Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2024, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (29): 75-79.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2024-0108
Previous Articles Next Articles
YAO Li1(), CAI Hongmei2, WANG Hong1, LIU Haitao1, CAI Kai1, WU Yueying1, ZHANG Qi1, LIN Chaowen1(
)
Received:
2024-02-04
Revised:
2024-07-08
Online:
2024-10-15
Published:
2024-10-14
YAO Li, CAI Hongmei, WANG Hong, LIU Haitao, CAI Kai, WU Yueying, ZHANG Qi, LIN Chaowen. Effect of Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Fertilizer on Rice in Central Sichuan Basin Based on ‘3414’ Experimental Model[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(29): 75-79.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2024-0108
pH | 有机质/ (g/kg) | 全氮/ (g/kg) | 全磷/ (g/kg) | 全钾/ (g/kg) | 碱解氮/ (mg/kg) | 有效磷/ (mg/kg) | 速效钾/ (mg/kg) | CEC/ [cmol(+)/kg] | 容重/ (g/cm3) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
7.2 | 39.4 | 2.25 | 0.28 | 23.76 | 181 | 36.0 | 192 | 25.91 | 1.24 |
pH | 有机质/ (g/kg) | 全氮/ (g/kg) | 全磷/ (g/kg) | 全钾/ (g/kg) | 碱解氮/ (mg/kg) | 有效磷/ (mg/kg) | 速效钾/ (mg/kg) | CEC/ [cmol(+)/kg] | 容重/ (g/cm3) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
7.2 | 39.4 | 2.25 | 0.28 | 23.76 | 181 | 36.0 | 192 | 25.91 | 1.24 |
序号 | 处理 | N施肥量 | P2O5施肥量 | K2O施肥量 |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | N0P0K0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
2 | N0P2K2 | 0 | 90 | 90 |
3 | N1P2K2 | 90 | 90 | 90 |
4 | N2P0K2 | 180 | 0 | 90 |
5 | N2P1K2 | 180 | 45 | 90 |
6 | N2P2K2 | 180 | 90 | 90 |
7 | N2P3K2 | 180 | 135 | 90 |
8 | N2P2K0 | 180 | 90 | 0 |
9 | N2P2K1 | 180 | 90 | 45 |
10 | N2P2K3 | 180 | 90 | 135 |
11 | N3P2K2 | 270 | 90 | 90 |
12 | N1P1K2 | 90 | 45 | 90 |
13 | N1P2K1 | 90 | 90 | 45 |
14 | N2P1K1 | 180 | 45 | 45 |
序号 | 处理 | N施肥量 | P2O5施肥量 | K2O施肥量 |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | N0P0K0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
2 | N0P2K2 | 0 | 90 | 90 |
3 | N1P2K2 | 90 | 90 | 90 |
4 | N2P0K2 | 180 | 0 | 90 |
5 | N2P1K2 | 180 | 45 | 90 |
6 | N2P2K2 | 180 | 90 | 90 |
7 | N2P3K2 | 180 | 135 | 90 |
8 | N2P2K0 | 180 | 90 | 0 |
9 | N2P2K1 | 180 | 90 | 45 |
10 | N2P2K3 | 180 | 90 | 135 |
11 | N3P2K2 | 270 | 90 | 90 |
12 | N1P1K2 | 90 | 45 | 90 |
13 | N1P2K1 | 90 | 90 | 45 |
14 | N2P1K1 | 180 | 45 | 45 |
序号 | 处理 | 有效穗数/ (×104穗/hm2) | 结实率/% | 千粒重/g | 籽粒产量/ (kg/hm2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | N0P0K0 | 132.6 | 89.24 | 29.7 | 4430 |
2 | N0P2K2 | 147.2 | 94.27 | 30.8 | 4545 |
3 | N1P2K2 | 173.6 | 95.09 | 31.1 | 6900 |
4 | N2P0K2 | 164.1 | 80.34 | 30.4 | 7225 |
5 | N2P1K2 | 162.5 | 96.35 | 30.8 | 7650 |
6 | N2P2K2 | 184.5 | 86.72 | 31.2 | 8100 |
7 | N2P3K2 | 139.5 | 94.19 | 29.6 | 7695 |
8 | N2P2K0 | 178.7 | 85.67 | 31.0 | 7950 |
9 | N2P2K1 | 175.1 | 90.65 | 31.5 | 8310 |
10 | N2P2K3 | 187.1 | 94.02 | 30.8 | 7800 |
11 | N3P2K2 | 189.8 | 85.61 | 30.8 | 7450 |
12 | N1P1K2 | 175.2 | 91.96 | 30.7 | 6500 |
13 | N1P2K1 | 179.4 | 90.68 | 30.1 | 6950 |
14 | N2P1K1 | 182.9 | 88.53 | 30.3 | 7110 |
序号 | 处理 | 有效穗数/ (×104穗/hm2) | 结实率/% | 千粒重/g | 籽粒产量/ (kg/hm2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | N0P0K0 | 132.6 | 89.24 | 29.7 | 4430 |
2 | N0P2K2 | 147.2 | 94.27 | 30.8 | 4545 |
3 | N1P2K2 | 173.6 | 95.09 | 31.1 | 6900 |
4 | N2P0K2 | 164.1 | 80.34 | 30.4 | 7225 |
5 | N2P1K2 | 162.5 | 96.35 | 30.8 | 7650 |
6 | N2P2K2 | 184.5 | 86.72 | 31.2 | 8100 |
7 | N2P3K2 | 139.5 | 94.19 | 29.6 | 7695 |
8 | N2P2K0 | 178.7 | 85.67 | 31.0 | 7950 |
9 | N2P2K1 | 175.1 | 90.65 | 31.5 | 8310 |
10 | N2P2K3 | 187.1 | 94.02 | 30.8 | 7800 |
11 | N3P2K2 | 189.8 | 85.61 | 30.8 | 7450 |
12 | N1P1K2 | 175.2 | 91.96 | 30.7 | 6500 |
13 | N1P2K1 | 179.4 | 90.68 | 30.1 | 6950 |
14 | N2P1K1 | 182.9 | 88.53 | 30.3 | 7110 |
处理 | 互作效应 | 施肥量/(kg/hm2) | 产量/ (kg/hm2) | 增产率/% | 相对产量/% | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
氮 | 磷 | 钾 | |||||
N0P0K0 | 无肥区 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4430 | - | 54.6 |
N0P2K2 | 无氮区 | 0 | 90 | 90 | 4545 | 2.6 | 56.0 |
N2P0K2 | 无磷区 | 180 | 0 | 90 | 7225 | 63.1 | 89.1 |
N2P2K0 | 无钾区 | 180 | 90 | 0 | 7950 | 79.5 | 98.0 |
N2P2K2 | 全素区 | 180 | 90 | 90 | 8110 | 83.1 | - |
处理 | 互作效应 | 施肥量/(kg/hm2) | 产量/ (kg/hm2) | 增产率/% | 相对产量/% | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
氮 | 磷 | 钾 | |||||
N0P0K0 | 无肥区 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4430 | - | 54.6 |
N0P2K2 | 无氮区 | 0 | 90 | 90 | 4545 | 2.6 | 56.0 |
N2P0K2 | 无磷区 | 180 | 0 | 90 | 7225 | 63.1 | 89.1 |
N2P2K0 | 无钾区 | 180 | 90 | 0 | 7950 | 79.5 | 98.0 |
N2P2K2 | 全素区 | 180 | 90 | 90 | 8110 | 83.1 | - |
养分因子 | 一元二次方程 | R2值 | F值 |
---|---|---|---|
纯氮 | y=-0.0927x2+36.0583x+4510.25 | 0.9966 | 148.50 |
五氧化二磷 | y=-0.1025x2+17.9667x+7181 | 0.8991 | 4.46 |
氧化钾 | y=-0.0815x2+9.5333x+7974 | 0.9190 | 5.672 |
养分因子 | 一元二次方程 | R2值 | F值 |
---|---|---|---|
纯氮 | y=-0.0927x2+36.0583x+4510.25 | 0.9966 | 148.50 |
五氧化二磷 | y=-0.1025x2+17.9667x+7181 | 0.8991 | 4.46 |
氧化钾 | y=-0.0815x2+9.5333x+7974 | 0.9190 | 5.672 |
[1] |
林玉娟, 周才良, 王祝余, 等. 水稻测土配方施肥技术对化肥利用率的影响[J]. 北方水稻, 2023, 53(3):26-29.
|
[2] |
王文婷, 马佳颖, 李光彦, 等. 高温下不同施肥量对水稻产量品质形成的影响及其与能量代谢的关系分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(3):253-264.
doi: 10.16819/j.1001-7216.2023.220808 |
[3] |
刘金松. 旌德县水稻“3414”试验对水稻产量效应研究试验报告[J]. 农家参谋, 2020(13):74-75.
|
[4] |
高祥照, 马常宝, 杜森. 测土配方施肥技术[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2005.
|
[5] |
刘华, 李明, 田永强, 等. 基于“3414”试验的黄芩氮磷钾肥推荐施肥量研究[J]. 黑龙江农业科学, 2021(11):26-30,31.
|
[6] |
孙道苗. 油菜“3414”肥料效应试验研究[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2017, 45(20):37-39.
|
[7] |
张志才. 金湖县丘陵地水稻3414肥效试验[J]. 农技服务, 2022, 39(10):31-36.
|
[8] |
吴寿华, 范晓晖, 吴国灿, 等. 福建省福安市水稻“3414”肥料效应试验[J]. 湖南农业科学, 2019(8):42-45.
|
[9] |
陈昌尧, 王成, 汤静静, 等. 2018年阜宁县沟墩镇勤泥土水稻“3414”肥效试验[J]. 现代农业科技, 2019(15):17-19.
|
[10] |
胡昌高, 赵贤友, 刘元兵, 等. 肥西县环巢湖区域水稻“3414”肥效试验[J]. 现代农业科技, 2021(24):3-4,11.
|
[11] |
胡杨, 段斌, 何世界, 等. 豫南水稻“3414”肥效试验[J]. 现代农业科技, 2021(3):6-9.
|
[12] |
刘小灿. 一季中稻“3414”肥料效应试验[J]. 热带农业工程, 2020, 44(4):87-89.
|
[13] |
冯静, 李京蓉, 关绍华, 等. 钟祥市潴育型土壤水稻“3414”肥料效应完全试验分析[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2020, 59(24):48-50.
|
[14] |
余磊. 基于3414试验的普安县水稻肥效模型及推荐施肥量研究[D]. 长沙: 湖南农业大学, 2022.
|
[15] |
廖玉琴. 永定区烟后稻氮磷钾施肥效应与肥料利用率研究[J]. 福建农业科技, 2022, 53(1):48-53.
|
[16] |
韩雪梅, 杨林章, 俞映倞, 等. 配方施肥对水稻生产和经济、环境效益的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2021, 40(12):2614-2622.
|
[17] |
朱启东, 鲁艳红, 廖育林, 等. 施氮量对双季稻产量及氮磷钾吸收利用的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2019, 33(2):183-188.
|
[18] |
郭振希, 薛振亚, 赵锦儒, 等. 氮、磷、钾肥配施对辽宁棕壤水稻产量与养分吸收利用的影响[J]. 土壤与作物, 2023, 12(1):18-24.
|
[19] |
李书钰. 四川省农田土壤钾素储量估算及三维表达[D]. 成都: 四川农业大学, 2019.
|
[1] | YAO Jinbao, YANG Xueming, ZHANG Peng, FAN Xiangyun, YU Guihong, HE Yi, WANG Huadun. Analysis of Yield and Quality Traits of New Weak-Gluten Wheat Cultivar ‘Ningmai 36’ [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(9): 20-24. |
[2] | LI Qian, ZHANG Yangli, YAN Miaomiao, HAO Shuangkui, NIE Song, SUN Jie, CAO Sanchao, WANG Na. Effect of Sowing Date, Planting Density and Nitrogen Application on Population Structure and Grain Quality of ‘Weimai 9’ [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(9): 25-29. |
[3] | HOU Mengyuan. Cotton Yield Forecast in Shandong Province Based on Meteorological Key Factors [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(9): 37-41. |
[4] | ZHENG Jianchao, LI Ming, DONG Fei. Effects of Chemical Fertilizer Reduction Combined with Organic Fertilizer and Microbial Agent on Tomato Yield and Soil Microbial and Enzyme Activities [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(9): 48-54. |
[5] | LIU Yu, YAN Shi, ZHAO Kaili, YU Yueyue, HAN Bao, ZHANG Jing, GUO Ning. Recommendation of Appropriate Phosphorus Application Rate for Lettuce in Vegetable Fields with Different Phosphorus Levels [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(9): 55-59. |
[6] | FAN Shanshan, CHEN Juan, WU Changchun, WANG Rui, ZHANG Xingang, CHEN Xiaohui, GAO Fei, WU Wenqiang. Effect of Alginic Acid Fertilizer on Growth, Yield and Quality of Strawberry [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(9): 60-65. |
[7] | DING Hao, GAO Haitao, BI Xiangjun, LI Shengdong. Effects of Different Sowing Methods on Yield Components and Flag Leaf Photosynthetic Characteristics of Winter Wheat [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(9): 9-19. |
[8] | HE Guohe, CHEN Haibin, DU Jianjun, ZHANG Weili, GUO Lihua, HU Yibo, YAN Zhaohua, ZHANG Jing. Effects of Fertilizer Reduction Combined with Organic Fertilizer on Rice Yield and Nutrient Utilization in Western Guangdong [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(9): 1-8. |
[9] | ZHANG Shijie, YANG Bo, WANG Bingang, LIU Yun, ZHANG Xifeng, WANG Wenli, WANG Zeli, LI Shan. Effect of Organic Fertilizer on Yield and Quality of Flue-cured Tobacco in Weibei Loess Tableland [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(8): 38-46. |
[10] | ZHANG Zhengzhen, MU Ruirui, WANG Jia, XU Can, CHEN Yongwei, ZHANG Zhansheng, WU Hongliang, KANG Jianhong. Effect of Potassium Application Rate on Absorption, Transport and Yield of Maize Potassium [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(8): 47-56. |
[11] | TENG Qing, LIN Xuanjie, LIU Wei. Experimental Study on the Struvite Crystallization on Composting of Banana Stalk [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(8): 86-90. |
[12] | YANG Zhiwei, QIAN Aiping, ZHANG Wei, CAO Xiuxia. Effect of Planting Density on Lodging Resistance and Yield of Flax [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(8): 1-5. |
[13] | YANG Xiaolin, XUE Minfeng, ZHANG Shu, LI Jinbo, LV Liang, CHANG Xiangqian, ZHANG Youhong, GONG Yan. Analysis of Abnormal Growing Phenomena Occurred in Xiangyang District, Hubei Province: Grain-Dropping in Advance and Pole-Withered [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(8): 112-118. |
[14] | ZHAN Wenjie, ZHOU Ben, ZHU Linxing, WANG Min, ZHU Changtai, SHEN Qirong, GUO Shiwei. Effects of Trichoderma Bio-organic Fertilizer on Salinized Soil Fertility and Yield and Quality of Hang Cabbage [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(7): 108-117. |
[15] | MA Xiaoling, ZHOU Yanbo, YUAN Jie, ZHANG Jianjun, JIA Liting. Variation Characteristics and Correlation Analysis of Meteorological Elements During Maize Growth Period in Yangquan City [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(7): 118-122. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||