Analysis of the Research Situation of Ancient Trees at Home and Abroad from 2012 to 2021:Based on CiteSpace and VOSviewer

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2022-0806

Abstract

Abstract:

In order to conduct a comprehensive and in-depth analysis of the research status of ancient trees at home and abroad, and identify the hotspots and frontiers of ancient trees during 2012 and 2021, this paper took the relevant research literature as the data foundation, which was included in the CNKI database and the core collection of Web of Science. This paper fully integrated the advantages of CiteSpace and VOSviewer visualization software, and used comprehensive literature co-author network, co-citation network and co-word network to carry out the visualization analysis of scientific knowledge map. This paper found that the attention of researchers at home and abroad on ancient trees was on the rise year by year. In China, the main research institutions included Shanghai Green Management Guidance Station, Taiyuan Garden Plant Research Center, etc. The main domestic research contents involved four aspects, respectively: investigation of ancient tree resources, ancient tree protection measures, the soil impact on ancient tree growth and analysis of ancient tree ecological characteristics. Internationally, the most influential research country was the United States, and the second was China. Among the international research institutions, the most influential research institution was the Chinese Academy of Sciences, and Yang Y, et al. were highly influential authors in this field. The main research contents of international ancient trees involved four aspects, namely: the biological and cultural heritage value of ancient trees, the extensive ecological value of ancient trees, the value of ancient trees in the protection of regional biodiversity, and the unique advantages of ancient trees in genetic diversity.

Key words: ancient trees, situation analysis, scientific knowledge map, CiteSpace, VOSviewer

YE Chunlei, MA Xiaoyan, LIU Zixuan, CHENG Guanhua. Analysis of the Research Situation of Ancient Trees at Home and Abroad from 2012 to 2021:Based on CiteSpace and VOSviewer[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(28): 142-150.

Figures/Tables 11

References 39

[1]	BLICHARSKA M, MIKUSINSKI G. Incorporating social and cultural significance of large old trees in conservation policy[J]. Conservation biology, 2014, 28(6):1558-1567. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12341 pmid: 25115905
[2]	石红旗, 谢兴刚, 方建忠. 太原城区古树名木现状分析与后续资源保护研究[J]. 中国园林, 2014, 30(3):111-114.
[3]	LINDENMAYER D B, LAURANCE W F, FRANKLIN J F. Global decline in large old trees[J]. Science, 2012, 338 :1305-1306. doi: 10.1126/science.1231070 URL
[4]	LINDENMAYER D B, LAURANCE W F. The unique challenges of conserving large old trees[J]. Trends in ecology & evolution, 2016, 31(6):416-418. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2016.03.003 URL
[5]	谢兴刚. 太原市建成区古树名木资源现状调查分析[J]. 太原学院学报(自然科学版), 2019, 37(2):17-20.
[6]	蔡施泽, 乐笑玮, 谢长坤, 等. 3种上海市常见古树粗根系分布特征及保护对策[J]. 上海交通大学学报(农业科学版), 2017, 35(4):7-14.
[7]	刘家雄, 金陈斌, 张静, 等. 古树土壤酶活性与土壤肥力的关系[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2018, 46(12):146-148.
[8]	张艳, 黄灏峰, 杨兴康, 等. 华北地区古树主要形态特征变异分析[J]. 四川农业大学学报, 2013, 31(1):37-41.
[9]	陈悦, 刘则渊. 悄然兴起的科学知识图谱[J]. 科学学研究, 2005(2):149-154.
[10]	CHEN C. CiteSpace Ⅱ: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2006, 57(3):359-377. doi: 10.1002/(ISSN)1532-2890 URL
[11]	WALTMAN L, ECK N J V, NOYONS E C M. A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2010, 4(4):629-635. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2010.07.002 URL
[12]	徐志平, 叶广荣, 何世庆, 等. 广州市古树群保护现状调查[J]. 广东园林, 2012, 34(1):55-57.
[13]	叶广荣, 吴渭湛, 何世庆, 等. 广州木棉古树生长状况调查及保护对策[J]. 农业研究与应用, 2014(3):88-92.
[14]	谢兴刚. 太原市建成区古树名木资源现状调查分析[J]. 太原学院学报(自然科学版), 2019, 37(2):17-20.
[15]	孙明巡, 陈嫣嫣, 李胜华, 等. 建设时期古树综合保护技术初探——以0369号古银杏保护为例[J]. 中国园艺文摘, 2012, 28(5):87-89.
[16]	谢兴刚, 石红旗. 城市生态环境中古树保护应对策略研究[J]. 中国园艺文摘, 2015, 31(10):79-82.
[17]	石红旗, 谢兴刚. 浅析山西太原市城中村改造中的古树保护对策[J]. 中国园艺文摘, 2016, 32(7):81-82.
[18]	陈嫣嫣, 孙明巡. 光触媒在上海古树防腐中的应用效果初探[J]. 中国园艺文摘, 2012, 28(9):24-25.
[19]	李伟林, 文剑, 肖中亮, 等. 颐和园古树内部异常的雷达波检测[J]. 福建农林大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 46(6):665-671.
[20]	谢兴刚, 苗峰, 石红旗. 太原地区古树树体健康与安全评估技术研究[J]. 林业科技通讯, 2018(4):67-70.
[21]	吴海龙, 刘晶岚, 黄灏峰, 等. 北京市不同区域3种古树木叶片营养元素特征[J]. 四川农业大学学报, 2013, 31(2):140-144.
[22]	谢媛媛, 吴海龙, 黄灏峰, 等. 北京古树健康评价[J]. 林业资源管理, 2012(6):71-75.
[23]	夏聪, 黄华枝, 龚志勤, 等. PICUS在华南地区古树健康状况与安全性评估中的应用研究[J]. 河北林业科技, 2015(3):24-26,30.
[24]	郜旭芳, 张新权. 古树名木病虫害综合防控技术[J]. 绿色科技, 2018(17):36-37,39.
[25]	杜宾. 声波在古树保护中的应用研究[J]. 山西林业, 2015(6):24-25.
[26]	汤珧华, 潘建萍, 邹福生, 等. 上海松柏古树生长与土壤肥力因子的关系[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2017, 23(5):1402-1408.
[27]	陈志华, 潘建萍, 邹福生, 等. 上海地区松柏古树周边不同配置材料对古树生长土壤的影响研究[J]. 上海农业科技, 2017(5):100-101.
[28]	刘家雄, 金陈斌, 张静, 等. 古树土壤酶活性与土壤肥力的关系[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2018, 46(12):146-148.
[29]	张艳, 黄灏峰, 杨兴康, 等. 华北地区古树主要形态特征变异分析[J]. 四川农业大学学报, 2013, 31(1):37-41.
[30]	王萱, 刘晓静, 邢世岩, 等. 中国部分古银杏资源遗传多样性的AFLP分析及核心种质的构建[J]. 园艺学报, 2016, 43(2):249-260. doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2015-0601
[31]	SCHICCHI R, SPECIALE C, AMATO F, et al. The monumental olive trees as biocultural heritage of mediterranean landscapes: The case study of sicily[J]. Sustainability, 2021, 13(12).
[32]	ZAPPONI L, MAZZA G, FARINA A, et al. The role of monumental trees for the preservation of saproxylic biodiversity: Re-thinking their management in cultural landscapes[J]. Nature conservation, 2017, 19:231-243. doi: 10.3897/natureconservation.19.12464 URL
[33]	HANNON G E, MOLINARI C, BRADSHAW R H W. Factors influencing late-Holocene vegetation dynamics and biodiversity on Hallands Vadero, SW Sweden: A statistical evaluation[J]. Holocene, 2021, 32(11).
[34]	LIU J J, LINDENMAYER D B, YANG W J, et al. Diversity and density patterns of large old trees in China[J]. Science of the total environment, 2019, 655:255-262. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.147
[35]	CUI B, DENG P, ZHANG S, et al. Genetic diversity and population genetic structure of ancient Platycladus orientalis L. (Cupressaceae) in the middle reaches of the Yellow River by chloroplast microsatellite markers[J]. Forests, 2021, 12(5).
[36]	CHOLEWINSKA O, KECZYNSKI A, KUSINSKA B, et al. Species identity of large trees affects the composition and the spatial structure of adjacent trees[J]. Forests, 2021, 12(9).
[37]	CHANG E M, TIAN Y X, WANG C Y, et al. Exploring the phylogeography of ancient Platycladus orientalis in China by specific-locus amplified fragment sequencing[J]. International journal of molecular sciences, 2019, 20(16).
[38]	CUI B, DENG P, TIAN L H, et al. Genetic evaluation of ancient Platycladus orientalis L. (Cupressaceae) in the middle reaches of the Yellow River using nuclear microsatellite markers[J]. Forests, 2021, 12(12).
[39]	ZHU P, WANG Z F, YE W H, et al. Maintenance of genetic diversity in a small, isolated population of ancient tree Erythrophleum fordii[J]. Journal of systematics and evolution, 2013, 51(6):722-730. doi: 10.1111/jse.12047 URL

序号	主要研究机构	主要作者
1	上海市绿化管理指导站	张静、陈嫣嫣、刘家雄、傅徽楠、邹福生、潘建萍、乐笑玮、陈志华、孙明巡、汤珧华
2	太原市园林植物研究中心	石红旗、谢兴刚
3	北京林业大学	黄灏峰、张振明、刘晶岚、张容
4	山东省泰安市泰山林业科学研究院	王晓英、赵进红、王玉山、周光锋、冯殿奇
5	广州市林业和园林科学研究院	叶广荣、何世庆
6	山东农业大学林学院	刘晓静、邢世岩、吴岐奎
7	太原学院	杜宾
8	河南林业职业学院	刘光武、张新权、周亚爽

序号	主要研究机构	主要作者
1	上海市绿化管理指导站	张静、陈嫣嫣、刘家雄、傅徽楠、邹福生、潘建萍、乐笑玮、陈志华、孙明巡、汤珧华
2	太原市园林植物研究中心	石红旗、谢兴刚
3	北京林业大学	黄灏峰、张振明、刘晶岚、张容
4	山东省泰安市泰山林业科学研究院	王晓英、赵进红、王玉山、周光锋、冯殿奇
5	广州市林业和园林科学研究院	叶广荣、何世庆
6	山东农业大学林学院	刘晓静、邢世岩、吴岐奎
7	太原学院	杜宾
8	河南林业职业学院	刘光武、张新权、周亚爽

序号
1	中国科学院(Chinese Academy of Sciences)	中国	23	706	29
2	乌普萨拉大学(Uppsala University)	瑞典	14	735	27
3	哥本哈根大学(University of Copenhagen)	丹麦	12	426	20
4	哥廷根大学(University of Gottingen)	德国	5	300	16
5	南安普顿大学(University of Southampton)	英国	7	345	16
6	斯德哥尔摩大学(Stockholm University)	瑞典	5	58	13
7	牛津大学(University of Oxford)	英国	9	207	12
8	波兹南密茨凯维奇大学(Adam Mickiewicz University)	波兰	5	39	11
9	赫尔辛基大学(University of Helsinki)	芬兰	6	377	11
10	约翰内斯堡大学(University of Johannesburg)	南非	5	58	11

序号
1	中国科学院(Chinese Academy of Sciences)	中国	23	706	29
2	乌普萨拉大学(Uppsala University)	瑞典	14	735	27
3	哥本哈根大学(University of Copenhagen)	丹麦	12	426	20
4	哥廷根大学(University of Gottingen)	德国	5	300	16
5	南安普顿大学(University of Southampton)	英国	7	345	16
6	斯德哥尔摩大学(Stockholm University)	瑞典	5	58	13
7	牛津大学(University of Oxford)	英国	9	207	12
8	波兹南密茨凯维奇大学(Adam Mickiewicz University)	波兰	5	39	11
9	赫尔辛基大学(University of Helsinki)	芬兰	6	377	11
10	约翰内斯堡大学(University of Johannesburg)	南非	5	58	11