Comprehensive Fuzzy Evaluation and Analysis of Impact of Meteorological Conditions on Quality of Sweet Cherry in Guanzhong Region

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2025-0039

Abstract

Abstract:

In order to explore the influence of meteorological conditions on the comprehensive quality of sweet cherry in Guanzhong area of Shaanxi Province, this paper took ‘Brooks sweet cherry’ as the research object, adopted the method of fuzzy comprehensive evaluation, and established the comprehensive indexes of internal and external quality of cherries in different areas. To further analyze the impact of different weather conditions on the quality of cherries, this paper used data from four meteorological stations in Baqiao, Liquan, Yaozhou, and Dagu in 2024 and employed correlation analysis and other methods to analyze the weather conditions that affect various quality factors of cherries. The results showed that the external quality of cherries from Liquan region was the best, and the internal quality of cherries from Baqiao region was the best. The appearance quality of cherry fruit in four regions was less affected by regional meteorological factors, indicating that the appearance of cherry fruit had strong adaptability to ecological environment. The difference of soluble sugar (TSC) was not obvious, indicating that the soluble sugar of sweet cherry could maintain a stable level in Guanzhong area. The sucrose content varied significantly in different regions, indicating that sucrose was easily affected by regional meteorological conditions. The content of Vc in the cherries from Baqiao was significantly higher than that in other areas, indicating that the meteorological conditions of Baqiao were more conducive to the accumulation of Vc. The correlation analysis showed that the external quality of cherry was positively correlated with the average temperature difference during the whole growth period, and was significantly correlated with the average temperature and the maximum temperature. The internal quality of cherry was significantly correlated with precipitation and minimum temperature. The results of this study can provide a scientific basis for the sustainability and industrial development of the sweet cherry industry in the Guanzhong region.

Key words: sweet cherries, external quality, internal quality, comprehensive fuzzy evaluation, correlation analysis

GAO Rui, WU Qiong, LI Yunxi, CHEN Mulan, CUI Yihan, ZHA Yangliang. Comprehensive Fuzzy Evaluation and Analysis of Impact of Meteorological Conditions on Quality of Sweet Cherry in Guanzhong Region[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(32): 88-94.

Figures/Tables 5

References 30

[1]	周晓丽. 陕西铜川地区樱桃生长气象条件研究[D]. 兰州: 兰州大学, 2016.
[2]	李保艳, 王红梅, 韩定丽, 等. 陕西大樱桃品质影响因素及产业发展对策[J]. 基层农技推广, 2023, 11(9):110-113.
[3]	邵柯森. 陕西铜川地区不同甜樱桃品种发育期与果实品质对比及需冷量分析[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2023.
[4]	崔天舒. 甜樱桃果实风味品质及花色苷组分的研究[D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2014.
[5]	吴澎, 贾朝爽, 范苏仪, 等. 樱桃品种果实品质因子主成分分析及模糊综合评价[J]. 农业工程学报, 2018, 34(17):291-300.
[6]	王紫文, 赵海涵, 温婷婷, 等. 柴达木盆地枸杞气候品质认证技术研究[J]. 青海科技, 2018, 25(6):47-53.
[7]	李保来, 厉力, 段军成, 等. 山东晚熟苹果品质分析与综合评价[J]. 北方园艺, 2024(11):16-22.
[8]	刘庆泰, 王树波, 杨鹤. 气温对大樱桃生长发育的影响[J]. 山东气象, 1996(1):55-57.
[9]	李燕, 李玲, 李少旋, 等. 高温对设施甜樱桃花器官发育的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2011, 44(10):2101-2108. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2011.10.015
[10]	王莹, 王若男, 黄岩, 等. 辽宁省大樱桃气候品质认证技术研究[J]. 吉林农业, 2019(17):104-105.
[11]	赵林, 杨峰, 樊继德, 等. 不同甜樱桃品种果实性状差异性比较[J]. 南方农业学报, 2012, 43(2):209-212.
[12]	张志良, 瞿伟菁, 李小方. 植物生理学实验指导[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2009.
[13]	ZOU Z H, SUN J N. Study and application on the entropy method for determination of weight of evaluating indicators in fuzzy synthetic evaluation for water quality assessment[J]. Acta scientiae circumstantiae, 2005, 44(2):171-202.
[14]	陈爱强. 果蔬采后冷激处理的理论与试验研究[D]. 天津: 天津大学, 2016.
[15]	XU C, YANG Z Q, WANG M T, et al. Characteristics and quantitative simulation of stomatal conductance of Panax notoginseng[J]. International journal of agriculture and biology, 2019, 22(2):388-394.
[16]	刘万代. 源库调节方式对两种穗型高产小麦碳氮代谢生理和籽粒品质的影响[D]. 郑州: 河南农业大学, 2014.
[17]	LEE S H, SONG M K, CHOI W H, et al. Effect of the shading conditions on the photosynthesis and fruit quality of ‘Jarang’ and ‘Heukboseok’ grape at high temperature period[J]. Journal of the Korean society of international agriculture, 2015, 27(2):221-225. doi: 10.12719/KSIA. URL
[18]	阎依超, 万春雁, 古咸彬, 等. 过量表达RdreB1BI对草莓果实品质及相关基因的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2018, 51(7):1353-1367. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2018.07.013
[19]	刘晓芬, 李方, 殷学仁, 等. 花青苷生物合成转录调控研究进展[J]. 园艺学报, 2013, 40(11):2295-2306.
[20]	郑丽静, 聂继云, 闫震. 糖酸组分及其对水果风味的影响研究进展[J]. 果树学报, 2015, 32(2):304-312.
[21]	姜骁, 许静, 潘丽娟, 等. 花生产量相关性状与气象因子多环境相关性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(11):3110-3121. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2023.24218
[22]	陆佳岚, 王净, 马成, 等. 长江流域中稻产量和品质性状差异与其生育期气象因子的相关性[J]. 江苏农业学报, 2020, 36(6):1361-1372.
[23]	周宝元, 马玮, 孙雪芳, 等. 冬小麦-夏玉米高产模式周年气候资源分配与利用特征研究[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(4):589-600. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2019.81067
[24]	王丹, 周宝元, 马玮, 等. 长江中游双季玉米种植模式周年气候资源分配与利用特征[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6):1437-1450. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2022.13022
[25]	樊晓芸, 郭素娟, 李艳华. 不同生态区域板栗品质差异性分析及气候适应性评价[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2022, 44(11):20-30.
[26]	田彦龙. 西北不同生态区甜樱桃果实品质与环境因子的相关性研究[D]. 西宁: 青海大学, 2021.
[27]	王琴, 王建友, 韩宏伟, 等. 南疆地区甜樱桃品种果实品质测定与评价[J]. 食品工业科技, 2019, 40(8):215-220.
[28]	陈烨锜, 庞柳, 陈小央, 等. 基于不同方法综合评价浙北平原地区101份鲜食葡萄果实品质[J]. 果树学报, 2024, 41(12):2377-2388.
[29]	WOLD S. Principal component analysis[J]. Chemometrics and intelligent laboratory systems, 1987, 2(1):37-52. doi: 10.1016/0169-7439(87)80084-9 URL
[30]	刘美迎, 李小龙, 梁茁, 等. 基于模糊数学和聚类分析的鲜食葡萄品种综合品质评价[J]. 食品科学, 2015, 36(13):57-64. doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-201513012

地区	平均最高温度/℃	平均最低温度/℃	≥10℃积温/℃	平均相对湿度/%	总降雨量/mm
灞桥区	21.9	10.2	1084	60.46	92.00
大荔县	23.2	9.9	1147	61.70	75.80
耀州区	20.8	8.6	970	58.78	78.20
礼泉县	22.0	9.3	1071	60.10	85.30

地区	平均最高温度/℃	平均最低温度/℃	≥10℃积温/℃	平均相对湿度/%	总降雨量/mm
灞桥区	21.9	10.2	1084	60.46	92.00
大荔县	23.2	9.9	1147	61.70	75.80
耀州区	20.8	8.6	970	58.78	78.20
礼泉县	22.0	9.3	1071	60.10	85.30

地区	果重/g	横径/mm	纵径/mm	果核重/g	果形指数
V₁	5.43±1.02	22.6±1.5	17.5±1.0	0.28±0.03	0.78±0.033
V₂	7.34±0.67	25.4±.9	19.3±0.6	0.36±0.05	0.76±0.030
V₃	9.43±0.96	28.4±1.8	20.2±1.0	0.35±0.05	0.71±0.057
V₄	9.57±1.27	27.9±1.4	20.6±1.3	0.38±0.06	0.74±0.032
均值	7.94	26.07	19.41	0.34	0.75
变幅	5.43~9.57	22.6~28.4	17.5~20.6	0.28~0.38	0.71~0.78
标准差	1.97	2.74	1.54	0.06	0.05
变异系数CV/%	24.82	10.53	7.96	18.55	6.2

地区	果重/g	横径/mm	纵径/mm	果核重/g	果形指数
V₁	5.43±1.02	22.6±1.5	17.5±1.0	0.28±0.03	0.78±0.033
V₂	7.34±0.67	25.4±.9	19.3±0.6	0.36±0.05	0.76±0.030
V₃	9.43±0.96	28.4±1.8	20.2±1.0	0.35±0.05	0.71±0.057
V₄	9.57±1.27	27.9±1.4	20.6±1.3	0.38±0.06	0.74±0.032
均值	7.94	26.07	19.41	0.34	0.75
变幅	5.43~9.57	22.6~28.4	17.5~20.6	0.28~0.38	0.71~0.78
标准差	1.97	2.74	1.54	0.06	0.05
变异系数CV/%	24.82	10.53	7.96	18.55	6.2

地区	平均气温/℃			最高气温/℃			最低气温/℃			活动积温/℃			平均湿度/%			降雨量/mm			平均温差/℃
地区	3月	4月	5月	3月	4月	5月	3月	4月	5月	3月	4月	5月	3月	4月	5月	3月	4月	5月	3月	4月	5月
灞桥区	10.9	17.6	18.8	17.5	24.3	26.1	6.2	12.8	13.2	77.9	262.2	156.9	56.0	65.5	64.4	5.0	77.2	14.8	11.2	11.5	12.9
大荔县	11.4	18.7	20.5	18.7	25.6	27.9	5.5	12.8	13.2	73.2	229.1	131.3	58.5	66.6	64.6	20.2	38.8	16.8	13.2	12.9	14.7
耀州区	10.0	16.7	18.2	16.6	23.2	24.6	4.4	11.2	12.0	55.0	201.9	123.1	52.0	65.0	65.0	12.8	40.5	24.9	11.9	12.4	12.5
礼泉县	10.9	17.8	19.1	18.1	24.2	26.0	5.2	12.1	12.4	40.5	233.9	136.6	54.9	64.2	65.9	23.3	44.8	17.2	12.9	12.1	13.6