Analysis of Resistance of Potato Varieties (lines) to Potato Common Scab in Yunnan Province

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2023-0547

Abstract

Abstract:

With the continuous expanding of planting area, frequent transportation of seed potatoes and inadequate quality supervision, the potato scab has been increasingly serious since potato staple food normalization. In order to clarify the resistance of potato cultivars (lines) to potato scab in Yunnan Province and screen out the breeding materials for resistance, this study collected 33 potato materials, conducted tissue culture, and evaluated the resistance by means of tissue culture potted seedlings. At the same time, the field incidence of potato cultivars was investigated. The results showed that after inoculation of scab pathogen on tissue culture seedlings of 33 tested potato varieties (lines), different degrees of scab disease occurred in all tested varieties. The incidence rate ranged from 58% to 96.67%. The lowest incidence rate was I-1085, and the highest incidence rate was F37-2; the disease index ranged from 22.58 to 67.27, with the lowest being Fx3 and the highest being F37-2. This study aims to preliminarily clarify the resistance level of the main potato varieties (lines) in Yunnan Province to potato scab, providing support for the breeding of potato varieties with resistance to potato scab in Yunnan Province.

Key words: potato common scab, varietal resistance, resistance evaluation, plantlet

SHI Guizhi, FENG Jiawen, XU Yajin, LIN Zhixu, LIU Xia. Analysis of Resistance of Potato Varieties (lines) to Potato Common Scab in Yunnan Province[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(15): 137-142.

Figures/Tables 5

References 27

[1]	夏善勇, 盛万民. 我国马铃薯疮痂病及其防治研究进展[J]. 植物保护, 2022, 48(1):7-16.
[2]	罗山, 巩晨, 赵庆云, 等. 云南省马铃薯疮痂链霉菌种群分布及环境相关因子分析[J]. 南方农业学报, 2021, 52(5):1246-1254.
[3]	赵伟全, 杨文香, 刘大群, 等. 中国马铃薯疮痂病研究初报[J]. 河北农业大学学报, 2004(6):74-77.
[4]	张萌. 中国不同地区马铃薯疮痂病菌遗传多样性分析[D]. 保定: 河北农业大学, 2008.
[5]	CARL P B. Potato Tuberlenticels: a review of their development, structure, function, and disease susceptibility[J]. American journal of potato research, 2023, 100:253-264.
[6]	DEES M W, WANNER L A. In search of better management of potato common scab[J]. Potato research, 2012, 55(3/4):249-268.
[7]	AZNAR A, CHEN N, THOMINE S, et al. Immunity to plant pathogens and iron homeostasis[J]. Plant science, 2015, 240:90-97. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2015.08.022 pmid: 26475190
[8]	ARSENEAULT T, GOYER C, FILION M. Phenazine production by Pseudomonas sp.LBUM223 contributes to the biological control of potato common scab[J]. Phytopathology, 2013, 103(10):995-1000.
[9]	CLARKE C R, TEGG R S, THOMPSON H K, et al. Low-dose foliar treatments of the auxin analog 2,4-D reduce potato common scab and powdery scab for multiple potato cultivars and enhance root development[J]. Crop protection, 2020, 136:105208.
[10]	DE JONG W S, HALSETH D E, BRODIE B B, et al. MARCY: A chipping variety with resistance to common scab and the golden nematode[J]. American journal of potato research, 2006, 83(2):189-193.
[11]	DOUCHES D S, COOMBS J, HAMMERSCHMIDT R, et al. Kalkaska: a round white chip-processing potato variety with common scab resistance[J]. American journal of potato research, 2009, 86(5):347-355.
[12]	徐小虎, 郑玉宝, 周芳, 等. 辽宁地区抗马铃薯疮痂病种质资源筛选[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2023, 11:33-35,39.
[13]	杨鑫, 赖振光, 樊吴静, 等. 马铃薯疮痂病不同抗性品种发病与健康块茎内生细菌群落结构及多样性[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2023, 51(14):134-140.
[14]	朱展鹏, 蒋建霞, 傅欣雨, 等. 马铃薯疮痂病抗病资源鉴定和药剂筛选[J]. 中国马铃薯, 2021, 35(2):170-175.
[15]	李爽. 23个马铃薯品种资源疮痂病抗性鉴定和评价指标筛选[D]. 长春: 吉林农业大学, 2019.
[16]	赵远征, 徐利敏, 聂峰杰, 等. 不同马铃薯品种抗疮痂病的田间鉴定与评价[J]. 北方农业学报, 2020, 48(1):81-86. doi: 10.12190/j.issn.2096-1197.2020.01.16
[17]	吴郁青, 包丽仙, 田志梅, 等. 马铃薯产业在加快云南省扶贫攻坚中的重要作用探讨[J]. 云南农业科技, 2019(4):20-22.
[18]	金璟, 张涛. 云南马铃薯产业区域竞争力比较分析[J]. 云南农业大学学报(社会科学), 2022, 16(1):98-107.
[19]	周波. 浅谈安康市发展马铃薯产业在脱贫致富中的作用[J]. 南方农业, 2018, 12(14):141-142.
[20]	崔凌霄, 杨成德, 杨丽萍, 等. 致病链霉菌毒素多样性及马铃薯疮痂病综合防治研究进展[J]. 西北农业学报, 2021, 30(4):469-480.
[21]	王前前, 闫冲冲, 付玉营, 等. 安徽马铃薯疮痂病防治药剂筛选试验[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2020, 26(21):82-83.
[22]	张春雨, 张桂芝, 李鑫, 等. 疮痂病菌胁迫马铃薯块茎的转录组分析[J]. 分子植物育种, 2021, 19(8):2491-2499.
[23]	王鹏程, 金光辉, 张春雨, 等. 不停生防菌剂组合及施用方式对马铃薯疮痂病的防治效果及促使左右[J]. 西南农业学报, 2022, 35(4):797-803.
[24]	杜魏甫. 云南省马铃薯疮痂病菌鉴定及品种资源抗性评价[D]. 昆明: 云南农业大学, 2016.
[25]	高玉林, 徐进, 刘宁, 等. 我国马铃薯病虫害发生现状与防控策略[J]. 植物保护, 2019, 45(5):106-111.
[26]	刘淑娜. 马铃薯不同种质资源对疮痂病的抗性鉴定及其抗病机制[D]. 大庆: 黑龙江八一农垦大学, 2019.
[27]	邢莹莹. 黑龙江省部分地区马铃薯疮痂病病原鉴定及主栽品种的抗性评价[D]. 大庆: 黑龙江八一农垦大学, 2015.

编号	品种	编号	品种	编号	品种
1	大西洋	12	F27-1	23	黄扁洋芋
2	青薯9号	13	F24-2	24	中甸1号
3	荷兰15	14	F29-2	25	丽薯6号
4	希森6号	15	F38-3	26	会薯10号
5	F44	16	F37-2	27	合作114
6	F44-1	17	马尔科	28	会-2
7	Fx3	18	凤薯6号	29	六哨PB06
8	F16-1	19	剑川红	30	PB08
9	F14	20	保山小洋芋	31	PB12
10	F37-1	21	剑川大牛角	32	I-1085
11	F36	22	大海老品种	33	合作88

编号	品种	编号	品种	编号	品种
1	大西洋	12	F27-1	23	黄扁洋芋
2	青薯9号	13	F24-2	24	中甸1号
3	荷兰15	14	F29-2	25	丽薯6号
4	希森6号	15	F38-3	26	会薯10号
5	F44	16	F37-2	27	合作114
6	F44-1	17	马尔科	28	会-2
7	Fx3	18	凤薯6号	29	六哨PB06
8	F16-1	19	剑川红	30	PB08
9	F14	20	保山小洋芋	31	PB12
10	F37-1	21	剑川大牛角	32	I-1085
11	F36	22	大海老品种	33	合作88

品种	发病率/%	病情指数	抗性类别
大西洋	(69.67±10.84)ab	(27.44±3.23)bc	MR
青薯9号	(90.33±5.70)ab	(50.63±7.20)abc	HS
荷兰15	(83.67±3.48)ab	(42.20±1.34)abc	HS
希森6号	(87.00±2.65)ab	(48.16±2.57)abc	HS
F44	(86.67±4.70)ab	(54.72±5.73)abc	HS
F44-1	(71.67±11.33)ab	(27.11±5.35)bc	MR
Fx3	(67.67±6.49)ab	(22.58±1.32)c	MR
F16-1	(90±6.43)ab	(52.02±8.46)abc	MS
F14	(81.67±3.18)ab	(37.67±3.27)abc	MS
F37-1	(89.33±5.61)ab	(64.41±7.10)ab	HS
PB12	(73.00±5.51)ab	(35.75±7.06)abc	MS
F36	(69.67±2.73)ab	(29.21±1.03)bc	MR
F27-1	(88.33±2.67)ab	(46.34±4.88)abc	HS
F24-2	(85.00±7.77)ab	(49.26±11.18)abc	HS
F29-2	(76.33±4.06)ab	(39.40±5.00)abc	HS
F38-3	(76.33±4.06)ab	(46.37±11.22)abc	HS
F37-2	(96.67±2.03)a	(67.27±4.08)a	HS
马尔科	(89.33±7.06)ab	(44.53±8.24)abc	HS
凤薯6号	(85.67±3.71)ab	(58.58±6.04)abc	HS
剑川红	(87.33±4.91)ab	(48.71±7.33)abc	HS
保山小洋芋	(89.67±4.91)ab	(54.62±3.13)abc	HS
I-1085	(58.00±13.43)b	(26.70±9.58)c	MR
剑川大牛角	(93.33±1.4)5ab	(56.65±6.79)abc	HS
大海老品种	(83.33±2.96)ab	(46.39±6.57)abc	HS
黄扁洋芋	(78.33±5.04)ab	(35.17±4.90)abc	MS
中甸1号	(77.00±10.41)ab	(38.57±9.42)abc	MS
丽薯6号	(59.33±9.62)b	(24.57±7.33)c	MR
会薯10号	(78.00±9.54)ab	(38.80±11.30)abc	MS
合作114	(80.33±6.01)ab	(39.08±8.59)abc	MS
会薯2号	(80.00±2.89)ab	(38.24±0.73)abc	MS
六哨PB06	(82.67±7.88)ab	(46.28±8.52)abc	HS
PB08	(70.67±8.45)ab	(29.17±6.22)bc	MR
合作88	(78.00±7.55)ab	(38.97±3.56)abc	MS

品种	发病率/%	病情指数	抗性类别
大西洋	(69.67±10.84)ab	(27.44±3.23)bc	MR
青薯9号	(90.33±5.70)ab	(50.63±7.20)abc	HS
荷兰15	(83.67±3.48)ab	(42.20±1.34)abc	HS
希森6号	(87.00±2.65)ab	(48.16±2.57)abc	HS
F44	(86.67±4.70)ab	(54.72±5.73)abc	HS
F44-1	(71.67±11.33)ab	(27.11±5.35)bc	MR
Fx3	(67.67±6.49)ab	(22.58±1.32)c	MR
F16-1	(90±6.43)ab	(52.02±8.46)abc	MS
F14	(81.67±3.18)ab	(37.67±3.27)abc	MS
F37-1	(89.33±5.61)ab	(64.41±7.10)ab	HS
PB12	(73.00±5.51)ab	(35.75±7.06)abc	MS
F36	(69.67±2.73)ab	(29.21±1.03)bc	MR
F27-1	(88.33±2.67)ab	(46.34±4.88)abc	HS
F24-2	(85.00±7.77)ab	(49.26±11.18)abc	HS
F29-2	(76.33±4.06)ab	(39.40±5.00)abc	HS
F38-3	(76.33±4.06)ab	(46.37±11.22)abc	HS
F37-2	(96.67±2.03)a	(67.27±4.08)a	HS
马尔科	(89.33±7.06)ab	(44.53±8.24)abc	HS
凤薯6号	(85.67±3.71)ab	(58.58±6.04)abc	HS
剑川红	(87.33±4.91)ab	(48.71±7.33)abc	HS
保山小洋芋	(89.67±4.91)ab	(54.62±3.13)abc	HS
I-1085	(58.00±13.43)b	(26.70±9.58)c	MR
剑川大牛角	(93.33±1.4)5ab	(56.65±6.79)abc	HS
大海老品种	(83.33±2.96)ab	(46.39±6.57)abc	HS
黄扁洋芋	(78.33±5.04)ab	(35.17±4.90)abc	MS
中甸1号	(77.00±10.41)ab	(38.57±9.42)abc	MS
丽薯6号	(59.33±9.62)b	(24.57±7.33)c	MR
会薯10号	(78.00±9.54)ab	(38.80±11.30)abc	MS
合作114	(80.33±6.01)ab	(39.08±8.59)abc	MS
会薯2号	(80.00±2.89)ab	(38.24±0.73)abc	MS
六哨PB06	(82.67±7.88)ab	(46.28±8.52)abc	HS
PB08	(70.67±8.45)ab	(29.17±6.22)bc	MR
合作88	(78.00±7.55)ab	(38.97±3.56)abc	MS

调查地点	品种（系）	发病率/%	病情指数
曲靖市马龙区	P14-122-3	72	31
	S14-106	76	34
	C12	80	32
	会薯20号	84	41
	会薯22号	84	43
	合作88	72	29
	03-3-10	74	29
	云薯3号	86	33
	凤薯11-14-12	70	28
	S15-1957	86	38
	青薯9号	76	36
曲靖市会泽县	丽薯6号	26	11
	PB06	58	24
	合作88	80	40
	云薯108	76	39
	云薯301	74	26
	云薯304	84	36
	云薯921	92	49
	会薯13	72	25
	会薯14	92	50
	会薯15	82	38
	会薯16	72	32
	会薯17	80	33
	青薯9号	90	43