Effect of Different Efficiency Enhancing DAP on Maize Growth in Soil of Xinjiang

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2025-0009

Abstract

Abstract:

This study investigated the ecological adaptability of different efficiency-enhanced DAP fertilizers in soil of Xinjiang, aiming to identify novel DAP fertilizers with lower nutrient content that promote the growth of maize in Xinjiang. The research provided a reference for the selection and application of DAP fertilizers for maize in Xinjiang, while also offered a basis for cutting-edge research on low-nutrient, high-efficiency fertilizers in the region. Using 64% DAP without additives (high-nutrient fertilizer) as the control, comparisons were made with low-nutrient fertilizers, including 57% DAP with additive (formula A), 57% DAP with additive (formula B), 57% DAP with additive (formula C), 57% DAP with additive (formula D), 57% DAP with additive (formula E), and 57% DAP with additive (formula F). The growth morphology, physiological indicators and biomass of maize under different treatments were measured, and statistical methods such as regression analysis were applied to evaluate the results. The results showed that the addition of efficiency-enhancing additives promoted root development in maize plants and improved physiological indicators such as chlorophyll content and plant height. Low-nutrient DAP fertilizers with additives showed a tendency to outperform high-nutrient DAP fertilizers in promoting maize growth. The effects varied among different additive formulations, with formula A, formula E, and formula F demonstrating the most significant promotion effects on maize growth.

Key words: DAP, Xinjiang soil, ecological adaptability, maize, efficiency enhancing agents, new type of fertilizer, nutrient utilization, low nutrient content

KUANG Jialing, CHEN Yuewu, XU Ruo, LI Hongshu, CHEN Xu, WU Shengnan. Effect of Different Efficiency Enhancing DAP on Maize Growth in Soil of Xinjiang[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(17): 72-77.

Figures/Tables 8

References 22

[1]	BARłóG P, ŁUKOWIAK R, HLISNIKOVSKý L. Band Phosphorus and Sulfur Fertilization as Drivers of Efficient Management of Nitrogen of Maize (Zea mays L.)[J]. Plants (Basel)., 2022,Jun23, 11(13):1660.
[2]	CHEN Q, QU Z, LI Z, et al. Coated diammonium phosphate combined with humic acid improves soil phosphorus availability and photosynthesis and the yield of maize[J]. Frontiers in plant science, 2021, 12:759929.
[3]	朱琦, 周广威, 王西和, 等. 施氮对新疆不同春玉米基因型产量和氮效率的影响[J/OL]. 分子植物育种,1-19[2024-09-26]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/46.1068.S.20230823.1141.002.html.
[4]	周广威, 韩登旭, 朱琦, 等. 耐低磷新疆春玉米基因型筛选及其磷效率[J]. 新疆农业学, 2023, 60(4):847-856.
[5]	ZHENG W L, LUO B L, HUX Y. The determinants of farmers^,fertilizers and pesticides use behavior in China: An explanationbased on label effect[J]. Journal of cleaner production, 2020, 272,123054.
[6]	HUANG W, JIANG L. Efficiency performance of fertilizer use in arable agricultural production in China[J]. China agricultural economic review, 2019, 11.10.1108/CAER-12-2017-0238
[7]	Fan L C, YUAN Y M, YING Z C, et al. Decreasing farm number benefits themitigation of agricultural non-point source pollution in China. Environ[J]. Environmental science and pollution research, 2019, 26:464-472.
[8]	CHI L, HAN S, HUAN M, et al. Technology adoption and chemical fertilizer application: evidence from China[J]. International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022, Jul 2, 19(13):8147.
[9]	李慧敏, 陈骏, 束维正, 等. 生测试验在肥料增效剂筛选中的应用[J]. 中国盐业, 2021(16):54-57.
[10]	李树杰. 甘肃民勤县减量施肥配施肥料增效助剂对玉米生长的影响[J]. 农业工程技术, 2024, 44(13):22-23,28.
[11]	陈德高, 廖国刚. 57%磷酸二铵养分的精益控制[J]. 磷肥与复肥, 2022, 37(12):21-22.
[12]	王玉霞, 杜梦扬, 李洪杰, 等. 不同磷酸二铵对冬小麦产量·经济效益和土壤特性的影响[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2024, 52(11):133-138.
[13]	ZHANG W F, MA W Q, JI Y X, et al. Efficiency, economics, and environmental implications of phosphorus resource use and the fertilizer industry in China[J]. Nutrient cycling in agroecosystems, 2008:131-144.
[14]	MA W Q, MA L, LI J H, et al. Phosphorus flows and use efficiencies in production and consumption of wheat, rice, and maize in China[J]. Chemosphere, 2011, 84:814-21. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.04.055. pmid: 21570104
[15]	ZHOU L, MONREAL C M, XU S T, et al. Effect of bentonite-humic acid application on the improvement of soil structure and maize yield in a sandy soil of a semi-arid region[J]. Geoderma, 2019, 338:269-280.
[16]	ZHANG Y, ZHANG X, WEN J, et al. Exogenous fulvic acid enhances stability of mineral-associated soil organic matter better than manure[J]. Environmental science and pollution research, 2022 Feb, 29(7):9805-9816.
[17]	OGUNLEYE A, BHAT A, IRORRRE VU, et al. Poly-γ-glutamic acid: production, properties and applications[J]. Microbiology (Reading)., 2015, Jan,161(Pt 1):1-17. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.081448-0 pmid: 25288645
[18]	常云, 艾新帅, 袁乐斌, 等. 含聚谷氨酸肥料对静宁苹果品质及经济效益的影响[J]. 现代农业科技, 2024(18):48-51.
[19]	廉晓娟, 王艳, 梁新书, 等. 聚谷氨酸肥料增效剂对设施黄瓜生长、产量、品质的影响[J]. 天津农业科学, 2024, 30(5):8-12.
[20]	曹丽茹, 鲁晓民, 王国瑞, 等. 叶面喷施炭吸附聚谷氨酸对玉米生长发育的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2022(2):158-166.
[21]	李建成, 伍维模, 赵长巍, 等. 氮肥减量配施壳寡糖对棉花根系生长及根际土壤酶活性的影响[J]. 寒旱农业科学, 2024, 3(8):752-758.
[22]	周俊康, 陆莹, 陈宁一, 等. 海藻活性物质的提取及其在肥料中的应用研究[J]. 特种经济动植物, 2024, 27(1):188-192.

土壤	处理	助剂	DAP肥料	追肥
新疆土（新疆奇台）	XJ1	无	64%DAP	尿素+硫酸钾兑水浇施
新疆土（新疆奇台）	XJ2	生化黄腐酸	57%DAP	尿素+硫酸钾兑水浇施
新疆土（新疆奇台）	XJ3	聚谷氨酸	57%DAP	尿素+硫酸钾兑水浇施
新疆土（新疆奇台）	XJ4	硝基黄腐酸	57%DAP	尿素+硫酸钾兑水浇施
新疆土（新疆奇台）	XJ5	壳寡糖	57%DAP	尿素+硫酸钾兑水浇施
新疆土（新疆奇台）	XJ6	海藻多糖、F30	57%DAP	尿素+硫酸钾兑水浇施
新疆土（新疆奇台）	XJ7	壳寡糖、F30	57%DAP	尿素+硫酸钾兑水浇施

土壤	处理	助剂	DAP肥料	追肥
新疆土（新疆奇台）	XJ1	无	64%DAP	尿素+硫酸钾兑水浇施
新疆土（新疆奇台）	XJ2	生化黄腐酸	57%DAP	尿素+硫酸钾兑水浇施
新疆土（新疆奇台）	XJ3	聚谷氨酸	57%DAP	尿素+硫酸钾兑水浇施
新疆土（新疆奇台）	XJ4	硝基黄腐酸	57%DAP	尿素+硫酸钾兑水浇施
新疆土（新疆奇台）	XJ5	壳寡糖	57%DAP	尿素+硫酸钾兑水浇施
新疆土（新疆奇台）	XJ6	海藻多糖、F30	57%DAP	尿素+硫酸钾兑水浇施
新疆土（新疆奇台）	XJ7	壳寡糖、F30	57%DAP	尿素+硫酸钾兑水浇施

处理	种植2周	种植3周	种植4周		种植5周		种植6周		种植7周	种植8周
XJ1	1.63±00.31b	2.37±0.17a	3.97±0.29b		4.23±0.45a		5.17±0.24a		4.53±0.76ab	5.80±0.73a
XJ2	1.80±0.08ab	2.63±0.31a	4.27±0.33ab		4.25±0.24a		5.07±0.37a		4.17±1.89b	5.47±0.12a
XJ3	2.03±0.17a	2.60±0.51a	4.53±0.05a		4.43±0.26a		4.83±0.46a		4.83±0.62ab	5.07±0.25a
XJ4	2.00±0.08ab	2.70±0.36a	4.47±0.17a		4.20±0.70a		5.30±0.24a		5.60±0.29a	5.70±0.45a
XJ5	1.93±0.17ab	2.43±0.26a	4.43±0.05a		4.73±0.66a		5.33±1.10a		5.63±0.61a	5.83±0.77a
XJ6	1.87±0.09ab	2.23±0.17a	3.87±0.09b	4.47±0.39a		5.30±0.85a		5.53±0.37ab		5.20±0.16a
XJ7	1.83±0.12ab	2.50±0.22a	3.97±0.05b	4.47±0.12a		4.80±0.14a		5.20±0.16ab		4.80±0.41a

处理	种植2周	种植3周	种植4周		种植5周		种植6周		种植7周	种植8周
XJ1	1.63±00.31b	2.37±0.17a	3.97±0.29b		4.23±0.45a		5.17±0.24a		4.53±0.76ab	5.80±0.73a
XJ2	1.80±0.08ab	2.63±0.31a	4.27±0.33ab		4.25±0.24a		5.07±0.37a		4.17±1.89b	5.47±0.12a
XJ3	2.03±0.17a	2.60±0.51a	4.53±0.05a		4.43±0.26a		4.83±0.46a		4.83±0.62ab	5.07±0.25a
XJ4	2.00±0.08ab	2.70±0.36a	4.47±0.17a		4.20±0.70a		5.30±0.24a		5.60±0.29a	5.70±0.45a
XJ5	1.93±0.17ab	2.43±0.26a	4.43±0.05a		4.73±0.66a		5.33±1.10a		5.63±0.61a	5.83±0.77a
XJ6	1.87±0.09ab	2.23±0.17a	3.87±0.09b	4.47±0.39a		5.30±0.85a		5.53±0.37ab		5.20±0.16a
XJ7	1.83±0.12ab	2.50±0.22a	3.97±0.05b	4.47±0.12a		4.80±0.14a		5.20±0.16ab		4.80±0.41a