbo. Effects of Jiabowen Soil Conditioner on Radish Yield and Quality and Soil Physical and Chemical Properties [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(6): 64-71. |
[14] | ZHOU Jie, QI Chuandong, TANG Chun, GUO Fengling, QIN Zhushan, CAI Xiaodong, WU Jinping. Application Effect of Ethephon, Medium Trace Element and Functional Fertilizer on Ginger [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(6): 72-76. |
[15] | YU Chong, ZHANG Fengyun, HUANG Hao, LU Yuncai. Quantitative Genetic Analysis of Cob Correlated Traits in Maize F2 Population [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(5): 13-20. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||