Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2023, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (4): 44-51.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2022-0833
Previous Articles Next Articles
ZHENG Jian1(), RUI Danping1, GAO Xianyu1, ZHANG Huiyun1, SONG Yunlian1, PAN Jihong1, YU Weilin1, WANG Yuequan1, LIU Siyuan1, ZHENG Pingqing2, LUO Xinping1(
)
Received:
2022-10-09
Revised:
2022-12-01
Online:
2023-02-05
Published:
2023-01-31
ZHENG Jian, RUI Danping, GAO Xianyu, ZHANG Huiyun, SONG Yunlian, PAN Jihong, YU Weilin, WANG Yuequan, LIU Siyuan, ZHENG Pingqing, LUO Xinping. Fruit Quality Performance of Litchi chinensis ‘Guiwei’ and Regional Test Cultivars in Yongde of Yunnan[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(4): 44-51.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2022-0833
品种 | 审认定编号 | 品种特性 | 单果重/g | 可溶性固形物/% | 可食率/% | 焦核率/% | 参考文献 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
冰荔 | 粤审果2018001 | 优质、焦核、不易裂果 | 20.70 | 19.40 | 75.30 | — | [ |
贵妃红 | 热品审2014003 | 果大、丰产、质优 | 35.40 | 18.70 | 73.50 | 46.00 | [ |
观音绿 | 粤审果2012002 | 肉质细软,香甜蜜味、品质特优 | 21.00~25.00 | 18.50 | 81.60 | 95.00 | [ |
仙进奉 | 粤审果2011009 | 迟熟、抗裂、优质 | 25.00 | 19.10 | 79.00 | 85.00 | [ |
凤山红灯笼 | 粤审果2011005 | 坐果力强、抗裂 | 25.50 | 17.80 | 80.00 | 82.00 | [ |
岭丰糯 | 粤审果2010002 | 果肉细嫩、爽脆,品质上乘 | 25.80 | 17.60~18.80 | 80.40 | 95.60 | [ |
无核荔 | 粤审果2005002 | 果实较大、无核、品质优 | 35.31 | 16.00~18.00 | 80.00 | 90.00 | [ |
品种 | 审认定编号 | 品种特性 | 单果重/g | 可溶性固形物/% | 可食率/% | 焦核率/% | 参考文献 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
冰荔 | 粤审果2018001 | 优质、焦核、不易裂果 | 20.70 | 19.40 | 75.30 | — | [ |
贵妃红 | 热品审2014003 | 果大、丰产、质优 | 35.40 | 18.70 | 73.50 | 46.00 | [ |
观音绿 | 粤审果2012002 | 肉质细软,香甜蜜味、品质特优 | 21.00~25.00 | 18.50 | 81.60 | 95.00 | [ |
仙进奉 | 粤审果2011009 | 迟熟、抗裂、优质 | 25.00 | 19.10 | 79.00 | 85.00 | [ |
凤山红灯笼 | 粤审果2011005 | 坐果力强、抗裂 | 25.50 | 17.80 | 80.00 | 82.00 | [ |
岭丰糯 | 粤审果2010002 | 果肉细嫩、爽脆,品质上乘 | 25.80 | 17.60~18.80 | 80.40 | 95.60 | [ |
无核荔 | 粤审果2005002 | 果实较大、无核、品质优 | 35.31 | 16.00~18.00 | 80.00 | 90.00 | [ |
果园编号 | 单果重/g | 果皮重/g | 种子重/g | 焦核率/% | 可溶性固形物/% | 可食率/% | 品质加权分 | 排名 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 23.75 | 4.23 | 1.22 | 40.00 | 19.72 | 76.90 | 75.655 | 7 | ||||||
2 | 21.61 | 3.58 | 1.22 | 60.00 | 19.14 | 78.03 | 73.911 | 17 | ||||||
3 | 24.87 | 4.47 | 0.70 | 90.00 | 20.14 | 79.26 | 77.812 | 1 | ||||||
4 | 19.05 | 3.33 | 0.66 | 90.00 | 19.65 | 79.16 | 74.043 | 15 | ||||||
5 | 21.03 | 3.79 | 1.97 | 10.00 | 20.09 | 72.65 | 73.593 | 20 | ||||||
6 | 19.18 | 3.45 | 0.92 | 80.00 | 19.93 | 77.49 | 74.066 | 14 | ||||||
7 | 25.82 | 4.31 | 1.31 | 40.00 | 19.62 | 78.18 | 76.904 | 4 | ||||||
8 | 22.08 | 3.77 | 0.81 | 70.00 | 20.67 | 79.37 | 77.523 | 2 | ||||||
9 | 26.45 | 4.50 | 1.63 | 30.00 | 18.56 | 76.91 | 74.741 | 9 | ||||||
10 | 17.41 | 3.02 | 0.87 | 60.00 | 18.93 | 77.87 | 71.431 | 28 | ||||||
11 | 24.35 | 4.19 | 1.52 | 20.00 | 18.85 | 76.36 | 74.095 | 13 | ||||||
果园编号 | 单果重/g | 果皮重/g | 种子重/g | 焦核率/% | 可溶性固形物/% | 可食率/% | 品质加权分 | 排名 | ||||||
12 | 21.21 | 3.91 | 1.60 | 40.00 | 20.11 | 73.98 | 74.177 | 12 | ||||||
13 | 22.61 | 3.55 | 2.18 | 0.00 | 18.58 | 74.61 | 72.140 | 25 | ||||||
14 | 24.49 | 4.14 | 2.22 | 20.00 | 19.30 | 74.15 | 74.262 | 11 | ||||||
15 | 25.55 | 4.47 | 1.68 | 50.00 | 18.65 | 76.43 | 74.310 | 10 | ||||||
16 | 22.11 | 3.77 | 1.74 | 20.00 | 19.24 | 75.12 | 73.333 | 22 | ||||||
17 | 22.31 | 3.88 | 0.49 | 100.00 | 18.59 | 80.34 | 73.990 | 16 | ||||||
18 | 23.07 | 3.96 | 1.49 | 40.00 | 20.03 | 76.39 | 75.751 | 6 | ||||||
19 | 22.50 | 3.66 | 1.11 | 70.00 | 19.58 | 78.83 | 75.455 | 8 | ||||||
20 | 21.78 | 4.03 | 1.89 | 20.00 | 18.77 | 72.89 | 71.511 | 27 | ||||||
21 | 22.07 | 3.83 | 0.55 | 80.00 | 18.40 | 80.19 | 73.457 | 21 | ||||||
22 | 22.33 | 3.40 | 2.23 | 0.00 | 18.99 | 74.76 | 72.842 | 24 | ||||||
23 | 23.11 | 4.16 | 1.43 | 50.00 | 20.52 | 76.15 | 76.620 | 5 | ||||||
24 | 24.18 | 3.93 | 1.55 | 20.00 | 18.53 | 77.39 | 73.756 | 18 | ||||||
25 | 21.10 | 3.81 | 2.35 | 0.00 | 19.07 | 70.72 | 71.011 | 30 | ||||||
26 | 26.61 | 4.63 | 2.91 | 0.00 | 17.72 | 71.63 | 71.387 | 29 | ||||||
27 | 18.47 | 2.97 | 0.81 | 70.00 | 19.50 | 79.59 | 73.622 | 19 | ||||||
28 | 22.69 | 3.71 | 1.75 | 30.00 | 18.75 | 76.03 | 72.993 | 23 | ||||||
29 | 21.88 | 4.08 | 0.80 | 70.00 | 20.82 | 77.74 | 77.149 | 3 | ||||||
30 | 22.20 | 3.41 | 1.24 | 50.00 | 17.65 | 79.10 | 71.712 | 26 | ||||||
均值 | 22.53 | 3.86 | 1.43 | 44.00 | 19.27 | 76.61 | 74.108 | |||||||
标准差 | 2.23 | 0.42 | 0.60 | 29.70 | 0.81 | 2.55 | 1.87 | |||||||
最大值 | 26.61 | 4.63 | 2.91 | 100.00 | 20.82 | 80.34 | 77.81 | |||||||
最小值 | 17.41 | 2.97 | 0.49 | 0.00 | 17.65 | 70.72 | 71.01 | |||||||
变异系数 | 0.099 | 0.108 | 0.421 | 0.674 | 0.042 | 0.033 | 0.025 |
果园编号 | 单果重/g | 果皮重/g | 种子重/g | 焦核率/% | 可溶性固形物/% | 可食率/% | 品质加权分 | 排名 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 23.75 | 4.23 | 1.22 | 40.00 | 19.72 | 76.90 | 75.655 | 7 | ||||||
2 | 21.61 | 3.58 | 1.22 | 60.00 | 19.14 | 78.03 | 73.911 | 17 | ||||||
3 | 24.87 | 4.47 | 0.70 | 90.00 | 20.14 | 79.26 | 77.812 | 1 | ||||||
4 | 19.05 | 3.33 | 0.66 | 90.00 | 19.65 | 79.16 | 74.043 | 15 | ||||||
5 | 21.03 | 3.79 | 1.97 | 10.00 | 20.09 | 72.65 | 73.593 | 20 | ||||||
6 | 19.18 | 3.45 | 0.92 | 80.00 | 19.93 | 77.49 | 74.066 | 14 | ||||||
7 | 25.82 | 4.31 | 1.31 | 40.00 | 19.62 | 78.18 | 76.904 | 4 | ||||||
8 | 22.08 | 3.77 | 0.81 | 70.00 | 20.67 | 79.37 | 77.523 | 2 | ||||||
9 | 26.45 | 4.50 | 1.63 | 30.00 | 18.56 | 76.91 | 74.741 | 9 | ||||||
10 | 17.41 | 3.02 | 0.87 | 60.00 | 18.93 | 77.87 | 71.431 | 28 | ||||||
11 | 24.35 | 4.19 | 1.52 | 20.00 | 18.85 | 76.36 | 74.095 | 13 | ||||||
果园编号 | 单果重/g | 果皮重/g | 种子重/g | 焦核率/% | 可溶性固形物/% | 可食率/% | 品质加权分 | 排名 | ||||||
12 | 21.21 | 3.91 | 1.60 | 40.00 | 20.11 | 73.98 | 74.177 | 12 | ||||||
13 | 22.61 | 3.55 | 2.18 | 0.00 | 18.58 | 74.61 | 72.140 | 25 | ||||||
14 | 24.49 | 4.14 | 2.22 | 20.00 | 19.30 | 74.15 | 74.262 | 11 | ||||||
15 | 25.55 | 4.47 | 1.68 | 50.00 | 18.65 | 76.43 | 74.310 | 10 | ||||||
16 | 22.11 | 3.77 | 1.74 | 20.00 | 19.24 | 75.12 | 73.333 | 22 | ||||||
17 | 22.31 | 3.88 | 0.49 | 100.00 | 18.59 | 80.34 | 73.990 | 16 | ||||||
18 | 23.07 | 3.96 | 1.49 | 40.00 | 20.03 | 76.39 | 75.751 | 6 | ||||||
19 | 22.50 | 3.66 | 1.11 | 70.00 | 19.58 | 78.83 | 75.455 | 8 | ||||||
20 | 21.78 | 4.03 | 1.89 | 20.00 | 18.77 | 72.89 | 71.511 | 27 | ||||||
21 | 22.07 | 3.83 | 0.55 | 80.00 | 18.40 | 80.19 | 73.457 | 21 | ||||||
22 | 22.33 | 3.40 | 2.23 | 0.00 | 18.99 | 74.76 | 72.842 | 24 | ||||||
23 | 23.11 | 4.16 | 1.43 | 50.00 | 20.52 | 76.15 | 76.620 | 5 | ||||||
24 | 24.18 | 3.93 | 1.55 | 20.00 | 18.53 | 77.39 | 73.756 | 18 | ||||||
25 | 21.10 | 3.81 | 2.35 | 0.00 | 19.07 | 70.72 | 71.011 | 30 | ||||||
26 | 26.61 | 4.63 | 2.91 | 0.00 | 17.72 | 71.63 | 71.387 | 29 | ||||||
27 | 18.47 | 2.97 | 0.81 | 70.00 | 19.50 | 79.59 | 73.622 | 19 | ||||||
28 | 22.69 | 3.71 | 1.75 | 30.00 | 18.75 | 76.03 | 72.993 | 23 | ||||||
29 | 21.88 | 4.08 | 0.80 | 70.00 | 20.82 | 77.74 | 77.149 | 3 | ||||||
30 | 22.20 | 3.41 | 1.24 | 50.00 | 17.65 | 79.10 | 71.712 | 26 | ||||||
均值 | 22.53 | 3.86 | 1.43 | 44.00 | 19.27 | 76.61 | 74.108 | |||||||
标准差 | 2.23 | 0.42 | 0.60 | 29.70 | 0.81 | 2.55 | 1.87 | |||||||
最大值 | 26.61 | 4.63 | 2.91 | 100.00 | 20.82 | 80.34 | 77.81 | |||||||
最小值 | 17.41 | 2.97 | 0.49 | 0.00 | 17.65 | 70.72 | 71.01 | |||||||
变异系数 | 0.099 | 0.108 | 0.421 | 0.674 | 0.042 | 0.033 | 0.025 |
果园编号 | 焦核情况(焦核数/测量数) | 果园内和临近果园荔枝品种 |
---|---|---|
1 | 4/10 | 桂味、怀枝、大红袍、黑叶 |
2 | 6/10 | 桂味、怀枝 |
3 | 9/10 | 桂味、怀枝、黑叶 |
4 | 9/10 | 桂味、怀枝、大红袍、黑叶 |
5 | 1/10 | 桂味、怀枝、大红袍、黑叶、贵妃红 |
6 | 8/10 | 桂味、怀枝、大红袍、黑叶 |
7 | 4/10 | 桂味、怀枝、黑叶,白腊 |
8 | 7/10 | 桂味、怀枝、黑叶,三月红 |
9 | 3/10 | 桂味、怀枝、大红袍 |
10 | 6/10 | 桂味、怀枝、大红袍、黑叶 |
11 | 2/10 | 桂味、怀枝、大红袍、黑叶 |
12 | 4/10 | 桂味、怀枝、黑叶、白腊、三月红 |
13 | 0/10 | 桂味、怀枝、大红袍、黑叶 |
14 | 2/10 | 桂味、怀枝、大红袍、黑叶 |
15 | 5/10 | 桂味、怀枝、大红袍、黑叶 |
16 | 2/10 | 桂味、怀枝、大红袍、黑叶 |
17 | 10/10 | 桂味、怀枝、大红袍、黑叶、白腊 |
18 | 4/10 | 桂味、怀枝、黑叶 |
19 | 7/10 | 桂味、怀枝 |
20 | 2/10 | 桂味、怀枝、大红袍、黑叶、贵妃红、无核荔 |
21 | 8/10 | 桂味、怀枝 |
22 | 0/10 | 桂味、怀枝 |
23 | 5/10 | 桂味、怀枝、大红袍、黑叶 |
24 | 2/10 | 桂味、怀枝、妃子笑 |
25 | 0/10 | 桂味、怀枝、大红袍 |
26 | 0/10 | 桂味、怀枝 |
27 | 7/10 | 桂味、怀枝 |
28 | 3/10 | 桂味、怀枝、大红袍、黑叶 |
29 | 7/10 | 桂味、怀枝、三月红、妃子笑、黑叶、冰荔、观音绿、岭丰糯 |
30 | 5/10 | 桂味、怀枝、大红袍、黑叶、白腊 |
果园编号 | 焦核情况(焦核数/测量数) | 果园内和临近果园荔枝品种 |
---|---|---|
1 | 4/10 | 桂味、怀枝、大红袍、黑叶 |
2 | 6/10 | 桂味、怀枝 |
3 | 9/10 | 桂味、怀枝、黑叶 |
4 | 9/10 | 桂味、怀枝、大红袍、黑叶 |
5 | 1/10 | 桂味、怀枝、大红袍、黑叶、贵妃红 |
6 | 8/10 | 桂味、怀枝、大红袍、黑叶 |
7 | 4/10 | 桂味、怀枝、黑叶,白腊 |
8 | 7/10 | 桂味、怀枝、黑叶,三月红 |
9 | 3/10 | 桂味、怀枝、大红袍 |
10 | 6/10 | 桂味、怀枝、大红袍、黑叶 |
11 | 2/10 | 桂味、怀枝、大红袍、黑叶 |
12 | 4/10 | 桂味、怀枝、黑叶、白腊、三月红 |
13 | 0/10 | 桂味、怀枝、大红袍、黑叶 |
14 | 2/10 | 桂味、怀枝、大红袍、黑叶 |
15 | 5/10 | 桂味、怀枝、大红袍、黑叶 |
16 | 2/10 | 桂味、怀枝、大红袍、黑叶 |
17 | 10/10 | 桂味、怀枝、大红袍、黑叶、白腊 |
18 | 4/10 | 桂味、怀枝、黑叶 |
19 | 7/10 | 桂味、怀枝 |
20 | 2/10 | 桂味、怀枝、大红袍、黑叶、贵妃红、无核荔 |
21 | 8/10 | 桂味、怀枝 |
22 | 0/10 | 桂味、怀枝 |
23 | 5/10 | 桂味、怀枝、大红袍、黑叶 |
24 | 2/10 | 桂味、怀枝、妃子笑 |
25 | 0/10 | 桂味、怀枝、大红袍 |
26 | 0/10 | 桂味、怀枝 |
27 | 7/10 | 桂味、怀枝 |
28 | 3/10 | 桂味、怀枝、大红袍、黑叶 |
29 | 7/10 | 桂味、怀枝、三月红、妃子笑、黑叶、冰荔、观音绿、岭丰糯 |
30 | 5/10 | 桂味、怀枝、大红袍、黑叶、白腊 |
品种 | 平均单价/(元/kg) | 平均株产/(kg/株) | 经济效益指数/% | 排名 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
同期省外价格 | 当地价格 | 文献值 | 测算值 | ||||
桂味 | 18.42 | 16.00 | — | 38.00 | 100.00 | 8 | |
冰荔 | 100.00 | 86.00 | 30.10[ | 30.00 | 424.34 | 1 | |
贵妃红 | 10.00 | 16.00 | 42.00[ | 48.00 | 126.31 | 7 | |
观音绿 | 51.58 | 32.00 | 30.64[ | 33.00 | 173.68 | 4 | |
仙进奉 | 40.92 | 32.00 | 32.00[ | 36.00 | 189.47 | 3 | |
凤山红灯笼 | 34.28 | 32.00 | 25.50[ | 27.00 | 142.10 | 6 | |
岭丰糯 | 29.64 | 32.00 | 42.50[ | 40.00 | 210.52 | 2 | |
无核荔 | 27.50 | 50.00 | — | 20.00 | 164.47 | 5 |
品种 | 平均单价/(元/kg) | 平均株产/(kg/株) | 经济效益指数/% | 排名 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
同期省外价格 | 当地价格 | 文献值 | 测算值 | ||||
桂味 | 18.42 | 16.00 | — | 38.00 | 100.00 | 8 | |
冰荔 | 100.00 | 86.00 | 30.10[ | 30.00 | 424.34 | 1 | |
贵妃红 | 10.00 | 16.00 | 42.00[ | 48.00 | 126.31 | 7 | |
观音绿 | 51.58 | 32.00 | 30.64[ | 33.00 | 173.68 | 4 | |
仙进奉 | 40.92 | 32.00 | 32.00[ | 36.00 | 189.47 | 3 | |
凤山红灯笼 | 34.28 | 32.00 | 25.50[ | 27.00 | 142.10 | 6 | |
岭丰糯 | 29.64 | 32.00 | 42.50[ | 40.00 | 210.52 | 2 | |
无核荔 | 27.50 | 50.00 | — | 20.00 | 164.47 | 5 |
品种 | 单果重/g | 果皮重/g | 种子重/g | 焦核率/% | 可溶性固形物/% | 可食率/% | 品质加权分 | 排名 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
桂味 | 22.53±2.23c | 3.86±0.42c | 1.43±0.60bc | 44.00 | 19.27±0.81c | 76.61±2.55bcd | 74.108 | 5 |
冰荔 | 18.75±1.02d | 3.79±0.16cd | 0.74±0.61cd | 80.00 | 21.69±0.88a | 75.87±2.96cd | 76.669 | 3 |
贵妃红 | 38.33±2.52b | 8.45±0.82a | 2.39±1.06a | 10.00 | 18.49±0.80d | 71.66±3.63e | 78.505 | 2 |
观音绿 | 22.38±2.03c | 3.50±0.32cde | 0.44±0.08d | 100.00 | 18.38±1.07d | 82.41±1.20a | 74.337 | 6 |
仙进奉 | 23.86±2.79c | 5.06±0.51b | 0.98±0.81bcd | 70.00 | 20.24±0.77b | 74.49±4.63de | 75.874 | 4 |
凤山红灯笼 | 20.01±1.25d | 3.15±0.25e | 0.99±0.69bcd | 60.00 | 19.34±0.54c | 79.32±3.57b | 73.964 | 7 |
岭丰糯 | 14.80±1.11e | 3.30±0.28de | 0.40±0.05d | 100.00 | 20.00±0.56bc | 74.97±1.83d | 71.222 | 8 |
无核荔 | 45.66±2.92a | 8.19±1.54a | 1.75±2.18ab | 70.00 | 16.99±0.88e | 78.34±7.11bc | 81.456 | 1 |
品种 | 单果重/g | 果皮重/g | 种子重/g | 焦核率/% | 可溶性固形物/% | 可食率/% | 品质加权分 | 排名 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
桂味 | 22.53±2.23c | 3.86±0.42c | 1.43±0.60bc | 44.00 | 19.27±0.81c | 76.61±2.55bcd | 74.108 | 5 |
冰荔 | 18.75±1.02d | 3.79±0.16cd | 0.74±0.61cd | 80.00 | 21.69±0.88a | 75.87±2.96cd | 76.669 | 3 |
贵妃红 | 38.33±2.52b | 8.45±0.82a | 2.39±1.06a | 10.00 | 18.49±0.80d | 71.66±3.63e | 78.505 | 2 |
观音绿 | 22.38±2.03c | 3.50±0.32cde | 0.44±0.08d | 100.00 | 18.38±1.07d | 82.41±1.20a | 74.337 | 6 |
仙进奉 | 23.86±2.79c | 5.06±0.51b | 0.98±0.81bcd | 70.00 | 20.24±0.77b | 74.49±4.63de | 75.874 | 4 |
凤山红灯笼 | 20.01±1.25d | 3.15±0.25e | 0.99±0.69bcd | 60.00 | 19.34±0.54c | 79.32±3.57b | 73.964 | 7 |
岭丰糯 | 14.80±1.11e | 3.30±0.28de | 0.40±0.05d | 100.00 | 20.00±0.56bc | 74.97±1.83d | 71.222 | 8 |
无核荔 | 45.66±2.92a | 8.19±1.54a | 1.75±2.18ab | 70.00 | 16.99±0.88e | 78.34±7.11bc | 81.456 | 1 |
[1] |
李明芳, 卢诚, 刘兴地, 等. 荔枝无核和焦核机理的研究进展[J]. 热带作物学报, 2016, 37(5):1043-1049.
|
[2] |
|
[3] |
侯延杰, 李鸿莉, 邱宏业, 等. 花粉直感对“仙进奉”荔枝效应的研究[J]. 中国南方果树, 2022, 51(4):53-57.
|
[4] |
刘友接, 熊月明, 卢新坤, 等. 不同品种授粉对‘东刘1号’荔枝果实主要性状的影响[J]. 热带作物学报, 2011, 32(5):796-799.
|
[5] |
邱燕萍, 李志强, 欧良喜, 等. 不同荔枝花粉源对桂味坐果及种子大小的影响[J]. 广东农业科学, 2007(8):24-25.
|
[6] |
谢丹容. ‘桂味’荔枝种胚败育的表现及其机理初探[D]. 广州: 华南农业大学, 2016.
|
[7] |
吕柳新, 陈荣木, 陈景渌. 荔枝胚胎发育过程的观察[J]. 亚热带植物通讯, 1985(1):1-5.
|
[8] |
杨转英, 王惠聪, 丰锋, 等. 荔枝果实败育发生机制的研究进展[J]. 广东农业科学, 2014, 41(23):31-34.
|
[9] |
李明芳, 郑学勤. 荔枝开花结果调控机制及种质分析研究进展[J]. 热带农业科学, 2004, 24(2):41-47.
|
[10] |
王家保, 杜中军, 陈业渊, 等. 海南荔枝种质资源研究进展[J]. 园艺学报, 2006(6):1377-1382.
|
[11] |
王冉, 许淑珺, 沈浩, 等. 野外增温对桂味荔枝产量和果实品质的影响[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2011, 39(24):14566-14568.
|
[12] |
doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2018.11.083 URL |
[13] |
向旭, 欧良喜, 邱燕萍, 等. 荔枝大核品种诱导焦核结果研究[J]. 果树学报, 2002(2):111-114.
|
[14] |
李冬波, 黎晓峰, 黄凤珠, 等. 黑叶荔枝焦核诱导的研究[J]. 福建果树, 2012(3):8-11.
|
[15] |
李冬波, 黎晓峰, 黄凤珠, 等. 荔枝胚胎发育不同品种诱导焦核的研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2013, 29(16):115-118.
|
[16] |
陈新全, 钟敏芝, 李平, 等. 晚熟荔枝新品种“仙进奉”在桂平产区的引种试验初报[J]. 南方农业, 2021, 15(19):26-28.
|
[17] |
丁晓波, 王秀琪, 李景明, 等. “红绣球”荔枝引种试验初报[J]. 中国热带农业, 2016(4):28-30.
|
[18] |
董晨, 郑雪文, 王弋, 等. 优质荔枝品种“观音绿”在粤西地区的引种试验[J]. 南方农业, 2022, 16(3):104-106.
|
[19] |
郭映云, 钟敏芝, 李平, 等. 晚熟荔枝“观音绿”在桂平产区的引种试验初报[J]. 南方农业, 2021, 15(4):59-62.
|
[20] |
叶建东, 陈洁珍, 欧良喜, 等. ‘桂味’荔枝高接换种‘仙进奉’引种试验[J]. 中国热带农业, 2020(6):42-45.
|
[21] |
林金利, 蓝翠珍, 叶建东, 等. 优质荔枝‘凤山红灯笼’高接换种及栽培技术[J]. 热带农业工程, 2021, 45(3):4-6.
|
[22] |
高贤玉, 左艳秀, 张惠云, 等. 贵妃红荔枝引种试验初报[J]. 热带农业工程, 2012, 36(4):8-10.
|
[23] |
宋云连, 罗心平, 王跃全, 等. 2个引种荔枝品种在云南怒江干热河谷地区的品质性状[J]. 贵州农业科学, 2021, 49(8):115-119.
|
[24] |
宋云连, 张惠云, 王跃全, 等. 两个引进荔枝品种果实品质的筛选[J]. 热带农业科学, 2020, 40(10):72-75.
|
[25] |
张惠云, 高贤玉, 左艳秀, 等. 几个荔枝品种果实综合性状比较分析[J]. 南方农业学报, 2014, 45(8):1429-1432.
|
[26] |
张惠云, 高贤玉, 左艳秀, 等. 红绣球荔枝引种试验初报[J]. 中国南方果树, 2016, 45(4):72-73.
|
[27] |
马锞, 赖旭辉, 胡锐清, 等. 荔枝新品种‘冰荔’[J]. 园艺学报, 2019, 46(3):605-606.
doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2018-0305 |
[28] |
苏伟强, 彭宏祥, 朱建华, 等. 荔枝新品种贵妃红的选育[J]. 中国果树, 2005(4):12-13.
|
[29] |
王泽槐, 刘秀荣, 陈衬喜, 等. 荔枝新品种‘观音绿’[J]. 园艺学报, 2012, 39(8):1615-1616.
|
[30] |
“仙进奉荔枝”、 “凤山红灯笼荔枝”新品种通过专家现场鉴定[J]. 广东农业科学, 2010, 37(7):389.
|
[31] |
欧良喜, 陈洁珍, 蔡长河, 等. 优质荔枝新品种——凤山红灯笼的选育[J]. 果树学报, 2012, 29(2):314-315.
|
[32] |
范妍, 尹金华, 刘成明, 等. 晚熟荔枝新品种——岭丰糯的选育[J]. 果树学报, 2010, 27(5):852-853.
|
[33] |
粤引无核荔[R]. 广东:东莞市林业科学研究所,2009-01-01.
|
[34] |
胡磊. 龙眼荔枝有性杂交、杂种流式细胞术鉴定及优株选育[D]. 广州: 华南农业大学, 2016.
|
[35] |
中国农垦热作网. 2018年热带作物审定品种公示[EB/OL]. http://www.farmchina.org.cn/ShowArticles.php?url=ADxWM1o6U2ZSYlIyUmYJawRh, 2019-01-10.
|
[36] |
罗红辉, 李珍, 张昭其, 等. 不同产地桂味荔枝果实特性及其耐藏性差异[J]. 广东农业科学, 2012, 39(9):37-39.
|
[37] |
邱燕萍, 戴宏芬, 李志强, 等. 不同品种授粉对桂味荔枝果实品质的影响[J]. 果树学报, 2006(5):703-706.
|
[38] |
|
[39] |
李焕苓, 张蕾, 王果, 等. 不同品种花粉对母本荔枝果实品质的影响[J]. 中国南方果树, 2020, 49(6):52-57.
|
[1] | GAO Wenrui, SUN Yanjun, HAN Bing, FEI Cong, WANG Xiansheng, XU Gang. Effects of Low Light on Quality and Sucrose Metabolism of Watermelon Fruit [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(1): 56-61. |
[2] | PENG Cheng, DENG Linping, MENG Wancong, CHANG Xiaoxiao, ZHANG Zengwen, LUO Jianliang, QIU Jishui, LU Yusheng. Effect of Bagging on Fruit Appearance and Aromatic Components of Prunus salicina var. cordata [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(7): 45-51. |
[3] | SHAO Xuehua, LAI Duo, XIAO Weiqiang, HE Han, LIU Chuanhe, KUANG Shizi. The Effects of Drying Methods on Fruit Quality and Antioxidant Activity of Guava [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(6): 134-140. |
[4] | ZHAO Mingxin, CAO Gang, WANG Wei, CAO Sufang, LI Hongxu. Comparative Study on Pollination Effects of Five Pear Varieties for ‘Yulu Xiangli’ Pear [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(28): 52-57. |
[5] | ZHANG Ziqing, HAN Shou’an, WANG Min, XIE Hui, ZHANG Wen, ZHOU Long. Effects of Leaf Curtain Shaping on Growth and Fruit Quality of Red Wine Grapes in Xinjang [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(28): 58-67. |
[6] | ZHOU Lin, LI Mengsha, WANG Hua, SHEN Guang, LV Pin, ZHOU Liping. Comparative Study on Fruit Quality of Different Varieties of Lonicera caerulea [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(26): 44-49. |
[7] | Yu Fenghui, Cheng Daoquan, Wang Xiangchuan, Zhou Qian, Wu Wenlei, Zhang Qian, Yang Chuanlun, Han Lixia, Wu Lei, Liu Haiyu, Xu Zeping. Zinc Chitooligosaccharide: Effects on Disease Control, Fruit Quality and Yield of Greenhouse Tomato [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(9): 42-48. |
[8] | Tan Zongkun, Luo Zenggui, Wang Jing. Climatic Suitability Planting Regionalization of Orah’s Fruit Quality Grade in Guangxi [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(5): 65-74. |
[9] | GONG Deqiang, LI Min, GAO Zhaoyin, YANG Yan, GU Hui, HU Meijiao. Effect of Low Temperature Combined with GABA on Postharvest Quality of Cherry Tomato [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(36): 54-60. |
[10] | Shen Huifang, Yang Qiyun, Pu Xiaoming, Zhang Jingxin, Sun Dayuan, Lin Wei, Chen Yusheng, Lin Birun, Li Xiaogang. Evaluation of Control Effects of Prochloraz on Black Rot of Pineapple [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(34): 133-140. |
[11] | Ou Shanhan, Lin Lin, Liu Binghao, Mei Zhengmin, Zhang Shenan, He Shenkui, Cai Jun, Xiao Yuanhui, Mo Jiansheng. Shrimp Peptide Organic Fertilizer and Shatian Pomelo: Effects of on Nutrients in Leaf or Orchard Soil and Fruit Quality [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(3): 105-111. |
[12] | Duan Pengwei, Ma Xiaojian, Shi Haiqiang, Du Jizhuang, Qin Lizhe, Xu Guoliang, Yang Sumiao. Correlation Analysis of Fruit Quality of ‘Fuji’ Apple and Altitude [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(22): 49-56. |
[13] | Fan Qijun, Chen Chuanwu, Liu Ping, Niu Ying, Tang Yan, Deng Chongling. Influence of Canopy Film-covering on Photosynthesis and Fruit Quality of Citrus reticulata ‘Shiyueju’ [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(22): 57-62. |
[14] | Peng Cheng, Meng Wancong, Deng Linping, Chang Xiaoxiao, Luo Jianliang, Chen Zhe, Qiu Jishui, Lin Zhixiong, Lu Yusheng. Effects of Transformation on Soil Nutrients and Fruit Quality of ‘Xinghuayin’ Pear Orchard [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(21): 40-45. |
[15] | Yang Qin, Yu Lu, Zhao Zhi, Chi Jiyan, Tan Shuming. Effects of Plant Growth Regulators on Passiflora edulia [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(19): 58-64. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||