Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2023, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (12): 42-48.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2022-0332
Previous Articles Next Articles
LIU Jing(), LIU Jinli, LI Yang, BAI Zhongkui, YU Qiuxiang(
)
Received:
2022-04-27
Revised:
2022-06-14
Online:
2023-04-25
Published:
2023-04-21
LIU Jing, LIU Jinli, LI Yang, BAI Zhongkui, YU Qiuxiang. Effects of Different Soil Mulching Treatments on Walnut Quality[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(12): 42-48.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2022-0332
处理 | N/% | P/(mg/kg) | K/(mg/kg) | Ca/(mg/kg) | Mg/(mg/kg) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
覆秸秆 | 0.11±0.01a | 92.92±15.60a | 418.04±151.08a | 354.50±96.90b | 131.76±39.74a |
自然生草 | 0.11±0.01a | 92.55±3.51a | 235.15±32.10b | 628.64±198.06ab | 176.19±62.85a |
覆地布 | 0.11±0.01a | 76.48±28.15a | 139.17±20.44b | 602.91±182.32ab | 136.38±44.30a |
对照(清耕) | 0.11±0.01a | 69.75±16.26a | 214.76±52.41b | 663.41±7.12a | 165.39±30.06a |
处理 | N/% | P/(mg/kg) | K/(mg/kg) | Ca/(mg/kg) | Mg/(mg/kg) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
覆秸秆 | 0.11±0.01a | 92.92±15.60a | 418.04±151.08a | 354.50±96.90b | 131.76±39.74a |
自然生草 | 0.11±0.01a | 92.55±3.51a | 235.15±32.10b | 628.64±198.06ab | 176.19±62.85a |
覆地布 | 0.11±0.01a | 76.48±28.15a | 139.17±20.44b | 602.91±182.32ab | 136.38±44.30a |
对照(清耕) | 0.11±0.01a | 69.75±16.26a | 214.76±52.41b | 663.41±7.12a | 165.39±30.06a |
处理 | Fe/(mg/kg) | Mn/(mg/kg) | Cu/(mg/kg) | Zn/(mg/kg) | 有机碳/% | pH |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
覆秸秆 | 74.90±21.88a | 9.86±6.43a | 2.65±0.80a | 2.07±0.49a | 0.66±0.13a | 6.09±0.80a |
自然生草 | 97.35±34.10a | 9.77±5.11a | 3.49±0.54a | 2.64±0.61a | 0.72±0.07a | 6.50±0.39a |
覆地布 | 99.66±21.05a | 13.66±7.86a | 3.00±0.66a | 2.41±0.51a | 0.73±0.07a | 5.94±0.40a |
对照(清耕) | 86.83±14.45a | 8.37±0.84a | 3.82±0.66a | 2.80±0.40a | 0.78±0.12a | 6.53±0.14a |
处理 | Fe/(mg/kg) | Mn/(mg/kg) | Cu/(mg/kg) | Zn/(mg/kg) | 有机碳/% | pH |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
覆秸秆 | 74.90±21.88a | 9.86±6.43a | 2.65±0.80a | 2.07±0.49a | 0.66±0.13a | 6.09±0.80a |
自然生草 | 97.35±34.10a | 9.77±5.11a | 3.49±0.54a | 2.64±0.61a | 0.72±0.07a | 6.50±0.39a |
覆地布 | 99.66±21.05a | 13.66±7.86a | 3.00±0.66a | 2.41±0.51a | 0.73±0.07a | 5.94±0.40a |
对照(清耕) | 86.83±14.45a | 8.37±0.84a | 3.82±0.66a | 2.80±0.40a | 0.78±0.12a | 6.53±0.14a |
处理 | N/% | P/(mg/kg) | K/(mg/kg) | Ca/(mg/kg) | Mg/(mg/kg) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
覆秸秆 | 1.38±0.11a | 2262.28±214.98a | 6857.28±1009.99b | 25326.79±1702.37a | 4978.96±567.14a |
自然生草 | 1.47±0.08a | 2402.63±128.83a | 9480.32±1276.63a | 25733.36±6832.13a | 4447.48±557.69a |
覆地布 | 1.50±0.06a | 2209.13±380.55a | 7539.20±1716.89ab | 29426.36±2925.67a | 4853.15±285.75a |
对照(清耕) | 1.53±0.07a | 2093.99±307.06a | 7118.24±400.99b | 29199.78±1043.75a | 4742.77±203.29a |
处理 | N/% | P/(mg/kg) | K/(mg/kg) | Ca/(mg/kg) | Mg/(mg/kg) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
覆秸秆 | 1.38±0.11a | 2262.28±214.98a | 6857.28±1009.99b | 25326.79±1702.37a | 4978.96±567.14a |
自然生草 | 1.47±0.08a | 2402.63±128.83a | 9480.32±1276.63a | 25733.36±6832.13a | 4447.48±557.69a |
覆地布 | 1.50±0.06a | 2209.13±380.55a | 7539.20±1716.89ab | 29426.36±2925.67a | 4853.15±285.75a |
对照(清耕) | 1.53±0.07a | 2093.99±307.06a | 7118.24±400.99b | 29199.78±1043.75a | 4742.77±203.29a |
处理 | Fe/(mg/kg) | Mn/(mg/kg) | Cu/(mg/kg) | Zn/(mg/kg) | 有机碳/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
覆秸秆 | 106.43±10.32a | 1670.78±226.78a | 5.41±0.79a | 42.97±6.09a | 50.00%±0.62a |
自然生草 | 109.70±2.58a | 1250.65±158.60b | 4.19±1.51a | 46.07±3.62a | 50.50%±1.40a |
覆地布 | 105.60±2.22a | 923.79±147.66b | 4.39±0.71a | 38.78±7.42a | 50.24%±0.58a |
对照(清耕) | 98.09±10.98a | 986.85±209.17b | 4.09±0.57a | 38.78±7.39a | 50.54%±0.09a |
处理 | Fe/(mg/kg) | Mn/(mg/kg) | Cu/(mg/kg) | Zn/(mg/kg) | 有机碳/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
覆秸秆 | 106.43±10.32a | 1670.78±226.78a | 5.41±0.79a | 42.97±6.09a | 50.00%±0.62a |
自然生草 | 109.70±2.58a | 1250.65±158.60b | 4.19±1.51a | 46.07±3.62a | 50.50%±1.40a |
覆地布 | 105.60±2.22a | 923.79±147.66b | 4.39±0.71a | 38.78±7.42a | 50.24%±0.58a |
对照(清耕) | 98.09±10.98a | 986.85±209.17b | 4.09±0.57a | 38.78±7.39a | 50.54%±0.09a |
处理 | N/% | P/(mg/kg) | K/(mg/kg) | Ca/(mg/kg) | Mg/(mg/kg) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
覆秸秆 | 1.60±0.15a | 3995.26±297.18a | 3211.28±290.83a | 1326.49±194.80a | 1446.66±71.21ab |
自然生草 | 1.59±0.13a | 3731.95±173.22a | 3128.65±79.26a | 1362.51±137.31a | 1370.50±50.57b |
覆地布 | 1.63±0.09a | 4195.98±383.08a | 3286.12±162.63a | 1546.37±123.68a | 1609.48±137.36a |
对照(清耕) | 1.66±0.10a | 3990.96±222.99a | 3397.46±238.68a | 1429.18±41.74a | 1447.54±106.13ab |
处理 | N/% | P/(mg/kg) | K/(mg/kg) | Ca/(mg/kg) | Mg/(mg/kg) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
覆秸秆 | 1.60±0.15a | 3995.26±297.18a | 3211.28±290.83a | 1326.49±194.80a | 1446.66±71.21ab |
自然生草 | 1.59±0.13a | 3731.95±173.22a | 3128.65±79.26a | 1362.51±137.31a | 1370.50±50.57b |
覆地布 | 1.63±0.09a | 4195.98±383.08a | 3286.12±162.63a | 1546.37±123.68a | 1609.48±137.36a |
对照(清耕) | 1.66±0.10a | 3990.96±222.99a | 3397.46±238.68a | 1429.18±41.74a | 1447.54±106.13ab |
处理 | Fe/(mg/kg) | Mn/(mg/kg) | Cu/(mg/kg) | Zn/(mg/kg) | 有机碳/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
覆秸秆 | 20.51±2.82a | 385.84±33.43a | 16.45±2.22a | 45.78±4.89a | 66.86±3.83a |
自然生草 | 22.55±7.05a | 363.17±52.98a | 13.52±0.51ab | 47.59±8.23a | 68.92±2.41a |
覆地布 | 20.10±2.26a | 228.95±52.58b | 11.47±1.03b | 54.96±7.47a | 68.00±3.71a |
对照(清耕) | 19.25±2.29a | 252.90±69.57b | 10.56±2.34b | 45.41±3.74a | 70.23±0.33a |
处理 | Fe/(mg/kg) | Mn/(mg/kg) | Cu/(mg/kg) | Zn/(mg/kg) | 有机碳/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
覆秸秆 | 20.51±2.82a | 385.84±33.43a | 16.45±2.22a | 45.78±4.89a | 66.86±3.83a |
自然生草 | 22.55±7.05a | 363.17±52.98a | 13.52±0.51ab | 47.59±8.23a | 68.92±2.41a |
覆地布 | 20.10±2.26a | 228.95±52.58b | 11.47±1.03b | 54.96±7.47a | 68.00±3.71a |
对照(清耕) | 19.25±2.29a | 252.90±69.57b | 10.56±2.34b | 45.41±3.74a | 70.23±0.33a |
处理 | 青果质量/g | 纵径/mm | 横径/mm | 棱径/mm | 青皮厚度/mm | 湿重/g | 出实率/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
覆秸秆 | 91.81±8.62a | 58.71±4.05ab | 55.61±1.89ab | 53.85±2.13a | 8.51±0.78a | 28.43±4.06ab | 30.88±2.53a |
自然生草 | 85.75±12.24a | 56.19±2.75c | 54.18±2.85b | 51.54±3.31b | 8.10±0.92a | 26.77±4.68b | 31.13±2.92a |
覆地布 | 92.60±9.71a | 56.87±2.04bc | 54.51±2.21ab | 51.82±1.89b | 8.52±0.79a | 29.16±4.28ab | 31.44±2.82a |
对照(清耕) | 92.16±8.65a | 59.63±1.82a | 55.81±1.53a | 52.49±2.47ab | 8.07±1.06a | 29.86±3.44a | 32.48±3.42a |
处理 | 青果质量/g | 纵径/mm | 横径/mm | 棱径/mm | 青皮厚度/mm | 湿重/g | 出实率/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
覆秸秆 | 91.81±8.62a | 58.71±4.05ab | 55.61±1.89ab | 53.85±2.13a | 8.51±0.78a | 28.43±4.06ab | 30.88±2.53a |
自然生草 | 85.75±12.24a | 56.19±2.75c | 54.18±2.85b | 51.54±3.31b | 8.10±0.92a | 26.77±4.68b | 31.13±2.92a |
覆地布 | 92.60±9.71a | 56.87±2.04bc | 54.51±2.21ab | 51.82±1.89b | 8.52±0.79a | 29.16±4.28ab | 31.44±2.82a |
对照(清耕) | 92.16±8.65a | 59.63±1.82a | 55.81±1.53a | 52.49±2.47ab | 8.07±1.06a | 29.86±3.44a | 32.48±3.42a |
处理 | 纵径/mm | 横径/mm | 棱径/mm | 坚果质量/g | 种仁质量/g | 种壳厚度/mm | 出仁率/% | 果形指数 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
覆秸秆 | 39.93±2.76ab | 37.77±1.35a | 36.51±1.79a | 16.28±1.35a | 8.51±0.86a | 1.87±0.23bc | 52.23±2.07ab | 1.06±0.06ab |
自然生草 | 39.51±2.39b | 37.57±2.24a | 36.52±2.41a | 15.00±2.40b | 8.18±1.70a | 1.78±0.15c | 54.02±4.52a | 1.05±0.04ab |
覆地布 | 39.55±1.01ab | 38.67±1.26a | 36.26±1.51a | 16.88±1.06a | 8.57±0.68a | 1.97±0.19ab | 50.73±1.58b | 1.02±0.04b |
对照(清耕) | 41.19±1.50a | 38.23±1.07a | 36.92±1.90a | 16.90±1.39a | 8.64±0.83a | 2.10±0.18a | 51.07±1.97b | 1.08±0.03a |
处理 | 纵径/mm | 横径/mm | 棱径/mm | 坚果质量/g | 种仁质量/g | 种壳厚度/mm | 出仁率/% | 果形指数 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
覆秸秆 | 39.93±2.76ab | 37.77±1.35a | 36.51±1.79a | 16.28±1.35a | 8.51±0.86a | 1.87±0.23bc | 52.23±2.07ab | 1.06±0.06ab |
自然生草 | 39.51±2.39b | 37.57±2.24a | 36.52±2.41a | 15.00±2.40b | 8.18±1.70a | 1.78±0.15c | 54.02±4.52a | 1.05±0.04ab |
覆地布 | 39.55±1.01ab | 38.67±1.26a | 36.26±1.51a | 16.88±1.06a | 8.57±0.68a | 1.97±0.19ab | 50.73±1.58b | 1.02±0.04b |
对照(清耕) | 41.19±1.50a | 38.23±1.07a | 36.92±1.90a | 16.90±1.39a | 8.64±0.83a | 2.10±0.18a | 51.07±1.97b | 1.08±0.03a |
[1] |
裴东, 鲁新政. 中国核桃种质资源[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2011.
|
[2] |
曲泽洲. 果树栽培各论[M]. 北京: 农业出版社, 1980:321.
|
[3] |
侯立群. 核桃栽培实用技术[M]. 济南: 山东科学技术出版社, 2012:5.
|
[4] |
doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2021.126277 URL |
[5] |
尹晓宁, 刘兴禄, 董铁, 等. 苹果园不同覆盖材料对土壤与近地微域环境及树体生长发育的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2018, 26(1):83-95.
|
[6] |
潘雅文, 樊军, 郝明德, 等. 黄土塬区长期不同耕作、覆盖措施对表层土壤理化性状和玉米产量的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2016, 22(6):1558-1567.
|
[7] |
张洋, 倪九派, 谢德体. 果园覆盖土壤生态效应研究进展[J]. 农业工程, 2013, 3(6):1-6.
|
[8] |
李会科, 张广军, 赵政阳, 等. 黄土高原旱地苹果园生草对土壤养分的影响[J]. 园艺学报, 2007(2):477-480.
|
[9] |
罗玲, 钟奇, 王进, 等. 不同覆盖材料对避雨葡萄园土壤微生物特征及葡萄生长与品质的影响[J]. 核农学报, 2021, 35(2):471-480.
doi: 10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2021.02.0471 |
[10] |
罗玲. 不同地表覆盖模式对避雨葡萄园土壤性质及果实品质的影响[D]. 雅安: 四川农业大学, 2019.
|
[11] |
王中堂, 沙建川, 解小锋, 等. 枣园生草处理对土壤养分和细菌群落的影响[J]. 核农学报, 2022, 36(2):456-465.
doi: 10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2022.02.0456 |
[12] |
|
[13] |
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210777 URL |
[14] |
|
[15] |
doi: 10.3390/agronomy9040190 URL |
[16] |
古元梓, 郑敏燕, 邓玲娟. ICP-OES法测定长白山和秦岭黑木耳中的矿质元素[J]. 广东化工, 2020, 47(24):212-214.
|
[17] |
山东省果树研究所,中国农业科学院茶叶研究所. NY/T 2330—2013,农作物种质资源鉴定评价技术规范核桃[S].
|
[18] |
周国民. 数字果园研究现状与应用前景展望[J]. 农业展望, 2015, 11(5):61-63.81.
|
[19] |
韩明玉. 近年我国苹果生产呈现的几大变化值得关注[J]. 西北园艺(果树), 2010(3):4-6.
|
[20] |
赵佐平, 同延安, 刘芬, 等. 渭北旱塬苹果园施肥现状分析评估[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2012, 20(8):1003-1009.
|
[21] |
严昌荣, 梅旭荣, 何文清, 等. 农用地膜残留污染的现状与防治[J]. 农业工程学报, 2006(11):269-272.
|
[22] |
王玉娟, 陈永忠. 农作物及果园地面覆盖研究综述[J]. 经济林研究, 2008(2):131-134.
|
[23] |
张洋, 倪九派, 谢德体. 果园覆盖土壤生态效应研究进展[J]. 农业工程, 2013, 3(6):1-6.
|
[24] |
卜玉山, 王建程, 邵海林, 等. 不同覆盖材料土壤生态效应与玉米增产效应研究[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2005(2):138-141.
|
[25] |
沈鹏飞. 不同覆盖措施对渭北苹果园土壤理化性质及微生物群落结构的影响[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2019.
|
[26] |
高茂盛, 廖允成, 李侠, 等. 不同覆盖方式对渭北旱作苹果园土壤贮水的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2010, 43(10):2080-2087.
|
[27] |
|
[28] |
冯志国. 不同覆盖材料对苹果园土壤水分、养分状况的影响[J]. 防护林科技, 2019(6):21-23.
|
[29] |
郑悦, 李会科, 张泰然, 等. 园艺地布微垄覆盖对渭北旱地矮化苹果根域土壤水分的影响[J]. 西北农业学报, 2019, 28(4):631-640.
|
[30] |
陈蓓, 张仁陟. 免耕与覆盖对土壤微生物数量及组成的影响[J]. 甘肃农业大学学报, 2004(6):634-638.
|
[31] |
赵思东, 张琳, 谢志明, 等. 覆草栽培对梨园土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 中南林学院学报, 2005(4):66-70.
|
[32] |
doi: 10.1186/s13568-021-01294-6 pmid: 34581888 |
[33] |
朱占玲, 夏营, 刘晶晶, 等. 山东省苹果园磷素投入调查及磷环境负荷风险分析[J]. 园艺学报, 2017, 44(1):97-105.
doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2016-0471 |
[34] |
寇建村, 杨文权, 韩明玉, 等. 我国果园生草研究进展[J]. 草业科学, 2010, 27(7):154-159.
|
[35] |
蔡冬元. 果园生草栽培的生理生态效应研究动态与展望[J]. 湖南农业科学, 2005(2):37-38,43.
|
[36] |
焦润安, 张舒涵, 李毅, 等. 生草影响果树生长发育及果园环境的研究进展[J]. 果树学报, 2017, 34(12):1610-1623.
|
[37] |
李发林, 郑域茹, 郑涛, 等. 果园带状生草对果园面源污染的控制效果[J]. 水土保持学报, 2013, 27(3):82-89.
|
[38] |
白岗栓, 周楠, 邵发琦, 等. 自然生草对渭北旱塬苹果园土壤氮及果实品质的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2021, 37(10):100-109.
|
[39] |
王燕, 白岗栓. 自然生草对土壤和树体矿质营养及苹果树生理病害的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(10):2309-2322.
doi: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2021.10.023 |
[40] |
焦润安, 张舒涵, 李毅, 等. 生草影响果树生长发育及果园环境的研究进展[J]. 果树学报, 2017, 34(12):1610-1623.
|
[41] |
李会科, 梅立新, 高华. 黄土高原旱地苹果园生草对果园小气候的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2009, 17(5):615-620.
doi: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2009.05.013 |
[42] |
杨露, 毛云飞, 胡艳丽, 等. 生草改善果园土壤肥力和苹果树体营养的效果[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2020, 26(2):325-337.
|
[43] |
张文利, 吴步梅, 马浩轩, 等. 生草对高海拔冷凉干旱地区杏园生态环境及果实品质的影响[J]. 北方园艺, 2014(6):24-27.
|
[1] | CHEN Shujian, CHEN Jingdu, YANG Chengqin, XU Meigang, GAO Jianbo. Effects of Nitrogen Application Rates on Yield and Quality of Rice with Mechanical Sowing in Line Under Water [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(9): 1-6. |
[2] | REN Haiying, ZHENG Jingmeng, SHI Wei, WU Haodi, WANG Kangqiang, YU Mingquan, WANG Zhenshuo, WANG Qi. Effects of Micro-ecology Preparation Improving Soil on the Vegetative Growth and Fruit Quality of Twig Blight Diseased Bayberry [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(9): 153-157. |
[3] | WANG Guozhong, LI Zhongyuan, ZHANG Jiyu, YANG Dan, LUO Qingyuan, LU Yuanzhang. Evaluation of Synergistic Control Level for Water Resources, Sediment and Pollution in Small Watershed: A Case Study of the Ying River Source Area [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(9): 57-62. |
[4] | CHEN Gaolin, MAI Yongxin, ZHANG Dongqing, LV Mengyu, LI Xia. Antibiotic Removal Mechanism in Constructed Wetland: A Review [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(9): 63-70. |
[5] | WU Chupeng, SHENG Jiandong, HU Yutong, CHENG Zhihui, YANG Pengfei. Soil Quality Evaluation of Oasis Cotton Fields in Shaya County of Xinjiang [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(9): 71-78. |
[6] | LIAO Heting, ZHENG Yao, WANG Ning, AN Shuwei, Gu Lingling, CHEN Jiazhang. Analysis of Plankton Community Structure Characteristics of Lotus Root-Crayfish Culture Model in Different Areas of Northern Jiangsu [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(8): 156-164. |
[7] | YUAN Mingrui, YANG Fengshan, CAI Baiyan, FU Haiyan, LIU Chunguang. Research Progress of Agricultural Soil Carbon Sink [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(8): 37-42. |
[8] | ZHAO Shouping, XIAO Wendan, CHEN De, YE Xuezhu, ZHANG Qi, WU Shaofu, HU Jing, GAO Na, HUANG Miaojie. Evaluation of Heavy Metal Passivation in Contaminated Paddy Fields Based on Soil Quality and Rice Safety [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(8): 51-62. |
[9] | LIU Yu, LI Ping, ZHAO Kaili, YAN Shi, LIU Jipei, LIU Lei, GUO Ning. Effects of Chemical Fertilizer Reduction Combined with Application of Bio-organic Fertilizer on Yield, Quality and Soil Nutrients of Celery [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(8): 63-68. |
[10] | SHEN Jianguo, SU Guijun, LOU Ling, HE Linhai, HU Kangying. Effects of Salt Washing Methods on Soil Salinity and Nutrient Content and Vegetable Growth in Facility Agriculture [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(8): 69-73. |
[11] | JIA Limin, ZHAO Xiaoyu, WANG Xuejiao, SU Erhu, LI Qiang, GUO Jiahua. Changes of Agronomic Characters, Quality and Yield of Soybean Varieties Approved in Different Years in Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(7): 10-18. |
[12] | SHAO Xuehua, KUANG Shizi, HUANG Jianhui, OUYANG Jiamin, WAN Yan, LAI Duo. Effects of On-tree Storage on the Fruit Quality of Phyllanthus emblica [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(7): 140-145. |
[13] | GAO Bohang, XIA Tongyong, WANG Guangfei, MA Yan, XU Yehong. Application Effect of Organic Fertilizer Combined with Chemical Fertilizer Reduction on Xinyi Honey Peach [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(7): 33-39. |
[14] | NIU Xianqian, JIANG Li, LIN Qiujin, LIN Xiuxiang, LI Yongyu, SHI Qing. Division of Planting Areas for Superior Quality Passion Fruits in Fujian [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(7): 40-45. |
[15] | HE Lijuan, HONG Mingwei, WU Xing’en, ZHANG Hongchang, REN Jing, BAI Chunlan, WANG Zhenghe, YANG Rongping, ZHANG Hong. Effect of CO2 Capture Agent on Mineral Element Content of Pomegranate Leaves [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(7): 46-50. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||